Undertrial killed by inmates: What Delhi High Court has said in the past on security in courts
In 2021, when gangster Jitender Gogi was gunned down in the Rohini court complex allegedly by rivals, the Delhi High Court had initiated a public interest litigation (PIL) on suo motu cognisance. While the PIL continues to be pending before the HC, police has given repeated assurances of heightened security measures each time a shooting incident was reported from a court.
Two assailants, dressed up as lawyers, had shot at Jitender alias Gogi, who was also a high-risk prisoner, in September 2021. Gogi was being produced in court with the police. Responding to the firing, the police fired back at the assailants. The incident left Gogi and the two assailants dead.
Here is an overview of the HC's remarks in recent years on security in courts.
September 2021
A division bench of the High Court, on September 30, 2021, took suo motu cognisance of a firing incident at the Rohini court complex on September 24, 2021, with three lives lost, and recorded that 'there is an imminent and urgent need to take effective measures to ensure that such incidents do not recur' and to ensure 'safety and security' of the 'advocates, litigants, court staff, witnesses as well as the judges and judicial officers.' The court had immediately suggested interim measures such as the deployment of sufficient police personnel in all court complexes, installation of CCTVs at all strategic points for round-the-clock vigilance in district court complexes as well as the High Court complex.
Among other measures, the court suggested the installation of high-tech metal detectors and baggage scanners, provision of UVSS (Under Vehicle Surveillance System), efficient frisking mechanism, regular meetings with stakeholders concerned about the security arrangements, and specialised training for the police personnel deployed at the HC and district court complexes.
It had sought responses from a slew of stakeholders, including the Delhi government, the Ministry of Law and Justice and the Ministry of Home Affairs, Bar Council of India, the Coordination Committees of all district courts, and the Delhi High Court Bar Association, along with the bar associations of all the district courts.
Subsequently, in October 2021, the Delhi Police had told the HC that security of all seven district courts in the city was taken over by the Security Unit, a specialised unit, and that necessary security arrangements were being made, and more police personnel were being deployed. It had also told the court that it is conducting 'a detailed joint security review of all seven District Courts by seven Security Unit team headed by an Officer at the level of ACP.'
The police had also told the court that it is taking several measures such as deployment of a higher number of security police personnel for access control in all the Courts with extra support by the Central Paramilitary Forces ('CPMF'), apart from measures such as installing different security gadgets such as door frame and hand-held metal detectors, X-ray scanners, CCTVs etc.
In November 2021, the HC had issued directions to the Delhi Police Commissioner to constitute a team of experts to undertake a security audit of complexes of the High Court as well as all the district courts, which would factor in the various factors peculiar to each of the complexes. Based on the audit, the Delhi police chief was also directed to undertake a 'periodical review' of the security arrangements.
The November 24, 2021, order further records that concerning high-risk Under Trial Prisoners (UTPs), 'as far as possible, their appearance may be secured through virtual mode. Wherever or whenever there is a necessity to produce such UTPs, physically abundant care and precautions shall be taken in terms of providing adequate police escort and checking/frisking etc,' adding that 'the directions shall be scrupulously followed by all concerned'.
April 2023
In April 2023, another shooting took place at the Saket District Court complex, where an advocate had shot at a woman and injured her. Taking note of the incident, on April 26, 2023, the HC recorded that 'security personnel deployed in various court premises, including the High Court, are facing some resistance in the matter of frisking and checking of cars.'
The court had then suggested that joint meetings be held between bar associations and senior police officers while counsels for the Delhi government and the union government had assured the court that they would ensure 'proper security arrangements are in place to avoid any such incident in the future.'
July 2023
On July 5, 2023, another firing incident between two groups of lawyers took place at the Tis Hazari court complex.
