Succession at Estee Lauder
THE passing of Leonard Lauder last week (June 14) at age 92 marks more than the end of a personal chapter – it closes an era for one of the most iconic family-run businesses in global beauty. As someone who spent years in the media industry, where beauty advertisers often account for up to 40 per cent of total revenue, I've long held a deep affinity for cosmetic brands – especially Estee Lauder – shaped by both professional experience and personal encounters.
In the early part of my career, I was based in Tokyo, as part of the global leadership ad sales team at Elle magazine. One of the defining memories of that chapter was travelling to New York to present a global partnership programme to the Estee Lauder global leadership team. I was representing Asia, and while I didn't get to meet Leonard Lauder himself, his vision was present in every conversation – the precision, the pride, the promise of timeless beauty.
That season also gave me the privilege of meeting and engaging with some of the most influential figures in the beauty industry – founders and next-generation chairmen and chief executive officers whose names are synonymous with luxury and excellence. I met Hiroshi Uemura of the Shu Uemura family, Yoshiharu Fukuhara of the Shiseido family, and Christian Courtin of the Clarins family. I've always been deeply interested in family entrepreneurship. These weren't just professional encounters – they were windows into the soul of family-owned empires, each grappling with legacy, innovation and succession in their own way.
My connection to Estee Lauder deepened at home. My wife worked under the Aramis brand, part of the Estee Lauder Companies, and I became an Aramis user myself. I could even recognise the distinct scent of White Linen when someone wore it – a reminder of a household legendary brand.
One of my most defining career moments came later, during my tenure as president of Mindshare China, when we won the largest advertising pitch in China's history – the L'Oreal China account, valued at US$2.5 billion. We mobilised over 90 professionals across cities to present a unified brand strategy for L'Oreal Paris, Lancome, Maybelline, and Kerastase. It was a powerful lesson in alignment and storytelling at scale – and deepened my appreciation for how global beauty brands, especially family-founded ones, balance legacy and innovation.
Now, as a family legacy planner, I find myself drawn to examining how the Estee Lauder family navigated succession – not just as a business case, but as a generational journey of values, vision, conflict management, and continuity.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
A succession strategy worth studying
What makes Estee Lauder's journey particularly remarkable – and relevant to those of us in the world of family enterprises – is how it has navigated succession across three generations, blending professionalism with preservation.
Estee Lauder, the founder, built not just a beauty brand but a household name. Her son, Leonard Lauder, scaled the business globally, acquiring key brands and turning the company into a public powerhouse. His son William took over as CEO in 2004 and later transitioned to chairman. Meanwhile, Jane Lauder, a third-generation leader, held key roles in digital transformation and brand management, and was widely seen as a potential successor – until internal dynamics made the path less clear.
In recent years, there were signs of internal disagreement within the family leadership. Public reports alluded to differences in views between Jane Lauder and her cousin William regarding the company's direction. It marked a typical instance of visible tension within a business family long regarded for its cohesion.
Rather than allow the business to be entangled in internal politics, the Lauder family made a bold but measured move: they appointed Stephane de La Faverie, a seasoned executive, as the company's first non-family CEO. Jane stepped down from operational duties but retained a board seat. William moved fully into a strategic governance role.
This was not a retreat. It was a recalibration – a shift from operational control to strategic stewardship.
Control through structure
Even with only about 35 per cent equity ownership, the Lauder family retains 86 per cent of voting power through a dual-class share structure – giving them enduring influence over the direction of the company.
This structure – often misunderstood – has allowed the family to:
Maintain long-term vision and brand values
Avoid short-termism from outside investors
And, when necessary, make difficult but decisive leadership changes
While Estee Lauder Companies faced recent headwinds – notably from slowed growth in China – the leadership transition and ongoing restructuring have been positively received by the market. It's a reminder that well-governed family firms can both adapt and endure.
Lessons I learned
The Estee Lauder story is a living example of how legacy businesses can evolve:
1. Structure is power: With thoughtful planning, families can retain control without needing majority ownership.
2. Letting go is leadership: Knowing when to step back – and how – is often the hardest but most strategic move.
3. Governance evolves: From founder-led to professionally managed, the company's journey shows that values can outlive titles.
