In a world of injustices, be Greta Thunberg

Even as a schoolgirl Greta Thunberg has stood up for environmental and human rights.
Greta Thunberg continues to engrave her name for eternity, this time with her trip to war-torn Gaza in a bid to deliver humanitarian aid.
What is so heroinic about the 22-year-old Swedish climate and human rights activist is her uncompromised courage, determination and resilience to confront injustice in all its forms.
Greta and 11 other people boarded a yacht, the Madleen, which is part of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, carrying aid for Gaza to draw global attention to the plight of people under siege and being killed. The Israeli forces intercepted the vessel and Greta was later deported.
Many superstars and philanthropists with bigger audiences remain mute about Israel's fullscale war in Gaza for fear of being labelled antisemitic and Zionists, but Greta traded it all to speak out. She defied this intimidation.
What she wants the world to know is in the world of injustices is, don't be silent but rise, speak out and take action.
Silence may be the safest way from danger and prejudicial accusations but it's a fertile ground upon which the tyranny of injustice thrives.
In this whole Greta Gaza saga, what touched me as a parent was the moment she displayed a placard reading 'Bombing kids is not self-defence'. This was an act of demanding justice from the perpetuators.
Greta advocating for the safety of children and innocent lives resonates with the United Nations Children's Fund that civilians and children should not be the targets in Israel's war in Gaza and the West Band and Russia's war in Ukraine.
In the interviews after Israel deported Greta, her facial expression was one of sadness about the ongoing injustices in Gaza, reflecting a critical question. Where is ubuntu? Where is humanity?
Greta, the founder of Fridays for Future, reminds the world of Charles Bukowski's words: 'I guess the only time most people think about injustice is when it happens to them.'
The fearless Thunberg is not waiting for children in Sweden to be bombarded or denied food, safe drinking water and homes; she is taking action with conviction knowing that injustice in one part of the world is injustice everywhere.
To deny people their basic needs such as food, water and shelter denies them their very basic human rights and existence.
In August 2018 Greta started her
skolstrejk för klimatet
(school strike for climate) outside the Swedish parliament demanding something be done to deal with climate change. Her lone protest spread around the world.
In 2024 she joined the Georgian election protests for a rerun of the 26 October elections after the ruling Georgian Dream party was declared the winner amid claims of vote-rigging.
Greta has also publicly condemned environmental injustices regarding Russia's ecocide, calling it an atrocity against people and planet. This followed Russia's blowing up of Ukraine's Kakhovka Dam.
Many of her fellow climate activists remain mute about the ongoing gross injustices in Uganda and East African region such as state abductions, torture, arbitrary arrests and fraudulent elections. We hope they can use their global status to draw attention to these.
Greta is consistently using her status to speak truth to power and push back political, social, economic and environmental injustices.
My call is for activists, celebrities and other famous people to use their voices to protest against injustices in the world.
Robert Kigongo is a sustainable development analyst.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The South African

11 hours ago

• The South African

Putin unveils Iran-Israel peace plan at global forum

Russian President Vladimir Putin held a press conference with international media on 19 June 2025, at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF). Nearly 20 000 people from 140 countries attended the event. Vladimir Putin used the forum to talk about Russia's foreign policy, economic strategy, and global security issues. Putin pushed for mutual recognition of Israel's security and Iran's peaceful nuclear rights to resolve the Iran-Israel conflict diplomatically. He claimed that while Moscow is willing to facilitate dialogue, it will not set the terms. Russia sent recommendations to Washington, Tel Aviv, and Tehran, the Kremlin confirmed. Putin said Iran has not asked for military support. Putin emphasised Russia's economic partnership with Belarus while pointing to $50 billion in trade and joint ventures in aviation and microelectronics. In addition, he credited Belarusian President Lukashenko for keeping the vital industry intact despite Western sanctions. The SPIEF 2025 theme, 'Shared Values: The Foundation of Growth in a Multipolar World', underscored Russia's shift towards non-Western relationships. Russian President Vladimir Putin also met with South Africa's Deputy President, Paul Mashatile, and Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto. Furthermore, Putin called the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation's (NATO's) claims of a Russian threat 'nonsense,' pointing to the alliance's high military spending. Russia insists Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia are part of the Russian Federation, a position Putin has maintained since 2022. To sum up, he questioned President Zelenskyy's legitimacy while expressing a conditional willingness to negotiate peace with Ukraine. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Eyewitness News

11 hours ago

• Eyewitness News

Israel military confirms hitting Hezbollah site in south Lebanon

JERUSALEM - Israel's military said Saturday its navy hit a Hezbollah "infrastructure site" near the southern Lebanese city of Naqoura, a day after Israel's foreign minister warned the Lebanese armed group against entering the Iran-Israel war. "Overnight, an Israeli Navy vessel struck a Hezbollah 'Radwan Force' terrorist infrastructure site in the area of Naqoura in southern Lebanon", the military said in a statement. The military said the site was used by Hezbollah "to advance terror attacks against Israeli civilians". In a separate statement on Saturday, the military said it had "struck and eliminated" a Hezbollah militant in south Lebanon the previous day, despite an ongoing ceasefire between both sides. In a statement carried by the official National News Agency, Lebanon's health ministry said late on Friday that one person was killed in a "strike carried out by an Israeli enemy drone on a motorcycle" in the same south Lebanon village. The November ceasefire aimed to end hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, which sparked months of deadly hostilities by launching cross-border attacks on northern Israel in solidarity with Palestinian ally Hamas following its October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. Lebanon's army, which has been dismantling Hezbollah infrastructure as part of the truce, said earlier in June that the Israeli military's ongoing violations and "refusal to cooperate" with the ceasefire monitoring mechanism "could prompt the (Lebanese) military to freeze cooperation" on site inspections.

