Patriotism more than an emblem on school uniforms

YOURSAY | 'It should not be forcefully applied.'
Imprint school uniforms with Jalur Gemilang, MOE urged
MarioT: During my school days, we were taught that our national flag was our identity as a nation and our national pride.
The flag-raising ceremony and singing of the national anthem gave us a feeling of oneness.
But today, certain interferences have lowered the flag's profile. The emphasis on religion makes nationalistic feelings a second priority.
Go to the basics of giving priority to the national flag and national anthem to start the week in schools, giving the children the patriotic feeling of being Malaysians.
Explain the importance of a united nation to counter any forces out to cause trouble and damage.
To me, pinning the flag on the school uniform is just a show with no significant result.
Cynic: Pre-schoolers and primary school students know nothing about patriotism or what the emblem of a national flag entails.
International students have absolutely no patriotic fervour for any other national flag except for their own.
They are only here for their studies and nothing else.
Secondary school students and students in institutes of higher education may have an inkling of what the flag means.
However, the degree of fervour varies according to how the government treats them in terms of race and religion and whether they are accorded the same equality as their Malay-Muslim peers.
The only places where I think the Jalur Gemilang would be useful are with the political elites and the civil service.
These are the places where corruption is at its highest.
Sticking the national flag over their pockets may, just may, deter them from pocketing bribes or money embezzled from the nation's coffers.
If they are patriotic enough. One would do well to remember that every Malaysian has patriotism for the nation's Jalur Gemilang, but that cannot be applied to any ruling government.
In the words of Mark Twain: Loyalty for the country - always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it.
P Dev Anand Pillai: Patriotism will come automatically to anyone if they see and experience equality and fairness in their country of birth, a country that accepts them or a country that gives them refuge.
It should not be forcefully applied.
Our children may wear these uniforms because they do not have a choice, but as they grow older in our system of education, they see what happens right before their eyes as to the opportunities, equality in treatment and even in their religious beliefs, they will begin to think!
We, yesteryear students (1950s to the 1960s) did not have to wear such uniforms, but we were very proud of our achievements when we had the opportunity to represent our district, state and country in competitions.
We had fairness and better representation back then. Our teachers were 'real' teachers who had the power to teach and lead schools.
They moulded us and made us have good character, and that is what has brought us to achieve the best that we can in our lives today.
So let patriotism be natural, sticking it on a uniform when the rest of our lives are the same is not going to achieve the intended results.
Solo: Not sure if wearing a Jalur Gemilang flag or badge on a school shirt will alter the thinking of the wearer.
If that is all it takes, those guys marching around with flags draped across their shoulders should be warriors, but alas, some are just for show.
I prefer teaching school kids the Rukun Negara, and practising what is preached may be more useful. Don't judge the book by its cover.
Coward: Print it? It will not work. And I am ashamed that the National Parent-Teacher Association (NPTA) proposed this.
I am expecting them to oppose this if it is proposed. Why? The increased cost of uniforms. Maybe the members of NPTA can afford it, but not all parents can.
Let's not forget that for underprivileged students, their uniforms are passed down. What happened to the kid whose printed flag faded?
Are you going to tell him to buy a new uniform? Can he afford it? Even if schools ignore faded imprints, school children won't.
You just clearly marked him out as poor in the eyes of other kids. Children can be cruel at times. So why enable them to be?
KK Voter: The tenders were awarded to 26 suppliers, mainly companies that provide printing services and supply stationery.
The average cost for each badge is about 76 sen, but the price differs between each contract, ranging from 72 sen and 80 sen.
At this volume, the badges should not cost 72 to 80 cents, it can be sold at 80 cents with a profit. Malaysiakini should go one step further and dig out the background of the owners of these companies.
LimeHorse5802: A few outcomes will arise from this:
1. Now that the badge's specification is out, manufacturers will produce and sell it at bookshops at prices lower than the average of RM0.76 that the government has procured.
2. Another piece of plastic will be sold at say RM0.50 where the badge could be pinned into it and inserted into the left pocket of students' shirts.
3. The shirt of the school uniform will have two pockets, one on the right for the school badge/name/house colour and on the left for the plastic (where the flag is pinned on) to be inserted into. It is amazing how things will find their correct ways.
The Illusion Of Choice: So, this is what is inside the brains of NPTA.
Meanwhile, students are being bullied to death, being sexually abused and exploited, committing suicide and skipping Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) en masse.
Students are given toy AK47s and balaclavas, shouting death and jihad. Students lack basic language and arithmetic skills even after SPM, and there are cases of students being bullied by racist teachers.
While all this is going on the NPTA is prioritising 'putting flag stickers on uniform.' Bravo, very good use of brains.
Cyclonus: Isn't the flag on the uniform thing going too long and too much already?
If the worry is about safety by using pinned badges, then use magnets or velcro. Or just take off the badge when doing sports.
The kids should be using T-shirts instead of school shirts during physical education anyway.
I am just waiting for the Islamic Development Department to start imposing its halal requirements on school uniforms. If we want to imbue a unified Malaysian spirit, then start with the school administration and teachers.
Placebo: Genius. If you can afford to buy a new shirt just so you can have a printed flag on it, then RM0.80 for the badge is hardly a 'financial burden'.
Plus, you could always transfer the badges to new shirts later. Let's get real. The government probably spent more on the flags for Hari Merdeka.
Lone_star: Can patriotism be equated with an emblem on the shirt?
The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. In the past year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now.
These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Borneo Post

