Ecology is the world's permanent economy
The phrase, 'Ecology is the permanent economy', made popular by environmentalist Sunderlal Bahuguna, is much more than a slogan. It is a profound reminder of the foundational truth that human prosperity is inextricably linked to ecological health. It is true that economic development without exploiting natural resources and economic stability without conserving them are impossible. As we face serious challenges such as climate change and the rapid loss of biodiversity, we must ask ourselves whether we have truly understood and embraced this idea.
Striking the right balance
Understanding nature's complexity is at the heart of science. In this pursuit, humans have made tremendous efforts through observation, experimentation, and modelling, as this understanding is crucial for addressing environmental challenges such as climate change and for informing sustainable practices. While these scientific discussions are valuable, there is an even more urgent and fundamental truth we need to focus on: ecology is the real economy — our survival, security and progress depend on it. In simple terms, this might be the clearest way to define sustainability — finding the right balance between protecting the environment and supporting economic development. Without this balance, neither the environment nor the economy can thrive in the long run.
Despite being part of the animal kingdom, human evolution, through the course of civilisation, has led to a growing disconnection from nature. This disconnection with nature has been identified as a reason for the ongoing biodiversity loss (the recent Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services or IPBES Transformative Change report).
In the early stages of human history, a nomadic lifestyle compelled individuals to rely on and exploit natural resources solely for their basic, day-to-day survival needs. Over time, this individual-centric resource use evolved into collective consumption aimed at meeting the needs of growing communities. As human societies expanded and organised themselves into nations, this demand scaled further to cater to the needs of entire countries. Eventually, this progression gave rise to global competition, where nations began to exploit nature not only to satisfy present demands but also to secure resources for future development. Unlike humans, no other species in the animal kingdom exhibits this pattern of large-scale, anticipatory exploitation of natural resources. Other animals live in harmony with their environments, taking only what they need for immediate survival, without disturbing the long-term balance of the ecosystems they inhabit.
New complications
The ever-intensifying cycle of human consumption and global competition has placed an unprecedented strain on the planet's ecosystems and significantly accelerated the pace of climate change — a natural phenomenon now dangerously amplified by human activities. In response to these growing environmental challenges, nature-based solutions have been widely advocated in global conservation efforts. These approaches aim to leverage the inherent resilience of ecosystems to mitigate climate impacts, restore biodiversity, and support sustainable development. However, a paradox emerges: we continue to exploit nature to satisfy our needs and greed, while simultaneously relying on the same natural systems to act as a buffer against the consequences of such exploitation. This dual dependence risks creating deeper ecological imbalances and may further complicate the ability to address the climate crisis effectively.
In this context, rather than merely attempting to understand the intricate complexity of ecological systems from a scientific standpoint, it is far more critical to recognise a fundamental truth — that ecology is the permanent economy. Acknowledging this principle shifts our perspective from short-term exploitation to long-term stewardship, positioning ecological health not as a constraint, but as the very foundation of human survival, economic stability, and climate resilience.
This realisation is not just timely — it is essential to confronting the ongoing environmental crisis and shaping a sustainable future. It is only through this reframing that humanity can move from reactive conservation to proactive planetary sustainability. The climate crisis is not just a scientific challenge. It is a moral and existential reckoning with the ecological foundations of our existence.
The need to reconnect with nature
Climate change and change in distribution patterns of biological diversity are not new for planet earth. However, the rate at which it is now occurring is detrimental to the planet's biological diversity, including people, due to past unsustainable developmental activities by humans. Therefore, the change we need must come from within.
Since all developmental activities across the globe are aimed at fulfilling human needs, adopting a sustainable lifestyle is every individual's responsibility in order to ensure the success of global sustainability initiatives. To achieve this, we must realise that humans are an integral part of nature.
Though technological advancements have distanced modern lifestyles from nature, one unique natural trait that humans possess is the power to reconnect with nature using emotion (which still lives within us). Thus, future conservation efforts should be designed to strengthen our emotional bond with nature. To ignite this, a realisation that 'ecology is the permanent economy', is more imperative than merely understanding the ecological complexity that exists in nature.
