CEO caught on video admitting fraud - but it's a deepfake
William Petherbridge | Published 9 hours ago
Artificial intelligence has now made it possible to wake up to a video of your CEO seemingly admitting to fraud or receiving an urgent audio message from your CFO authorising a large, unexpected transaction, without any of it being real. Deepfakes aren't limited to criminal use cases targeting individuals or governments – they represent a sophisticated and escalating threat to corporations globally, including South Africa. Disinformation using deepfake technology
The use of deepfake technology has become one of the most powerful tools fueling disinformation. The rise in AI and machine learning embedded in commercially available tools such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) has levelled the playing field and increased the sophistication of deepfake content.
Cybercriminals, disgruntled insiders, competitors, and even state-sponsored groups can leverage deepfakes for devastating attacks, ranging from financial fraud and network compromise to severe reputational damage.
The threat itself, however, is not fake; it's manifesting tangibly within South Africa. The South African Banking Risk Information Centre (SABRIC) has issued stark warnings about the rise in AI-driven fraud scams, explicitly including deepfakes and voice cloning used to impersonate bank officials or lure victims into fake investment schemes, sometimes even using fabricated endorsements from prominent local figures.
With South Africa already identified by Interpol as a global cybercrime hotspot, estimating annual losses in the billions of Rands , the potential financial impact of sophisticated deepfake fraud targeting businesses is immense.
There are also implications for democracy as a whole. Accenture Africa recently highlighted how easily deepfakes could amplify misinformation and political unrest in a nation where false narratives can already spread rapidly online – a critical concern when it comes to elections.
Furthermore, the 'human firewall' – our employees – represents a significant area of vulnerability. Fortinet's 2024 Security Awareness and Training Global Research Report highlights that 46% of organisations now expect their employees to fall for more attacks in the future because bad actors are using AI.
Phishing emails used to be easier to identify because they were poorly worded and contained multiple spelling errors, but they led to successful breaches for decades. Now, they're drastically more difficult to identify as AI-generated emails and deep-fake media have reached levels of realism that leave almost no one immune.
Numerous types of malicious actors are most likely to target companies using deepfake technology.
Cybercriminals who have stolen samples of a victim's email, along with their address book, for example, may use GenAI to generate tailored content that matches the language, tone and topics in the victim's previous interactions to aid in spear phishing – convincing them to take action such as clicking on a malicious attachment.
Other cybercriminals use deepfakes to impersonate customers, business partners, or company executives to initiate and authorise fraudulent transactions. According to Deloitte's Center for Financial Services, GenAI-enabled fraud losses are growing at 32% year-over-year in the United States and could reach $40 billion by 2027.
Disgruntled current or former employees may also generate deepfakes to seek revenge or damage a company's reputation. By leveraging their inside knowledge, they can make the deepfakes appear especially credible.
Another potential deepfake danger may be from business partners, competitors or unscrupulous market speculators looking to gain leverage in negotiations or to try to affect a company's stock price through bad publicity.
Combating the deepfake threat requires more than just technological solutions; it demands a comprehensive, multi-layered strategy encompassing technology, processes, and people. Advanced threat detection: Organisations must invest in security solutions capable of detecting AI-manipulated media. AI itself plays a crucial role, powering tools that can analyse content for the subtle giveaways often present in deepfakes.
Robust authentication and processes: Implementing strong multi-factor authentication (MFA) remains paramount. Businesses should also review and strengthen processes around sensitive actions like financial transactions or data access requests, incorporating verification steps that cannot be easily spoofed by a deepfake voice or video call. A Zero Trust approach, verifying everything and assuming breaches when in doubt, is essential.
Empowering the human firewall: Continuous education and awareness training are vital. Employees need to be equipped with the knowledge to recognise potential deepfake indicators and understand the procedures for verifying communications, especially those involving sensitive instructions or financial implications.
Reputation management: Proactive reputation management and clear communication channels become even more critical. Being able to swiftly debunk a deepfake attack targeting the company or its leadership can mitigate significant damage.
Staying informed and advocating: Cybersecurity teams must stay abreast of evolving deepfake tactics. Collaboration and information sharing within industries and engagement with bodies working on updating South Africa's cyber laws (such as aspects of POPIA) to specifically address deepfake crimes are important. Preparing for the inevitable
Deepfakes are not a future problem; they are a clear and present danger to South African businesses. They target the very accuracy of the information we rely on as consumers, employees and investors.
