125 Jets, B-2 Bombers And A Decoy Plan: Inside Trump's 'Operation Midnight Hammer' Against Iran

Last Updated:
Operation Midnight Hammer, which involved 125 aircraft and several B-2 bombers, also included a deception plan that likely gave the US Army a strategic advantage against Iran
Operation Midnight Hammer: The world witnessed US intervention in the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict on Sunday, as strikes were carried out on Tehran's key nuclear sites under the codename 'Operation Midnight Hammer'.
But the operation, which involved 125 aircraft and several B-2 bombers, also included a deception plan that likely gave the US Army a strategic advantage during its strikes on Iran.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, said the American forces used several B-2 Spirit stealth bombers during the operation to destroy Iran's buried network of nuclear research facilities.
'At midnight Friday into Saturday morning, a large B2 strike package comprised of bombers launched from the continental US," he said during a press briefing at the White House.
How US Deceived Iranian Intelligence
Caine said that, to maintain a tactical surprise, part of the main strike package was directed westward into the Pacific as a 'decoy"—a deception effort known only to an 'extremely small number of planners and key leaders in Washington and in Tampa."
Here's a detailed explanation of Washington's 'decoy" plan against Iran:
Deception Strategy: A portion of the strike package was directed westward into the Pacific Ocean as a decoy, creating the illusion of a different operational focus. This move helped preserve tactical surprise.
Final Approach and Coordination: Upon entering Iranian airspace, the B-2s linked up with escort and support aircraft in a precisely timed and complex manoeuvre, requiring exact synchronisation across multiple platforms in a narrow corridor of airspace.
Further detailing the operation, Caine noted that this level of tight integration with minimal communication highlights the 'unmatched coordination capabilities of the U.S. joint force."
He further issued a stern warning to Iran, saying: 'Our forces remain on high alert, and are fully postured to respond to any Iranian retaliation or proxy attacks which would be an incredibly poor choice. We will defend ourselves. The safety of our service members and civilians remains our highest priority."
Meanwhile, US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth called Washington's 'Operation Midnight Hammer' against Iran an 'overwhelming success", adding that they 'devastated" Iranian nuclear facilities at multiple locations.
First Published:

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

37 minutes ago

• Time of India

'Why wouldn't there be a regime change?': Trump's 'hint' after US air strikes in Iran; contradicts his own administration's stand

President Donald Trump speaks from the East Room of the White House in Washington, as Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth listen. (Carlos Barria/Pool via AP) US President Donald Trump on Sunday (local time) appeared to support a potential regime change in Iran, seemingly contradicting his own administration's stand that Operation Midnight Hammer - US air strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran - was not aimed at bringing about a regime change in the Islamic Republic. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, slightly tweaking his "Make America Great Again" slogan. Earlier, Trump administration members such as vice president JD Vance, secretary of state Marco Rubio and defense secretary Pete Hegseth, all made public remarks about how Operation Midnight Hammer was only meant to target the nuclear sites, and not toppling the Iranian regime. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said at a news conference which detailed the aerial bombing of the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites. "Our view is very clear that we don't want a regime want to end their nuclear programme and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here," Vance told NBC News. Speaking to CBS News, Rubio noted that the precise mission had only three objectives - the three targeted nuclear sites. "It was not an attack on Iran, not an attack on the Iranian people, and this wasn't a regime-change move," he stated.

The Hindu

37 minutes ago

• The Hindu

India debunks claims of U.S. using Indian airspace for Iran strikes, PIB Fact Check confirms

India on Sunday (June 22, 2025) dismissed as 'fake' claims by certain social media handles that the U.S. fighter jets used Indian airspace to launch strikes against Iran. Also read: Israel-Iran conflict updates The U.S. bombed three nuclear sites in Iran on Sunday (June 22, 2025), with U.S. President Donald Trump warning of additional strikes if Iran retaliates. Several social media accounts have claimed that Indian Airspace was used by the United States to launch aircrafts against Iran during Operation #MidnightHammer#PIBFactCheck ❌ This claim is FAKE ❌Indian Airspace was NOT used by the United States during Operation… — PIB Fact Check (@PIBFactCheck) June 22, 2025 'Several social media accounts have claimed that Indian airspace was used by the United States to launch aircraft against Iran during Operation #MidnightHammer. This claim is fake,' PIB Fact Check said in a post on X. 'Indian Airspace was NOT used by the United States during Operation #MidnightHammer,' said the fact check unit of the Press Information Bureau that functions under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. It said that the Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine had explained the route used by U.S. aircraft during a press briefing.

Hindustan Times

38 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

US claims strikes on Iran's nuclear sites caused severe damage but full impact unclear

Jun 23, 2025 05:50 AM IST The US military's strike on three sites in Iran raised urgent questions Sunday about what remains of Tehran's nuclear program and how its weakened military might respond. A combination picture shows satellite images over Fordow underground complex, before and after the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran, June 20, 2025 (L) and June 22, 2025.(Reuters) The decision to directly involve the US comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defenses and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. Follow LIVE updates. But U.S. and Israeli officials have said that American stealth bombers and a 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) bunker buster bomb they alone can carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear program buried deep underground. Also Read | US warns Iran against closing Strait of Hormuz: 'It's economic suicide' 'At this time, no one, including the (International Atomic Energy Agency), is in a position to assess the underground damage at Fordo,' said U.N. nuclear chief Rafael Grossi. President Donald Trump announced the strikes. Iran's state-run IRNA news agency reported that attacks targeted the country's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. Iran's foreign minister said Iran reserves the right to retaliate.