Trump postpones decision to get involved in Iran conflict
Washington: US President Donald Trump is expected to make a decision about whether to take direct action against Iran in the next two weeks, the White House Press Secretary said.
Karoline Leavitt, told reporters at a briefing here on Thursday that she had a message directly from Trump in response to speculation about whether he would get directly involved in the conflict between Iran and Israel.
"Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," the White House press secretary quoted Trump as saying.
Leavitt said communication between the US and Iran "has continued" as the two sides engage in negotiations. She, however, did not provide specifics about whether they were direct or through intermediaries.
Iran must agree to no enrichment of uranium, and Tehran must not be able to achieve a nuclear weapon as part of any diplomatic agreement, Leavitt said.
Trump, on Wednesday, when asked about a potential US strike on Iran, remained noncommittal.
"I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do," Trump told reporters. "I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble. And they want to negotiate. And I say, 'Why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction?'", the US President said.
Trump demanded that Iran give up its entire nuclear programme and has warned Iran to quickly surrender to a deal or face even more dire repercussions.
On June 13, Israel launched an attack against Iran, carrying out strikes including against Iran's state television station. Tehran carried out a retaliatory attack, firing ballistic range missiles at Israel, targeting military and security installations, and hitting the Haifa oil refinery among others.
The two countries have since then exchanged strikes.
As per an analysis by Al Jazeera, Iran had long relied on its ally, the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah, to provide deterrence from direct Israeli attacks, but Hezbollah was significantly weakened after fighting an all-out war against Israel last year. In addition, Iran lost another ally when Syria's former President Bashar al-Assad was toppled in December 2024. Iran could also make Americans feel the impact of the war economically. It has threatened to attack commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz, which would affect global trade and increase oil prices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
an hour ago
- Times of Oman
Third group of Omani citizens return home safely from Iran
Muscat: In a continued effort to facilitate the safe return of Omani Citizens, Oman Foreign Ministry announced the successful arrival of 195 Omani citizens from Bandar Abbas, Iran, to Khasab Port as part of the third phase of an approved evacuation plan. The operation, carried out with close coordination between Omani authorities and diplomatic missions, also extended humanitarian support to 158 nationals of other countries who were allowed passage through Oman under the current regional circumstances. In a parallel initiative, 155 Omani citizens and a number of foreign nationals were returned by the flight from the Republic of Iraq to Oman, in collaboration with relevant agencies and the Omani Embassy in Baghdad. The Ministry reaffirmed its ongoing commitment alongside its embassies abroad to complete the remaining stages of the evacuation plan, aiming to ensure the safe return of all Omanis to their homeland.
Times of Oman
an hour ago
- Times of Oman
US: Appeals court permits Trump to keep National Guard deployed in LA for now
Washington, DC: A federal appeals court panel on Thursday permitted US President Donald Trump to keep the National Guard deployed in Los Angeles, for now, The Hill reported. The unanimous order from a three-judge panel for the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals extended its pause of a judge's order finding Trump's deployment illegal and forcing him to return control of the troops to California Governor Gavin Newsom. The three judge appeals panel included two judges nominated by Trump - Eric Miller and Mark Bennett and a judge appointed by former US President Joe Biden - Judge Jennifer Sung. In its unsigned 38-page decision, the appeals panel wrote, "We emphasize, however, that our decision addresses only the facts before us. And although we hold that the President likely has authority to federalize the National Guard, nothing in our decision addresses the nature of the activities in which the federalized National Guard may engage." The panel said it did not agree with the administration that Trump's decision is not reviewable by the courts. However, the judges said they must be "highly deferential." The opinion reads, "Affording the President that deference, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority." The court's order came after Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops to protect immigration officers due to the recent protests in Los Angeles, which at times resulted in violence. Newsom and the state's attorney general filed a lawsuit against Trump's decision, The Hill reported. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals decision marks a win for Trump in the legal battle. However, the victory may be short-lived as the US District Judge Charles Breyer, who issued last week's decision invalidating the deployment, is set to hold a hearing on Friday on whether to issue an indefinite injunction. Former US President Bill Clinton had appointed Breyer, who is also the brother of retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. Trump deployed troops using a statute that enables him to federalize the National Guard whenever there is a rebellion or when he cannot execute federal laws with regular forces. On Thursday, the appeals panel said it agreed the latter trigger was likely met, so it did not need to reach the question if there was a rebellion. The opinion reads, "Plaintiffs' own submissions state that some protesters threw objects, including Molotov cocktails, and vandalized property. According to the declarations submitted by Defendants, those activities significantly impeded the ability of federal officers to execute the laws," The Hill reported. In addition, the judges rejected argument made by Newsom that Trump failed a statutory requirement to issue his deployment order "through" the governor. Newsom said Trump needed his consent as per the requirement. However, the judges contented that informing the adjutant general of the California National Guard was likely sufficient. The panel said that the statute "does not give governors any veto power over the President's federalization decision."
Times of Oman
5 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Brent crude prices to remain at $70 per barrel in FY26 despite Israel-Iran conflict: Report
New Delhi: Despite recent volatility and rising conflicts between Israel and Iran, Brent crude oil prices are expected to average around $70 per barrel in FY26, according to a report by Emkay Research. The report stated that the oil markets remain fundamentally well supplied, with rising production levels from both OPEC+ and non-OPEC+ countries. It said "we continue to assume Brent price at USD70/bbl for FY26. Fundamentally, oil markets are well supplied with rising production." This steady supply is expected to help stabilise prices in the coming weeks, even though geopolitical risks may cause short-term volatility. The report noted that Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear sites and personnel had initially triggered a sharp 12-13 per cent jump in oil prices, with Brent reaching close to USD 80/bbl. Since then, prices have settled around USD 75/bbl, despite ongoing attacks from both sides. Iran has responded by hitting Israeli cities with missiles, and Israel has intensified its strikes on Iran. Signals from the US administration regarding a ceasefire remain unclear. According to the report, unless there is lasting damage to oil and gas infrastructure, similar to earlier patterns seen during the Russia-Ukraine conflict, oil prices are likely to stabilise. A ceasefire could even bring Brent prices down below USD 70/bbl. The report also highlighted that Iran has partially shut its South Pars gas field following Israeli attacks. A major fuel depot and a gas refinery were hit, but the impact seems limited to domestic markets. Israel has suspended operations in two of its gas fields that export to Egypt and Jordan. As a result, spot LNG prices have increased to around USD 13.5/mmbtu, compared to USD 12/mmbtu before the conflict. The report further noted that oil markets in 2025 have remained well supplied with rising inventories. Although near-term volatility may continue, the average Brent crude price for the year is still expected to be around USD 70/bbl. At this price level, both upstream oil players and oil marketing companies (OMCs) are in a safe zone. However, the report believed OMCs offer a more attractive valuation and better risk-reward profile. The report also flagged concerns over the gas market, as the early onset of monsoons has impacted demand, making the gas outlook uncertain.
