How deeply would you have to hate Britain to damage our means of defending it?

How deeply would you have to hate Britain to damage our means of defending it? Last night, activists broke into RAF Brize Norton on electric scooters and sprayed red paint into the engines of two Airbus Voyager aircraft that are used to refuel airborne fighter jets. In an additional flick of symbolism, one of the planes bore the Union flag and had previously carried the Royal Family.
The answer to my question, of course, is quite a lot. These people detest our country, our values, our traditions, our history, and evidently our national security.
Two weeks ago, RAF Typhoons were scrambled to intercept a Russian Su-24 that was buzzing an American logistics vessel in the Baltic Sea. This is the sort of vital, unglamorous, everyday mission that these activists are disrupting.
Do they want us to start learning Russian? Or Farsi, or Arabic? What lies behind such moral confusion? It will come as no surprise that these benighted souls belonged to a group called 'Palestine Action', a hyper-radical militant group known for acts of extreme vandalism involving red paint. Ostensibly, they tried to destroy British planes in the name of Gaza.
Only it wasn't about Gaza, was it? For one thing, although Sir Keir Starmer has shamefully refused to deploy the RAF to defend Israel's skies, preferring to sit back and watch as a hospital was hit in Beer Sheva and a world-leading cancer research unit was destroyed in Rehovot, he has recently said that our planes may go into action to 'defend allies' and interests in the region, which presumably no longer include Israel.
So this is about weighing the scales in favour of Iran, which is an entirely different matter to Gaza. The totalitarian regime in Tehran, which has done nothing to cure cancer by the way, is one of the most malignant on Earth.
Its people live under the threat of torture, execution and amputation – I can show you a photograph of Iranian authorities cutting off a man's hand with a circle saw – if they dare to speak their minds, dance in public, eschew the hijab or otherwise break the law, but the Ayatollah is the head of the octopus whose malevolent tentacles grip the region and the world.
Iran is the world's biggest state sponsor of terrorism. At rallies, speeches by the supreme leader are greeted by chants of 'death to England' and 'death to America' as well as 'death to Israel'.
The driving ideology of the regime is to plunge the globe into apocalyptic war by destroying Israel, thus enabling a mythical Messiah figure called the 'Mahdi' to emerge from invisibility and lead the faithful to victory. This is not mere fantasy. It informs the Ayatollah's foreign policy, and a recent tweet shows that he believes this showdown is happening right now.
The true problem, however, is not the activists. It is the hesitancy in the mainstream to condemn them with their whole chests. How much does the public care about the vandalism of RAF planes? Forty-eight per cent of Britons say they would not take up arms to defend our country 'under any circumstances'. We have been taught to demean ourselves for so many decades that society has lost its immune system.
This spirit has been successfully connected with antipathy towards Israel. The gratuitous coverage of collateral damage in Gaza, which tragically resembles that of any war, has comprehensively turned people's hearts and minds against the Jewish state, even those who previously supported it.
If the same level of attention to civilian suffering had been applied to the far bigger wars in Sudan and Yemen, public sympathies would take a different form. But it is all directed at Gaza. And it's one-sided. When the Israeli hospital was hit – a hospital, guys! Anyone? Anyone? – it received no condemnation by the UN and barely made the news. This is information warfare and the widespread public hostility towards Israel is testament to its success.
As a result, many people feel deep down that the thugs from Palestine Action, and those who deface our streets with rallies on Saturday afternoons, are making a point that the country supports, albeit in especially vivid terms.
The unconscionable vandalism overnight at RAF Brize Norton should serve as an important reminder that when the keffiyeh slips, the hatred of these activists doesn't stop at the Jews.
Israel's success is a consequence of the fact that it has not discarded the spirit that formerly animated the West as a whole. Just like the generation of our grandparents, the Jewish state is unafraid to stand upon its history, identity, culture and values and defend them against those who wish it harm.
It is a place of love: love of family, love of country, love of life and humanity. Just like Britain of 1940, these are the principles for which it sends its young men to war. Yes, all conflict is ugly, but the operations in Iran, which have incurred so few civilian casualties, show the extent to which the Jewish state protects the innocent, and the effectiveness of its operations when the enemy is not placing his own people in the line of fire.
The gulf that has opened between the Britain of our grandparents and the Britain of today is matched only by the gulf between our country and the Middle East's only democracy. People hate Israel because it has retained those values that they have come to hate in ourselves. I'm only glad that my Jewish grandfather, who fought for our country during the D-Day landings, is no longer alive to see it.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

43 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Trainline sues Transport Secretary over ‘secret' deal for state-owned rail operator

