Push for school curriculum changes to improve First Nations history literacy

When Jegan Sivanesan's nieces began asking him about First Nation's history, he didn't know how to respond.
"They would have NAIDOC week [at school], they'd have questions, not really being able to answer a lot of questions was confronting," he said.
The first-generation immigrant from Sri Lanka grew up in the northern Victorian town of Mooroopna, but said his schooling barely scratched the surface of Australia's pre-colonial history.
"What we did learn was about the First Fleet and a bit about the Stolen Generations but nothing that really went in depth, which was challenging," Mr Sivanesan said.
Bombarded with questions from his son as well as his nieces, Mr Sivanesan decided to fill his gap in historical knowledge through further reading and attending the Yoorrook Justice Commission's public hearings.
"It was an opportunity to talk about things that I've felt for a while, to be able to bring up that our education system needs to be really reformed so that our next generations can learn about these things," he said.
Mr Sivanesan is not alone in his experience, with others raising the issue in submissions made to the Yoorrook Justice Commission.
Yoorrook is the first Australian truth-telling process of its kind, led and designed by First Peoples, with the powers of a royal commission.
The inquiry is piecing together Victoria's true history, by listening to the experiences of First Peoples through an inquiry focusing on injustices within health, education, country, criminal justice and child protection.
Multiple witnesses have told Yoorrook that settlements were illegally established outside of the boundary set by the Crown, in areas across Victoria in the 1830s, including the Henty brothers' settlement of the area now known as Portland.
It also heard from researchers involved in mapping the 49 known massacres in Victoria in which 1,045 Aboriginal people were killed.
A report is due to be handed down in June and is expected to include recommendations to modify the school curriculum to include the inquiry's findings.
Mr Sivenasan was one of dozens of Victorians who made a submission to the inquiry.
As was Our Lady of Sion Sister Denise Cusack, who said she learnt almost nothing about First Nations history during her schooling, only becoming aware of it as an adult.
"We would have known growing up that the Aboriginal people were here in this country but nowhere near the awareness of their sovereignty, what happened to them, what happened to the country," she said.
"I realised much, much later on that there was a tangible grief in the country, that people carried, they weren't setting out to put all this on us.
"But there's something in the country, I think, that carries that grief."
Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan was the first Australian leader of a state or territory government to appear before an Indigenous-led truth telling inquiry last month.
Ms Allan said she was distressed and ashamed to learn of the brutality involved in massacres of Aboriginal people on Dja Dja Wurrung country, where she lives in Central Victoria.
She said her government was committed to ensuring Yoorrook's findings on Victoria's full history was better taught at schools.
"Growing up and living as I have all my life, in Central Victoria, on Dja Dja Wurrung country, I did not know about the massacres that occurred so close to home," Ms Allan said.
"That was the area that was particularly concerning to me that I hadn't learnt of that, the depth and the extent of the brutality that went on as part of that.
"What I see as the legacy of this part [Yoorrook] of the process is to be the writing of the fundamental truth of the history of our state, for that truth to be told in classrooms across the state."
Yoorrook Chair Aunty Eleanor Bourke said in a speech at the Melbourne Press Club earlier this month that Yoorrook was expected to make more than 100 recommendations based on the evidence coming before the Commission.
"These recommendations include significant reforms to broken systems, and a range of practical solutions to problems the government can implement now," she said.
"Yoorrook also wants to see improvements to education, such as the way history and other subjects are taught in school.
"This includes better teaching methods for First People's students and for all children to be educated as to the true history of the settlement of Victoria and its impacts on First Peoples."
Professor Bourke said learning about the past from First Peoples' perspective would allow students to better understand how the past connects with the present.
She said the history taught in schools was different to the history experienced by First Peoples and that the people behind the massacres and the removal of children from their families were remembered as founding fathers, pioneers and heroes.
"They were cogs in the colonial machine, which was charging full steam ahead, leaving a wake of death and human devastation behind," Professor Bourke said.
"Yoorrook's goal has never been to encourage shame or guilt. Instead, listen and learn, open your heart and your mind to our story.
Last week, the Yoorrook Justice Commission began its Walk for Truth, inviting the public to join them throughout the journey from Portland on Gunditjmara country, where colonisation began, to Parliament House in Melbourne.
The walk will mark the commission's report being handed down to Parliament.
Victorian Year 10 student and Yorta Yorta Bundjalung Wiradjuri woman Gymea said throughout her 11 years of schooling, there were only two pages within a textbook that addressed Indigenous culture, condensing information about Captain Cook, protests, NAIDOC week and Australia Day into just a few classes.
Gymea even approached her school's Vice Principal, who spoke with the Head of Humanities, who then contacted the publisher of the history textbook about the lack of First Nations history content.
"I don't think that Aboriginal history is taught enough at school because there are so many other things to our history like we have different clans, different tribes, different languages … and people don't know that," she said.
Gymea said she learnt about Aboriginal history through her family and many of her peers asked her directly about her culture.
"There is more to what happened in our history, I feel like people are living too much in the past," she said.
"They're living too much in the protesting of what happened to Indigenous people instead of embracing our culture more and putting it out there more."
Deakin University NIKERI Institute lecturer and Dja Dja Wurrung man Aleryk Fricker said the Victorian school curriculum and the teaching of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander history was inadequate.
He said the commission's report would likely highlight the deficiencies present within curriculums across the country for decades.
"It's often quite bitsy, it's inconsistent, and there's no real scope of sequence of engagement," Dr Fricker said.
"One of the ways that we can address this is to support teachers to be able to deliver quality content better.
"This involves professional learning and involves the provision of quality resources."
For the curriculum to change Dr Fricker said recommendations would need to be passed through to the Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority which will liaise with the Department of Education before it's reviewed by the national curriculum body, the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.
He said the challenge in modifying the curriculum was that the content could not be standardised as First Nations history differed across Victoria.
Dr Fricker said reform was needed across early childhood, primary and secondary education.
"We need to recognise that Indigenous content goes across every single discipline area. Literacy was not invented when the Europeans arrived, nor was mathematics, nor was science, nor was geography.
"These are all discipline areas that have had Indigenous knowledge as a part of them for millennia and these need to be featured centrally in all of these different discipline areas."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News.com.au

