'This is another insult' : Water rates to triple in Central Hawke's Bay
Photo:
123rf
Water rates in Central Hawke's Bay are set to triple over the next decade, and angry residents are wondering how they are going to pay.
By 2035 Central Hawke's Bay residents connected to the council's water supply could see an increase per household from about $2500 a year to more than $7000.
The hike is due to a proposed regional water entity under the replacement for the Three Waters Policy. The new 'Local Water Done Well' scheme sits alongside legislation mandating councils decide, along with their communities, how it meets the new standards government has set for water delivery and quality of infrastructure.
Bob in Waipawa is shocked by the figures, he told RNZ that it is simply unaffordable for so many.
"It's extreme - and it also means there must have been a significant failure. It's unheard of - and as if the cost of living isn't already through the roof.
"We probably can weather it, we'll cut down on any extras.. but for people who can't weather it, it will really badly impact them - anyone on fixed income such as a disability or pension," he said.
Fellow resident Debbie Stewart was also worried.
"I think it's disgusting. We have very high rates here, the second highest in New Zealand and we get nothing for it - so this is another insult.
"You'll notice a lot of houses for sale right now, people are moving because of rates being hiked up all the time. It used to be a cheap option to live here, but now we pay more rates than Hastings," she said.
Debbie Stewart
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
Another resident, who did not want to be named, shared Bob and Debbie's fears.
"I'm quite concerned about it, I think people are struggling already just paying their rates fees as they are.. and if they're projected to rise it's just going to take more money out of people's pockets," he said.
Bob wanted to see the government offering incentives for tax and rate payers who take more responsibility - such as conserving water and reusing grey water.
"If someone isn't doing anything, then their rates should be higher. There should be incentives to improve and reduce, and make the region better - rather than a blanket cost that negatively impacts everyone," said Bob.
Central Hawke's Bay District Council (CHBDC) said the water rates were derived from modelling completed for business cases for each of the three options.
It said costs were determined from what each council indicated it needed to do in their long-term plans. And while there were still a number of details to be worked out, it has been assumed each council would pay its own way for its water infrastructure.
Mayor Alex Walker said this was the basis of the numbers presented to the community - so everyone can clearly see what costs and increases are looming over the next 10 years.
"We're in a perfect storm in Central Hawke's Bay. We're having to invest in catch-up from past underinvestment, meet growing regulatory expectations and invest for the future all at the same time," said Walker
She told RNZ a tripling of water rates by 2035 would be very tough for residents.
"This is intimidating for a householder to think about what $7000 of just water would mean for their household," she said.
He said it was also intimidating to deal with the huge list of problems that CHBDC had on its plate with its 'three waters' infrastructure, which is the combined services of drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater management.
"Twenty-five percent of our drinking water piping network is at high risk of failure, 40 percent of our wastewater pipe network is at high risk of failure. We have two water reservoirs that feed our main towns - both of which are over 100 years old and earthquake prone and need replacement.
"We have six wastewater treatment plants - none are compliant and one is under an environment court order and all needed to be upgraded. And all of this is in the context of a growing community," said Walker.
Central Hawke's Bay Mayor Alex Walker.
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
Under the new 'Local Water Done Well' scheme, the Central Hawke's Bay District Council has three options to choose from: A regional controlled organisation, a stand-alone district council controlled organisation, or an in-house delivery unit.
The mayor said the council's preferred option was the regional model.
"If we are going to make inroads into these huge numbers, then we need to be in a bigger entity, we need a team approach," she said.
Walker also acknowledged that cost to councils and ratepayers would have been 'significantly less' under the previous government's Three Waters policy. But she said being part of a much larger water entity with about 22 councils, rather than four, would have been challenging, so this latest scheme was the best way forward.
"It's very clear to the councillors and I that the model is not a silver bullet to our affordability issues, but in the current changing legislative and regulatory environment, we are stronger together as Hawke's Bay."
