FEMA head should know about hurricane season, right?
Welcome to the Trump administration, where a person like Richardson who has no experience in emergency management can ascend to the top job at FEMA by checking President Donald Trump's three key boxes: white, male and radically unqualified.
How has the head of FEMA never heard of hurricane season?
Richardson's apparent lack of basic meteorological knowledge brings into question his ability to do his job, given that hurricane season, which is, in fact, real, started June 1 and lasts through the end of November.
How is it possible that a fully grown, human American has never heard of hurricane season? There's a Jimmy Buffett song titled "Trying to Reason with Hurricane Season," for Pete's sake.
Opinion: Sen. Joni Ernst helps GOP find its authentic voice: 'We all are going to die.'
As news of Richardson's comment spread, the Department of Homeland Security released a statement claiming it was "a joke." That doesn't help much because: a) If it was a joke, it was a very dumb joke, Dave!; and b) It probably wasn't a joke, since Richardson seems like the type who would proudly conclude, "Hurricanes can't hurt us if we don't believe in them!"
The truth, I'd posit, is closer to this: The entire Trump administration is a joke and Americans are the punchline.
Hurricane season is here, and FEMA doesn't have a disaster plan
On May 15, the Wall Street Journal reported on video of a FEMA meeting it obtained. The video made it clear then that with two weeks to go before hurricane season started, the new FEMA chief had yet to come up with a disaster-response plan, and the paper reported: "He also seemed to express surprise at the vast range of FEMA's responsibilities, raising concerns among career officials about his ability to run the nation's disaster-management agency."
In the video, Richardson said: "I feel a little bit like Bubba from 'Forrest Gump.' We've got hurricanes, we've got fires, we've got mudslides, we've got flash floods, we've got tornadoes, we've got droughts, we've got heat waves and now we've got volcanoes to worry about."
North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein: FEMA is broken as we brace for a new hurricane season | Opinion
Hoo boy. If you live anywhere near an ocean, I recommend moving to the Midwest for the season.
FEMA is expected to do the same as last year despite massive cuts
So remember, two weeks ago, there was no FEMA disaster plan for hurricane season. How about now?
Per the Wall Street Journal on June 3: "Richardson told staff Monday that the agency would be returning to the same guidance for hurricane response as last year. Some were confused how that would be possible, given the agency had already eliminated key programs and sharply cut its workforce."
According to Journal sources, Richardson said: "Here's the guidance. It's the same as it was last year."
Cool. So, President Trump, who spends most of his time claiming President Joe Biden was senile and incompetent, will now just allow his FEMA head to use the plan created under the Biden administration. Cool, cool, cool.
Opinion: Manufacturing down, food expensive and ICE is deporting moms. Happy now, MAGA?
It seems FEMA's best hurricane season advice might be: Pray harder
But there's a catch. Thanks to the Trump administration cuts, according to the New York Times, "FEMA has lost about a quarter of its full-time staff, including one-fifth of the coordinating officers who manage responses to large-scale disasters."
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store.
So the whole "Just do what you did last year when hurricanes hit" idea sounds about as smart as telling people who live near the water to just lash themselves to the nearest street lamp and pray really hard.
Which, if we're being honest, sounds about right for an administration that has a U.S. Health and Human Services secretary who guzzles raw milk, an education head who confuses AI with A1 steak sauce and a FEMA chief who wouldn't know a hurricane if it blew him off his wholly undeserved government perch.
Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @rexhuppke.bsky.social and on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
US strikes three Iranian nuclear sites
Iran's state-run IRNA news agency, quoting a provincial official, confirmed attacks on Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. The decision to directly involve the US in the war comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. US and Israeli officials have said that American stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound (13,500-kg) bunker buster bomb they alone can carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily-fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear programme buried deep underground. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Mr Trump said in a post on social media. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home.' Mr Trump added in a later post that he would address the national audience at 10pm eastern time, writing: 'This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!' Trump said B-2 stealth bombers were used but did not specify which types of bombs were dropped. The White House and Pentagon did not immediately elaborate on the operation. The strikes are a perilous decision for the US as Iran has pledged to retaliate if it joined the Israeli assault, and for Mr Trump personally, having won the White House on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism. Trump told reporters on Friday that he was not interested in sending ground forces into Iran, saying it's 'the last thing you want to do.' He had previously indicated that he would make a final choice over the course of two weeks, a timeline that seemed drawn out as the situation was evolving quickly. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned the United States on Wednesday that strikes targeting the Islamic Republic will 'result in irreparable damage for them'. Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei declared 'any American intervention would be a recipe for an all-out war in the region'. Trump has vowed that he would not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon and he had initially hoped that the threat of force would bring the country's leaders to give up its nuclear program peacefully. Israel 's military said Saturday it was preparing for the possibility of a lengthy war, while Iran's foreign minister warned before the U.S. attack that American military involvement 'would be very, very dangerous for everyone.' The prospect of a wider war threatened, too. Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen said they would resume attacks on U.S. vessels in the Red Sea if the Trump administration joins Israel's military campaign. The Houthis paused such attacks in May under a deal with the US. The US ambassador to Israel announced the US had begun 'assisted departure flights,' the first from Israel since the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, that sparked the war in Gaza. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at Thursday's press briefing that Trump had said: 'I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' Instead, the U.S. president struck just two days later. Trump appears to have made the calculation — at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republican lawmakers — that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear program, perhaps permanently. The Israelis say their offensive has already crippled Iran's air defences, allowing them to already significantly degrade multiple Iranian nuclear sites. But to destroy the Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, Israel appealed to Trump for US bunker-busting bomb, which uses its weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets and then explode. The penetrator is currently only delivered by the B-2 stealth bomber, which is only found in the American arsenal. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, and is believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. The International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, raising the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. Previous Israeli strikes at another Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, on a centrifuge site have caused contamination only at the site itself, not the surrounding area, the IAEA has said. Mr Trump's decision for direct US military intervention comes after his administration made an unsuccessful two-month push — including with high-level, direct negotiations with the Iranians — aimed at persuading Tehran to curb its nuclear programme. For months, Mr Trump said he was dedicated to a diplomatic push to persuade Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions. And he twice — in April and again in late May — persuaded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on military action against Iran and give diplomacy more time. The US in recent days has been shifting military aircraft and warships into and around the Middle East to protect Israel and US bases from Iranian attacks. All the while, Mr Trump has gone from publicly expressing hope that the moment could be a 'second chance' for Iran to make a deal to delivering explicit threats on Mr Khamenei and making calls for Tehran's unconditional surrender. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' Mr Trump said in a social media posting. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' The military showdown with Iran comes seven years after Mr Trump withdrew the US from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever'. The 2015 deal, signed by Iran, US and other world powers, created a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Mr Trump decried the Obama-era deal for giving Iran too much in return for too little, because the agreement did not cover Iran's non-nuclear malign behaviour. Mr Trump has bristled at criticism from some of his Maga faithful, including conservative pundit Tucker Carlson, who have suggested that further US involvement would be a betrayal to supporters who were drawn to his promise to end US involvement in expensive and endless wars.
NBC News
41 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump calls strikes on Iran a 'complete and total success'
Moderator of "Meet the Press" Kristen Welker shares details of her phone conversation with President Trump after he ordered strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran, reportedly calling it a "great success."
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
As Trump strikes Iran, the US - which launched Iran's nuclear programme - now seeks to end it
So the country which launched Iran's nuclear programme is now the country seeking to end it. Seven decades after President Eisenhower and the Shah cooperated on the Atoms for Peace programme, President Trump is at war with Iran, insisting not doing so risks global security. Unfortunately, for the region and the world, by doing so he risks exactly the same thing. Trump gave diplomacy a two week deadline, that deadline lasted less than two days. With Trump's demands for an 'unconditional surrender' ignored by the Islamic leadership, it fell to the B2 bombers of the United States Air Force to try and destroy Iran's nuclear assets, taking over where Israel failed. The consequences are likely to stretch far beyond their targets. Iran says any form of US military intervention will be met with 'irreparable harm'. 'This nation will never surrender to imposition from anyone,' the Ayatollah has already warned. American bases in the region are likely to be the first to be targeted. The assets in Iraq are likely to be particularly hard hit by in country Shia militia loyal to Iran. It is likely Iran's other proxies, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen may also enter the fray. Though significantly weakened by a structural decapitation by Israel over the past 18 months, Hezbollah do still have the weapons to strike Israel. The Houthis have the power to strike Israel and ships in the Red Sea. They have form for both and could step up their actions. A easy target would be the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow shipping lane between Iran and Oman. Around a quarter of global oil supplies and a third of liquified natural gas production moves though that stretch. So too thousands of containers ships. You don't need to be an expert in trade or economics to work out the knock-on effect of Iran effectively closing it. And let's not forget global terrorism would be another weapon in Iran's arsenal. All that is before we even consider the other objective, regime change. The regional destabilisation that would trigger would destroy that 'golden age' vision Trump spoke of on his recent Middle East trade tour. Then he eulogised a region defined by commerce not chaos. His own actions may render his words worthless. Without doubt his allies in the Gulf have sought his ear over these past weeks, desperate to avoid such a scenario. It seems even their bank balances have not been enough to reign in their erstwhile ally or weaken the seemingly unbreakable alliance with Israel. Iran in its current form may not be the neighbour the Gulf states would chose but it is better than a chaos of a power vacuum. By taking action President Trump may hope he can bring this conflict to a speedier end. He may yet discover, like so many before, the dreadful dangers of a Middle Eastern war. They take political lives as well as civilian ones.