an hour ago

• Borneo Post

Taxing taste of Malaysian politics

PM Anwar shared this image of himself pushing a wheelbarrow, captioned 'New Year Clean-up' in ushering in 2025. The photo was widely welcomed by Malaysians, many interpreting it as a hopeful metaphor for a national reset. Yet as SST kicks in, some wonder: will the clean-up go beyond optics – down to the kitchen table? — Photo from Facebook MALAYSIAN politics has certainly entered a new flavour spectrum with the words of politicians not about budget, economy or investment but about what's on our meal plates. Acting Muda president Amira Aisya Abd Aziz recently whipped out a storm by comparing Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's supposed love for avocado toast to Najib Razak's infamous switch from rice to quinoa. When 'kolo mee', 'roti canai' and 'nasi lemak' are breakfast of the people (despite rising prices), bringing up avocados and quinoa of the present prime minister and a former one, respectively, which are out-of-touch with everyday Malaysia, seems like a strategic move of Muda. It speaks to how political branding now happens not in speeches or slogans, but in what leaders are seen eating, wearing, or doing on a holiday. But let's unpack this properly – before someone throws a durian into the batter. The timing of Muda's food commentary was not accidental. It came just as the government announced the expansion of the Sales and Service Tax (SST) scheduled to take effect this July 1 with the imposition of five per cent to 10 per cent sales tax on selected non-essential goods and broaden the service tax to include services such as rental or leasing, construction, finance, private healthcare, education, and beauty. For many urban middle-class Malaysians, this tax hike stings. Expanded sales tax includes imported fruits; thus, avocado being considered imported goods was uttered by Anwar: 'If the rich want to eat avocados, then they will need to pay a little more.' So what better way to channel discontent than by framing it as a class issue? Muda's avocado analogy may seem like harmless satire, but it taps into a deeper frustration – that leaders may be preaching belt-tightening while they are enjoying imported produce. Whether or not Anwar actually had avocado toast is beside the point. The image has taken root. And in politics, perception is often more powerful than fact. Najib's quinoa moment in 2018 became a national punchline. For a leader under scrutiny for corruption and excess, his choice of a trendy, protein-packed South-American grain, instead of humble rice, was the icing on a chocolate cake. In contrast, Anwar's 'avocado' is not being mocked as luxurious, but to signal detachment from the people. The narrative is 'the Prime Minister does not know the suffering of the people'. This shift is unfavourable to the Madani Government. It shows that younger politicians are now savvier in using cultural signals such as food, fashion and fitness routines to frame their critiques. But it also raises a key question – is this fair game? Both avocado and quinoa are dear to me – not as symbols of elitism, but out of necessity and circumstance. Back when Najib's quinoa quote made headlines, I was struggling with gluten intolerance. I had to replace wheat with quinoa. It was not about being trendy; it was about survival. For two years, quinoa — pricey as it was — became part of my daily diet until, thankfully, I could slowly reintroduce wheat without discomfort. As for avocados, they were not always this high-end item that you now find on café menus with microgreens and olive oil. When I was stationed in Sabah, avocados were so abundant and cheap, I could have avocado toast at any time I wanted without it costing me more than a regular breakfast. In fact, Sabah grows them and in recent years, Sarawak does too. After all, it is a superfood and many lower income groups could afford locally produced avocado. Ironically, Anwar may have picked a food that is not elitist at all — just under-appreciated local produce. That's where I find him a little naïve. He could have used his breakfast moment to celebrate Malaysian farmers and promote food security – not unwittingly serving himself on a silver platter for social media roast. Quoting Prof Dr Ramasamy: 'At least he should have gone one step further by urging Malaysian farmers to plant avocado trees to bring down the imported fruit. 'I am sure his buddy Mohammed Sabu, the Minister of Agriculture, might welcome it especially coming from the Prime Minister.' Muda's strategy could be seen as clever youth-oriented political branding. In a crowded opposition landscape, they need to be louder and fresher. But surely Muda, a party built on reform and ideas resorting to comparing grocery lists risks appearing superficial. More importantly, it shifts the focus from policy to personality. The expanded SST, for instance, deserves serious scrutiny. Is it a fair way to broaden the tax base? Will the government ensure these revenues are channelled into healthcare, education, and cost-of-living relief? Could exemptions be refined to protect vulnerable groups? These are the questions worth debating – not whether Anwar spreads avocado over its breakfast toast. Likewise, when Opposition leaders resort to metaphors instead of manifestos, we must ask – where's your alternative policy? What would Muda do differently on SST, tax reform, or public spending? In the end, it is not what our leaders eat that should matter most – it is what they serve us. If Anwar's policies can stabilise the economy, lower inflation, and protect the poor, then let him enjoy his avocado. If Najib's quinoa came with billion-ringgit scandals, then no amount of quinoa can redeem that taste. And if Muda can only offer critiques based on food preferences, then perhaps it is time for them to go back to the kitchen – and cook up better policies. Because for most Malaysians, the question remains simple – can I still afford breakfast next month? anwar ibrahim cost of living economy Madani malaysia SST tax