Submissions on the new water infrastructure scheme are open until 12 June
A spokesperson for the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) told RNZ that as Mayor Walker has pointed out, Central Hawkes Bay District Council, like many councils around the country, required major investment in water services infrastructure to address underinvestment.
"The cost of the required investment will ultimately be met by households and businesses, whether that's directly via council rates or water charges from council owned water organisations," they said.
Local Water Done Well is the coalition government's plan to address New Zealand's long-standing water infrastructure challenges, and the DIA said it recognised the importance of local decision making, and flexibility for communities and councils to determine how their water services will be delivered in the future.
"It does this while ensuring a strong emphasis on meeting rules for water quality and investment in infrastructure."
The DIA said the scheme included key features and significant differences from the previous government's policy, which were more supportive of affordability for households.
Waipawa main street
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
"The previous government's policy imposed mandatory amalgamation of council water services and assets into a handful of large water services entities. It relied on significant efficiency gains and price harmonisation, with some communities within each entity's service delivery area subsidising costs for others to keep household costs low.
"This is not a requirement under Local Water Done Well, instead it is up to individual councils and regions to determine what the best arrangements are for their communities."
The DIA said an arrangement the coalition government secured last year with Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA) supports affordability for households and other users.
"It gives council water organisations under Local Water Done Well better access to financing. This allows them to spread the cost of required investment for long-term capital improvements over future users of the asset, rather than front loading the costs onto the current ratepayer base."
Local Government Minister Simon Watts agreed that water rates rises for residents would not have been less under Three Waters, and he said councils are progressing well with their new plans.
"They're putting those plans to me in September and when we receive those we will review them and make sure they are fit for purpose.
"I don't believe they (residents) will be paying more under our scheme," said Watts.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
19 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Bidders for Northern Expressway public private partnership revealed
Transport and Infrastructure minister Chris Bishop said there was "very strong" interest in the project. Photo: RNZ/Calvin Samuel Three bidders have been confirmed for the next section of the Northern Expressway from Warkworth to Te Hana. The government has revealed the shortlist for the public private partnership, with the bids made up of three consortia. The groups are bidding to build a 26km, four-lane expressway connecting to the existing Pūhoi to Warkworth stretch. The indicative design includes a 850m long twin-bore tunnel in the Dome Valley, and three interchanges at Warkworth, Wellsford and Te Hana. The government opened up expressions of interest as part of its Investment Summit in Auckland in March. The summit invited representatives from more than 100 companies from 15 countries, who controlled $6 trillion in assets and funds between them. Some businesses indicated they were keen on the project before the summit had even wrapped up, two of which were included in the shortlist. The shortlist consortia are: The groups must now submit a Request for Proposals, setting out how they intend to finance, design, construct, manage and maintain the section of the expressway. Transport and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop said the government received "very strong" interest in the project. "The shortlisted consortia are all well positioned to deliver a high-quality motorway that will boost regional resilience, enhance road safety and travel reliability, and strengthen vital connections for freight, tourism and everyday drivers," he said. The preferred bidder will be chosen in early 2026, with the contract finalised by the middle of the year and construction to begin later in the year. In March, Guido Cacciaguerra from Italian firm Webuild confirmed he would bid. "If the government gets this right, it's the most powerful marketing tool to attract more investors in the future," he said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Iwi must deal with us 'whether they want us or not'
