Warangal students win $5,000 in prestigious Generative AI Hackathon
Pavushetty Yashwanth Krishna and Eesha Belladi, third-year B.Tech (CSE-Networks) students at Kakatiya Institute of Technology and Science, Warangal (KITSW), have secured first prize at the recently held Generative AI Hackathon with IBM Granite, out of 1,931 participants forming 267 teams worldwide. Their project, Content Hub, stood out for its innovative approach to AI-driven social media engagement, said principal K. Ashoka Reddy.
The 48-hour hackathon, organised by IBM and powered by their state-of-the-art Granite AI models, challenged competitors to build solutions that drive efficiency, automation and innovation in business workflows. The winning team received $5,000 in cash, $500 IBM Cloud credits and a special prize of one conference pass to IBM TechXchange Conference 2025 in Orlando, Florida.
The winning project, Content Hub, is an AI-powered platform that transforms raw social media interactions into personalised, SEO-optimised narratives within seconds. Leveraging IBM Granite AI APIs for inference, the solution captures each user's unique voice and produces dynamic digital content, including tweets, threads and LinkedIn posts, along with actionable analytics, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Is this year the beginning of the end of smartphones?
Last month, a curious partnership in the Valley made me wonder on the future of smart devices and the way we access our digital universe. In a rather whimsical blog post, OpenAI announced the acquisition of Jony Ive's studio startup io for $6.5 billion. 'We have the opportunity to completely reimagine what it means to use a computer,' said Altman, adding that despite unprecedented capability and new technologies like AI, the digital experience is being shaped by traditional products and interfaces. A new technology like AI, he explained, requires a complete rethink of tools through which we interact with the digital universe. The first smartphone came into being in the early 1993, when IBM's Simon added email and fax to a phone's capability. (Representative photo) This acquisition would've become yet another corporate announcement, except for the timing of it. In the last couple of years, there's a feeling across Silicon Valley that smartphone as a device to interact with the digital world is not enough. New technologies like AR/VR, robotics and now AI need new products to explore them with. The new generation is approaching the digital world as an extension of themselves, through speech and not swiping or typing. As technology becomes more intuitive, we need new devices to reflect this change – more immersive and aural, devices that augment the real world and not take you away from it. Tech companies are putting their heads together to develop devices that are more immersive or approach digital through other senses like aural or even neural. Legacy companies like Meta, Apple and Google and startups like Neuralink are experimenting with smart glasses, wearables, iOT devices, smartwatches, neural computers and even spatial computers (like VisionPro) where digital media is integrated with our real-life experience. So far, none of these devices have worked, but it does feel like we're at a cusp of dramatic change. A senior vice president in Apple even acknowledged that in 10 years, iPhones could go the way of iPods - become irrelevant and retro. It's time for this change, I would say. After all, our way of interacting with digital spaces – through laptops, desktops and smart devices - has been the same for more than 30 years now. The first smartphone came into being in the early 1993, when IBM's Simon added email and fax to a phone's capability. In 1990s that there was a constant feeling of experimentation as the handheld phones and PDAs that could access the internet were being played with through product design. Companies across the world from USA to Japan wanted to integrate access to internet with a phone. The mid 2000s brought smartphones like Blackberry with QWERTY keyboards, which quickly made tapping and emailing the done thing to do. This changed dramatically when finger-operative touchscreen technology came out into the market. Within a couple of years in 2006, LG had used it to launch a touchscreen smartphone. And then Apple made it the new normal when it launched iPhones in 2007. Also Read: Do gaming smartphones really make sense in 2025? Though there have been amazing advances in the smartphone including camera capabilities, chip design and biometrics, the device design itself hasn't changed the way we interact with the digital world. There's a screen we swipe, touch and pinch. We check out social media, upload our photos on cloud and chat and email on the go. This staleness in the design was clear in Apple's recently concluded annual developer conference, WWDC 2025. The new iPhone 17 will be more or less the same as iPhone 16 with a few tiny tweaks. Jony Ive, whose company OpenAI acquired, was formerly Apple's chief design officer and led design teams for Apple's iconic products – the iPhone, the iPod and even the Macbook Pro – before leaving the company in 2019. This new project that he's working on, has got him (and us) excited. According to him, this time now, 2025, reminds him of three decades ago when he emigrated to Silicon Valley to design products that would interact with the Internet. 'I have a growing sense that everything I have learned over the last 30 years has led me to this moment,' he said in the acquisition announcement. The Wall Street Journal reported that Open AI is considering options that want to move consumers beyond screens into a unique combination of listening devices and cameras. 'Surely there's something beyond legacy products,' says Ive, adding that they've already built a prototype and are currently working on more AI-first devices. I know what you're thinking and frankly, I'm thinking the same. Smartphones are our lifelines. We do everything on these devices – from chatting to watching shorts and videos, to making payments on the go. We're multi-screen beasts today, our fingers constantly swiping or typing and ridden with RSI, our eyes fatigued. Also Read: AI needs to be open and inclusive like India Stack But the world is also changing in ways that make me think maybe we will use devices without screens as the enablers. Voice interaction has caught on. The way we fish for information is going from a typed search to a prompt we ask. There is an increasing unease about phone-addiction and screen time. We're all looking for a way out. Something that allows us to be digitally connected without exhausting us. Devices that are more intuitive, more immersive, aural and neural that become extensions of us so we can interact with digital spaces without choosing them over real life. All this signals to an experimentative market which is ready for something new. I can't wait to find out what replaces my screens in the near future. What about you?
Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Quantum computing's achilles' heel: Tech giants are tackling an error crisis
At the turn of this year, the course became clear. First, quantum computing chips made a generational leap, albeit with Microsoft and Google taking different approaches to generating desired performance. Now, Microsoft has pushed the envelope further, having developed error-correction codes that are applicable to many types of qubits. So has IBM, signifying broad efforts towards the same result. The company insists the present generation of quantum computers, that use qubits, often run into errors, which they cannot resolve on their own. 'Reliable quantum computing requires progress across the full stack, from error correction to hardware. With new 4D codes reducing error rates 1,000x, and our co-designed quantum system with Atom Computing, we're bringing utility-scale quantum closer than ever,' says Satya Nadella, Microsoft Chairman and CEO. Atom Computing builds scalable quantum computers. A quantum computer, compared with traditional, familiar computers, pack magnitudes more computing power to be able to solve complex problems. To compute, traditional computers store information in bits (that is, 0 and 1). Quantum computing is built around qubits that do both at the same time (a bit like Shrodinger's cat). They are not designed to replace traditional computers, at least work and home uses. One could point to the 2024 movie AfrAId, and Netflix' 2023 movie Heart Of Stone, as having foretold quantum's prowess. Microsoft's four-dimensional geometric codes require fewer physical qubits for compute, can check for errors faster, and have reportedly returned a 1,000-fold reduction in error rates. There is hope for this framework of error detection and correction, that can adapt to various types of qubits, making the technology more versatile and practical for real-world applications. The significance of Microsoft's approach cannot be overstated. Traditional quantum error correction methods have struggled with a delicate balance between protecting quantum information whilst maintaining the very properties that make quantum computing powerful. They aren't the only tech giant that is tackling errors in quantum computing. IBM, this month, detailed a roadmap for the IBM Quantum Starling, which they say is the world's first large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computer. It is expected to be delivered by 2029, as part of IBM's new Quantum Data Center. 'Our expertise across mathematics, physics, and engineering is paving the way for a large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer — one that will solve real-world challenges and unlock immense possibilities for business,' says said Arvind Krishna, Chairman and CEO of IBM. Quantum computing stands at a critical juncture. Qubits are extremely sensitive to their environment. Smallest of disturbances, ranging from electromagnetic interference to temperature fluctuations, can cause them to 'decohere'. That means, they lose their quantum properties and essentially become classical bits. At that stage, quantum computations produce errors. The challenge is both technical and mathematical. Since quantum states cannot be copied like data on a computer, quantum error correction becomes exponentially more complex. Microsoft is assessing this development with a sense of caution. 'We are in the early stages of reliable quantum computing, and the impact that this technology will have is just beginning to be realised. Practical applications will start to be revealed as researchers in various industries adopt a co-design approach to explore interactions between quantum architectures, algorithms, and applications,' explains Krysta Svore, Technical Fellow, Advanced Quantum Development at Microsoft Quantum. Earlier in the year, Microsoft's quantum computing aspirations saw significant forward movement, with the Majorana 1 chip — a first of its kind scalable chip with versatile architecture, that can potentially fit a million qubits. It currently holds 8 topological qubits. Majorana 1 sits alongside Google's Willow chip, IBM's Quantum Heron, as well as the Zuchongzhi 3.0, developed by Chinese scientists late last year. Error correction was a focus area then too. Microsoft created what is essentially a new state of matter called a topological superconductor, that is more stable and error resistant. Google too believes it has cracked the code for error correction and is building a machine that they expect will be ready by 2029. Crucial to their approach is the Willow chip, and the balance between logical qubits and physical qubits. Physical qubits are the actual quantum bits built into the hardware - the individual atoms, photons, or superconducting circuits that store quantum information. Whereas, logical qubits are error-corrected qubits created by combining multiple physical qubits together with sophisticated error correction codes. Think of them as 'virtual' qubits. Google's research points to the 'quantum error correction threshold', as the tipping point where this dynamic reverses — where logical qubits that are more reliable, outnumber physical ones. There are similarities in Google and IBM's approach regarding this balance. Central to IBM's approach is its creation of a quantum error-correcting code that they claim is about 10 times more efficient than prior methods. This efficiency gain proves crucial, at least in tests, because traditional error correction methods require hundreds or thousands of physical qubits to create a single reliable logical qubit, making large-scale quantum computers prohibitively complex. For all the potential that quantum computing may profess to, at least in delivering real-world solutions for matters including drug discovery, cybersecurity, material science and financial risk analysis, it finds itself precariously perched in this pivotal moment. Error correction capabilities are important for it to simply work as it should, and also to keep operational costs down. IBM's modular scalability, Google's systematic threshold-crossing methodology, and Microsoft's new 4D code architecture, though differing in approach, all believe they may be rushing towards a workable solution. As quantum creeps ever closer, the years that lie ahead will testify to levels of success.
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
India moves to benchmark iron ore prices to global index for greater transparency
India has proposed benchmarking the price of domestically produced iron ore to S&P Global Platts , or other such global publication gauges. Currently, the Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM) announces the average sale price (ASP) of iron ore in the country based on self-declarations by mining companies. This is then used to calculate royalty and District Mineral Fund (DMF) disbursals payable to states. Moving away from the self-declaration regime, a Mines Ministry notification said the IBM shall compute the daily price of Iron Ore (60 to below 62 per cent Fe grade) Fines in Indian Rupees based on prices published daily by S&P Global Platts or other reputed publications for iron ore (of the same grade). Self-declared prices by mining companies led to the possibility of understating revenues which also meant a lesser royalty payable to the states. The proposal brings transparency in iron ore pricing, limiting room for mining companies to declare lower prices for higher grades. It also brings uniformity in iron ore prices , as earlier prices would vary across states. States use prices declared by these companies to calculate their revenue, as the law stipulates that mining entities pay 15 per cent of the iron ore sale revenue as royalty to the states. Further, 2 per cent of the royalty is paid as DMF, used to fund development activities in mining-affected areas.
