‘Until it irrevocably ends support to cross-border terrorism': At UN, India iterates suspension of Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan

Over a week after Pakistan signalled its willingness to discuss New Delhi's concerns about the Indus Water Treaty, India, at the United Nations, reiterated its stance at suspending the treaty with the neighbouring country, saying it was constrained to respond to the disinformation carried out by the delegation of the neighbouring country.
Referring to Pakistan as a global epicenter of terror, India said the treaty will remain in abeyance until the neighbouring country 'credibly and irrevocably ends its support for cross-border terrorism.'
Speaking at the Arria Formula meeting on Protecting Water in Armed Conflict – Protecting Civilian Lives, the Permanent Representative of India at the UN, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish said, 'India has always acted in a responsible manner as an upper-riparian state. I would like to highlight four aspects to expose the disinformation of Pakistan.'
Describing the aspects, Harish said: 'First, India entered into the Indus Water Treaty 65 years ago in good faith. The preamble of the treaty describes that the treaty was concluded in a spirit of goodwill and friendship. Throughout these six and a half decades, Pakistan has violated the spirit of the treaty by inflicting three wars and thousands of terror attacks on India. In the last four decades, more than 20,000 Indian lives have been lost in terror attacks, the most recent of which was a dastardly targeted terror attack on tourists in Pahalgam last month. India has shown extraordinary patience and magnanimity throughout this period. Pakistan's state-sponsored cross-border terrorism in India seeks to hold hostage the lives of civilians, religious harmony, and economic prosperity.'
India also highlighted Pakistan's consistent blockage of changes to the infrastructure and modifications of its provisions permissible under the treaty in the past years. Harish said, 'Second, in these 65 years, far-reaching fundamental changes have taken place not only in terms of escalating security concerns through cross-border terror attacks, but also growing requirements for producing clean energy, climate change and demographic change. Technology for dam infrastructure has transformed to ensure safety and efficiency of operations and water use. Some of the old dams are facing serious safety concerns. However, Pakistan has continued to block consistently any changes to this infrastructure and any modifications of the provisions which is permissible under the treaty. In fact, in 2012, terrorists even attacked the Tulbul navigation project in Jammu and Kashmir. These cynical acts continue to endanger safety of our projects and lives of civilians.'
Third, Harish stated, 'India has formally asked Pakistan to discuss the modifications of the treaty on several occasions in the past two years. However, Pakistan continues to reject these and Pakistan's obstructionist approach continues to prevent the exercise of full utilization of the legitimate rights by India.'
Earlier, in January 2023 and again in September 2024, India had sent notices to the neighbouring country requesting a 'review and modification' of the IWT, however, Pakistan had not expressed its explicit willingness. It is only after India placed the treaty in abeyance with immediate effect after the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, that Pakistan seems to have signalled its willingness.
India asserted that the abeyance will continue to stay in place until Pakistan irrevocably ends its support to cross-border terrorism. 'Four, it is against this backdrop that India has finally announced that the treaty will be in abeyance until Pakistan, which is a global epicenter of terror, credibly and irrevocably ends its support for cross-border terrorism. It is clear that it is Pakistan which remains in violation of the Indus Water Treaty. Thank you, Mr. President,' he concluded.
India's firm stance comes after Pakistan's Water Resources Secretary, Syed Ali Murtaza, recently responded to India's formal intimation of the Union Cabinet's decision to keep the treaty in abeyance, and offered to, on behalf of his government, discuss the specific terms India objects to.
The Indus Waters Treaty was signed on September 19, 1960, after nine years of negotiations between India and Pakistan. It has 12 Articles and eight Annexures (from A to H). As per its provisions, all the water of the 'Eastern Rivers' — Sutlej, Beas and Ravi — shall be available for the 'unrestricted use' of India; Pakistan, meanwhile, shall receive water from the 'Western Rivers' — Indus, Jhelum and Chenab.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

20 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Today in Politics: After Omar Abdullah touches a raw nerve in Punjab over water sharing, what's next?