A seabed mining protest held earlier in June. Photo: RNZ / Emma Andrews The head of a company that wants to mine millions of tonnes of ironsands from the seabed off the Taranaki coast says local iwi - which unanimously oppose the project - must engage with Trans-Tasman Resources "whether they want us or not", when it gets its consents. TTR has approval to vacuum up 50 million tonnes of sand annually from the South Taranaki seabed for 35 years to extract iron, vanadium and titanium, but the company still needs consent to discharge 45 million tonnes of unwanted sediment a year back into the shallow waters. The company has previously been thwarted through legal challenges right up to the Supreme Court and is currently going through the fast-track consenting process. TTR said it can mine the seabed environmentally safely, and its project would significantly boost the national and regional economies. Managing director Alan Eggers outlined the virtues of the project to councillors and members of the public - many of whom opposed it - for about an hour at a workshop last week. At the conclusion of his presentation, councillor Bryan Vickery asked Eggers why - despite his compelling case - did all eight Taranaki iwi oppose the project, and why was there a disconnect between TTR and iwi. In May, Ngā Iwi o Taranaki released a statement on behalf of the eight Post Settlement Governance Entity iwi of Taranaki, voicing their support for South Taranaki iwi in their opposition to seabed mining off the coast of Pātea. "Our iwi stand alongside our southern iwi to support them and amplify their concerns about seabed mining in their takiwā," said Ngā Iwi o Taranaki pouwhakahaere Wharehoka Wano. "We encourage all iwi to support our South Taranaki whānau in their deep opposition to TTR and seabed mining." Eggers told the workshop TTR had documented its interactions with iwi and they were extensive. "We're very disappointed at the lack of engagement that they have given us. They haven't engaged, they've refused to engage with us. "We would love to engage with them and, let me say this, we are going to be working with South Taranaki iwi when we get our consent, whether they like want us or not. "We're going to want them on board, and were going to want them to actually do a lot of this marine monitoring and research." After the meeting, Eggers told RNZ that iwi previously wanted to invest in the project. "We had a quite good relationship with South Taranaki iwi to start with and they were quite keen, in fact, to join us as perhaps an equity partner in the project, invest in the project. We'd welcomed that." Protect Our Moana group member and Parihaka uri Tihikura Hohaia said he didn't know who Eggers was talking about, when he said TTR had consulted with iwi. "He certainly hasn't come to consult with any of us grassroots whanau, hapū that are keeping our home fires burning on our marae... not at all, I can tell you that right now." Hohaia didn't hear anything in Eggers' presentation that made him think the project could go ahead in an environmentally safe way. "I don't believe it," he said. "It mustn't go ahead. "If it goes ahead, it's going to condemn our already impoverished, trampled uri to generations of protest." During his presentation, Eggers spoke to economic benefits and environmental credentials of TTR's project, while councillors and the public gallery maintained a steely silence. He pointed to the 3.2 billion tonne resource TTR had discovered in the South Taranaki Bight, saying it could generate export revenues of $1 billion a year, making it New Zealand's 11th or 12th largest exporter. The project would create about 1320 jobs nationally, and generate $190 million in government royalties and taxes per annum, Eggers said. Taranaki would benefit significantly. New Plymouth would be the operational headquarters, and Hāwera a training and logistics base. TTR would directly employ 305 people in Taranaki - 270 operational staff and 35 in administrative support. Eggers said 1125 jobs would be generated in the region in logistics, supplies, services and maritime operations. Port Taranaki and Whanganui Port would be upgraded, and TRR would spend $250 million annually in Taranaki. He brushed off concerns about the project disturbing marine mammals and rocky reefs, arguing - with supporting evidence - that there were no reefs in the project area and visits by blue whales anywhere near the mining site were extremely rare. Concerns about the plume created by dredging the seafloor were also dismissed, Eggers arguing that waters near the site would be no more turbid than during a stormy day and reefs would not be smothered. At the conclusion of his presentation, Eggers took about half a dozen questions from councillors, before Mayor Neil Holdom drew the meeting to a close. Eggers thought the meeting went well. "Well, I was pleased to have been given the opportunity, and hopefully I did give them some facts and figures around the project, and its benefits and effects." Hohaia remained unconvinced. "It felt very violent against a backdrop of a cultural upbringing in an area of land loss and so the pure focus on economics for us, the people in the room, sitting in the gallery, it seemed totally bereft of any wairua, of any spirit at all." He said proud opponents of the project sat through the address "with dignity". "These kinds of presentation, as you'd expect, are all about money, all about the supposed benefits through that perspective alone. We've seen enough environmental degradation, we've seen enough cultural degradation here in Taranaki to know better than to be lured by any more sliver coins." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
West Coast Regional Council chief executive calls for more staff as goldmine delays bite
