Police discover bodies believed to be those of missing journalist and his partner

Police have uncovered the remains of what they believe to be Pretoria journalist Sibusiso Aserie Ndlovu and his partner Zodwa Precious Mdhluli, who mysteriously vanished on 18 February 2025.
The discovery of the bodies follows the arrest of five suspects on Sunday, 4 May, who had been linked to the disappearance of the couple. Police Commissioner Major General Fannie Masemola said one of the suspects had pointed out an area where a police search discovered human remains.
The remains were found next to each other in a thicket outside Rust De Winter in Limpopo, nearly 72km from where the couple was last seen nearly three months ago, on 18 February 2025.
Masemola confirmed the grisly find on the boundary of Gauteng and Limpopo.
'Whether it's them or not, we are not sure. But we will do the necessary processes in terms of DNA … to check whether it's them or not.'
Daily Maverick reported this week that police found parts belonging to Ndlovu's car in some of the suspects' vehicles. Furniture and other household appliances which had been stolen at the Ndlovus' house during a break-in were also recovered from the suspects.
Two of the suspects, Samuel Mogongwe, 41, and Lucky Michael Sikhosana, 40, appeared in the Kwa Mhlanga Magistrates' court on kidnapping charges on Wednesday, 7 May. A suspect also appeared in a Pretoria court, but the matter was transferred to Kwa Mhlanga.
The South African Police Service told Daily Maverick on 24 April that the search and investigation had been escalated to the provincial head office and the docket assigned to a senior investigating officer.
Masemola confirmed to the media that forensic experts would conduct rigorous testing to establish the identities of the remains.
Reward doubled
Last week, the African Media and Communicators Forum (AMCF) and the National Press Club (NPC), which had offered a reward in exchange for information that could lead to the couple's whereabouts, increased the reward from R50,000 to R100,000.
The organisations expressed their sadness and shock on Thursday, 8 May.
'We would like to thank the South African Police Service, the leadership and each and every member of the force that assisted in this search for the couple. We are devastated. We are devastated,' the organisations said in a statement.
'Thanks to all the colleagues who assisted with keeping the search on the agenda. We were unable to bring them back home alive, but at least the families can get closure, and we can bury them with dignity. Our deepest sympathy to Zodwa and Aserie's family and friends and colleagues. We will follow the court process closely. The law must now take its course.'
Family and friends distraught
Daily Maverick approached several family members and friends, but most were in no state to speak.
Bongi Mokoena, Zodwa's best friend, cried bitterly on the phone for several minutes until her mother (whose full name we could not ascertain) took over the call. Mokoena's mother, too, was emotional, but managed to communicate.
'We are all devastated,' Mokoena's mother said.
'Where do the people who commit murders in this country come from?' she asked.
She said her daughter was preparing to head for Kwa Mhlanga to follow the court case.
Mokoena's mother said Mdhluli 'was so free. When she saw me, she saw her own mother.'
'Zodwa was a decent person. She was a very nice person. She was a loving mother and also loved her family a lot. She was just a loving person. When she went to the shops, she would bring food, but would also bring a lot more for the children,' she said.
Speaking to the media on Thursday afternoon, Deputy National Police Commissioner Major General Shadrack Sibiya said the accused who had pointed out where the remains might be could not remember the specific spot where they had disposed of the bodies.
'They dumped the bodies at night and could not specifically remember where. Police had to comb the entire area, and that's when we found the remains,' Sibiya said. DM

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Maverick

26 minutes ago

• Daily Maverick

ATM hacking accused freed on bail after magistrate's blunder in multimillion-rand case

A man who allegedly made millions in cash by hacking ATMs in the Eastern and Western Cape was released on bail late last week after the Bhisho High Court ruled that the magistrate had made a mistake by not giving reasons for the decision to keep him behind bars. One of the men arrested by the Hawks in March 2025 and linked to a syndicate that has allegedly netted R7-million by hacking ATMs has been released on bail after the court ruled that the magistrate hearing his bail application had made a mistake. Mongameli Tom was arrested with another man near Peddie in the Eastern Cape after the pair allegedly hacked into two ATMs in Mdantsane, Buffalo City. At the time of Tom's arrest the Hawks said that he was also linked to a series of ATM fraud incidents in the Western Cape. Tom has denied any involvement. Tom and the other man were intercepted near Peddie on 17 March 2025 following a multidisciplinary, intelligence-driven operation led by the East London Serious Organised Crime Investigation team. The Hawks explained at the time that the suspects allegedly disguised themselves as cash-in-transit security guards, armed with a rifle, to create the illusion that they were legitimately servicing the ATM. But instead they were using 'jackpot' software to hack into the ATM and take all the money. Tom was arrested by the Hawks on 19 March 2025. On 9 April 2025 he applied for bail but this was refused. He is charged with 51 counts of fraud and 52 counts of theft which were allegedly committed between Cape Town and East London. Four of these offences were committed in the Eastern Cape and two in the magisterial district of Mdantsane, where he appeared in court. In February and March 2025 amounts of R143,500 and R236,900 were taken from two ATMs at two garages in Mdantsane. Tom, from Mitchells Plain in the Western Cape, is the director of two companies, Abakwazidenge Trading (Pty) Ltd and Khundulu Holdings (Pty) Ltd. According to Tom both companies made between R30,000 and R50,000 profit a month but had stopped operating after he was arrested. In an affidavit before court – detailing his personal circumstances – he stated that he had dependent children and had to provide for their needs. Acting Judge Aaron Zono said the magistrate hearing Tom's bail application had not dealt with an affidavit setting out his personal circumstances. Tom has no previous convictions nor pending cases. 'There is not a single reason in the magistrate's judgment why [Tom's] case or version has not been accepted or rejected. We may only assume that it was rejected for the fact that it is not referred to in the judgment,' Zono said. 'In fact, the magistrate's failure to accept or reject appellant's case is rooted in his failure to consider the same. One cannot accept or reject something he has not considered. No balancing act has been made by the magistrate. 'The magistrate did not account for the judgment he gave. He did not analyse the evidence before arriving at his conclusion. He did not explain why the evidence of the accused persons was not accepted and why that evidence did not meet the standard of being reasonably possibly true. He did not even explain on what basis he found that the state had discharged its onus of proof and why its evidence was accepted. 'A judgment without reasons is arbitrary. Equally a judgment that does not account for all the evidence is arbitrary. A judgment without balancing exercise between the two opposing versions or evidence lacks proper analysis and is consequently arbitrary. Zono also said the State had not rebutted evidence presented by Tom, who denies knowledge of any crimes, but only stated that the prosecution's case is strong and Tom's case is weak. He added that the magistrate should have given a reasoned ruling on why bail was refused.

