Here's why Ottawa still covers most of the N.W.T.'s annual budget
This year, the territory is receiving about $1.8B through federal funding to cover its $2.5B budget
It's the biggest source of revenue for the N.W.T. government this year, just as it was last year and the year before that: federal transfer payments.
"Territorial Formula Financing is the largest source of the government's revenues and the primary driver of overall revenue growth," N.W.T. Minister of Finance Caroline Wawzonek told MLAs last week, during a committee meeting to help them understand how the funding works.
In 2025-26, the N.W.T. is receiving about $1.8 billion through Territorial Formula Financing, a major chunk of revenue for its $2.5 billion budget to run the territory this year. The funding is also especially useful because it's unconditional, and can be spent however the territory wants.
Why the N.W.T. gets this funding
N.W.T. finance department officials said the formula for this transfer payment takes into account several factors including the territory's population growth, and spending on public services elsewhere in Canada.
This year, the federal government has calculated that the N.W.T. will need $2.2 billion to deliver public services such as health, infrastructure, and education, that are comparable to what is available in the provinces.
But the territorial government is only expected to be able to raise $386 million in revenue through taxes — less than a fifth of that $2.2 billion. The $386 million would include revenue from personal income taxes, business income taxes, property taxes, and other sources.
"That gap is just so large relative to what we see elsewhere, that we need a special type of transfer," Trevor Tombe, an economics professor at the University of Calgary, told CBC News.
Tombe says the Territorial Formula Financing from Canada bridges this gap, so the N.W.T. can offer public services similar to the provinces.
He added it's unlikely the territory would ever be able to outgrow this support, pointing out that this year's Territorial Formula Financing is around five times as much money as the N.W.T. could get from taxes over the same period.
He says the additional money is necessary to run a vast, sparsely populated territory.
"N.W.T. is not unique," Tombe said. "Yukon and Nunavut are also quite reliant on Territorial Formula Financing for the simple reason that spending needs to be a lot higher to deliver comparable levels of public services compared to the tax base that actually exists in the territories."
Population effect
In the briefing, several MLAs told Department of Finance officials that most N.W.T. residents believe the funding is calculated solely based on population numbers, so increasing the territory's population would result in getting more money in total — but staff at the department said that's not completely accurate.
Tombe explained the payment is based on how much spending on public services has increased across the country, as well the N.W.T.'s population.
He said in the most recent aggregate figure, about $820 billion was being spent altogether across the provinces to deliver public services. That increased from about $767 billion the year earlier, a seven-per-cent increase in total provincial and local spending elsewhere.
He said some of that increase in spending Canada-wide is because of population growth in other parts of the country.
Tombe says the N.W.T.'s population growth is about 1.6 per cent slower than other places in the country — and this number is used to calculate how different the increase in funding for N.W.T. services should be than that national average.
"If the population in N.W.T. is growing more slowly than what we observe elsewhere, then we want to deflate, you know, how much of an increase N.W.T. would get," Tombe said.
The N.W.T.'s Territorial Formula Financing of $1.8 billion is up from about $1.7 billion last year, less than that seven per cent number to reflect the N.W.T.'s slower population growth.
Currently, the N.W.T. gets about $42,000 of Territorial Formula Financing per person.