Taking note of the incident, Delhi Police's Sandeep Byala, DCP, Security Courts, had told HC that frisking of lawyers and litigants and those who are entering the court building is 'being rigorously done in all the court complexes' and at the time, Byala had told HC that the Delhi Police 'is beefing up the security arrangements in all the Court complexes, including the High court of Delhi.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Chhattisgarh HC denies bail to accused in Rs 411 crore 'Hamar-Lab' scam
RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the first bail application of Shashank Chopda, an accused in the alleged Rs 411 crore 'Hamar-Lab' scam. The case, registered by the Economic Offences Wing/Anti-Corruption Bureau (EOW/ACB), Raipur, involves charges under Sections 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code, along with Sections 13(1)(A), 13(2), and 7(C) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha, after hearing arguments from both sides, stated that economic offences are more serious than conventional crimes as they impact the entire economy and pose a grave threat to the country's financial health. The prosecution's case centres on alleged irregularities in the "Hamar-Lab" scheme, launched in 2021 by the Public Health and Family Welfare Department. The scheme aimed to procure essential medical equipment and machines through the Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd (CGMSCL). The FIR alleged that officials from the Directorate of Health Services and CGMSCL placed disproportionate orders without proper budget evaluation or administrative approval, causing a loss of approximately Rs 411 crore to the state exchequer. Senior counsels Siddharth Mridul and Ajay Mishra, appearing for Chopda, argued that their client had no role in the alleged offence and was merely a bidder. They claimed that Chopda's company incurred a loss of Rs 351 crore and was being made a "scapegoat" to evade payment liabilities. They further contended that the EOW/ACB investigation was selective, as no govt officials were questioned or arrested until directed by the High Court. The defence also maintained that there was no risk of evidence tampering since all documents were submitted online and electronic devices, including mobile phones and computers, were already seized. Bail was sought on grounds of parity, citing a Supreme Court stay on the arrest of co-accused Rajesh Gupta in the same case. Dr Sourabh Kumar Pande, Deputy Advocate General for the state, opposed the bail plea, stating that CGMSCL purchased reagents without following due procedures or assessing actual requirements. He alleged that the specifications for medical equipment were "tailor-made" to favour a particular company, resulting in substantial losses. Pande described Chopda as the "mastermind" behind the cartel who influenced govt officials. The Deputy Advocate General also informed the court that five other co-accused, including public servants and CGMSCL officials, were arrested. He expressed concern that if granted bail, Chopda might tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. The High Court observed that economic offences, involving deep-rooted conspiracies and significant losses to public funds, must be treated seriously. It cited Supreme Court judgments emphasising that such crimes impact the national economy and erode public confidence in the financial system. Chief Justice Sinha noted that while a chargesheet was filed against Chopda, the investigation against other accused persons, including govt officials, was ongoing. He stated that the applicant appeared to be a "direct beneficiary" of the crime and could not be equated with co-accused Rajesh Gupta. The court also highlighted that the equipment supplied by Chopda's firm involved "closed system" technology, which would necessitate future procurement of reagents exclusively from his company, potentially leading to a monopoly and depriving the public of access to pathological tests. The court concluded that granting bail at this stage would "embolden corrupt practices" and undermine public trust in the justice delivery system. Chopda, representing Mokshit Corporation, faces several specific allegations, including procuring EDTA tubes (used for blood sample collection) from Mokshit Corporation at an inflated price of Rs 2,352 per piece, while other institutions procured them for a maximum of Rs 8.50. This was later clarified as a typographical error, with the actual price being Rs 23.52 per piece. He is also accused of purchasing reagents worth Rs 300 crore to prevent the expiry of chemicals held by Mokshit Corporation and supplying CBC machines at Rs 17 lakh per unit—significantly higher than the market price of Rs 5 lakh—after Mokshit Corporation was declared L-1 in the tender process. Additionally, he is alleged to have conspired with other firms such as Recorders and Medicare Systems and Shri Sharda Industries to generate illicit profits.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Photojournalist dies after brutal Melbourne assault by released immigration detainee
