If you're quick, you can get the original Pixel Watch for just $69.99
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
We're big advocates of stepping back a generation or two to find the best value in tech. If you're of the same mind, this is a tantalizing offer. Those of you fast enough to catch it can find that Woot has an amazing Google Pixel Watch deal running right now. Originally selling for $400, the eye-catching smartwatch is down to just $69.99 today.
Google Pixel Watch (41mm, LTE) for $69.99 ($330 off)
We've obviously seen plenty of deals on this device since it launched a couple of years back, but nothing to match this offer. For example, the LTE model to which this deal refers has never been even close to this cheap on Amazon. You may have to decide quickly, though, as the Wi-Fi-only variant is already sold out — unsurprising at this price.
Google Pixel Watch (LTE)
Google Pixel Watch (LTE)
The Pixel Watch is the first wearable with the Big G.
The Google Pixel Watch is a Wear OS-powered wearable that's aiming to be the smartwatch for everyone. It has a robust app library, plenty of Fitbit-based health-tracking features, and a classy design.
See price at Woot!
Save
$330.00
Selling fast!
The first-gen Pixel Watch marked a promising debut for Google's smartwatch ambitions. Its sleek, minimalist design and fluid performance made a strong first impression, and the integration of Fitbit features like heart rate tracking and sleep monitoring gave it solid fitness credentials. It also nailed the basics of a modern smartwatch, with Google Assistant, Wallet, Maps, and more on board. Battery life can't match that of its successors, but at this price, it's still a steal.
Hit the widget above if you want to learn more, and cross your fingers that the limited stock hasn't been snapped up yet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Women are getting wealthier — and they don't invest the same way as men
Women's share of retail financial assets in the US and EU is set to reach between 40% to 45% by 2030. Factors like declining marriage rates and higher earnings have played a role in the trend. Commentators say women invest more cautiously than men, focusing on goals and values. Women are becoming richer, and they're changing the face of wealth. According to a report by McKinsey published last month, women control about a third of all retail financial assets in the US and the European Union. By 2030, that proportion is expected to rise to between 40% to 45%, wrote Cristina Catania, global co-convener and European lead for the risk and resilience practice, and Jill Zucker, senior partner and co-leader of McKinsey's global growth transformation service line. The report is based on a survey of about 13,000 American and European investors, nearly half of whom were female financial decision makers. It found that between 2018 and 2023, global wealth rose by 43%, but jumped by 51% for women. Women's expanding control of assets is being driven by a combination of factors, including a continuing decline in marriage rates, the ongoing boost in women's average earnings, demographic trends like longer life expectancies, and a broad shift in attitudes about women managing their own finances. As women become wealthier through investing, it's becoming clearer that they don't approach it the same way as men. "Women are much more risk-aware," Anna-Sophie Hartvigsen, cofounder of financial education and investment platform Female Invest, told Business Insider. "I would like to call it much more realistic in their own ability to invest." She said women are less likely than men to invest emotionally. "On average, men trade a lot more often than women because they believe they can beat the market or they read something in the news, and they get pumped up or afraid, and then they invest based on that," Hartvigsen said. Female investors, in her view, tend to be more calm, more realistic, and better at assessing risk. However, Katie Geery, an advisor at Rise Private Wealth Management, says being more cautious can also hold women back by leading them to miss out on opportunities to build wealth. "It is important to work with a trusted financial advisor who understands your risk tolerance and can walk you through making well-educated investment decisions based on your long-term goals," she told BI. The aims of investing also sometimes differ between men and women. "Women prefer to invest toward achieving specific goals rather than chasing the highest returns," said Avanti Shetye, financial planner at Wealthwyzr. Geery said female investors tend to be more focused on philanthropy and gifting. They often consider their values when buying stock and want their purchases to help make a better impact on the world. "Women often seek financial advisors who are empathetic and take the time to get to know them on a more personal level to gain a deeper understanding of their goals and values," she said. On Female Invest, Hartvigsen said the principles its members care about the most include climate, especially a firm's carbon footprint, and diversity in leadership, in terms of a board having a good gender balance. For Shetye, it's important to start investing early. "Women tend to be primary caregivers for children or aging parents and often take unpaid time off," she said. "Not only that, women statistically live longer than men, which implies that women would need to invest as much as they can as early as possible so that their portfolios last them through retirement." Hartvigsen said long-term financial planning is vital: "When you do that, it doesn't matter what happens today." Both agree that this plan should be grounded in expert advice. "Working with a financial planner whose planning process is rooted in financial education can help provide comfort and security to stay consistent even in the roughest of markets," Shetye said. But she also believes that practice is more important than perfection. "You are never going to know everything there is to know about investing," Shetye said. "The key is consistency, and time will do the heavy lifting." Hartvigsen advises her clients to invest monthly on the same day and to diversify their investments. "If you do that, historically, it has been near impossible not to make money in the long run." Read the original article on Business Insider 登入存取你的投資組合
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It sounds sick, but Iran hostilities may be good for stocks
