A peaceful protest on Ashley Terrace – but with a serious message

On Wednesday evening locals took to the streets in a peaceful protest drawing attention to the amount of traffic, the speed of the traffic and the lack of pedestrian crossings.
An 80-year-old woman was seriously injured at the junction of Ashley Terrace on 28 April.
Cllr Christopher Cowdy said to The Edinburgh Reporter: 'The biggest problem is lack of resources in the council. So when I came here in 2022 there was already a pedestrian crossing programme. There were hundreds of crossings being promised. But within a year, when I was on the Transport Committee that had already run over two years late, because they had bitten off more than they could chew, they said, and they were lacking in resources.
'So I know that the city council is short of money, and it's running on a budget deficit about £50 million a year, and trying and trying to make that up, and trying to get the resources to provide all of the crossings for all of the schools across the entire city is very difficult.'
David Hunter of Living Streets said: 'I think it's fantastic to see. I think pedestrians often don't kick up as much of a fuss as maybe other groups do, so it's great to see it mobilised.
'There must be quite a strength of feeling to have this amount of support.
'But of course there has been a really serious injury to an old lady here. You can see the speed, some of this traffic's going at. I think we really need a strategy for the whole city. I would like to see more money going into these kind of routine improvements, particularly around schools, and I think it would get a lot of public support.'
Despite the council promising crossings three years ago nothing has happened, although Cllr Stephen Jenkinson the Transport Convener has said that 'Councillor Stephen Jenkinson, Transport and Environment 'pedestrian safety across the city is a priority'
He said: 'I fully understand the safety concerns raised by the community in relation to the junction at Ashley Terrace and Harrison Gardens, particularly given the recent road traffic accident which took place there.
'As outlined in the Road Safety Delivery Plan, there are plans in place for two footpath build-outs on Ashley Terrace. Unfortunately, we have experienced some delays due to necessary design revisions and coordination with other services.
'In relation to Ashley Terrace, the installation of a build-out directly in front of the school entrance requires the relocation of a nearby bin hub. This is being progressed through a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) by the Waste team, and we are awaiting further updates from them.'
Like this:
Like

Related

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Edinburgh Live

3 days ago

• Edinburgh Live

Ambitious £35m redevelopment of Edinburgh George Street set to go before councillors

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info An ambitious £35 million redevelopment of George Street is set to go before city councillors for approval. The project was confirmed to still be going ahead at a meeting last month, when it was included in the City Mobility Plan. Now, councillors will be asked to ditch consideration of two 'do minimum' options for the future of the project, and instead endorse the most ambitious version of it. And they'll be asked to sign off on work to get permission to close off streets and other works prepared. Transport Convener and Labour councillor Stephen Jenkinson said: 'I think it's a unique kind of opportunity to do something quite forward thinking. 'Something quite modern and progressive in the centre of a World Heritage Site, in what I would argue is one of the most important streets, not only in Edinburgh but for Scotland as well. 'What we're proposing to do is start the promotion of the statutory process. So this would be doing the behind the scenes work with regards to TROs and the statutory process. 'At the appropriate time, we are able to kick off that process and not delay it further down the line. Under the full version of the plan, George Street would be transformed, with new setts, planters and seating spaces added and eight trees planted. Also, 'hostile vehicle mitigation' – anti-vehicle barriers to stop terror attacks – would be installed, which would be raised and lowered daily to cut off the street from traffic. It has been costed at just over £35 million, with reduced utility relocation costs meaning it can step down from the previously reported £39 million price tag. Funding for the project has not yet been secured, but the bulk of it is expected to come from external grants from the Scottish Government and other bodies. Some could also come from the city's Transient Visitor Levy. Council officers also presented three 'value-engineered' options for the scheme, which could see the trees, some drainage and anti-terrorism barriers removed, as well as the elimination of future-proofing for the street. These versions of the scheme would cost between £13 million and £20 million. However, in a report they will present to councillors next Thursday, officers say that these options could put more financial risk on the council, as they would mean the city could get less external funding. In addition, they say it could cost the city more long-term, both due to the direct cost of installing parts of the project later and due to the impact on businesses of a second closure. Cllr Jenkinson continued: 'George Street is, obviously, a public realm project, it's an active travel project, but it's also, from my perspective, an economic development project as well. 'I think for a project to deliver on all those objectives, I think it ticks many boxes for me as an exciting project to deliver for the city over the next few years.' At next Thursday's Transport and Environment Committee meeting, councillors will also be asked to discard any consideration of two 'do minimum' options previously considered. One of these options was a £10.3 million investment in maintenance on the street, avoiding other changes. Officers said this would not comply with the city's street design guidelines, frustrate local stakeholders who have been invested in the project, and possibly cost the city more than in the other options due to the lack of available external funding. The other option would be a permanent ban on parking throughout George Street, mirroring a trial carried out in 2014. While it would contribute towards the city's emissions reduction targets, and be 'minimal cost', officers said that there was not strong local support for such a move. Cllr Jenkinson said that the project could be scaled back from the full version to one of the 'value engineered' ones if external funding is not as readily available as expected. And, the report says that councillors will be able to reconsider the 'Do Minimum' options at a later date if drawing in funds proves difficult. Councillors will make a decision on the project at the next meeting of the Transport and Environment Committee on Thursday, 26 June, which you can view here.