The question is no longer if a South African organisation will be targeted by a deepfake attack, but how prepared it will be when it happens. Proactive investment in robust security measures, stringent processes, and comprehensive employee education is not just advisable – it's essential for survival in this new era of digital deception.
William Petherbridge, Systems Engineering Manager at Fortinet
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
What's holding back South Africa's economy? Key insights from experts
Infrastructure failure and bottlenecks at ports, are among factors costing the economy billions of Rands. Image: eThekwini Municipality Failing infrastructure, systemic corruption, collapsed rule of law, state incapacity in public service and state-owned entities, erosion of local government, and high crime rates are among the key factors causing a decline in South Africa's economic growth, according to experts. This is despite the positive growth from the agricultural sector, where the Gross Value Added (GVA) expanded by 15.8% in the first quarter of 2025. Agriculture became the main driver of South Africa's overall GDP growth in Q1 2025, contributing 0.4 percentage points to the national GDP expansion of 0.1%. However, experts say that agriculture, although it has driven the country's economic growth, is volatile and dependent on factors such as weather, electricity supply, and transportation, among others. Professor William Gumede, from the Wits School of Governance, said the country's political culture has made corruption, incompetence, and misbehaviour acceptable if it is done by those who share a similar colour, party, and ideology, which has contributed to the economic decline. 'Property rights are vulnerable. The rule of law in many parts has collapsed, the lower courts are inefficient, and policing is ineffective. Corruption is systemic. State capacity in many parts of the public services, among state-owned entities, and local government has been eroded. Crime is out of control. The state cannot efficiently enforce laws, rules, or policies. Infrastructure has collapsed in many areas. Many sectors of the economy, such as public transport, mining, and construction, have become informalised. The country has been deindustrialising,' Gumede said. He added that state infrastructure development plans and forums, including the Reconstruction and Recovery Plan and initiatives such as Operation Vulindlela, have become virtual talk shops, and structures set up to play an oversight and coordination role, and provide governance over infrastructure, have not been able to do so. 'The breakdown of infrastructure drives up inflation, just as state, SOE, and policy failures do, as they drive up prices, the cost of living, cost of business, and erode savings and deter future investment. The Reserve Bank has warned that the breakdown in infrastructure threatens the stability of the financial system. 'Loadshedding, for example, has caused not only the loss of lives, but also of businesses, capital, skills, employment, and investment. It has contributed to South Africa's low-growth path, possibly taking away up to 3% of possible growth. South Africa needs around R150 billion per year just to replace the destroyed infrastructure, let alone build new infrastructure,' Gumede said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He added that water provision has also plunged, with many of the water infrastructure SOEs, municipal entities, and boards having fallen into disarray. The provision of water in many of South Africa's cities and towns has deteriorated to such an extent that many citizens are without water for long periods during water outages. 'Transnet, the state-owned logistics giant responsible for South Africa's ports, rail, and pipelines, is, like Eskom, a major contributor to the country's low-growth path. Transnet has a debt burden of R136 billion. Its inefficiencies are causing bottlenecks at ports and limiting rail freight, undermining trade. It costs the economy over R1 billion per day," Gumede said. Transnet estimates it needs to invest R200 billion to restore the railways to capacity, however, Gumede said it will be a waste of money to invest in Transnet without bringing in merit-based management, cleaning up procurement by exempting the organisation from preferential procurement rules, and discarding ideological objections to having the organisation fully partner with the private sector in delivering infrastructure services. According to the Department of Public Enterprises, between 2012 and 2023, the debt levels of the largest 10 SOEs rose by R313.6 billion. The government had to bail out these SOEs with R318.1 billion during that period. In its latest Financial Stability Review, the Reserve Bank said while electricity availability appears to be gradually returning to historical trends, other critical infrastructure, such as the supply and quality of water and transport infrastructure, especially rail, port, and road networks, continues to degrade. Gumede said an external economic shock, such as a prolonged fallout with the US Donald Trump administration, will have a disproportionately debilitating impact on the South African economy. Political actors and groups who reckon South Africa can quickly pivot from the US market to alternatives, such as BRICS, have a case of wishful thinking, as a loss of the US market cannot be immediately replaced. A transition to new markets cannot be achieved overnight. Worse, SA's state trade negotiation capacity is currently possibly at its weakest, most over-ideological, least agile, and opportunity-minded, since the end of apartheid. State capacity has been eroded in state trade structures, as in other parts of the state, through cadre deployment, exclusion of minorities, and informalisation, he