4. Conflict happens; resolution must be designed: The family's maturity in managing differences while preserving unity is a lesson for every business family.
5. Brand is legacy: What Estee built was not just a business, but a belief – the promise that every woman can be beautiful. I agree.
Final thought: AI as the next legacy frontier
As someone who has had the privilege of working with and learning from some of the world's most iconic beauty brands – and who now advises families navigating succession and legacy – I find the Lauder story both personal and inspiring.
It reminds us that while brands can be bought, legacies must be built – and guarded.
Now, a new frontier demands equal attention: artificial intelligence. In June 2025, L'Oreal announced a strategic partnership with Nvidia, leveraging advanced AI tools to personalise customer experiences, power virtual beauty consultations, and drive data-driven content creation across its multi-brand portfolio.
As legacy beauty brands transition to professional management, they must also embrace technological transformation. The Estee Lauder legacy story continues.
The writer is a family enterprise adviser and educator
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
LME imposes new restrictions on holders of large positions
[LONDON] The London Metal Exchange (LME) has imposed new restrictions on holders of large positions in nearby contracts amid low inventory levels, it said on Friday (Jun 20). LME took action after premiums for nearby copper contracts jumped to their highest levels since October 2022. The exchange, the world's oldest and largest market for industrial metals, said it has been monitoring large positions in recent months and in some cases, had to take action. 'At times, the LME's Special Committee has directed market participants to take a number of actions to reduce large on-exchange positions relative to prevailing stock levels,' the LME said. 'Given the ongoing low stock environment, the Special Committee now feels it appropriate to introduce ... transparent and generally applicable set of requirements.' The action was taken to head off the development of a potential 'corner' on the market or an 'undesirable situation', it added. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The new rule expands the LME's existing restrictions on so-called 'tom-next' positions that are closer to delivery, it added. The restriction requires holders of long positions which are greater than the total stocks levels to lend back to the market at a zero premium. In copper, the premium for the cash contract over the three-month forward is trading at US$180 a tonne from a US$3 premium only a month ago. LME data shows there is one company holding a dominant position of more than 90 per cent copper warrants and cash contracts and two companies holding 50 to 79 per cent. Warrants are title documents conferring ownership of metal. Copper stocks in LME registered warehouses at 99,200 tonnes have dropped more than 60 per cent since the middle of February and are at their lowest since August 2023. The LME is owned by Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Musk's xAI extends deadline and ups yield on bonds following lukewarm demand: source
[NEW YORK] Elon Musk's xAi extended the deadline and increased the yield it is paying on a US$5 billion debt sale following lukewarm reception from investors, a source with direct knowledge of the matter said on Friday (Jun 20). The deadline for investors to commit to buying into the deal, which includes bonds and loans, was extended from Tuesday to Friday, this source said, asking not to be named because the details of the deal were private. xAI also upped the yield on the US$3 billion in bonds and a US$1 billion term loan from 12 per cent to 12.5 per cent yield, they said. xAi sweetened the pot on a second term loan from 700 basis points to 725 basis points over the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, known as SOFR. The term loan B is set to be priced at a discount of 96 US cents on the US dollar, the source said. xAI and Morgan Stanley, which is leading the deal, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. High-yield bonds paid an average yield to maturity of 7.6 per cent as at Thursday, according to ICE BofA High Yield Index. Investors are demanding more for xAI's debt because the company and its bonds are not yet rated, giving investors little visibility into the company's finances and increasing the risk. An increase in the yield offer could mean that investors had probably agreed to buy the debt only for a higher yield. The borrower also has lesser flexibility on pricing when investor demand is modest. If the deal closes on Friday, Morgan Stanley will distribute the securities to investors on Monday, this source said. The xAI offering, which was reported on Jun 2 as Musk and US President Donald Trump traded barbs over social media, did not receive overwhelming interest from high-yield and leveraged loan investors, Reuters reported earlier this week. One portfolio manager, who said he passed on the bonds, said a 'good deal' will typically be oversubscribed by three to four times. xAI would up the yields if it didn't attract enough investors, he added. Unlike Musk's debt deal when he acquired Twitter, Morgan Stanley did not guarantee how much it would sell or commit its own capital to the deal, in what is called a 'best efforts' transaction, according to one source familiar with the terms. xAi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Morgan Stanley declined to comment. REUTERS
