Stonegate Updates Coverage on Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) Q1 2025
Dallas, Texas--(Newsfile Corp. - April 25, 2025) - Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ: TCBX): Stonegate Capital Partners updates their coverage on Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. For 1Q25, Third Coast reported net income of $13.6M, virtually flat from $13.7M in 4Q24. This was equal to a basic and diluted EPS of $0.90 and $0.78, respectively. The Q/Q stability was primarily attributed to higher net interest income, driven by steady loan growth and strong asset quality. However, this increase was partially offset by a slightly higher provision for credit losses and rising expenses related to salaries, employee benefits, and seasonal expenses. We anticipate that the Company will continue prioritizing operational efficiency by sustaining its 1% improvement initiative, though the securitization is expected to impact this. This strategy is expected to support Third Coast in the current macroeconomic landscape.
To view the full announcement, including downloadable images, bios, and more, click here.
Key Takeaways:
[ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7294/249776_figure1_550.jpg ]
Click image above to view full announcement.
About Stonegate
Stonegate Capital Partners is a leading capital markets advisory firm providing investor relations, equity research, and institutional investor outreach services for public companies. Our affiliate, Stonegate Capital Markets (member FINRA) provides a full spectrum of investment banking, equity research and capital raising for public and private companies.
Contacts:
Stonegate Capital Partners
(214) 987-4121
[email protected]
Source: Stonegate, Inc.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/249776
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The past three years for Sinclair (NASDAQ:SBGI) investors has not been profitable
For many investors, the main point of stock picking is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Sinclair, Inc. (NASDAQ:SBGI) shareholders, since the share price is down 36% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 57%. Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 18% in the last 90 days. Now let's have a look at the company's fundamentals, and see if the long term shareholder return has matched the performance of the underlying business. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. During five years of share price growth, Sinclair moved from a loss to profitability. We would usually expect to see the share price rise as a result. So it's worth looking at other metrics to try to understand the share price move. We note that the dividend seems healthy enough, so that probably doesn't explain the share price drop. However, the weak share price might be related to the fact revenue has been disappearing at a rate of 17% each year, over three years. This could have some investors worried about the longer term growth potential (or lack thereof). The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail). It's good to see that there was some significant insider buying in the last three months. That's a positive. On the other hand, we think the revenue and earnings trends are much more meaningful measures of the business. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on Sinclair When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Sinclair the TSR over the last 3 years was -21%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence! We're pleased to report that Sinclair shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 22% over one year. Of course, that includes the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 0.9% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. Someone with an optimistic perspective could view the recent improvement in TSR as indicating that the business itself is getting better with time. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Sinclair (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Sinclair is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find lesser know companies this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trip.com Group (NASDAQ:TCOM) pulls back 6.9% this week, but still delivers shareholders strong 33% CAGR over 3 years
It hasn't been the best quarter for Group Limited (NASDAQ:TCOM) shareholders, since the share price has fallen 13% in that time. But that doesn't change the fact that the returns over the last three years have been very strong. In fact, the share price is up a full 136% compared to three years ago. To some, the recent share price pullback wouldn't be surprising after such a good run. Only time will tell if there is still too much optimism currently reflected in the share price. Although Group has shed US$2.7b from its market cap this week, let's take a look at its longer term fundamental trends and see if they've driven returns. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement. During three years of share price growth, Group moved from a loss to profitability. Given the importance of this milestone, it's not overly surprising that the share price has increased strongly. You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). It is of course excellent to see how Group has grown profits over the years, but the future is more important for shareholders. If you are thinking of buying or selling Group stock, you should check out this FREE detailed report on its balance sheet. It's nice to see that Group shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 16% over the last year. That's including the dividend. Having said that, the five-year TSR of 17% a year, is even better. Is Group cheap compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide. But note: Group may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Retail investors account for 55% of Gesher Acquisition Corp. II's (NASDAQ:GSHR) ownership, while private companies account for 29%
Significant control over Gesher Acquisition II by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions 45% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders 11% of Gesher Acquisition II is held by Institutions This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. If you want to know who really controls Gesher Acquisition Corp. II (NASDAQ:GSHR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 55% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Private companies, on the other hand, account for 29% of the company's stockholders. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Gesher Acquisition II. View our latest analysis for Gesher Acquisition II Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that Gesher Acquisition II does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Gesher Acquisition II's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. It would appear that 5.3% of Gesher Acquisition II shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Gesher Acquisition Sponsor II LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Our studies suggest that the top 5 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here. The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 55% of Gesher Acquisition II shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability. It seems that Private Companies own 29%, of the Gesher Acquisition II stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Gesher Acquisition II (of which 2 are concerning!) you should know about. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
