Can I reduce Capital Gains Tax by splitting assets with other half?

Thinking of selling a second property? Cashing in a share portfolio? Or even selling some unwanted valuables you've inherited? When you sell an asset that's gone up in value since you acquired it, you may have to pay CGT on your profits.
It can feel like a bitter pill for someone who made a wise investment some years back and has seen it grow in value – only to hand a sizable percent back to the government.
However, you may have more options than you think to mitigate a high CGT bill.
Splitting your assets can reduce your CGT bill
One possible way of reducing CGT is by giving an asset away to your spouse or civil partner, or splitting it with them. By doing this, both of you are able to use your individual CGT allowance to bring down the amount of tax you'll pay.
Read on to find out how splitting your assets can help you get on top of CGT. But first, since most of us are only likely to find ourselves liable for CGT a handful of times in our lives, we'll run over the basics of this tax.
What is Capital Gains Tax?
CGT is a tax payable on the profit or gain you make when you sell something that's increased in value since you acquired it. It's not a tax on the whole amount, just on the profit you make. If you sell or gift certain assets and your overall profit is above the annual CGT allowance (see below), you'll need to pay CGT.
Read more: What is the seven year rule in Inheritance Tax?
Assets that you might pay CGT on include shares that aren't part of an ISA or pension (both CGT exempt); business assets; personal possessions worth more than £6,000; and property that isn't your main home. That could include a second home, a buy-to-let rental, or even a house or room that's only occasionally occupied.
Has the rate of Capital Gains Tax changed?
CGT was, as anticipated, targeted by the Chancellor in her Autumn Budget, and the increase in Capital Gains Tax was one of the steepest for investors. New rates for disposing of assets other than property rose from 10% to 18% for basic rate taxpayers, and from 20% to 24% for higher or additional rate taxpayers. This change took effect immediately.
The rates for disposing of property remained unchanged.
How much CGT will I pay?
How much CGT you pay depends on your income bracket, and the value of the asset you're selling or giving away.
If you pay basic-rate tax, you'll pay 18% CGT on disposing of assets, whether residential property, investments or valuables. Higher and additional rate taxpayers pay 24% on any gains above the annual allowance. However, if your gains tip you into the higher-rate tax threshold, you may pay tax at both rates.
If you're selling all or part of your trading business – and you've had the business for two years – you may be eligible for a special rate of 10%. This is known as Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR), which is set to increase to 14% in April 2025. Our Business Advisory Services can guide you through this critical moment for your business.
What is the Capital Gains Tax allowance?
The CGT allowance for 2025-26 remains £3,000 per individual. Therefore, £3,000 is the maximum profit you can make on the sale of chargeable assets this tax year before you have to pay CGT.
As far as CGT is concerned, if you are living with a spouse or a civil partner, you each currently have a £3,000 tax-free annual allowance, giving you a £6,000 tax-free buffer if you sell a jointly-owned asset, or one that you've already split between you.
Your CGT allowance resets each year. So if, for example, you're considering selling an asset other than property, such as shares, you could split the sale over two years and take advantage of two years' worth of allowance. However, do be aware that if you don't use your allowance one year, you can't carry it forward.
Can gifting assets to my spouse or civil partner cut our CGT bill?
Married couples or those in a civil partnership can maximise their Capital Gains allowances by splitting assets between them. Such a transfer must be on an outright and unconditional basis. Splitting assets allows you to double your tax-free CGT allowance – and you may reduce or avoid paying CGT altogether.
This only applies to individuals who are married, in a civil partnership and living together. If you are living together, even in a long-term relationship, but not married or in a civil partnership and you give an asset to your partner, there may be CGT to pay.
Read more: Retirement planning: how to maintain your living standards
Splitting assets is a neat and legitimate means of reducing your CGT liability. Do be aware that, once you've given that asset away, your spouse or civil partner will become its legal owner. Therefore, give consideration to the possibility of relationships breaking down before splitting assets. If, for any reason, your relationship breaks down and you separate or divorce, you cannot ask for the asset back.
Are there other ways to cut my CGT bill?
Splitting your assets isn't your only option to reduce CGT. You could:
Stagger the sale of assets over several tax years. You could sell part of a share portfolio on 3 April and the rest on 6 April to take advantage of two years' CGT allowance.
Offset any losses you've made on other assets against your gain. So, if you have a share portfolio or family heirloom that sold at a loss, for example, you can use that to reduce the taxable gain against another asset you're selling, such as property. Special rules apply when it comes to offsetting losses, so do check with a financial adviser.
Invest your assets in an ISA or pension – sheltering them from tax. You might want to consider a Bed and ISA – this is where you sell shares (the Bed part) and buy them back within an ISA wrapper to shelter them from future gains. Always speak to a financial adviser if you're considering this option, to make sure it's the right choice for you.
Ben Stark is a chartered financial planner with over a decade of experience advising businesses and families. He is partnered with St. James's Place Wealth Management.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