Mail & Guardian

19 hours ago

• Mail & Guardian

International Atomic Energy Agency resolution was weaponised against Iran

Iranian missiles hit Jerusalem earlier this week. (X) The perversion of multilateral institutions using seemingly benign resolutions as quasi-declarations continues. Consequently, the multilateral system is slowly collapsing. The election of Donald Trump as United States president has further complicated the situation. Trump has pulled the US out of a number of multilateral agreements, including the Paris Accord on climate change. The International Criminal Court (ICC) is accused of selective justice when it comes to the prosecution of those charged with crimes against humanity — of only targeting African leaders and ignoring Western leaders who are accused of similar crimes. The ICC ignored calls to charge former British prime minister Tony Blair and former US president George Bush for crimes against humanity when they falsely asserted that Iraq's Saddam Hussein had stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) resolution that Iran was in breach of its proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years was a precursor to Israel's attack on Iran. The resolution was adopted by the IAEA's board of governors on 10 June; three days later Israel attacked Iran. The resolution was passed by 19 votes in favour, three against and 11 abstentions. The timing of the report and the speed with which Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, acted on it has raised questions. When did he know about the resolution? How did he manage to prepare Israel's attacks on Iran in such a short space of time? Was he given prior knowledge about the content of the resolution? Netanyahu, who has always scorned talks with Iran, took advantage of the resolution and the changes in the Middle East since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023. Israel has always claimed that Iran poses an existential threat to it. This follows a statement made by Iran's former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in 2012 at the United Nations. Ahmadinejad said Israel has no roots in the Middle East and would be 'eliminated'. He was criticised for uttering an inflammatory statement and ignoring a UN's warning to avoid incendiary rhetoric ahead of the annual General Assembly session. Netanyahu has been beating the war drum against Iran ever since, arguing that 'Iran has to be stopped on its tracks before it is too late'. There are 191 countries that are parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), making it one of the most widely adhered-to arms control agreements. But four nuclear weapons states — India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea — are not signatories to the treaty. The treaty's objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to achieve nuclear disarmament. The IAEA, an agency of the UN, is responsible for monitoring nuclear activities and obligations of countries party to the treaty. South Africa has a nuclear power station generating 5% of the country's electricity. The country ratified the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in February 2019 and was the first country to have disarmed its nuclear weapons. Fearing that these could end up in the wrong hands, South Africa ended its nuclear weapons programme, which began during the 1970s, in 1989. The decision was executed just months before negotiations on ending apartheid between the National Party (NP) and the ANC started. It was an important decision which facilitated a smooth political transition in South Africa. Otherwise, global powers could have delayed or derailed the political transition. According to Ali Mazrui, a Kenyan intellectual, the NP was under pressure from various quarters to prevent what he referred to as the 'Black Bomb' from being transferred to an unknown black political leadership. (Graphic: John McCann/M&G) Back to the Middle East. Who is presenting an existential threat to other nations in the Middle East? Who possesses nuclear weapons in the region? There is a wide belief that Israel has nuclear weapons. The estimates are that it has nuclear stockpiles of between 90 and 400 nuclear warheads. According to political analyst Msano Zive, it is Israel that poses an existential threat in the region. The manner in which Israel has continued with the genocide in Gaza, its willingness to starve and suffocate civilians in Gaza and its disproportionate response to the attacks on 7 October 2023 has never been experienced in modern times. Israel is intent on committing the same atrocities in Iran. The destruction of property in Gaza and the number of deaths, including those still lying under the rubble, resemble a country that was struck by an atomic bomb, Zive argues. Israel has not ratified the non-proliferation treaty, meaning that the IAEA's monitors have no access to its nuclear programme. The world should be concerned. Israel has continually violated national sovereignty and security of its neighbours. Other than continuing to commit genocide in Gaza, it is relentlessly bombing Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and now Iran. Netanyahu's political survival and avoiding jail time is dependent largely on the continuation of the war in the region. Israel's failure to destroy Hamas in Gaza has led to Netanyahu to search for new targets. Iran has been the low-hanging fruit for a long time, given the national sentiments on Iran in Israel. The IAEA has to ensure a nuclear weapon-free and responsible world. Importantly, it also has to ensure that those who possess nuclear weapons and run nuclear related programmes act responsibly and adhere to the basic rules and regulations of the treaty. Importantly, the role of the IAEA of encouraging a nuclear weapons-free world has to be promoted. It is important therefore how the IAEA deals with Iran; it has to be seen to be fair. Iran ratified the non-proliferation treaty voluntarily. Why is it then harassed by a country known to possess nuclear weapons that refuses to ratify the treaty and scrutiny by the IAEA? The continuation of these double standards is likely to encourage other countries in the world who intend to produce nuclear weapons from being open about their plans. Thembisa Fakude is a senior research fellow at Africa Asia Dialogues and a director at the Mail & Guardian.