said. China may be South Africa's largest trading partner by volume, but it mostly takes South Africa's raw material, not manufactured products – it has trade barriers, but sends manufactured products to South Africa, which displaces local jobs. US companies manufacture in South Africa, meaning they have larger multiplier impacts, Gumede said. The International Monetary Fund ranks South Africa as the most difficult place to do business globally among 49 countries in the IMF's ease of doing business index. It argues that halving SA's restrictive business regulations relative to its emerging market peers could increase medium-run output by 9% and boost employment, Gumede said. He added that policymakers underestimate the impact of state failure, corruption, incompetence, and anti-growth policies on the economy, which reduces revenue and undermines business confidence. In the 1990s, the Johannesburg Stock Exchange had around 850 listed companies. By 2024, this had dropped to under 300, including some companies that have dual listings. He highlighted the lack of inclusive compromises on key policies, the NHI, the Expropriation Law, apparent refusal to renegotiate aspects of the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Bill to make it more inclusive, and perceived anti-American foreign policies have caused investment, capital, and skills flight as some of the factors. 'Many ANC politicians do not genuinely think growth should be at the centre of economic policy, arguing wrongly that to do so will be promoting 'neo-liberalism'. Policies that undermine growth will have to be jettisoned,' Gumede said. He said state debt levels need to be brought down, and key catalytic growth sectors will have to be prioritised. 'Manufacturing remains important; its declining trend needs to be reversed. Agriculture is critical. It is important that land reform is not populist, emotional, ideological and revenge-driven, but rather, that it focuses on securing food; fostering an agricultural, manufacturing, processing, and technology industrial hub; and fostering related artisan, technical, and research skills. This would mean partnering with the private sector to bring back artisan programmes, agricultural technical institutions – especially in the rural areas – and fostering agriculture technology,' he said. Dawie Roodt, a chief economist at the Efficient Group, said the biggest challenge in South Africa is a government that is destructive, inefficient, and is quite often corrupt. 'The government policies are broadly wrong. The Expropriation Bill, for example, is one of those policy choices that is wrong for economic growth because you must protect private property rights. There's also the inefficiency of the state. 'All good things go together in the economy. If per capita GDP goes up, then life expectancy, quality of life, and education follow suit,' Roodt said.
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
Nischal Mewalall steps down as SABRIC CEO after five transformative years
Nischal Mewalall assumed the role of CEO amidst the chaos of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown and provided much-needed stability and strategic direction at a time when many organisations struggled to adapt. Image: Supplied Nischal Mewalall has announced his decision to step down as CEO of the South African Banking Risk Information Centre (SABRIC) after five years at the helm. His departure comes as he looks to pursue personal aspirations, a move met with gratitude from the board, employees, and stakeholders for his indelible impact on the organisation. Mewalall on Tuesday expressed his gratitude for the opportunity to lead SABRIC, saying it has been an incredible privilege. "I am proud of what we have achieved together, transforming the organisation, driving digital innovation, and fortifying South Africa's defences against fraud," he said. "I leave with confidence in SABRIC's continued success and extend my heartfelt thanks to the Board, our dedicated team, and our partners for their unwavering support." SABRIC is formed by the four major banks to assist the banking and cash-in-transit industries combat organised bank-related crimes by being a trusted financial crime risk information centre leveraging on strategic partnerships. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Assuming the role amidst the chaos of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown, Mewalall provided much-needed stability and strategic direction at a time when many organisations struggled to adapt. Under his stewardship, SABRIC not only navigated the challenges posed by the pandemic but also emerged with renewed strength and purpose, embracing a significant digital transformation that has redefined its approach to financial crime mitigation. Capable of withstanding the pressures of crisis, Mewalall's leadership fostered a technology-driven organisation capable of combating evolving threats. His forward-thinking approach also fortified partnerships between both the public and private sectors, collectively bolstering South Africa's defenses against cyber and financial threats. Bongi Kunene, SABRIC's board chairperson, said Mewalall has been instrumental in shaping SABRIC into a forward-looking, innovative organisation. "His leadership duringturbulent times was nothing short of remarkable, and his legacy will continue to benefitthe industry for years to come. We respect his decision to pursue new endeavours andwish him every success in his future pursuits," Kunene said. The Board has initiated a process to identify a successor and will announce furtherdetails in due course. In the interim, SABRIC remains firmly committed to its mission ofcombating financial crime through collaboration, innovation, and cutting-edgetechnology. BUSINESS REPORT
Daily Maverick