3 days ago

• Telegraph

Inheritance tax is heinous, but avoiding it could be a bigger disaster

They say nothing in life is certain but death and taxes, but I propose to add a third to the list: investors doing everything imaginable to avoid taxes. The bigger the bite HMRC wants, the heavier the hustle to shield hard-earned assets. Thanks to Labour dragging pensions into the inheritance tax net, it is now a stampede. Yet the avoidance path conceals huge pits I've watched investors fall into throughout my 50 years managing money. Estate planning is wonderful, but too often, sensible planning leads to tax considerations dictating investment decisions. This raises risk, reduces returns and can hit your planned inheritance much harder than any tax rise. Consider popular ways people now seek to shield pensions from inheritance tax: investing in Aim shares is one, with the double benefit of stamp duty exemption and business property relief. Enterprise Investing Schemes (EIS) are another, and business property relief schemes letting you access unlisted companies is a third. All these sprang from past governments' investment incentives, hoping to spur entrepreneurship and startups. A fine aim. But pursuing a strategy aimed at these incentives solely for tax benefits aren't the sunlit uplands some promise. You don't need me to tell you Aim has a long history of scandals and failures alongside those select success stories that graduated to the main market. Or that its stocks are Britain's tiniest, with a median market capitalisation of £15m. Or that FTSE's Aim All Share is down nearly -30pc since 2000, while the FTSE All Share has soared over 275pc. Astronomical missed returns are a dear price to pay for tax relief, particularly one whose relief is rapidly diminishing – Aim stocks' BPR relief drops from 100pc to 50pc next year. EIS and BPR schemes carry another risk: overloading on unlisted companies. These sport the veneer of stability and, in EIS's case, supposedly high growth potential. They are billed as a way for normal folks to invest in venture capital and reap big rewards when a startup hits it big, but the reality is those are needles in a haystack of hard-to-value, illiquid investments. Winners aren't guaranteed – untraded doesn't mean stable. It just means fewer pricing points, hiding the inherent behind-the-scenes volatility. That is illiquidity – a bug, not a feature. You risk being unable to sell when you really need to without suffering a steep discount. Aim companies aren't categorically horrid. Some are fine, even great. EIS and BPR can also be fine tools, in certain situations. But it all depends on your broader goals and time horizon, which gets us to the root of the problem. Your fixation on tax steers you away from why you invested in the first place. Done right, long-term investing is about picking the correct asset allocation – the blend of stocks, bonds and other securities – for reaching your goals over your investment time horizon. Your goals are the primary purpose for your money, usually growth, cash flow or some combination of the two. Your time horizon is how long your money must last, usually your lifetime – clearly longer if inheritance tax is a concern. Throughout history, stocks and bonds have done a marvellous job of delivering the growth and cash flow people need, given a sufficiently long-term horizon and reasonable withdrawals. Stocks deliver abundant long-term growth, despite bear markets and volatility along the way, while bonds cushion expected short-term volatility and support cash flow with interest. British and global listed stocks and bonds are liquid – easy to sell in a pinch to cover expenses both expected and sudden. When tax avoidance takes supremacy, will you let it steer you from whichever liquid asset allocation aligned with your goals and needs? If your pension is loaded with Aim shares, EIS or BPR schemes to reduce inheritance tax, it risks not delivering the returns needed to support your cash flow later on. Aged poverty is a real pain. Or maybe your pension ends up worth vastly less for your heirs, after tax, than if you had opted for a simple blend of stocks and bonds. If you have a sudden expense, your pension may not be liquid enough to cover it. Then what do you do? Borrow? Don't forget, tax policy is a whack-a-mole game. Pensions were exempt from inheritance tax until they weren't. After halving Aim relief in 2024's Budget, Labour capped BPR last year. Some ministers floated scrapping Aim relief altogether. What then? If you focus on tax optimisation, you may find yourself needing to make big changes again. And again. And again. Changes cost money. Taxes are certain in general, but the specifics are shape-shifting. When your goals and time horizon determine your strategy, there are fewer moving parts. You can build a diversified strategy with a long history of delivering what you need, while taking sensible steps to reduce tax exposure where available. Tax avoidance is nice. Liquidity, predictability and reaching your goals? Nicer.