West Coast Regional Council chief executive Darryl Lew (L) and councillors Allan Birchfield (M) and Brett Cummings (R). Photo: LDR The West Coast Regional Council has conceded it needs to take on more staff, after a raft of complaints about the time it takes to process resource consents, including some from its own councillors. The council's former chair - and alluvial goldminer - Allan Birchfield released letters last week from a company distressed that its fledgling goldmine had been shut down, and its seven workers and capital put at risk, after waiting 17 months for a consent. Council resource management committee chair Brett Cummings - also a veteran goldminer - has set out his concerns in a letter to West Coast Regional Council (WCRC) chief executive Darryl Lew, with a long list of questions about how consents are being dealt with. Both councillors have criticised the council's practice of hiring North Island consultancy firms to process goldmine consents, alleging the planners involved are unfamiliar with the industry, ask for irrelevant information and delay the process by asking what Cummings has called "stupid " questions. In his case, the wait has been seven months for what should have been a straightforward consent on Ngai Tahu forestry land, which the iwi had approved, Cummings said. In reply to the councillor's questions, Lew said the council had received 56 resource consent applications this year, and half of them had been outsourced to consultants in Buller, Greymouth and New Plymouth. Of those 28, two had been approved, 11 were sent back to the applicants because they were "incomplete" and the rest were still being processed, Lew said. "Similar to the WOF process for a car, when deficient applications are returned, applicants are informed of areas that are required to be enhanced and they can then resubmit the applications for processing." Of the remaining 28 being dealt with by council staff, 10 had been approved, one had been sent back for more information within the statutory time limit and 12 had been returned to sender as "incomplete". The rest were still being processed, Lew said. The council's use of consultants has increased, compared to the same period last year, the figures show. Between January and April 2024 , the council received 57 resource consent applications - one was publicly notified, 51 were processed in house and only six outsourced to a consultant. There was little difference in the fees charged to applicants - council staff were charged out at $185 an hour and consultants' hourly rates ranged from $140-192 - all plus GST. There had been only two council consents staff employed in January this year, joined by a trainee in February, and their availability had been reduced by sick leave, annual leave and training time, Lew said. Last year, there had been three officers on the job. "To date, I haven't increased the consents team, however I do believe now is the time. More consents are requiring technical input and we are having more going to hearings, so this is impacting on resourcing, not to mention future demands like the fast track projects." The council would prefer to use its own staff who had local knowledge, Lew said. But it would be impossible to do away entirely with consultants because the volume of consent applications and workload was unpredictable. Consents for alluvial goldmining were much more complex than they were in the early days of the RMA in the 1990s, the chief executive noted. They now had to be assessed against a lengthy list of national policy statements and environmental standards, including Freshwater Management, Indigenous Biodiversity, drinking water, air quality, greenhouse gases, and management of contaminants in soil to protect human health. "We await the government changes to these national instruments and the replacement RMA to see if this becomes simpler ... I agree it would be ideal to have consents and application forms as simple as possible. It is a challenge to have them reflect the law and remain simple." In the meantime, the WCRC consents team was working on new application templates and more guidance for alluvial goldminers, and would bring a paper on this to Council on July or August, Lew said. The council had complicated the process by trying to impose static conditions intended for subdivisions and septic tanks on alluvial mines, Cummings said. "An alluvial site evolves as you work your way through it, so you'll start off with your pumps and your pond, and even your access tracks in one place, and as you move along, you move them along as well, but they're demanding maps and trying to include these all things as fixed conditions on the consent. " Until about a year ago, those details were set out for the council in a separate mine work-programme, which was updated, as the site progressed, Cummings said. "The compliance staff would have that and refer to it, when they did their inspection visits. They didn't try to cram everything into the consent itself - that makes no sense, when you're dealing with a dynamic system. "If you move your pond, you're technically in breach." Hiring more consents staff could help the situation, as long as basic issues were addressed, Cummings said. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