Borneo Post

an hour ago

• Borneo Post

Power-sharing of a different kind

For Malaysia, the cross-border power-sharing is a meaningful contribution to the APG scheme itself, which aims to build an electricity grid link with almost all the member countries of Asean. — Bernama photo SHOULD the Republic of the Philippines need extra electricity for its industries and private homes and cannot get it elsewhere, it can turn to Sarawak. Within minutes, through the renewable energy grid, the Asean Power Grid (APG), electricity could be transmitted to the Southern Philippines through Sabah. I take it that Sarawak has no problem with the federal government in this cross-border transaction. After all, we are selling power to the Indonesians too in a similar fashion. In December of last year, the Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) began selling green energy to Singapore. So you say that Malaysia, both the West and the East, is a good source of electricity for the neighbours. Here is a good chance for Malaysia as the Asean Chair to play the role of a good promoter of product as well as act as salesman. Should there be any problem with any member of Asean with regard to the project, the Chair would be able to display tact and ingenuity to ensure that this, being an Asean project, has to proceed. Once the vendor and the buyer agree upon the terms of purchase that it is a deal, no second, third or fourth opinion needed. For Malaysia, this a meaningful contribution to the APG scheme itself, which aims to build an electricity grid link with almost all the member countries of Asean. Let's start with Malaysia. The electricity is actually from Sarawak, but never mind the saying 'lembu punya susu, sapi punya nama' (the milk is from the cow, but the buffalo gets the name). Somehow my gut feeling is that this energy grid, going through the territory of Sabah, may meet with some political problems. I'm thinking about the Philippines' claim to Sabah. I am confident that this was on the mind of the Prime Minister before he popped the suggestion, and he was confident that it would not stand in the way because this would be an Asean project. It is crucial that the Chair of Asean will be supported by the other member countries. Malaysia must make a mark during its term of office. 'Good personal relationship matters' I am told that our Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has a good personal relationship with the President of the Republic of the Philippines. That relationship is crucial when it comes to tackling a problem relating to an economic scheme that benefits both parties. This electricity grid is one such scheme. This is a sensible suggestion from our Prime Minister. It is a practicable move that deserves full support by anyone thinking about what to do with excess electricity in Sarawak. At this stage, there appears to be clear evidence of the existence of political will on the part of Malaysian leaders in terms of state-federal relations. However, at this stage, we do not really know what the Philippines government thinks of the proposal. The potential buyer of our electricity has not made known publicly its response or even interest in purchasing power from us. I am sure there will be some response from President Ferdinand R Marcos Jr after he has received the report from his representative. Give him and his colleagues time to think about the proposal by our PM in terms of the economic viability of the purchase of power, and to make decisions at their own speed. Politics may have a role in this deal. My surmise. I hope this would not derail the initial talks on the sale and purchase. Treat the dealing like a normal sale