Even as the dispute between Punjab and Haryana over water from the Bhakra-Nangal project continues to simmer, another controversy over water sharing is brewing between Punjab and its neighbour to the north, Jammu and Kashmir. Asked about the proposed construction of a 113-km canal to transfer surplus water from Jammu and Kashmir to Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan to prevent it from flowing to Pakistan, J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah told reporters on Friday, 'Right now, Jammu is facing water scarcity … There is no water in the taps. Why should I send water to Punjab? Punjab already has three rivers as per the Indus Waters Treaty. Has Punjab given us any water?' This drew a sharp response from political parties in Punjab, with the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) saying Omar Abdullah cannot make a 'unilateral decision'. The party's spokesperson in the state, Neel Garg, told PTI, 'Whenever there is a war, Punjab becomes the battleground. And when the country needs foodgrains, it becomes the granary of the nation. Now that there is water available, Punjab has a legitimate claim over it.' Punjab Congress chief Amarinder Singh Raja Warring took to X to criticise Omar's statements. 'It's sad that JK CM @OmarAbdullah ji has started doing politics over the proposed canals to be constructed to prevent flow of water to Pakistan. Want to ask Omar Sahab doesn't it amount to treating us at a par with Pakistan? We have suspended Indus Water Treaty as Pakistan has proved to be a rogue and enemy nation to us. What reasons do you have to refuse water to us?' Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader and former Punjab minister Daljit Singh Cheema also weighed in on the issue, accusing Omar of doing injustice to Punjab and pointing to the state's role as the food bowl of the country. He said farmers in the state had taken on a 'huge debt' to fulfil the food requirements of the country. 'Every time it is Punjab which suffers the most. River waters were snatched from our state … It is a historical fact that the then Indira Gandhi government did great injustice to Punjab by giving away a huge share of its river water to Rajasthan, a non-riparian state,' PTI quoted him as saying. How this plays out will be among the political stories to watch out for on Saturday. It is the 11th International Yoga Day today and Prime Minister Narendra Modi is in Visakhapatnam to participate in the celebrations. Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu has said the event, scheduled from 6.30 am to 8 am, will be organised in such a way to get recognition and set records, including a Guinness World Record. The event the PM will participate in will be held in a 26-km-long corridor where more than 3 lakh people can perform yoga together, according to officials. — With PTI inputs

Business Standard

23 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Amit Shah a disgrace to the post once held by Sardar Patel: Jairam Ramesh

Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh on Friday launched a direct attack on Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of failing to "bring the terrorists who carried out the brutal terror attacks in Pahalgam to justice," and restoring peace in Manipur. "Amit Shah is a disgrace to the position once held by the indomitable Sardar," claimed Ramesh. "The Union Home Minister has failed singularly in bringing the terrorists who carried out the brutal terror attacks in Pahalgam to justice. These terrorists had reportedly also been involved in terror attacks at Poonch (Dec 2023) and at Gagangir and Gulmarg (Oct 2024)," his post said. "The Union Home Minister has failed miserably to restore even a semblance of peace and normalcy in Manipur. All that he has accomplished is to provide guaranteed employment to his son. Now the Union Home Minister makes the most ridiculous of statements. Millions of Indians each speak more Indian languages - in addition to English - than him. He is a disgrace to the position once held by the indomitable Sardar," said the post from Ramesh. Ramesh called the visit a "publicity-driven exercise" that fails to address the ground realities of the state. "The advertisement-loving Prime Minister is once again on a tour of matter how many fake announcements the Prime Minister makes, no matter how many ribbons he cuts for free advertising, the truth is that the double engine government in Bihar has completely failed to meet the expectations of the common people," his post read. "In Bihar, oppression against the deprived classes is at its peak, the law and order situation is extremely bad, criminals have become unbridled and the common citizens are helpless. Every day there are reports of murder, robbery and violence against youth do not have any employment in the state and they are forced to migrate from Bihar," he said. "During this visit, the Prime Minister will also express his electoral concern about the pollution of Mother Ganga .But the truth is that in the last 11 years, 'Ganga cleansing' has become just an election slogan, which is suddenly remembered before every election. Not only in Bihar, Mother Ganga has become more polluted than before in the entire country. Most of the schemes launched in the name of Ganga cleanliness campaign have proved to be a black hole of corruption-After the foundation stone laying, inauguration and heavy publicity, neither any work is visible nor any concrete National Green Tribunal (NGT) itself is exposing the terrible condition of Ganga pollution in Patna and Bihar," added Ramesh.