"There's a lot going on under the hood," Tombe said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
3 days ago
- CBC
Gas prices, taxes and misinformation: why more Alberta drivers aren't going electric
Social Sharing Canada's electric vehicle sales are largely focused in just a few provinces, but a recent survey indicates the sector faces a particularly uphill road in Alberta. Just 28 per cent of Albertan respondents said they were certain, very likely or inclined to buy an EV as their next car, in a recent Abacus Data survey, tied with the Atlantic provinces for the lowest among Canadian provinces and falling below the national response of 45 per cent. The survey also found declining interest nationally, as the percentage of respondents who would buy an EV as their next vehicle dropped 13 per cent since they asked the same question to Canadians in 2022. Within that Alberta response, just one per cent said they were certain an EV would be their next car. Blake Shaffer, an associate professor of economics at the University of Calgary, was not surprised to see the disparity. He pointed to Canada's federal incentive for zero-emission vehicles ending, and the threat of U.S. tariffs driving down gas prices earlier this year, and the fact that cold weather can reduce battery range as factors that would create less interest in EVs. But he also noted the similarly low interest from respondents in Abacus's poll who voted Conservative, which he said is indicative of another barrier to EV growth in Alberta: political ideology. "You look at an electoral map, and I think it aligns quite closely with the numbers on your EV intention map," Shaffer said. "For whatever reason, electric vehicles have been caught up as an ideological symbol." Upfront costs vs. saving at the pump Nevertheless, EVs have seen growth in Alberta in recent years. As of March 2024, there were 14,189 electric vehicles registered in Alberta, more than double the number recorded in 2022. That growth has occurred even though Alberta has never had an EV incentive program of its own, like some other provinces. The lack of incentive, combined with a $200 annual provincial tax — which the province says is to account for wear and tear on roads, and make up for the fuel tax that electric vehicles owners don't pay — can lead to a stiff upfront cost compared to similar gas-powered models. That extra cost is the most common barrier to buying an electric car, Shaffer said. It can lead drivers to question if EVs are a good investment. Saskatchewan also places a tax on EV buyers, and its respondents showed a similar lack of enthusiasm to selecting an EV as their next vehicle in the Abacus survey. More simply, Shaffer said slower EV uptake can also be connected to an overall hesitancy to embrace new technology, which he's optimistic can change. "The more people see people like themselves, maybe their neighbours, with a new technology, they start to realize it works, it's not so uncomfortable or scary,'" Shaffer said. William York, president of the Electric Vehicle Association of Alberta, said he sees other reasons why some drivers in Alberta don't want to go electric, including a sense of loyalty to the oil and gas industry, especially among those who remember the downturn the industry felt a decade ago. "I think it plays out in terms of [Albertans] wanting to support the oil and gas industry. So EVs are considered, for right or wrong reasons, an enemy to that industry," York said. But York is frustrated with viewing gas-powered and electric vehicles in opposition. Instead, he notes that Alberta is well positioned to be a player in the EV industry, with its large supplies of lithium and natural gas, which can be used for car batteries and electricity generation respectively. "It just seems like we can't wrap our heads around the nuance, and we argue these topics with a surface-level understanding," York said. Nathan Taylor has noticed a stigma against EVs in his hometown of St. Paul, Alta. He owns a Tesla Model Y, a car he was drawn to out of a fascination for the technology behind electric cars. But the more tangible barrier to that technology, he said, is a lack of public charging infrastructure around much of the province with some towns having none at all. For families who may not be able to afford to own both an electric and gas-powered car, and who need their vehicle for long commutes between cities, a larger network of public charging ports would give them the option to consider an EV, Taylor said. Travelling between his home and Edmonton typically requires adding 20 to 30 minutes to his commute to ensure he can drive by a charging station en route. "It's teaching those little details and having to plan out your life out a little bit with an electric vehicle that is an added inconvenience," Taylor said. "Knowing that there's always a gas station around means you don't have to plan. If we had more charging infrastructure, it would be easier." Misperceptions and spontaneous combustion memes Todd Hillier, a Ford F-150 Lightning owner in Fort McMurray, echoed Taylor's point. He wants to see more charging stations around Alberta. But the money he's saved at the pump from not needing oil changes outweighs that inconvenience, he said. Ever since buying his EV a year and a half ago, he hasn't looked back. But that's still not a common sentiment among many people Hillier talks to, he said. The misinformation he often hears about EVs in conversation and shared in memes online, frustrates him, and he said it prevents people from making an informed choice. And he's heard it all, including that EVs need to be plugged in for days at a time, that the battery often dies unexpectedly leaving a driver stranded on the side of a highway, or that the cars are prone to spontaneous combustion. "A lot of the initial conversations I have with people are straight up misinformation," Hillier said. "It might take a little bit longer to get to Edmonton from Fort McMurray, but I can do it at a fraction of the cost of someone that fills up with gas ... Some people say 'Oh, I'll pay more to get to Edmonton faster.' Sure, that's your prerogative and that's very much a fact. I'd rather have that discussion than someone saying it might spontaneously explode on the way to Edmonton. No, that's not happening." Hillier still sees more EVs in his city than he ever has before, and has found a network of other drivers around Alberta to talk to that's grown even in the past year. That reflects an openness toward EVs that Clean Energy Canada director of communications Trevor Melanson sees in the survey's results. The Abacus survey was commissioned by Clean Energy Canada, and Melanson pointed out that because only 37 per cent of Albertan respondents were certain to buy a gas or diesel car as their next vehicle, it indicates a solid majority are at least open to buying an EV. It just needs to make financial sense to drivers, he said, and more incentives and information around EVs could lead to more uptake. The federal government is currently considering replacing its EV incentive program, which Melanson said would boost sales across the country. "There's a cyclical relationship here between supporting EVs and interest in EVs. When you have governments that support getting an EV and they make it easier for you, you're more likely to be open to it," Melanson said. The Abacus Data survey was conducted with 2,585 Canadians from June 2 to June 5, 2025. A random sample of panelists was invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 1.92%, 19 times out of 20. The data was weighted according to census data to ensure the sample matched Canada's population according to age, gender and region.