It sounds sick, but Iran hostilities may be good for stocks originally appeared on TheStreet. So, President Trump ordered B-2 bombers to drop bunker-busting bombs on three Iranian nuclear facilities late Saturday. He pronounced the result "a spectacular success," with Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities "completely and totally obliterated." There will be lots of media coverage Sunday and beyond on whether the operation worked and whether the United States will be dragged into a third war in the Middle East since 1991. 💵💰💰💵 A question for investors, however, is this: How will stocks react?There are some unknowns. There's been no verification that Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities are, in fact, totally obliterated. It's not clear if Iran will try to cut a deal to stop the Israeli and U.S. bombing or opt somehow to play a long game of defending itself with missile shots at Israel and U.S. military bases in the Middle East. Nonetheless, there's a good chance Wall Street will seize on the attacks as a prime stock-buying opportunity. That's what happened in 2003's Second Gulf War when U.S.-led forces invaded Iraq and toppled the dictatorial regime of Saddam started to tumble in late January 2003 as another war against Iraq became inevitable. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index was down as much as 9% for the year on March 11. But then investors started to believe the invasion would go well, and the S&P 500 started to recover. Indeed, when Baghdad fell on April 9, 2003, the index had recovered all the early losses and was up 8.2% from the March low. And stocks never looked back. The S&P 500 finished up 26.4% in 2023. The gain from the March 2003 low to year-end: 38%. One will be able to see how investors and markets are looking at the conflict starting at 6 p.m. ET Sunday. That's when futures trading in the S&P 500, the Dow Jones industrials and the Nasdaq-100 starts. Gains like 2003 might not happen. Iran was lobbing missiles at the Israeli cities of Tel Aviv and Haifa into Sunday. And, so far, there's no hint that Iran's leadership wants a cease fire. A prolonged fight might be bad for stocks. Iran has missiles and drones to deploy. It could block off Strait of Hormuz, through which 25% of the world's crude oil is shipped. Blocking the strait would send global oil prices sharply higher and cause havoc for the global economy. in fact, oil prices already have reacted. As tensions have grown between Israel and Iran (and now the United States), crude oil has climbed 29.3% to $73.84 per 42-gallon barrel from a May 5 closing low. U.S. gasoline prices have risen, too, about 4% or so, to about $3.20 a gallon, according to companies would profit. In fact, stocks in the S&P 500's Energy Sector are up 9.2% so far in June, the best performance by any of the 11 S&P 500 sectors. Oil-and-gas producer APA Corp. () , the sector leader is up 15.8% over the last month, according to data. Exxon Mobil () has jumped 9.3%; Chevron () is has risen almost 9%. More Experts Analyst makes bold call on stocks, bonds, and gold TheStreet Stocks & Markets Podcast #8: Common Sense Investing With David Miller Veteran fund manager sends dire message on stocks Theoretically, the first-quarter earnings seasons is done, but some of the late stragglers due this week are important. These include: FedEx () , after Tuesday's close. FedEx shares have struggled, but there is hope. The delivery giant is doing business again with () , and its business overall is growing again. But shares are off nearly 20% this year because of tariff worries. Earnings are estimated to rise 8.9% from a year ago to $5.89 a share. Revenue will be off slightly at $21.8 billion. Cruise-line giant Carnival Corp. () , before Tuesday's open. Between August 2024 and Jan. 30, the shares doubled to $28.49 because bookings were beyond terrific. Then, the shares fell 49%, thanks to the Trump tariff plan and the mini-stock panic. Carnival is back to $23.77. The quarterly revenue estimate of $6.2 billion is up 7.3% from a year ago. Earnings of 24 cents a share would be up 118%. Chip maker Micron Technology () shares are up 47% this year, and Wall Street likes — no, loves — the stock, whose chips have carved out a lucrative spot in artificial intelligence. In fact, the shares are already ahead of one analyst's one-year price target. The revenue estimate is $8.8 billion, up nearly 30% from a year ago. Earnings of $1.59 a share would be up 156%. Nike () is having a challenging year. The shares are down 21% this year, third-worst among the Dow Jones industrial stocks. True, it's selling athletic wear and shoes again on but it is extremely vulnerable to the Trump tariff hikes. Barrons says Nike's factories in Vietnam, Indonesia and China manufacture 50%, 27% and 18% of all its footwear. (Yes, that adds up to 95% of production.) The Nike revenue estimate: $10.7 billion, down 15.1% from a year ago. Earnings of 12 cents would be down 88%.It sounds sick, but Iran hostilities may be good for stocks first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 22, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 22, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Rises 3% After U.S. Bombs Iranian Nuclear Sites
While many were expecting the oil market to open for electronic trading at 6 p.m. ET with a bang, 30 minutes into trading, oil was up by barely 3%, despite the U.S. military's overnight strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, a geopolitical incident that might normally have sent oil soaring. At 6:27 p.m. ET, Brent crude was trading up 3.17% at $79.45 per barrel, while the U.S. crude benchmark, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) was trading up $3.18 at $76.19 per barrel in early New York trading. The muted reaction underscores how firmly markets remain anchored in OPEC+ spare capacity, robust global inventories, and bearish macro flows. Previous incidents of this magnitude have triggered far sharper moves in crude markets. When Iran-linked militants struck Saudi Aramco's Abqaiq facility in September 2019, temporarily halting 5% of global oil output, Brent futures spiked nearly 20% in a single day, marking the largest one-day price jump in history. Similarly, following the U.S. drone strike on Qassem Soleimani in early 2020, prices surged a much more modest ~4% amid fears of regional retaliation. Today's tepid response highlights how much more insulated markets have become from geopolitical flashpoints. The coordinated U.S. airstrikes hit Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan overnight, inflicting visible damage on enrichment and research infrastructure. Tehran has promised retaliation, but so far, energy markets are betting that escalation remains limited. Veteran analyst Tom Kloza said on X that traders seemed to be 'waiting to see if Iran disrupts Hormuz before lifting the gas price alarm,' while strategist Velina Tchakarova commented that despite rising tensions, 'signal remains weak' due to high inventories. Nearly 20% of global oil moves through the Strait of Hormuz. Should Iran retaliate there, today's calm could break into a price spike that puts $100 oil back on the table. For now, traders are holding their bets—watching, not panicking. By Tom Kool for More Top Reads From this article on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