and purchase of a product that the buyer needs and the vendor has the stock for disposal anytime – a business-like transaction. Meanwhile, we should support PM Anwar's proposal if we have enough electricity supply for our own use and enough to sell overseas. We are selling electricity to Indonesia anyway. Is there enough of the product for another buyer? As regards the sale of power to Kalimantan, my sources say that the time may come when the demand will be reduced or even stopped altogether once the Indonesians have built a hydro-power dam across the upper reaches of the River Mahakam. The power generation from that dam will serve the needs of the new capital Nusantara, and the districts along the coast including the city of Samarinda itself. There are several rivers in that part of Borneo that may be dammed for hydropower generation. In 1989, I was in the Sarawak team as a delegate attending the post-Asean Conference on Land Settlement Conference held in Samarinda. I joined a team who rode a Russian double-decker helicopter flying over the great Mahakam; we were being flown to a settlement of Kenyah and Kayan at Datah Bilang. It was an eye-opener. The river, if dammed, would generate an enormous amount of electricity for the entire region. The electricity supply from Sarawak could be affected if the Indonesians could produce enough electricity from their own dams, unless the APG steps in to enable the grid to provide the link to continue. An economic question. Between good neighbours, sharing of electrical power would be mutually beneficial on a commercial basis. It makes good economic sense. The other power (political) is not for sale, though! * The opinions expressed in this article are the columnist's own and do not reflect the view of the newspaper. Asean power grid malaysia Philippines

Barnama

7 hours ago

• Barnama

Palestine Embassy Condemns Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

KUALA LUMPUR, June 21 (Bernama) -- The Palestine Embassy in Malaysia has condemned the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), describing the aid distribution initiative as a veiled operation that further endangered innocent aid seekers in the enclave. First Secretary of Embassy Amjad Khamaysa said the US and Israel-backed entity undermined genuine humanitarian efforts and worsen the oppression of Palestinians suffering under the regime's brutality. "They (Israel) don't allow humanitarian access to Gaza and they are establishing this Gaza Humanitarian institution. Unfortunately, these distribution centres are used to hunt Palestinians. bootstrap slideshow 'They (Palestinians) come to get aid and they are killed (by Israel) there,' he told Bernama at the 'More Than A War, It's Genocide' forum, organised by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) here, Saturday. He also condemned the regime's banning of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) from carrying out its humanitarian mission in Gaza. Since May 7, Israel has been bypassing UN and international relief organisations by distributing limited aid through the GHF, which was rejected by the UN. According to Anadolu Ajansi, Palestinians seeking aid through this mechanism have become daily targets of Israeli fire, resulting in many casualties. Amjad said the embassy will continue to engage with the public to raise awareness and solidarity against the regime's ongoing genocide on Palestine and its people through various channels, including through cooperation with Malaysian civil societies and the digital sphere. Over 55,000 people in Gaza – mostly women and children – have been killed since Israel launched its aggression on October 7, 2023.