Dominic O'Brien, a veteran photojournalist, has died after an alleged assault in Footscray. Lominja Friday Yokoju, the suspect, was arrested. Yokoju was initially charged with intentionally causing serious injury. Following O'Brien's death, police are reviewing the charges. The incident has sparked public and political criticism regarding immigration detainee releases. Maribyrnong Council plans to improve safety in Footscray. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The suspect The veteran photojournalist Dominic O' Brien Police investigation Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Veteran photojournalist Dominic O'Brien, 62, has died in hospital, six days after being allegedly assaulted in Footscray on Sunday, June 15. The incident occurred just before 10 am at the intersection of Nicholson and Paisley Streets in an outdoor shopping mall, where O'Brien was reportedly approached by 43‑year‑old Lominja Friday Yokoju Yokoju, a former immigration detainee on a bridging visa and part of the 'NZYQ cohort' released after a High Court ruling in late 2023, was arrested at the scene. He was initially charged with intentionally causing serious injury. Witnesses allege Yokoju struck and stomped on O'Brien's head during the O'Brien, a renowned photographer for major outlets including The Age , The Australian, Getty Images, AAP, and Reuters, was a well‑respected figure in photojournalism and known for his work with Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. Colleagues described him as a 'talented storyteller' who embraced both analogue and digital photography O'Brien's death on Saturday morning, June 21, police confirmed they are reviewing the existing charges and may upgrade them pending the outcome of the post‑ remains in custody and is scheduled to face the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on October 20, 2025, for a committal incident has led to widespread public and political backlash. Figures such as Andrew Hastie and Brad Battin have criticized the government's handling of immigration detainee releases, while the Maribyrnong Council has pledged to bolster safety in Footscray.
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
Sex harassment FIR lodged against sports head, HC told
Mumbai: The state on Friday informed Bombay high court that Kherwadi police station, Bandra East, registered an FIR against the president of a sports body on a complaint of sexual harassment by a woman athlete. The FIR followed Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Neela Gokhale's direction on Wednesday to the police-in-charge to record her statement and "take appropriate action in accordance with the law, including registration of FIR, against Mr... and others found involved, if a cognisable offence is made out against them". The state's advocate, Vishal Thadani, informed that an FIR was registered on Thursday. The HC was hearing a petition by Mixed Martial Arts India to direct the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) to grant it recognition. Since the IOA granted recognition to the Mixed Martial Arts Sports Federation of India, the Asian Mixed Martial Arts Association recognised only it. In these circumstances, the petitioner's athletes are unable to participate in the first Asian Youth Championship in Bahrain between June 25 and 28. The rival federation submitted documents, including screenshots of Instagram texts between the petitioner's president and an athlete. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "A plain reading of the messages demonstrates sexual overtures being made by Mr... to the said woman athlete," the judges noted. They noticed a woman crying in court. Federation advocate Adil Parsurampuria said she was "the athlete concerned". The judges said "she had a story to tell. The woman athlete informed us she was being sexually harassed and suffered great anguish at the hands of Mr... She was compelled to reply to his Instagram and WhatsApp messages, and if she refused, she was threatened she would not be permitted to participate in any sport..." The woman complained to various authorities with proof of harassment, "but her every attempt was thwarted, and she was left to run from pillar to post for redressal of her grievance". The judges were "shocked" to hear her statements, adding it is "extremely unfortunate" that neither the petitioner, federation or IOA stood by the woman nor have taken steps "to provide succour to her". The petitioner's advocate, Abhishek Upadhyay, said the president shall "step down from his position". "We accept the said statement as an undertaking given to this court," the judges said. To the judge's query, advocates Sanjeev Sawant and Heramb Kadam informed that IOA has a POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment) committee in place, and if a complaint is received, it would take action. Parsurampuria said in national interest, the federation shall select 5 athletes of the petitioner to participate in the championship. On Friday, judges refused to expunge observations against the president.