India Today

31 minutes ago

• India Today

Israel-Iran conflict rages into second week as EU diplomacy fails to deliver

Israel and Iran traded strikes a week into their war on Friday as President Donald Trump weighed U.S. military involvement and key European ministers met with Iran's top diplomat in Geneva in a scramble to de-escalate the the first face-to-face meeting between Western and Iranian officials in the weeklong war concluded after four hours with no sign of an immediate give diplomacy a chance, Trump said he would put off deciding for up to two weeks whether to join Israel's air campaign against Iran. U.S. participation would most likely involve strikes against Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility, considered to be out of reach to all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. Whether or not the US joins, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel's military operation in Iran would continue 'for as long as it takes' to eliminate what he called the existential threat of Iran's nuclear program and arsenal of ballistic missiles. Israel's top general echoed the warning, saying the Israeli military was ready 'for a prolonged campaign.'As negotiations ended in Switzerland, European officials expressed hope for future negotiations. Iran's top diplomat said he was open to further Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emphasized that Tehran had no interest in negotiating with the US while Israel continued attacking.'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy if aggression ceases and the aggressor is held accountable for its committed crimes,' he told date was set for the next round of previously agreed to limit its uranium enrichment and allow international inspectors access to its nuclear sites under a 2015 deal with the US, France, China, Russia, Britain and Germany in exchange for sanctions relief. But after Trump pulled the US unilaterally out of the deal during his first term, Iran began enriching uranium up to 60% — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90% — and restricting access to its nuclear Israel said its warplanes hit dozens of military targets across Iran, including missile-manufacturing facilities, an Iranian missile crashed into Israel's northern city of Haifa, sending plumes of smoke billowing over the Mediterranean port and wounding at least 31 war between Israel and Iran erupted June 13, with Israeli airstrikes targeting nuclear and military sites, top generals and nuclear scientists. At least 657 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,000 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights has retaliated by firing 450 missiles and 1,000 drones at Israel, according to Israeli army estimates. Most have been shot down by Israel's multitiered air defenses, but at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds RISE OVER THE PERILS OF ATTACKING IRAN'S NUCLEAR REACTORS Addressing an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency warned against attacks on Iran's nuclear reactors, particularly its only commercial nuclear power plant in the southern city of Bushehr.'I want to make it absolutely and completely clear: In case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity to the environment,' said Rafael Grossi, chief of the U.N. nuclear watchdog. 'This is the nuclear site in Iran where the consequences could be most serious.'Israel has not targeted Iran's nuclear reactors, instead focusing its strikes on the main uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, centrifuge workshops near Tehran, laboratories in Isfahan and the country's Arak heavy water reactor southwest of the capital. Grossi has warned repeatedly that such sites should not be military initially reporting no visible damage from Israel's Thursday strikes on the Arak heavy water reactor, the IAEA on Friday said it had assessed 'key buildings at the facility were damaged,' including the distillation reactor was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so the damage posed no risk of contamination, the watchdog strikes on uranium enrichment facilities like Natanz can carry the risk of radiological contamination, experts say the chance of a serious incident is far lower than at reactors such as the Russian-built Bushehr power a call with Netanyahu, Russian President Vladimir Putin said he has secured Israel's promise to keep Russian workers at the plant out of harm's has long maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful it is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich uranium up to 60%. Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with a nuclear weapons program but has never acknowledged it. Tune InMust Watch