TG govt amping up fight against AP's Banakacharla move: Uttam
Hyderabad: State Irrigation Minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy has said that the Telangana Government was intensifying its fight against Andhra Pradesh's proposed Godavari-Banakacharla Link Scheme and was determined to protect Telangana's water rights.
The Minister said that he had written multiple letters to the Centre, exposing serious violations by Andhra Pradesh and demanding immediate intervention. Andhra Pradesh had failed to obtain technical clearances from the Central Water Commission (CWC) and from the Godavari River Management Board (GRMB), Krishna River Management Board (KRMB) and the Apex Council, as mandated under the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act (APRA) 2014. No project on inter-state rivers can proceed without these approvals. Andhra Pradesh is brazenly bypassing all statutory mechanisms, he added.
Andhra Pradesh misused Sections 46(2) and 46(3) of the APRA 2014 to seek funds from the Union Finance Ministry under the backward regions development clause, Uttam said in an information interaction with the media here on Friday. These sections cannot override Part IX of the Act, which deals with inter-state river water management, requiring technical clearance, inter-state consultations, and Apex Council approval before any project proceeds.
Andhra Pradesh had neither shared any proposal with the Telangana government nor provided any DPR or plans for scrutiny by the relevant boards. He noted that despite Andhra Pradesh's multiple letters to the Union Finance Ministry and the Ministry of Jal Shakti seeking funds, no DPR had been sent, and the ministries had merely forwarded Andhra Pradesh's letters to technical bodies like the GRMB, KRMB, and the Polavaram Project Authority (PPA) for comments. This is not due process. It's an attempt to mislead the Centre and push the project without scrutiny.
The previous BRS government failed to safeguard Telangana's interests. During the united Andhra Pradesh era, Telangana's rightful share was 724 tmcft, but the BRS government signed agreements that reduced Telangana's share to 299 tmcft while allocating 512 tmcft to Andhra Pradesh.
This betrayal laid the groundwork for the current situation. 'They are acting like Goebbels Rao, repeating lies to cover up their betrayal. Even Goebbels himself would be shocked at the level of false propaganda they are spreading', he claimed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Vijay Deverakonda booked under SC/ST Act over his remarks about tribal people during Retro pre-release event
Actor Vijay Deverakonda has found himself in trouble as a case has been registered against him under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for his remarks about tribal people during the pre-release event of Retro. The police confirmed the development to PTI on Sunday. Vijay Deverakonda faces trouble as police registers case against him for remarks against tribal people.(PTI) Case registered against Vijay Deverakonda Police stated that although the remarks, which likened the recent terror attack in Pahalgam to tribal conflicts from 500 years ago, were made in April, a case under the SC/ST Act was registered against the actor on 17 June following a complaint. "The actor made comments in April. However, based on a complaint, a case under the SC/ST Act was booked against him on 17 June,' a police official told PTI. The complaint was lodged by Nenavath Ashok Kumar Naik, also known as Ashok Rathod, who serves as the State President of the Joint Action Committee of Tribal Communities. He alleged that during the pre-release event of the film Retro, which stars actor Surya, the actor made statements that hurt the sentiments of tribal communities and caused serious offence. Rathod further claimed that the actor's comparison of tribal people to Pakistani terrorists was racially insensitive. What Vijay Deverakonda had said During the pre-release event of Surya's film Retro, Vijay addressed the Pahalgam terror attack and said, 'The solution to what is happening in Kashmir is also to educate them (terrorists) and ensure they don't get brainwashed. What will they achieve? Kashmir belongs to India, and Kashmiris are ours. India doesn't even need to attack Pakistan because Pakistanis themselves are fed up with their government and will attack them if this continues. Asalu 500 years back tribals kokkutunnatu, veelu buddi lekunda, minimum common sense lekunda chese panulu.' (They behave like tribals did 500 years ago, fighting without common sense). After facing backlash on social media for his comments, the actor expressed regret. He took to X and wrote, "It has come to my attention that a remark I made during the Retro audio launch event has caused concern among some members of the public. I wish to sincerely clarify: there was absolutely no intention to hurt or target any community, especially our Scheduled Tribes, who I deeply respect and consider an integral part of our country." The actor clarified that his intention was to promote unity, emphasising that India is one, its people are one, and the nation must progress together. He expressed disbelief at the idea that, while advocating for national solidarity, he would deliberately target or discriminate against any community, all of whom he considers part of his larger family. He concluded, "If any part of my message was misunderstood or hurtful, I express my sincere regret. My only aim was to speak of peace, progress, and togetherness. I remain committed to using my platform to uplift and unify — never to divide. Vijay Deverakonda."