P. Ragavan is a scientist with an interest in taxonomy, ecology and the biogeochemistry of mangroves and seagrasses. He is working on the conservation and management of mangroves and carbon dynamics in the blue carbon habitats of India. The views expressed are personal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
7 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Trump calls for ‘regime change' to ‘make Iran great again' after ‘monumental' nuke blitz as Tehran vows to revenge
DON'S MIGA CALL Trump calls for 'regime change' to 'make Iran great again' after 'monumental' nuke blitz as Tehran vows to revenge Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump has floated the idea of a regime change in Tehran to "Make Iran Great Again" after bombing the Islamic Republic. Less than a day after the US military blitzed three key facilities central to the Iranians' nuclear ambitions, Trump hinted that the Mullahs' regime could well be toppled. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 United States President Donald J Trump addressed the nation after bombing Iran Credit: AP 4 Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could be toppled, Trump suggested 4 Crowds holding Iranian flags gather in the Revolution Square in the capital Credit: Getty 4 Inspired by his Make America Great Again (MAGA) political movement, the president called for "Make Iran Great Again" (MIGA) - and hinted that the autocratic Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could be ousted. Trump wrote on Truth Social: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!" Trump's post came despite his MAGA administration repeatedly saying the US is not looking for a regime change in Iran. Though the Israelis have expressed great interest in toppling the top Islamist leadership in Tehran, something they think would bring peace in the Middle East. Trump's No2 JD Vance yesterday said that the administration's view "has been very clear that we don't want a regime change." He told NBC's Meet The Press: "We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out. We want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here." Speaking of the US bombings in Iran, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said: "This mission was not and has not been about regime change." Trump last night hailed the US military bombing on Iran's key nuclear facilities, saying the strikes "obliterated" Tehran's doomsday program. He said that the US military took the "bomb out of Iran's hands" and caused "monumental" damage to Tehran's nuclear ambitions. But the Islamic Republic - hurt and wounded - has vowed to retaliate by striking US targets in the Middle East. Tehran retaliated to the US bombing by approving steps to close the Strait of Hormuz - a bottleneck entrance to the Gulf where nearly a quarter of the oil shipped around the world passes through narrow waters. Attempting to choke off Gulf oil by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing and derail the world economy. It would also invite an almost certain conflict with the US Navy's massive Fifth Fleet based in the Gulf, which is tasked with keeping it open. Meanwhile, Ali Akbar Velayati, an advisor to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said bases used by US forces could be attacked in retaliation. 'Any country in the region or elsewhere that is used by American forces to strike Iran will be considered a legitimate target for our armed forces,' he said in a message carried by the official IRNA news agency. 'America has attacked the heart of the Islamic world and must await irreparable consequences.' Tehran has so far not followed through on its threats of retaliation against the US - either by targeting its military bases or trying to choke off global oil supplies. But that may not hold up. Trump warned that further action could be taken if Tehran doesn't agree to an adequate peace deal, or tries to harm American interests. He said in a nationally televised speech at the White House: "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier." "There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days." Stay up to date with the latest on Israel vs Iran with The Sun's live blog below...
Barnama
7 minutes ago
- Barnama
- Universities as Centres for AI Talent Development
Opinions on topical issues from thought leaders, columnists and editors. The Artificial Intelligence Roadmap (AI R-map) 2021–2025 aims to drive the comprehensive development and adoption of AI technologies. Malaysia is intensifying its efforts to become a regional leader in artificial intelligence (AI) by focusing on talent cultivation and digital infrastructure. AI technology is a strategic necessity for the nation to enhance its global competitiveness. It emphasises the creation of a robust AI ecosystem, strengthening data and technology infrastructure, empowering local talent, and ensuring ethical and inclusive AI governance. This initiative, developed by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), is supported by various stakeholders including higher education institutions, industry players, and government agencies. Therefore, universities must take a more proactive approach in offering AI-based academic programmes, including undergraduate and postgraduate degrees, as well as short-term and professional certification courses. Local universities play a pivotal role as key drivers in the development of human capital and responsible AI research. One of the major challenges in AI development in Malaysia is the shortage of skilled professionals and local experts in the field. Some local universities have begun to offer specialised programmes in AI and machine learning. However, these efforts need to be expanded through curriculum alignment, continuous training for lecturers, and close collaboration with industry to enhance graduate employability. Beyond education, universities also play a critical role in AI research. Research focus should not be limited to advanced technological development alone, but also include the application of AI in addressing local challenges such as smart agriculture, flood management, adaptive learning, and public health. The AI Roadmap underscores the importance of collaboration among universities, industry, and the public sector. This means universities must plan transdisciplinary research projects that go beyond the ivory tower and produce tangible impacts on society. The numerous challenges Nonetheless, efforts to strengthen AI at the university level face numerous challenges such as funding constraints, gaps in lecturer expertise, and varying levels of technological readiness. Thus, long-term strategies such as phased investments, sabbatical training for lecturers at global technology centres, and the development of online AI learning platforms must be explored to ensure these initiatives are inclusive and sustainable. With the immense potential of AI, ethical, privacy, and social justice concerns inevitably arise. Universities should serve as critical spaces for evaluating the societal implications of AI, particularly from the perspectives of policy, ethics, and equity. For instance, how can AI systems be applied fairly in education or recruitment processes? How is user data protected in AI applications? Courses such as AI Ethics, Responsible Innovation, and Digital Rights should be incorporated into the curriculum to ensure that future generations are not only technologically literate but also capable of critical and responsible thinking. Universities have the potential to become innovation hubs through centres of excellence, AI laboratories, and startup incubators. By supporting students and researchers in commercialising AI technologies, universities can contribute to the growth of the digital economy and strengthen the national innovation ecosystem. Reinforcing the university-government-industry relationship The tripartite relationship among universities, government, and industry must be reinforced through platforms such as the Public-Private Research Network (PPRN) and the National Technology and Innovation Sandbox (NTIS). Moreover, university alumni also play a significant role as change agents in the national AI landscape. Successful alumni in this field can mentor students through guidance sessions, workshops, or industrial training opportunities at IT companies. This creates a support network among agencies to accelerate the development of AI talent in the country. Neighbouring countries such as Singapore and Vietnam are also aggressively investing in AI development through world-class research centres and funding initiatives. Singapore, for example, has established AI Singapore, a national initiative focused on solving challenges in both the public and private sectors. Hence, Malaysian universities must act strategically to avoid falling behind in the race to build regional capabilities in future technologies. Regional cooperation in the form of student and researcher exchanges, as well as joint projects, should be pursued to enhance global competitiveness. With a clear commitment, strong policy support from the government, and collaborative efforts from various stakeholders, local universities can position Malaysia as a progressive and competitive regional leader in AI. -- BERNAMA Assoc Prof Dr Suhana Saad is a Senior Lecturer at the Centre for Development, Social and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pope Leo XIV makes a strong appeal for peace during his Sunday Angelus prayer
Pope Leo XIV made a strong appeal for peace during his Sunday Angelus prayer in St. Peter's square, calling for international diplomacy to 'silence the weapons.'
