Black church leaders pressure companies over Trump's anti-DEI push

Black church leaders are ramping up the pressure on corporate America as companies continue to roll back their diversity, equity and inclusion policies, trying to serve as a counterbalance to President Donald Trump's aggressive push to end DEI initiatives across the country.
The pressure comes as liberals are still trying to figure out how to respond to Trump's culture war — and as the Democratic Party grapples with Trump's improvement among Black and Latino voters in the 2024 election.
'Diversity, equity and inclusion is not charity. It's not a handout and the African American community is a valuable partner,' said Jamal Bryant, a Georgia-based pastor who masterminded a boycott of Target after the retailer curtailed its DEI initiatives in January. 'So we want to know: If you can take our dollars, how come you won't stand with us?'
Shortly after Trump's election, major companies like Meta and Google rolled back their DEI commitments made in the wake of the 2020 murder of George Floyd by former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. Within his first week of returning to office, Trump signed an executive order eliminating DEI practices in the federal workplace. He called such programs 'dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race- and sex-based preferences.'
'President Trump is bringing back common sense by eliminating DEI policies and making merit the standard once again,' White House Assistant Press Secretary Liz Huston said in a statement. 'Performance-driven companies see the value in President Trump's policies and are following his lead.'
But Black church leaders see these boycotts — Bryant announced in May that Dollar General would be the next target — as a way to push back against the Trump-fueled wave and hold companies accountable.
Bryant says his movement has garnered the support of 2,000 other churches and over 200,000 people signed his pledge to boycott Target.
Frederick Haynes, the pastor of the 13,000-member Friendship-West Baptist Church in Dallas, said joining the movement reflected how he was raised, influenced by the values of the Civil Rights Movement. Companies, he said, must recognize that they have 'a moral responsibility' to profiting.
'They have a responsibility to morally go inward and check themselves and recognize that you don't have a United States without diversity, without equity, without being inclusive,' Haynes said.
In a statement to POLITICO, Dollar General said 'our mission is not 'Serving Some Others' — it is simply 'Serving Others.'' The company added that it serves millions of Americans 'from all backgrounds and walks of life' in more than 20,500 stores. 'As we have since our founding, we continuously evolve our programs in support of the long-term interests of all stakeholders.'
Rev. Al Sharpton — the civil rights leader who supported Bryant's Target boycott — said the company boycotts are one of the most effective ways to push back against the rollback.
'The success of the Montgomery boycott is that it changed the law,' said Sharpton, founder and president of the National Action Network, referencing the famous mid-1950s bus boycott to protest segregation. 'We can't just do things as a grievance, we must go for their bottom line.'
It is hard to tell exactly how much boycotts are hurting companies' bottom lines. But Target's CEO Brian Cornell in May acknowledged that at least some of its sales drop, including a quarterly sales decrease by 2.8 percent, was due to 'headwinds' including 'the reaction to the updates we shared on Belonging in January,' referring to the company's announcement to end their DEI programs, along with consumer confidence and concerns around tariffs.
A spokesperson for Target told POLITICO that the company is 'absolutely dedicated to fostering inclusivity for everyone — our team members, our guests and our supply partners.'
'Today, we are proud of the progress we've made since 2020 and believe it has allowed us to better serve the needs of our customers,' the spokesperson said in a statement.
But Sharpton said the boycott is still a powerful tool.
'The power the Black church has is that the people that attend church are your major consumers,' said Sharpton. 'You go to a Black church that has 2,000 people and 1,900 of them are the ones that shop.'
Sharpton has his own demonstration planned for this summer — a rally on Wall Street on Aug. 28, the 62nd anniversary of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom where Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. gave his renowned 'I Have a Dream' speech. Sharpton said he chose the date for the rally on Wall Street intentionally.
'I wanted this year to show the pressure that we're putting on these companies with DEI, to go right to the bastion of industry and right where the stock exchange is and say to them that if you do not want to have diversity — in your boardroom, with your contracts and your employment — then you will not have diversity in your consumer base,' said Sharpton.
But the boycotts do present challenges for church leaders. In some cases, Sharpton said, congregants have forgotten the boycotts are still on — and he says Trump is in part to blame for this.
'One of the things that I learned during the Civil Rights Movement from [Rev. Jesse Jackson] and others is, you have to keep people's attention,' said Sharpton. 'But there's so much going on now, Trump and them are so good at flooding the zone. You've got to make sure people don't forget, 'I'm not supposed to be shopping at that store.' Keeping public attention is a challenge.'
But even with congregants who are engaged in the battle to retain diversity commitments across the country, Adam Clark, associate professor of theology at Xavier University, said the church cannot carry the burden alone, especially when the president has taken a stance.
'The attack on DEI is so much broader than the specific companies,' said Clark. 'Trump is the culmination of all this type of white aggression against DEI. He has the authority to implement what's been going on in certain parts of the country and he makes it federal law, and I don't think the church by itself has the capacity to just overturn everything that's happening.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Chicago Tribune