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Centre links part of state capex loans to new reforms in land, and digitization
New Delhi: The Centre has drawn up a new set of reform-linked conditions for states to access a portion of the ₹ 1.5 trillion interest-free capex loan for FY26, two people aware of the matter said, with a focus on digitization, governance, land reforms and urban planning. 'States will now be required to implement targeted reforms in key areas including digital public infrastructure (DPI) for agriculture, improvements in financial management systems, better urban planning, and streamlined land-related processes," said the first person mentioned above, speaking under the condition of anonymity. Of the ₹ 1.5 trillion earmarked for FY26, around 60% will be unconditional or linked to infrastructure spending, while the remaining 40% will be tied to reforms that states and Union Territories must undertake to access the funds, the person mentioned above added. Interest-free loans with a tenure of 50 years have played a vital role in stimulating capital spending by states and catalyzing the economy since the pandemic. As things stand, states account for 20–25% of India's total infrastructure spending, a critical priority for the government. 'This year's reform agenda puts a sharp focus on accelerating digital transformation in agriculture through federated farmer databases, digitized land records, and digital crop surveys,' the second person mentioned above said, requesting anonymity. Meanwhile, the central government has made Aadhaar-based Direct benefit transfer (DBT) integration with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) mandatory across all state-run schemes. "Land and regulatory reforms remain a key thrust as states are expected to enable flexible mixed-use development, digitize land use change approvals, rationalize industrial road width norms, and amend building rules to minimize land loss. These are critical steps to boost manufacturing, agriculture, and ease of doing business," the second person mentioned above said. 'The goal is to ensure that capital investment is not just about creating assets, but about improving the way states govern and deliver,' the person added. Launched in FY21, the Centre's 50-year interest-free capex loan scheme has played a key role in driving state-led capital spending and reviving the post-pandemic economy. For FY26, ₹ 1.5 trillion has been earmarked to accelerate infrastructure development and support state-level projects. Of this, about 60% will be either unconditional or tied to infrastructure spending, while the remaining 40% will be linked to specific reforms. The conditions states had to meet in the past two years to avail of the central loans included reforms in the housing sector, providing incentives for scrapping old government vehicles and ambulances, reforms in urban planning and urban finance, increasing housing stock for police personnel, and setting up libraries with digital infrastructure at panchayat and ward levels for children and young adults. Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman ramped up allocations to ₹ 1.5 trillion each for FY25 and FY26—up from ₹ 1.10 trillion in FY24. However, the FY25 outlay was later revised to ₹ 1.25 trillion due to slower-than-expected spending in the first half of the fiscal, which was largely due to elections. A spokesperson of the Ministry of Finance didn't respond to emailed queries.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
In landmark order, Calcutta HC says transgender ID can be submitted while applying for passport; ‘big victory' says petitioner
Following an order by the Calcutta High Court after a battle lasting over a year, Anuprabha Das Majumdar, a transgender woman, can now apply for a passport with her transgender identity card. Directing the passport authority to consider the transgender identity card of Majumdar, Justice Amrita Sinha said on Wednesday, 'Transgender identity card of the petitioner shall be taken into consideration at the time of consideration of petitioner's passport application.' The ruling came after Majumdar filed a writ petition after the passport office denied her application for a passport even though she had a transgender identity card. Majumdar had applied for a passport in 2023 after getting her transgender identity card in February 2022. The Calcutta High Court's ruling effectively mandates the Regional Passport Office to recognise the transgender identity card as a valid document when processing Majumdar's fresh application, marking a significant acknowledgment of transgender individuals' rights under the 2019 Act. Speaking to The Indian Express, Majumdar's counsel Suman Ganguly said, 'As per my knowledge, this is a first case regarding the issuance of a passport on the basis of a transgender identity card. So this particular judgment will act as a precedent for the community in the future. They are being deprived of a lot of basic rights. The fight will go on, but this judgment will open a lot of doors.' Speaking to The Indian Express, Majumdar said, 'I had also faced the same issue while trying to obtain an Aadhaar card. They did not accept the transgender card but I contacted the authority under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019. After discussions, they (Aadhaar authority) took some time but they changed it.' 'Slowly, I changed everything, from my Aadhaar card to voter's card to PAN card. The passport authority said it is a major change so I have to go through the old process of gazette notification and all. They said they have not received any notification regarding the transgender ID card. We tried to contact the regional officer, sent emails, notices, etc. As a transgender person we only have this as the proof. After not getting a positive response, we moved the high court,' Majumdar added. The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019, enacted by the Indian government in December 2019 and with rules notified in September 2020, is a landmark legislation aimed at protecting transgender individuals' rights. It mandates equal treatment in areas such as education, employment, and access to public services, including the right to self-perceived gender identity. The Act also requires authorities to issue transgender identity cards, which serve as official recognition of an individual's gender identity. However, as Majumdar's case illustrates, implementation at the ground level has been inconsistent, often leaving transgender individuals struggling to access basic rights. During the hearings, Justice Sinha had expressed surprise at the passport authority for not knowing whether Majumdar had applied for a passport in 2023. 'The application was made in 2023. How can your authority say that she has not applied? That means they did not check it properly. How could the authority not have the knowledge of the application being made? These are online applications; they must be knowing it,' Justice Sinha had observed. Majumdar's counsel had also submitted a supplementary affidavit stating that she had applied for a passport, thus the counsel for the passport department sought time to take instructions. On Wednesday, the counsel for the passport office informed the court that the application had elapsed and if she reapplied, it will be considered. The transgender certificate and ID card are nationally recognised and provided by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. Following this, the court ordered Majumdar to reapply for the passport. Majumdar told The Indian Expess, 'I am feeling very positive after the judgment. What all happened two years ago was very disturbing. As an Indian citizen, these are basic documents. This is a big victory for all transgender people. We face hurdles because of low awareness in society, but this is a law and any form of discrimination is a crime.' She said the fight will go on so that future generations do not have to face such hurdles. She has been invited for a senimar in the UK in July by an organisation that works for the legal rights of women. 'I will be applying for my passport via Tatkal once again and then a visa so that I can go for the seminar,' Majumdar said.