35 minutes ago

• News.com.au

‘Should not be punished': Queensland decries GST carve up

Cash-strapped state governments are looking west with envy as Western Australia pulls in its large slice of the GST carve up despite the healthiest books in the country. Resource-rich WA posted a $2.5bn operating surplus on Thursday – it's seventh budget surplus in a row. From Friday it is set to receive its share of the GST pool of 75 cents in the dollar, despite its strong revenue stream from its resources sector. State premiers and treasurers have been agitating for changes to the GST distribution, since the final figures were announced in March, and ahead of the funds formally being dished out on Friday. WA is still enjoying the windfalls of a 2018 GST deal struck under previous Coalition government by then-treasurer Scott Morrison and backed in by the Albanese government, where WA is guaranteed 75 cents of every dollar paid in GST. Without this benchmark, WA would have received as little as 18 cents back. The WA Premier and Treasurer credited their economic management for this week's operating surplus and healthy debt forecasts. Iron ore prices are hovering at $US95 while the state government has done its forecasting with an expectation of $US72 a tonne. But every state and territory except WA has been posting deficits since the 75 cent distribution reforms in 2018. The Queensland Treasurer feels short-changed, as strong coal royalties pad the state coffers. Victoria and NSW's slices of the GST pie are set to expand while Queensland's portion gets a trim. 'This money belongs to Queenslanders and we should not be punished because of our support for industries that underpin our national wealth,' state Treasurer David Janetzki said. The impending Queensland state budget, to be delivered on Tuesday, will show the effects of a dip in coal prices after an $8.8bn royalties windfall during the past four years. Despite the Sunshine State's royalty take coming down, Queensland's GST payout this year falls by $1.1bn to $16.5bn. In a speech to the National Press Club on Wednesday, federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has historically opposed raising the GST rate, left the door slightly open to raising it from 10 per cent – the amount the excise has remained for the past 25 years. 'I've, for a decade or more, had a view about the GST,' he told The Conversation. 'I repeated that view at the Press Club because I thought that was the honest thing to do, but what I'm going to genuinely try and do, whether it's in this policy area or in other policy areas, is to not limit what people might bring to the table.' This year, Queensland is the only state or territory getting less than previous years, while every other jurisdiction is getting more. Victoria is set to become a net-recipient of the GST pool for the first time as well. 'It used to be the case that our friends in Victoria would help us shoulder the burden in supporting all the other states,' NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said last month. 'Victoria is now a recipient state, to quite a large degree, $1.07 (per dollar taxed) is what they're getting. 'I'm going to continue to speak out, particularly about the fact that NSW is now carrying the federation when it comes to GST distribution.' The Northern Territory receives $5.15 for every dollar it contributes, far and away the largest return. Despite having the second largest population, Victoria receives the largest portion of the total pool, getting 27.5 per cent; with a $3.6bn year-on-year increase this time around.

