Saudi Arabia's strategic role in the new world order
https://arab.news/md85y
President Donald Trump's declaration during the US-Saudi Investment Forum in Riyadh on Tuesday that America will lift its sanctions on Syria was not merely a change in American foreign policy — it was a signal of the geopolitical evolution currently underway in the Middle East and beyond. The fact that such a consequential announcement came not from Washington, Brussels or the UN headquarters in New York but from the Saudi capital underscores Riyadh's growing influence in shaping global outcomes.
The forum itself has grown into a pivotal platform where transformative regional and international decisions are unveiled. Its significance lies not just in the participation of high-profile leaders, but in what it symbolizes: the emergence of Saudi Arabia as a diplomatic power center — no longer defined solely by its economic wealth or religious importance, but increasingly by its political foresight, strategic initiatives and ability to convene power brokers across ideological and geopolitical divides.
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, whose leadership continues to redefine the role of the Kingdom in regional and global affairs, played a central role in facilitating the Syria sanctions breakthrough. Joined virtually by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the crown prince oversaw talks that reflect a new regionalism — one that prioritizes practical cooperation, long-term stability and a departure from the failed policies of the post-Arab Spring era. In a world increasingly moving away from unilateralism, the Saudi-led model of inclusive dialogue and shared regional responsibility offers a compelling blueprint for conflict resolution and reintegration.
The implications for Syria are profound. After more than a decade of conflict, foreign intervention, economic collapse and humanitarian catastrophe, this announcement represents the first credible step toward normalcy. The US' lifting of sanctions — long a symbol of international isolation — opens a path for reconstruction, investment and diplomatic engagement. Crucially, it signals to the Syrian people that the world is willing to support a new chapter — if their leadership embraces genuine change.
The Saudi-led model of inclusive dialogue and shared regional responsibility offers a compelling blueprint
Hani Hazaimeh
For too long, Syria has served as a battleground for proxy wars and ideological showdowns, often at the expense of its citizens. Now, under a new leadership framework, the country stands at a pivotal juncture. Reintegration into the regional system and the global community will depend on the new Syrian government's ability to meet expectations — chiefly, to uphold human rights, ensure inclusive governance and rebuild a state that serves its people rather than represses them. This is not a carte blanche but an opportunity — facilitated by Riyadh — to demonstrate a commitment to a new political and social contract.
Saudi Arabia's involvement is not incidental — it is foundational. Over the past few years, the Kingdom has emerged as a quiet but powerful broker of peace. From hosting Sudanese peace negotiations to leading Arab League reconciliation efforts and supporting global humanitarian causes, Saudi diplomacy has transitioned from behind-the-scenes influence to front-line leadership. The Syria initiative is yet another manifestation of this shift.
Furthermore, Saudi Arabia's strategic balancing between global powers — maintaining close ties with the US while expanding its partnerships with China, Russia and other emerging economies — has given it a unique edge. It is able to speak to all sides, understand their strategic imperatives and mediate with credibility. This equidistant diplomacy allows Saudi Arabia to act as a trusted interlocutor in conflict zones that often defy resolution through traditional channels.
The economic dimension of this realignment is equally critical. The lifting of sanctions on Syria, especially in coordination with a regional power like Saudi Arabia, sends a clear signal to investors, institutions and international agencies: Syria is now potentially open for business, under new conditions. Saudi Arabia, through its sovereign funds and public-private partnerships, may play a leading role in Syria's reconstruction. More importantly, it can ensure that such investments are tied to benchmarks of stability, transparency and development — a vision that aligns with both regional security and Vision 2030's broader ambitions.
Vision 2030, often seen through the lens of internal reform, must also be recognized as a geopolitical doctrine. It projects Saudi Arabia not merely as a regional leader but as a global partner — capable of hosting G20 summits, leading digital transformation efforts through the Saudi Authority for Data and Artificial Intelligence, and now influencing postconflict transitions in one of the most devastated countries in the region. The convergence of technology, diplomacy and economic diversification gives Riyadh unmatched leverage in the evolving global order.