Trainline is suing Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, over the alleged backdoor award of a £32m ticketing contract by state-owned operator LNER. LNER, which has been run by the Department for Transport (DfT) since 2018, recently extended a ticketing sales platform contract it uses without offering rivals such as Trainline the chance to bid for the 10-year deal. Trainline claims that the failure to seek alternative bids means that Ms Alexander and LNER ignored due process as well as the best interests of passengers and the taxpayer. It alleges that the publication of the award on the Government's procurement website on December 23 was also too opaque because it effectively buried the news during Christmas week, limiting the ability of other parties to respond. LNER awarded the contract for the central booking engine that supports its digital ticket sales to Australia's Vix Technology. Trainline has its own rival division providing a similar 'white label' service to train operators and would have expected to compete for the work had it been tendered. It is understood that the company, which has filed the claim at the Technology and Construction Court against LNER and the Transport Secretary, will claim that a direct award of the contract was not permissible under procurement law because the terms were being varied in scope, duration and beneficiaries. The terms of the award also mean that the ticketing platform used by LNER, which operates between London Kings Cross and Scotland via Leeds and Newcastle, could be extended across the rail network. Rail unions have pressed Labour to squeeze out third-party ticket bookers such as Trainline, with the RMT accusing the company of engaging in 'relentless profiteering.' While the Government plans to simplify fares and ticketing as part of its nationalisation of the railway, it has nevertheless said that there would still be a need for 'an innovative and competitive third-party retail market.' Trainline even hosted the launch of the nationalisation policy by Louise Haigh, the then-transport secretary, last year. Labour subsequently ruled out establishing a national website and app to promote cheaper fares in competition with the firm. However, it reversed that guidance in January to say that a plan to bring together the ticket websites of individual operators was now in the pipeline. Though the DfT maintained that private-sector retailers would be able to compete in an open and fair manner, shares of Trainline, which has 18m customers, have since fallen by almost one third.

The Guardian

an hour ago

• The Guardian

Assisted dying set to become law in England and Wales after bill passed by MPs

Assisted dying is set to become law after a historic vote in parliament, as MPs passed Kim Leadbeater's bill by 314 to 291 votes, a majority of 23, to legalise the procedure for terminally ill people. Keir Starmer backed the bill which will now head to the House of Lords, though peers are not expected to block its progress. It will give those with less than six months to live in England and Wales the right to an assisted death, after approval from two doctors and a panel including a psychiatrist, social worker and senior lawyer. Opening the debate, Leadbeater said that now was the moment to seize, to 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. The Labour MP for Spen Valley said it was 'not a choice between living and dying – it is a choice for terminally ill people about how they die'. She said rejecting the bill was 'not a neutral act, it is a vote for the status quo … and it fills me with despair to think MPs could be here in another 10 years' time hearing the same stories'. Terminally ill people and families were in the public galleries watching the debate and at a rally in Parliament Square. But considerable concerns were raised by disability activists, who held a protest outside parliament, and MPs opposed to the bill made passionate pleas that it would lead to people being coerced into ending their lives early. The former foreign secretary James Cleverly, who had opened the debate for opponents of the measure, said he was an atheist but had rejected the bill because, he said, the right safeguards were not in place. 'We were promised the gold standard, a judicially underpinned set of protections and safeguards,' he said, citing concerns from professional bodies including the Royal College of Psychiatrists. 'I disagree with [Leadbeater's] assessment that it is now or never, and it is this bill or no bill, and that to vote against this at third reading is a vote to maintain the status quo. None of those things are true.'

The Independent

an hour ago

• The Independent

Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry to publish first tranche of final report in July

The inquiry into the Horizon IT scandal that led to the wrongful convictions of hundreds of Post Office workers will publish the first tranche of its final report next month. The first volume is to focus on compensation as well as the devastating impact on the lives of victims, and will be released on July 8. Sir Wyn Williams, the retired judge who is chairing the probe, is expected to make a public statement following its publication. The inquiry was established in 2020 to ensure there was a 'public summary of the failings which occurred with the Horizon IT system at the Post Office'. It was converted into a statutory inquiry, giving its chair greater powers to compel witnesses and documents, in 2021. Widely considered one of Britain's biggest miscarriages of justice, the scandal saw subpostmasters prosecuted for stealing after faulty computer software made it seem like money was missing from their branches. Many were sent to prison, shunned by their communities, and faced financial ruin. The report will be available to read on the inquiry's website at noon, and after this it will be laid before Parliament in line with Section 26 of the Inquiries Act 2005. Core participants to the probe, which include affected subpostmasters, will receive a copy of the report in advance.