The Independent

11-06-2025

• The Independent

Sustainable aviation fuel not a ‘silver bullet' to decarbonisation, warns MP

Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is not a 'silver bullet' to decarbonising the industry, ministers have been warned. Labour MP Ruth Cadbury, who chairs the Transport Committee, urged the Government to 'look beyond' SAF in its mission to reduce carbon emissions. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said she is 'determined to make rapid progress' on the roll-out of SAF, to ensure Britain can continue to 'grow and thrive'. In January, the Government introduced a mandate which requires an increasing amount of sustainable fuel to be used by jets, with the aim of ensuring 22% of all jet fuel comes from sustainable sources by 2040. Opening a debate on the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill, Ms Alexander said she wants to see more passengers 'take to the skies, not less'. She told MPs: 'We're determined to make rapid progress on this issue, because we do have an ironclad belief that our success as an island nation rests on our international connectivity. 'The flow of trade, exporting British expertise, the movement of people for business and leisure, all depend on aviation continuing to grow and thrive. 'We could put our head in the sand and pretend people do not want to fly, pretend the sector does not support hundreds of thousands of jobs, that people do not look forward to foreign holidays or family reunions, that air freight isn't a significant part of our trade by value, but we'd be on the wrong side of both reality and public aspiration. 'The truth is, demand for flight is only going in one direction. According to the CAA (Civil Aviation Authority), passenger levels were 7% higher in 2024 than the previous year. 'If we do not respond, if we don't set aviation up for long-term success, we don't just make ourselves poorer today, we kiss goodbye to the growth and opportunity this country needs in the decades to come. 'So I'm clear, I want a future where more passengers can take to the skies, not less. But like the rest of our economy, that must mean emitting less carbon, not more. This Bill will help to secure that future.' Intervening, Conservative MP Sir Julian Lewis (New Forest East) said: 'I gather that only last week, the International Air Transport Association highlighted the fact that sustainable aviation fuels, at the moment, cost approximately five times the cost of conventional jet fuel. 'Can she explain how the measures in the Bill will bridge that gap to make it economical?' Ms Alexander replied: 'There is constrained supply at the moment, we have one commercial production facility in the UK at Immingham.' She added: 'What we need to do is build investor confidence to commercialise some of the demonstration projects in sustainable aviation fuel that exists around the country.' During the second reading debate, Ms Cadbury said: 'I know that we need to see changes in aviation to meet our really ambitious climate goals, now that aviation and shipping are included in our carbon budget, this is even more important. 'I hope that the Government will also look beyond SAF when thinking about decarbonising aviation. SAF is not and will not be the silver bullet solution to the sector's responsibility, to this country's decarbonisation strategy.' The MP for Brentford and Isleworth added: 'The Climate Change Committee warned this Parliament in 2023 that relying on SAF alone was, I quote, high risk. 'For example, Heathrow Airport is already the single greatest source of carbon emissions in the UK, and the current plans for expansion will add an extra eight to nine megatons of CO2 a year. 'And if the Government do expand Heathrow, then it will mean that other airports across the UK would face having to make cuts to ensure that aviation didn't reach its carbon targets. 'Or, furthermore, and probably both, as continuing increases in aviation emissions grow, that will have to be offset against significant cuts in emissions in other sectors. 'So I ask the Transport Secretary, what is the Government doing to address that particular challenge?' Shadow transport minister Gareth Bacon branded the Government's pledge to begin work on the Heathrow expansion in this Parliament as 'very far-fetched'. He added: 'There are substantial logistical and financial barriers to its construction, and so far, the Government has provided no solutions on these points.'

Daily Mail​

08-06-2025

• Daily Mail​

Asylum seeker 'who recruited child soldiers' wins appeal to stay in Britain despite being refused refugee status in France because he's an alleged war criminal

An asylum seeker who allegedly recruited child soldiers has won an appeal to stay in Britain. The Sri Lankan, who remains unnamed after he was granted anonymity by the Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber, faces claims he 'enlisted children under the age of 15' to separatist terrorist group Tamil Tigers. The tribunal also heard he was working for the Tamils Rehabilitation Organisation [TRO] - a refugee charity - but was secretly supplying information. The French Justice system previously ruled he should be denied asylum due to allegations that he was a war criminal. And the Home Office agreed, refusing the man refugee status and attempting to deport him. He then won an appeal against the decision in 2023, with a judge citing a lack of evidence to support the accusations. The Home Office has now lost an appeal of their own, meaning the asylum seeker can remain in the country. British judges stuck with the ruling two years ago and said there is not enough evidence to say the allegations are true. The Home Office's original case referred to the French asylum court's verdict that he 'ought to be excluded from a grant of asylum under Article 1F of the Refugee Convention due to his alleged involvement in war crimes in this case the alleged recruitment of children'. But a judge found that the government department 'had not shown serious grounds for concluding that [the Sri Lankan] was guilty of the war crime of conscription or enlistment of children under the age of 15 or using them to participate actively in hostilities'. The judge added: 'I am not satisfied even on the evidence of his own admissions, accurate or otherwise, to the French that this goes far enough to show that the [Sri Lankan] was effectively collecting information which he knew was going to be misused, and misused specifically for the recruitment of child soldiers under the age of 15. 'Nor am I satisfied that there are serious reasons for considering on all the evidence adduced that the [Respondent] has been shown to have knowingly materially assisted in the recruitment of child soldiers under the age of 15, by the work done by the T.R.O. in gathering information, possibly subsequently used by the L.T.T.E. for that purpose.' Home Office lawyers argued at the appeal in London that the judge had not attached enough wait to the French court's decision. But, Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Adrian Seelhoff disagreed, saying: 'The Judge assessed that evidence to see if it supported the [Home Office's] case that [the Sri Lankan], whilst working for the TRO, supplied details which the LTTE used to recruit child soldiers. '[The Home Office's] position before us was not that the Judge was bound to follow the French Court decision, but that he had not given adequate reasons for reaching a different decision or that he failed to attach weight to the decision. 'We find that the Judge did give adequate reasons for not following that decision, and for the weight he attached to it and that accordingly there is no error of law in the decision under appeal.