The five considerable problems with the chancellor's U-turn on winter fuel payments
There are considerable problems with the winter fuel payment U-turn, but perhaps the political argument in favour outweighs them all? First, Rachel Reeves has executed the plan without working out how to pay for it. This, for an iron chancellor, is a wound that opponents won't let her forget. A summer of speculation about tax rises is not a summer anyone looks forward to. Politics latest: Treasury minister challenged over reason for U-turn Second, the fig leaf that she and Treasury ministers are using is an improvement in economic conditions. If you were being polite, you'd say this is contested. The OBR halved growth this year and the OECD downgraded UK forecasts, albeit only by a little, last week. The claim that interest rates are coming down ignores that their descent is slower because of government decisions of the last six months. Third, the question immediately becomes, what next? Why not personal independent payments (PIP) and the two-child benefit cap? At this stage, it would feel like a climbdown if they did not back down over those. But then, what will the markets - already policing this closely - make of it, and could they punish the government? Fourth, this is aggravating divisions in the Parliamentary Labour Party: the soft left Compass group and ministers like Torsten Bell pushing bigger spending arguments. Those MPs in Tory-facing seats who rely on arguments that Labour can be trusted with the public finances are worried. 👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne's on your podcast app👈 Fifth, this has created a firm division between No 10 (the PM) and No 11 (the Chancellor). No 10 is now conscious that it does not have enough independent advice about the market reaction to economic policies and is seeking to correct. Others, I am told, are just critical of the chancellor's U-turn - for she wobbled first. Read more:UK to become 'AI maker not taker', says PMHow much cash will Reeves give each department? Given the litany of arguments against, why has it happened? Because the hope is this maxi U-turn lances the boil, removes a significant source of pensioners' anger and brings back Labour voters, a price they calculate worth paying, whatever the fiscal cost. We wait to see who is right.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'
Sarah Pochin had asked the Foreign Secretary whether the US felt unable to use the UK-US airbase on Diego Garcia, following the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands. Responding during a statement on the Middle East, Mr Lammy said the MP for Runcorn and Helsby should 'get off social media'. Foreign Secretary David Lammy (Parliament TV/PA) The UK-operated base in the Chagos Islands was not used in the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty has said. He added that the US did not ask to use it, as he answered questions from the Foreign Affairs Committee on Monday. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Pochin said: 'Is he (Mr Lammy) able to explain to the House whether the United States felt unable to use the Diego Garcia base and have to refuel, in a highly dangerous operation three times because of that, because of your deal that you did with the with the Mauritians, that would then tell the Chinese, that would then tell the Iranians?' Mr Lammy replied: 'The honourable lady has got (to) get off social media, has got to get some help… because she is swallowing conspiracy theories that should not be repeated in this House.' The deal over the Chagos Islands follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which says the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The honourable lady has got (to) get off social media, has got to get some help... because she is swallowing conspiracy theories that should not be repeated in this House David Lammy During the statement on Monday, Mr Lammy was pressed by MPs on the UK's position following the US military action. Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) said: 'Does His Majesty's Government support or oppose US military action against Iran at the weekend?' Mr Lammy replied: 'His Majesty's Government will continue to work with our closest ally, as I was last week in Washington DC.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin (Tunbridge Wells) said: 'What is UK Government policy on whether regime change should be pursued in Iran?' Mr Lammy replied: 'It is not our belief that it's for us to change the regime of any country, that it must be for the people themselves.' SNP MP Brendan O'Hara (Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber) said: 'We've been here for an hour, and still the Foreign Secretary appears incapable of saying whether he supports or condemns America's actions, or whether he regards them as being legal or not. 'And nowhere in this statement does the role of international law even merit a mention. So will the Foreign Secretary take this opportunity now to tell us whether he believes that America's unilateral action was compliant with international law?' Mr Lammy replied: 'I've got to tell (Mr O'Hara), I qualified and was called to the bar in 1995, I haven't practised for the last 25 years. 'It is not for me to comment on the United States' legal validity. I would refer him to article 51 and article two of the UN Charter, and he can seek his own advice.'
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Protesters unfurl huge anti-Bezos banner in Venice ahead of Amazon billionaire's wedding
Greenpeace activists have joined protests in Venice against Jeff Bezos 's upcoming wedding to Lauren Sanchez in the city. The Amazon owner and former TV journalist have a star-studded guest list for their ceremony, but it appears many locals are not happy. Footage shared by the environmental group on Monday (23 June) shows demonstrators placing a large flag with the words 'If you can rent Venice for your wedding you can pay more tax' on the ground in St Mark's Square. The action follows other protests, including one by the group No Space for Bezos, who hung a huge banner at the San Giorgio bell tower.
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
GB News presenter claims he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist
A former GB News presenter has claimed he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist on air. Albie Amankona, who was dropped by the broadcaster last year, is taking the channel to an employment tribunal over a string of claims including racial discrimination and unfair dismissal. Mr Amankona, a Tory commentator who presented debate programme The Saturday Five, left the broadcaster shortly after stating that he believed Ms Braverman was 'a racist and a thoroughly bigoted woman'. GB News issued an apology to the former home secretary, saying the comments 'crossed a line between robust debate and causing unnecessary offence'. The broadcaster added that Ms Braverman was 'understandably upset'. Mr Amankona alleges that he was taken off air as a result of the comments. He is crowdfunding his claim, which also includes allegations of harassment and victimisation, through the Good Law Project, a legal campaign group founded by outspoken barrister Jo Maugham. Mr Amankona said: 'I regret that it has come to this, I have tried very hard to resolve matters privately and in good faith. Like so many fair-minded Britons I believe in free speech, fairness, the rule of law and I know right from wrong. GB News claims to stand for these values. 'My experience tells a different story. They must be held accountable, not only for cancelling me, but for seemingly treating non-white employees differently from white employees, and for abandoning the very values we Britons hold dear.' The Good Law Project said: 'GB News likes to brand itself as a champion of free speech and journalistic independence. But when one of its own presenters dared to call out racism and intolerance, the response was swift and severe: he was dropped instantly. 'It's a familiar pattern – when free speech aligns with their agenda, they celebrate it. But the moment it challenges their narrative, the mask slips.' GB News denies the claims. A spokesman said: 'Mr Amankona's claim is misconceived, without merit and being robustly defended. As the claim is ongoing we do not propose to comment further.' String of controversies Mr Amankona is a broadcaster and activist who co-founded the Conservatives Against Racism For Equality group. He presented the GB News programme from March 2023 until August 2024, and has made regular appearances on other broadcasters including the BBC, LBC and Sky News. The legal challenge marks the latest twist in a turbulent few years for GB News, which has courted controversy since its launch in 2021 as a challenger to incumbents such as the BBC. Ofcom has found the channel in breach of broadcasting rules a dozen times over impartiality issues including its use of politicians as presenters. But in a major victory earlier this year, GB News successfully challenged Ofcom's decisions in the High Court, leading to several impartiality rulings being dropped. Nevertheless, the start-up is still locking horns with the watchdog, which is now consulting on plans to broaden its ban on politicians acting as news presenters. Angelos Frangopoulos, GB News chief executive, has accused Ofcom of having a 'jailer' mentality towards broadcasters, while co-owner Sir Paul Marshall last month claimed the regulator was unfairly punishing the channel under pressure from Left-wing activists.