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Apple executives have held internal talks about buying AI startup Perplexity
[SAN FRANCISCO] Apple executives have held internal discussions about potentially bidding for artificial intelligence (AI) startup Perplexity AI, seeking to address the need for more AI talent and technology. Adrian Perica, the company's head of mergers and acquisitions, has weighed the idea with services chief Eddy Cue and top AI decision-makers, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The discussions are at an early stage and may not lead to an offer, said the sources, who asked not to be identified because the matter is private. Such a deal would help Apple develop an AI-based search engine, part of efforts to cope with the potential loss of a longstanding arrangement with Google. That partnership, which involves making Google the default browser on devices, generates roughly US$20 billion a year for Apple, and is now under threat from US antitrust enforcers. To date, Apple executives have not discussed a bid with Perplexity management. Bloomberg News reported earlier Friday that Meta Platforms tried to buy Perplexity earlier this year. 'We have no knowledge of any current or future M&A discussions involving Perplexity,' the AI startup said. Apple declined to comment. The Perplexity service provides real-time answers to questions using the latest information from the web. If Apple were to engage in talks to buy the startup, such a move likely would not happen until a decision is made in the Google antitrust trial. That's when Apple would know whether its lucrative Google agreement may have to be unwound. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Google shares reversed gains and fell nearly 1 per cent in late trading after Bloomberg reported on Apple's Perplexity discussions. Perplexity recently completed an investment round that valued it at US$14 billion. A deal anywhere near that level would be the largest acquisition in Apple's history. The company's biggest transaction until now remains the US$3 billion takeover of Beats in 2014 – though Apple made more recent billion US dollar deals for Intel Corp.'s modem unit and a stake in Chinese ride-sharing company DiDi. After Meta failed to reach an agreement with Perplexity, it bought a 49 per cent slice of Scale AI for US$14.3 billion. That deal is part of Meta's attempts to create a so-called superintelligence AI team, which will now include Scale co-founder Alexandr Wang. Perica and Cue, who both report to Apple chief executive officer Tim Cook, are leading the AI acquisition and recruiting efforts. The hunt for talent is part of a bid to catch up in generative AI. The company was slow to deliver its Apple Intelligence platform and still lags rivals in key features. A revamped Siri was delayed indefinitely this year, with the company now aiming to have it ready by next spring. Apple unveiled a relatively meagre slate of new AI enhancements at its Worldwide Developers Conference earlier this month. The latest features include live translation capabilities and a deeper partnership with OpenAI on ChatGPT-based image generation. Buying Perplexity would give Apple an infusion of AI talent, a known brand in the AI space and a consumer product. A deal could also potentially assist with future recruiting efforts. Apple has also discussed an alternative plan: teaming up with Perplexity instead of buying it. A partnership would involve adding Perplexity as an AI search engine option in Apple's Safari web browser and integrating it into Siri. Apple has met multiple times in recent months with Perplexity, and its AI team has been actively evaluating the technology – a sign that it's at least considering a close relationship with the company. One major snag in the process could be an in-the-works deal between Perplexity and Samsung Electronics, which plans to announce a deep partnership with the startup. Samsung is Apple's biggest competitor in smartphones, and AI features have become a critical new arena for the two rivals. In its statement, Perplexity said it should not be surprising that top manufacturers want to offer the 'best search and more accurate AI for their users.' 'That's Perplexity,' the startup said. Cue, whose department includes Apple's streaming services and iCloud, previously expressed an interest in Perplexity. While testifying at the Google antitrust trial in May, he told jurors that the industry is shifting away from standard Internet searches to AI tools. He outlined a scenario in which AI search engines could quickly supersede Google's current offering. 'We have been pretty impressed with what Perplexity has done, so we have started some discussions with them about what they are doing,' he said. BLOOMBERG