SBS Australia

42 minutes ago

• SBS Australia

Australia's social media ban is approaching, but questions remain over whether it will work

April Willis says young people need a seat at the table for figuring out how to implement the teen social media ban. Source: SBS News / Ash Minchin Like many, April Willis has been using social media since her early teens. As she grew up on the platforms, she says she didn't immediately understand the impact it was having on her. She says that in hindsight, though, she can see that a lot of her "behaviours" and "the content and interactions" she had on social media platforms were "definitely not great" for her mental health. But the now 22-year-old ReachOut youth advocate says she doesn't think a ban would have stopped her. "I think the hard truth is that a lot of us are thinking, 'I would've found a way around it', as I'm sure many young people will." Whether she actually would have is one of the many questions experts are wondering six months out from the implementation of Australia's social media ban for those under the age of 16. And as of 11 December this year, social media companies will be required to take "reasonable steps" to prevent Australian children and teenagers under 16 from using their platforms. A government-commissioned trial into the potential technologies used to assess the ages of users presented their preliminary findings on Friday. Their key finding was that "age assurance can be done in Australia and can be private, robust and effective". "The preliminary findings indicate that there are no significant technological barriers preventing the deployment of effective age assurance systems in Australia," project director Tony Allen said in a statement. "These solutions are technically feasible, can be integrated flexibly into existing services, and can support the safety and rights of children online." With details about the accuracy of the technologies tested left for later release, experts are wary of the trial's initial claim. Daniel Angus is a professor of digital communication at the Queensland University of Technology and the director of its Digital Media Research Centre. "One of the key concerns that we have is how the industry often will inflate their accuracy and the utility of these approaches when we know that there are still significant issues when it comes to both gender and also racial biases, but also the general lack of efficacy of these approaches," he said. According to the Department of Communications, a government-commissioned report from the Social Research Centre found nearly nine in 10 adults were supportive of age assurance measures. Only two of those 10 had heard of at least one potential method to check a person's age online. 'This research shows Australians widely support our world-leading age restrictions on social media for under 16s and have strong expectations of platforms when it comes to data protection and security," Communications Minister Anika Wells said in a statement. Angus says the general public has not been adequately informed about the likely impacts of these technologies. "I think Australians are in for a very rude shock when this actually perhaps, gets implemented, and they all of a sudden are being forced to hand over [their] data to access services that they've freely been able to access up to this point," he said. "It's absolutely everything you would expect to find in the midst of a moral panic where people have been sucked along with this idea that, 'Yeah, this thing is really, really bad and we need to prevent it,' but have not stopped to think critically about this, and then not been properly informed about the fullness of that risk." John Pane, chair of digital rights organisation Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA), is a member of the stakeholder advisory board for the trial. He says the EFA has "concerns about the rollout of this technology because it's not simply about restricting access to social media platforms for children 15 and under". "It requires all adults who participate in the online environment, who wish to access social media platforms to either have their age authenticated or establish their identity as a means of, or part of that age authentication. "So from our perspective, it's the Trojan horse for getting people to get used to providing more and more credentials online." Amid these concerns, some remain supportive of the ban, including Kirra Pendergast, another member of the stakeholder advisory board. "Initially, I was only against the ban purely because of the technical workarounds that are possible for some kids who are more technical than others," she said. "But after having lots of conversations with parents in particular, it became abundantly clear that the ban was making parents have a conversation that we've needed to have for a very, very long time." Pendergast is the founder of Safe on Social, an online safety advisory group for schools and businesses, and chief digital safety strategist at the global Ctrl+Shft Coalition. "I get contacted almost every single day by parents that are struggling with this," the cybersecurity expert said. "They don't know how to say no." Pendergast said parents and educators would have "a lot more time to get it right". "It's like all aspects of technical security, cybersecurity, and cyber safety. It's never ever going to be 100 per cent. This is never going to be the silver bullet. "It's a really, really good start because, again, it sparked all of the conversations that we needed to have at every level of society." Professor Tama Leaver, an internet studies academic at Curtin University and the chief investigator in the ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child, says the ban responds to a "very real fear that parents have that social media is an unknown space". "If this is world-leading, we need to be quite clear on what the legislation is actually doing." He warned that the implementation of the policy may not address all the issues that have been discussed. "Some harms, for example, such as cyberbullying, were very much touted as one of the big problems to be solved," he said. "There is nothing in this legislation that addresses cyberbullying meaningfully at all. "This at best addresses algorithmic amplification … of young people's experiences of social media, but … we expect from what's been said already that most messaging apps are exempt from this legislation. "So, the spaces where we imagine cyberbullying is most likely to happen are not being touched by this legislation at all." Leaver was a signatory on an open letter from more than 140 academics and civil society organisations against the ban. "If the rest of the world is watching Australia and hoping that this might be a blueprint, we're going to have an awful lot of work to do in the next few months to actually have a blueprint to practically do this rather than simply aspire to giving parents some reassurance," he said.