Daily Mirror

3 days ago

• Daily Mirror

Millionaires may be eligible for Winter Fuel Payments in new rules

The Winter Fuel Payment U-turn could open up an unexpected loophole for wealthy retirees After facing severe backlash for cutting back Winter Fuel Payments shortly after winning the election last year, the Labour party has made a U-turn. Announcing new rules to means-test the seasonal benefit to assure vulnerable retirees are helped through the harshest months. To be eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment, which offers either £200 or £300 every winter to help cover heating costs, people over state pension age will need to have a taxable income of under £35,000 per year. ‌ Experts at Forbes Dawson warned: 'Although this may seem like a sensible approach, as many pensioners are asset-rich but have relatively low levels of income this could have unintended consequences and exclude many 'poor' people. ‌ 'Wealthy pensioners are generally in a unique position to control their level of taxable income on a year-to-year basis. Most pensioners will generally have some control over the amount of taxable income they extract from their pensions on an annual basis and many pensioners will have no 'income' and live off their built-up capital.' However, the experts added: 'We are not seriously suggesting that wealthy individuals will manipulate their income just to enjoy a £200 benefit, there will be cases where the very wealthy still qualify, while more deserving cases go without.' To break it down, the finance experts shared a fictional example of a retired NHS consultant called Dr Sam who has an estate worth £5million and makes specific moves with his money already in order to cut down a future Inheritance Tax bill. Including making loans to his Family Investment Company that sits outside his estate. As none of the shares are held by him directly, he doesn't pay tax on it and instead gets £200,000 annually as a repayment on his loan to the company. So while his general income is sitting at six-figures, his taxable income is zero so he will qualify under the new Winter Fuel Payment rules. In another fictional example, the money experts pointed out how people with less assets in retirement don't have as much control over their finances and might be excluded from the benefit. Retired teacher Doris uses a defined benefit public sector pension which is taxable income. ‌ She gets £40,000 a year from it, roughly £2,600 after tax, and with little money elsewhere she is reliant on nearly every penny so she can't cut it down. Because of her taxable income, she will not qualify for the benefit despite getting £160,000 less each year than Dr Sam. The new rules will make nine million more pensioners eligible for Winter Fuel Payments. And people can still opt out of receiving it but will need to do so before 15 September, 2025. Eligible people over state pension age will be receiving £200 between November and December 2025. Meanwhile those over the age of 80 who are eligible will receive £300.

The Independent

4 days ago

• The Independent

Aim boss makes plea to boost market's appeal after inheritance tax blow

The boss of London's junior stock market has called on the Government to help halt an exodus of companies listed in the City as he warned over the impact of its move to cut inheritance tax relief on Aim shares. Marcus Stuttard, head of Aim and UK primary markets at the London Stock Exchange, urged the Government to reinstate 'financial incentives' for Aim investors after last autumn's Budget revealed plans to slash inheritance tax (IHT) relief on Aim-listed stock from 100% to 50% from April next year. Aim has suffered a raft of firms quitting the market in recent years as part of a wider shift away from London towards overseas rivals and as firms are bought out by foreign competitors or taken private. More than 60 firms – with a market cap of over £12 billion – have already announced plans to leave Aim in 2025 as they look to move to the main market, delist or are bought out. As Aim celebrates its 30th anniversary on Thursday, Mr Stuttard told the PA news agency that the Government can help stop the outflow of firms on London's beleaguered market, with 'more companies leaving than joining in the last two years'. He said the cut to IHT relief was a major blow. 'One hundred per cent relief has been and used to be really important to Aim,' he said. 'We are calling on the Government to make sure there's certainty… with financial incentives to support Aim.' He also backed Government plans to increase pension fund investment in UK stocks, saying it was crucial that 'domestic investors back our domestic economy'. He told PA: 'International investors understand the quality of our small businesses – we need our own pension funds to be backing that opportunity. 'It's vital that our UK pension funds back the UK economy.' The Aim – or Alternative Investment Market – was launched in June 1995 to give small and medium-sized firms access to capital. In the 30 years since, it has admitted more than 4,000 companies and raised over £136 billion. There were about 1,700 businesses listed on Aim in 2007, but this has dwindled to fewer than 700. Some of this is down to costs of listing and onerous rules and regulations. Mr Stuttard said the group is working on a discussion paper to ask firms how Aim could change and evolve and what are the current downsides of listing on the market. He said 'nothing is off the table' in terms of what could be looked at, with the market keen to see the consensus for a way forward. He said it is clear there is still a strong need for Aim to help companies get access to capital to grow without resorting to selling. 'From start-up to initial public offering (IPO) to big global business, we want to provide companies with a range of choice of financing options so they don't get sold too early,' according to Mr Stuttard. 'Aim is a really important part of the UK economy and the UK capital markets,' he added.