11 minutes ago

• Chicago Tribune

Appeals court lets President Donald Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES — An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965. In its decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard. It said that while presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters. 'The undisputed facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard, protesters 'pinned down' several federal officers and threw 'concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects' at the officers. Protesters also damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at least one federal building. And a federal van was attacked by protesters who smashed in the van's windows,' the court wrote. 'The federal government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant.' It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalizing the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president's order. Trump celebrated the decision on his Truth Social platform, calling it a 'BIG WIN.' He wrote that 'all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done.' Newsom issued a statement that expressed disappointment that the court is allowing Trump to retain control of the Guard. But he also welcomed one aspect of the decision. 'The court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court,' Newsom said. 'The President is not a king and is not above the law. We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens.' The court case could have wider implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritize deportations from other Democratic-run cities. Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The protests have since appeared to be winding down. Two judges on the appeals panel were appointed by Trump during his first term. During oral arguments Tuesday, all three judges suggested that presidents have wide latitude under the federal law at issue and that courts should be reluctant to step in. The case started when Newsom sued to block Trump's command, and he won an early victory from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which he said only allows presidents can take control during times of 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion.' 'The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'' wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can't second guess the president's decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court. The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.

Wall Street Journal

18 minutes ago

• Wall Street Journal

Oil Futures Diverge on U.S. Holiday Price Lag, Contract Expiration

Oil prices were mixed in European afternoon trade on Friday, with Brent crude down more than 2% to around $77 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate edging 0.7% higher to $74 a barrel. Brent futures fell after President Trump set a two-week deadline to decide whether the U.S. will strike Iran, easing fears of an imminent military intervention. The international oil benchmark had settled 2.8% higher on Thursday at $78.85, its highest close since January.

Yahoo

19 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Trump Gives Netanyahu Green Light to Continue His Reckless Wars

President Trump took time on Wednesday to reaffirm his unwavering support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wars. 'I said, 'Keep going.' What do I say?' Trump said when asked about his recent conversations with Netanyahu. 'I speak to him every day. He's a good man … been very unfairly treated by his country, I think. Very unfairly.' 'Have you given him any indication that you may seek to aid them more than you have already?' a reporter asked. 'No.' At this point in the Israel-Iran conflict, the U.S. has offered Israel intelligence and helped shoot Iranian missiles out of the air. Trump has also left the door open for further U.S. military intervention, a development that would make Netanyahu's job that much easier. Trump doesn't seem willing to budge on his support for Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran under the guise of some potential nuclear threat, even as many in his own base oppose it in the name of 'America First.' If anything, this war offers Netanyahu some temporary reprieve from attention on his genocide in Gaza. If Trump believes Netanyahu is being treated unfairly even as he commits genocide in Gaza and provokes all-out war with Iran, all while failing to both eliminate Hamas and free all the Israeli hostages, then Trump is even more blindly committed to the prime minister than initially feared.