4 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Crossed Wires: Artificial Intelligence reality check – not as smart as it thinks it is
Apple researchers' recent paper, The Illusion of Thinking, challenges the hype around AI, revealing its limitations in solving complex problems. If one is to believe Sam Altman and other AI boosters and accelerationists, the era of abundance is almost upon us. AI is about to relieve us all of drudgery, ill health, poverty and many other miseries before leading us to some promised land where we will shed our burdens and turn our attention to loftier concerns. Any day now. And so the publication of a paper by Apple researchers this month arrived as a refreshing dose of realism. It was titled The Illusion of Thinking and it broke the AI Internet. It concluded that ChatGPT-style GenAI models (like Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek and others) can only solve a constrained set of problems and tend to collapse spectacularly when complexity is introduced. The implications of the paper are clear – the underlying technologies that have so supercharged the AI narrative and fueled so much hyperbole have a long way to go before anyone attains the holy grail of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the imagined utopia of techno-optimists. For anyone with time and grit, here is the paper. One of the examples cited concerns the well-known 'Tower of Hanoi' problem, which involves stacking variously sized disks on a vertical rod. Any reasonably smart nine-year-old can find a solution, a very short computer program can describe the solution but, left to its own devices, GenAI cannot come up with a general solution to the problem. As more and more disks are added, the AI becomes a blithering idiot. It has no idea what it is doing. It is not able to 'generalise' from a few disks to many. This leads to the inescapable conclusion that, if a child or a very short algorithm can best the most advanced 'reasoning' models from ChatGPT and Claude, then we are far from AGI. No matter what Sam Altman says. It is not as if a whole slew of clever researchers are blind to this fact. There are some researchers busy trying to embed ethics and alignment into AI so that humans can survive its evolution without too much pain or possible extinction. There are some researchers who are taking what we have now and applying it to current real-world problems in science, education, healthcare or the sludge of institutional processes. And there are some who are saying: This version of AI, this 'deep learning' machine that has captured everyone's attention – it is simply not good enough. They are looking to invent something that breaks free of the constraints which Apple's paper so brutally highlights. There are some clever band-aids available to patch over the obvious weaknesses of current AI models, such as a widely used technique called RL (Reinforcement Learning), which boosts learning after the AI has been trained, but these partial fixes do not address the basic weakness of the core architecture – they address the symptoms and not the cause. It doesn't take an expert to know that humans learn in many different ways, all the way back to our warm launchpad in the womb. We have genetic programs gifted by our ancestors, we learn from our senses, we learn by example, we learn by trial and error, we learn by being taught by others, we learn by accident, we learn by intent, and then we also learn to reason, to generalize, to deduce, to infer. It is probably fair to say that we humans are learning machines – running all day, every day, from the moment of conception. Our learning may well be faulty, our memories inaccurate, our lessons sometimes haphazard, our failures manifold – but learn we do, always and forever. It is in this area that the current crop of AI techniques are exposed as having only a thin veneer of competence. Take ChatGPT, at least in its text version. It has learnt how to predict the next word from a historical store of human-created documents reduced to gigantic matrices of statistically related words. There is not much more to it than that, even though its usefulness has astounded everyone. But really, compare this with what our species does as we go about our daily business – learning, learning, learning, both to our benefit and sometimes to our detriment – all the time, unable to stop for even a microsecond. AI models are simply embarrassing next to that. Babies are smarter, primates are smarter. Dogs are smarter. The challenge of 'continuous autonomous learning' has yet to be met in current AI models. Before I go overboard about the absurdity of the AGI-is-nearly-here claim, I should throw some light on what has been achieved, especially via the GenAI technologies. These are sometimes confusingly called Large Language Models (they now go way beyond mere language). What they can do is truly unprecedented. I use them all day, every day. They are novel and brilliant assistants. They are much, much smarter or faster than I am at doing a whole slew of important things. But I am much, much smarter than they are when it comes to a huge number of other things. AGI, as now commonly defined, means the point at which AI equals (or betters) humans at all cognitive (as opposed to physical) tasks. I spend a large part of my day reading about the advances at the edge of this fabulous field, which is probably the most important technological development in human history. There is fabulous stuff coming down the line. A cure for cancer, perhaps. Infinite cheap energy. Healthy and long lives. But will it be better than humans at all cognitive tasks? Not today. Not this year. Not next year. Not until AI is spawned as we are and learns as we do. Like the witches riddle in Shakespeare's Macbeth, perhaps only when AI is of woman born. DM