Vision 2030, often seen through the lens of internal reform, must also be recognized as a geopolitical doctrine
Hani Hazaimeh
Trump's decision to make this announcement in Riyadh reflects a broader truth: the center of gravity in global diplomacy is shifting. The Middle East, long regarded as a source of instability, is now producing solutions — driven by regional actors that are stepping into leadership vacuums. Saudi Arabia, with its financial power, cultural reach and increasingly sophisticated statecraft, is not just reacting to global changes — it is initiating them.
For Syria, the path forward remains fraught with challenges. Internal political reconciliation, the return of refugees, rebuilding infrastructure and addressing a traumatized society will take time and vision. But with regional support — particularly from a partner as committed and capable as Saudi Arabia — the possibility of renewal is real. Riyadh's facilitation of Syria's diplomatic rehabilitation marks a pivotal test for the future of the region: can Arab states reclaim agency over their affairs and shape a future that prioritizes people over power, stability over chaos and cooperation over confrontation?
Saudi Arabia's leadership today is not about dominance — it is about direction. The Kingdom is setting the tone for what the Middle East can become in the 21st century: a hub of innovation, diplomacy and responsible power. And in doing so, it is not just transforming its own identity but reshaping the narrative of an entire region.
History may record the lifting of US sanctions on Syria as a turning point. But even more importantly, it will remember where it happened — and who made it possible.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Saudi analyst tells Al Arabiya news that Turki Al-Jasser was a ‘terrorist' and ‘traitor'
RIYADH: Salman Al-Ansari, a renowned Saudi political analyst, said during an interview with news channel Al Arabiya that Turki Al-Jasser, who was arrested in 2018 and executed last Saturday, was not a journalist, as many posts on social media accounts claimed after his death was announced. Al-Jasser was 'literally a terrorist (and) a traitor, and he had nothing to do with journalism,' Al-Ansari said. Media reports describing him as a journalist were a 'fabrication,' he added. During the interview, Al-Ansari told Al Arabiya his sources had confirmed Al-Jasser worked for a 'sensitive government agency' and had access to classified information. He added that Al-Jasser had been involved 'in the planning and financing of terrorism.' Saudi Affairs Expert @Salansar1 rejects claims that terrorism convict Turki al-Jasser was a journalist. He shares new details in an interview on Al Arabiya English's W News. — Al Arabiya English (@AlArabiya_Eng) June 20, 2025
Arab News
6 hours ago
- Arab News
GCC chief hails UN adoption of landmark resolution on strategic cooperation
RIYADH: The secretary-general of the Gulf Cooperation Council, Jasem Albudaiwi, on Friday welcomed the adoption by the UN General Assembly of a landmark resolution on collaboration between the organizations. He described the agreement, formally titled 'Cooperation between the United Nations and the Gulf Cooperation Council' and the first of its kind, as a major step forward in deepening regional and international collaboration, the Saudi Press Agency reported. The resolution, adopted on Monday, was submitted to the UN on behalf of GCC member states by Kuwait, which currently holds the presidency of the regional organization. Albudaiwi said its adoption reflects the respected status of the GCC as a proactive regional partner in efforts to support global peace and security. It signifies a new phase of strategic partnership between the organizations, he added, underscored by concrete plans and activities to enhance cooperation. He praised Kuwait for the diplomatic efforts of the nation's mission to the UN in New York, and said the success of the resolution embodies the spirit of unity within the GCC and its commitment to working constructively with international partners across multilateral platforms.