Eyewitness News

4 hours ago

• Eyewitness News

Four men sentenced to long-term imprisonment after murdering woman for funeral policy money

CAPE TOWN - An adoptive father of a mentally disabled woman and three hitmen have been sentenced to long-term imprisonment after murdering the woman for funeral policy money. The four men were sentenced in the Knysna High Court on Friday. Mboneleli Msila was handed two life sentences for masterminding the murder of his adopted daughter, 22-year-old Nosipho Mafana in Plettenberg Bay. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila says Mboneleli Msila says hitman Monde Tshemese will also serve two life sentences for his role in Mafana's murder. "Msila arranged for Mafana to take out three funeral policies with three different banks which would pay out an amount of R600,000 if she died an unnatural death." Ntabazalila says Msila and Tshemese planned Mafana's murder along with Mbulelo Jack and Lungisile Lucas. Jack and Lucas were sentenced to 17 years in prison for conspiracy to commit murder and 17 years for murder. After Mafana's murder in April 2022 Msila's claim for the policy was rejected after it became the subject of a police investigation.

IOL News

6 hours ago

• IOL News

EFT payments and cybercrime: Court says car buyer is liable to ensure money is paid into the correct account

In a case involving cybercrime, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that it is the duty of a buyer to ensure that the money is paid into the seller's correct bank account. Image: File Cybercrime was once again the topic of a legal wrangle - this time before the Supreme Court of Appeal, which found that payment via electronic transfer (EFT) is only complete when the funds are received by the correct account holder. This judgment followed legal proceedings between two car sale companies – with the one who bought two bakkies from the other only to discover after delivery of the vehicles that cybercriminals had intercepted the electronic payment made for the vehicles. None of the parties were prepared to take the financial loss, and the seller initially turned to the regional court in Louis Trichardt to get its R290,000 back – the price at which it sold the two bakkies. The lower court earlier ruled that Hyundai Louis Trichardt had to pay Northcliff Nissan the R290, 000 for the vehicles. The magistrate reasoned that the two car dealerships had a contract in place and, cybercrime or not, Northcliff Nissan was due payment for the two bakkies. Aggrieved with this judgment, Hyundai successfully turned to the Limpopo High Court, sitting in Thohoyandou, to appeal the lower court's verdict. But Northcliff Nissan took the matter on appeal to the SCA. The risk of erroneous payment due to the cybercrime was that of the payer in this instance, the SCA found. 'A debtor bears the risk of misdirected EFT payments and must ensure that the payment is made to the correct bank account,' it said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The court added that the onus of proof in contract disputes over payment lies with the payer (debtor). 'Cybercrime risks do not automatically shift liability to the payee, and the courts will not impose an overarching legal duty on creditors to protect debtors from cyber fraud,' the court said. The court was told that in October 2018, Hyundai purchased two Nissan bakkies from Northcliff Nissan for the sum of R145,000,00 each. Northcliff Nissan emailed the invoices for both vehicles to the buyer. The invoices provided details of the nominated bank account for payment of the purchase price for the bakkies. On the same day, Hyundai paid for one bakkie and emailed proof of payment to Northcliff Nissan, after which the bakkie was then delivered. A few days later, Hyundai made another payment and took delivery of the second bakkie. At that stage, no one realised that cybercriminals were at work. Approximately a week later, Northcliff Nissan told Hyundai that payment of the purchase price for the bakkies had not been reflected in its bank account. It then became clear to the parties that the emails had been intercepted and the bank account details on the invoices were altered by a cyber fraudster. The parties realised that they were victims of business email compromise (BEC), a cybercrime that has become popular in this technological age of electronic communication and payment.