Cision Canada
3 days ago
- Cision Canada
Fraser Institute News Release: Ottawa has spent nearly $18 billion settling Indigenous 'specific claims' since 2015
CALGARY, AB, June 19, 2025 /CNW/ - Since 2015, the federal government has paid nearly $18 billion settling an increasing number of 'specific claims' by First Nations, including more than $7 billion last year alone, finds a new study released today by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think tank. "Specific claims are for past treaty breaches, and as such, their number should be finite. But instead of declining over time, the number of claims keeps growing as lucrative settlements are reached, which in turn prompts even more claims," said Tom Flanagan, Fraser Institute senior fellow, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Calgary and author of Specific Claims—an Out-of-Control Program. The study reveals details about "specific claims," which began in 1974 and are filed by First Nations who claim that Canadian governments—past or present—violated the Indian Act or historic treaty agreements, such as when governments purchased reserve land for railway lines or hydro projects. Most "specific claims" date back 100 years or more. Specific claims are contrasted with comprehensive claims, which arise from the absence of a treaty. Crucially, the number of specific claims and the value of the settlement paid out have increased dramatically since 2015. In 2015/16, 11 'specific claims' were filed with the federal government, and the total value of the settlements was $27 million (in 2024 dollars, to adjust for inflation). The number of claims increased virtually every year since so that by 2024/25, 69 'specific claims' were filed, and the value of the settlements in 2024/25 was $7.061 billion. All told, from 2015/16 to 2024/25, the value of all 'specific claims' settlements was $17.9 billion (inflation adjusted). "First Nations have had 50 years to study their history, looking for violations of treaty and legislation. That is more than enough time for the discovery of legitimate grievances," Flanagan said. "Ottawa should set a deadline for filing specific claims so that the government and First Nations leaders can focus instead on programs that would do more to improve the living standards and prosperity for both current and future Indigenous peoples." The Fraser Institute is an independent Canadian public policy research and educational organization with offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Halifax, and Montreal and ties to a global network of think-tanks in 87 countries. Its mission is to improve the quality of life for Canadians, their families and future generations by studying, measuring and broadly communicating the effects of government policies, entrepreneurship and choice on their well-being. To protect the Institute's independence, it does not accept grants from governments or contracts for research. Visit
Calgary Herald
5 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Committee votes to close funding gap for post-secondary office conversion incentive program
A city program intended to entice universities and colleges to set up satellite campuses downtown is moving ahead, with tweaks to the program's terms of reference unanimously endorsed by a council committee on Tuesday. Article content The city's Downtown Post-Secondary Institution Incentive Program was established in 2021, when city council approved a new downtown strategy aimed at reinventing the core by spurring residential development and transforming vacant or underused office buildings into more active uses. Article content Article content Article content Post-secondary institutions that want to expand into the downtown can apply for up to $50 per square foot of convertible office space, up to a maximum of $15 million per project, unless council approves a greater amount. Article content Article content So far, the program has garnered one successful application: City officials announced in April that the former Nexen building off of 7th Avenue S.W. would be converted into a 180,000-square-foot academic, teaching and research space for the University of Calgary's School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape. Article content To help with facility conversion costs, the U of C applied for up to $9 million through the city's incentive program in 2024 but hit a hurdle due to the language of the terms of reference. Article content On Tuesday, Thom Mahler, director of the city's downtown strategy, said U of C officials flagged that under the current terms of reference, program funds are allocated based on the original rental area of existing office space. Article content Article content 'What that means is it limits us to funding only space that was previously designated as office,' he told the committee. Article content 'What we've learned from talking with institutions — as was the case with the University of Calgary proposal — is they're also very interested in using spaces that are at street level and at Plus-15 level in order to provide vibrant gathering spaces for students, and also to use storage and loading requirements for their programs.' Article content Article content In the U of C's case, the university wanted to convert an additional 4,739 square feet of 'retail' and 'storage' space as rentable area in its lease, which led to a $236,950 funding gap. Article content 'Through discussions with other post-secondary institutions, these spaces, which are often main floor lobby spaces, are essential to intended program delivery and used for things like gallery and event functions, student access and lounge areas, and for the assembly of large-scale projects,' Mahler's report stated.