ABC News

an hour ago

• ABC News

Workforce shortages the key roadblock to state government's 'Made in WA' future

Economic experts have endorsed the WA government's future-focused budget, but warned a tight labour market could be its biggest roadblock. Thursday's state budget represented a shift in the government's focus, from transport projects and cost-of-living relief to infrastructure spending to kick-start diversification of the state's economy. About 40 per cent of government infrastructure investment over the next four years is earmarked for so-called enabling infrastructure, like electricity transmission and ports. "There's global economic turmoil," Treasurer Rita Saffioti said of the shift in focus. "We need to make sure we protect Western Australia and help Western Australia grow into the future. "We don't want WA to be collateral damage in global economic chaos." Raymond Da Silva Rosa studies what drives corporate investment at the University of Western Australia and backed the government's plans to try and increase productivity across the state. "We have a budget that's in surplus, we have an economy that's booming, we have a state government that has pretty much total control of the political agenda," he said. "So all the pieces are in place for the government to take some considerable risks that other governments can't afford to." One missing piece though, he said, is likely to be workforce — largely because the mining industry remaining successful leaves few workers for other industries. Chief economist for the Committee for the Economic Development of Australia, Cassanda Winzar, agreed. "There's a real argument to be had there for spreading some of the spend out and looking at what the biggest priorities are," she said. "So looking at some of that infrastructure around the energy transition, but also really looking at our housing situation. "If people can't get houses here there's not really going to be much investment and much desire for new industries to grow and develop here in WA." That backing from the private sector will be critical to making the government's vision a reality — because without businesses changing where and how they spend money, the shape of the economy won't change. Saffioti used an address to a business breakfast yesterday to encourage them to back the government's plans. "We're here, ready to work with industry, making sure we can deliver on our commitments," she said. Asked later in the day what would happen if businesses didn't change their spending, the treasurer said the combination of providing initial infrastructure and capital with long-term government purchase agreements was attractive to industry. "I think there's a lot of excitement, and just speaking to a few people today, I think that there's a real willingness," she said. Despite the broad support, Ms Winzar and Professor da Silva Rossa questioned the government's focus on manufacturing as a priority area, beyond a few niche industries. "We're a very high-cost state, labour-wise, in a high-cost country," Ms Winzar said. "Manufacturing across Australia is always going to be challenging. "It's particularly challenging in WA when we've got competing demands for labour from industries such as mining." Professor da Silva Rosa said there were strengths the government should try to leverage, which could be enhanced by boosting the quality of primary and secondary education. "The services sector is the one that dominates, so it's more about high-end services, like medical services, computers and the like, engineering services," he said. For its part, the opposition continues to argue payroll tax is an unnecessary roadblock to economic growth. Payroll tax is paid to the state government by all businesses whose wage bill exceeds $1 million each year, and is expected to bring in $6.2 billion next financial year. "WA businesses face a disincentive when they hire people," Shadow Treasurer Sandra Brewer said. "Our payroll tax, particularly for small businesses, are the highest in the country." She made the case alongside Jay Sidhu, who owns a land surveying business and said the tax had influenced his thinking as demand for his services grew. "Me and my business partners have to consider it before we even think of growing," he said. Ms Brewer said those costs were often passed directly on to customers. "So what we're saying is, the government could help housing affordability by looking at all of the taxes on business, and seeing where they can reform," she said. Asked at the business breakfast if a Labor government was ever likely to consider changes to payroll tax, Ms Saffioti said: "Every budget we consider everything." "But also it's about the approvals process," she said. "So we're working across the breadth of the economy to [see] what we can do in relation to supporting industry and business." Ms Winzar said that was another area which needed to be looked at closely to attract investment to the state. "What often happens in WA is we have really good small businesses and they're looking to expand, and they feel like they can't do it in WA because they don't have access to the right resources, to get the right labour," she said. "The tax and regulation settings don't encourage them to grow here, so they leave either for interstate or overseas. "We really want to encourage all those businesses to stay, to grow here, and other businesses to come setup here."