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Turkiye on high alert due to Israel-Iran strikes
Turkiye is walking a tightrope as the Iran-Israel war intensifies. Given its long border with Iran and its complicated — often tense — relations with Israel, while being one of the few regional actors maintaining backchannels with Israel, Iran and the US, Ankara's position is particularly significant. Soon after Israel launched its attacks on Iran, Ankara swiftly responded: the Foreign Ministry issued a condemnation of Israel and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan also made a statement. Turkiye's current approach is shaped by a combination of security concerns, its position within the Western alliance and its relations with both Iran and Israel. Turkiye, Iran and Israel are the three non-Arab middle powers in the Middle East whose relationships have always influenced the regional balance of power. Within this context, Turkiye would normally welcome the weakening of Iranian influence in the region. However, the unprecedented escalation of tensions between Israel and Iran, and the broader consequences of this war, are of far greater concern to Ankara than a diminished Iran. To be clear, although the Turkish ruling elite and the public are not pleased with Tehran's domestic and regional policies, they would not favor regime change in Iran — especially if it were to come at the hands of Israel or the US. The memory of what happened in Iraq and elsewhere remains fresh in the minds of the Turkish people. Relations between Turkiye and Iran have historically been far from harmonious and, in recent years, tensions have increased due to sharp divergences on Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and even the South Caucasus. However, Ankara has managed to compartmentalize its relationship with Iran, adopting a pragmatic and less confrontational approach. Even while navigating its complex relationship with Israel, this approach has helped Turkiye avoid direct confrontation. The unprecedented escalation of tensions is of far greater concern to Ankara than a diminished Iran Dr. Sinem Cengiz For Ankara, current Israeli policies pose greater risks than Iran's, particularly as Tehran has already lost significant influence in Syria following the fall of the Assad regime. While Israel takes a confrontational stance toward Iran, Turkiye prefers cautious engagement. While Turkiye seeks stability in Syria after decades of turmoil, Israel — through its airstrikes and ground incursions — appears to favor a weakened Syria. And while Turkiye advocates for Palestinian statehood and an end to the war in Gaza, Israel opposes both. Amid such a contentious climate between Turkiye and Israel, in an increasingly disorderly region, the US factor becomes highly significant. As a NATO member and part of the Western security architecture, Turkiye maintains strategic ties with Washington, while Israel remains a key American ally. Ankara is keen to avoid tensions with the US administration at this stage — a stance reflected in recent statements from Turkish officials. With the NATO Summit taking place in the Netherlands in the next few days, Erdogan is seeking a meeting with US President Donald Trump and Ankara is working to avoid any deterioration in Turkiye-US relations ahead of the event. However, continued Israeli aggression may cause new fractures in Turkiye's relations with NATO and Western countries. Still, the evolving security dynamics are seriously squeezing Turkiye's room for maneuver. Sharing a long border with Iran makes it particularly vulnerable to the fallout from this conflict. Turkiye is not only geographically close, but it is also central to this conflict in terms of energy, security and diplomacy. Therefore, the Israel-Iran war raises serious military and strategic responsibilities for Turkiye. Defense Minister Yasar Guler stated on Wednesday that Turkiye had increased security measures along its border with Iran. Although no official figures have been released, reports suggest there has been a growing flow of people traveling from Iran into Turkiye. Erdogan announced that Turkiye would soon deploy new air defense systems and increase its stock of medium- and long-range missiles to a deterrent level following Israel's attacks on Iran. He said: 'We have made, and are making, preparations for every possible negative development and scenario.' Among the risks Turkiye faces are not only regional instability and growing security threats, but also rising energy prices, the risk of sabotage targeting natural gas pipeline infrastructure, and increasing vulnerabilities along foreign trade routes. Continued Israeli aggression may cause new fractures in Turkiye's relations with NATO and Western countries Dr. Sinem Cengiz Within the domestic sphere, opposition parties also appear to be aligned with Turkiye's position. Main opposition party leader Ozgur Ozel said he will attend the Solidarity with Palestine Rally organized in Istanbul on Sunday to condemn Israel, expressing that he expects 'the strongest reaction' from the government. At this critical juncture, Turkiye's only viable option is to push for regional diplomacy. Erdogan has declared that Turkiye is ready to mediate an end to the Iran-Israel conflict. However, due to its geographic proximity and the complexity of its relations with Israel, Turkiye's traditional mediation policy may not be as easily applied here as it was in the Russia-Ukraine war. The absence of ambassador-level relations with Israel makes communication more difficult and hampers Turkiye's potential mediation role. In this case, Turkiye may try to leverage its relationships with countries that have better ties with Israel — such as Azerbaijan and the UAE — to pressure the Israeli government to bring an end to this seemingly endless war. Geography cannot be changed and Turkiye has historically paid a high price for being neighbors with unstable states. While things have slowly started to improve in Iraq and Syria after decades of instability, it is now Iran posing a challenge for Turkiye at its doorstep, but it is Israel in the broader region. An Israel-Iran war is a multidimensional test for Turkiye — one that demands the careful reevaluation of every pillar of policy: energy security, border control, diplomacy and regional strategy. • Dr. Sinem Cengiz is a Turkish political analyst who specializes in Turkiye's relations with the Middle East. X: @SinemCngz
