Nippon Steel closes acquisition of US Steel to end 18-month saga

TOKYO – Nippon Steel closed its US$14.1 billion (S$18.1 billion) acquisition of United States Steel bringing an end to a bruising takeover battle that was embroiled in American politics for months until finally gaining support from US President Donald Trump.
The transaction closes exactly 18 months after the two steelmakers first announced their surprising tie-up, a timeline veteran traders called one of the most unique they've ever witnessed. The controversial deal weathered two presidential administrations, union opposition, an expensive lobbying campaign and two US security panel reviews.
'This has been an unprecedented situation that got completely politicised – the fact that the union was so vocal, but presidential candidates too? That's never happened before,' said Wolfe Research analyst Timna Tanners, who has covered the industry for two decades. 'Steel was the discussion at people's kitchen tables, which probably hasn't happened for a while, but in the end, it happened exactly how it should have.'
Nippon Steel's US$55-a-share acquisition creates the world's second-largest steelmaker and turns the combined entity into a formidable competitor within the American steel industry. The companies struck a conditional deal with the Trump administration on June 13 that saw the Japanese steelmaker agree to invest an additional US$11 billion in the Pittsburgh-based producer, giving them the green light to close a transaction first announced in mid-December 2023.
The biggest winners may have been US Steel investors who held onto their stock through the roller-coaster ride that saw shares sink as low as US$26.92 at one point – less than half Nippon Steel's offer. One top investor was Florida-based hedge fund Pentwater Capital Management, which held more than US$1 billion in stock.
'I'm wearing my US Steel shirt today,' Pentwater Capital's founder, Mr Matthew Halbower, said in a June 18 interview. 'In the end, sanity prevailed.'
Nippon Steel in the end offered enough concessions to Mr Trump that made it nearly impossible for his administration not to approve the combination. Most eye-opening were promises by the steelmakers to give the US president direct say in a number of decision-making scenarios for the American steelmaker in perpetuity.
Nippon Steel and US Steel struck a National Security Agreement with the US, in which US Steel will issue a so-called golden share to the government. The golden share gives consent rights to the US president concerning reductions in capital investments, changing US Steel's name and headquarters, redomiciling outside the US, transferring jobs or production outside the US, acquisitions and decisions to close or idle existing facilities.
Nippon Steel's concessions and added investments helped clinch Mr Trump's support of a takeover he opposed even before he became president. Throughout 2024's election campaign, Mr Trump had repeatedly said he was against foreign ownership of US Steel – a position he shared with then-President Joe Biden.
Mr Biden blocked Nippon Steel's takeover in early January, arguing that the deal would 'place one of America's largest steel producers under foreign control and create risk for our national security and our critical supply chains'. His decision came after the case was referred to him by a US security panel review.
As the two steelmakers sought last-ditch efforts to rescue their transaction, the newly elected Mr Trump started showing a willingness for the White House to revisit the transaction. On April 7, Mr Trump ordered another security review of the potential sale, directing the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to file a report within 45 days. Weeks later, Mr Trump touted a 'planned partnership' between the two companies, citing an investment and partial ownership, but under US control.
Nippon Steel, with its biggest foreign purchase to date, is making a bet on a new market for its high-end specialty steel – one that is intended to help the industrial heavyweight diversify away from shrinking demand at home and to help it cope with competition from low-cost Chinese exports.
Leadership of the influential United Steelworkers union, which represents workers at US Steel plants, opposed the deal from the start. USW President David McCall held significant influence over Mr Biden's decision on whether to block the deal as the then-president saw union and blue-collar votes as central to his ability to win the pivotal swing state of Pennsylvania in his re-election campaign.
That power began to wane, however, after Mr Trump won the election, and rank-and-file union members voiced a highly vocal split with leadership in support of the deal. Mr Trump's administration listened to those members, including United Steelworkers Local 2227 Vice President Jason Zugai who acted as the defacto head of the faction wanting Nippon Steel's bid approved.
Union leadership remains steadfast in its opposition to the transaction even after its closure, with Mr McCall highlighting the unprecedented presidential control over the company.
'It finally found acceptance by President Donald Trump, who now, through his 'golden share', has assumed a startling degree of personal power over a corporation,' Mr McCall said in a statement. 'We will continue watching, holding Nippon to its commitments.' BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Straits Times

13 minutes ago

• Straits Times

Hundreds of US citizens left Iran in last week, State Dept cable says

FILE PHOTO: A truck drives on a road in the border region of Iran, as seen from the Syunik Province of Armenia May 14, 2025. Hayk Baghdasaryan/Photolure via REUTERS/File Photo Hundreds of US citizens left Iran in last week, State Dept cable says WASHINGTON - Hundreds of American citizens have departed Iran using land routes over the past week since an aerial war between the Islamic Republic and Israel broke out, according to an internal State Department cable seen by Reuters on Friday. While many left without problem, "numerous" citizens had faced "delays and harassment" while trying to exit, the cable said. It said, without giving further details, that one unidentified family had reported that two U.S. citizens attempting to leave Iran had been detained. The internal cable dated June 20 underscores the challenge Washington is facing in trying to protect and assist its citizens in a country with which it has no diplomatic relations and in a war in which the United States may soon get involved. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The cable was first reported by The Washington Post. President Donald Trump and the White House said on Thursday he will decide in the next two weeks whether the U.S. will get involved in the Israel-Iran war. Trump has kept the world guessing on his plans, veering from proposing a swift diplomatic solution to suggesting Washington might join the fighting on Israel's side. The air war began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran and has alarmed a region that has been on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. Israel is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons, and said it struck Iran to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear program is peaceful, has retaliated with its own strikes on Israel. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. POTENTIAL EVACUATION The U.S. State Department in a travel alert earlier on Friday urged its citizens wishing to depart Iran to use land routes via Azerbaijan, Armenia or Turkey. Iranian airspace is closed. The U.S. Embassy in the Turkmenistan capital of Ashgabat has requested entry for over 100 American citizens, but the Turkmenistan government has yet to give its approval, the cable said. The Islamic Republic treats Iranian-U.S. dual citizens solely as nationals of Iran, the State Department emphasized. "U.S. nationals are at significant risk of questioning, arrest and detention in Iran," the alert said. Washington is looking at ways to potentially evacuate its citizens from Israel, but it has almost no way of assisting Americans inside Iran. The two countries have had no diplomatic ties since the Iranian Revolution in 1979. U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on Thursday said the administration was looking at different ways to get U.S. citizens out. "We're working to get military, commercial, charter flights and cruise ships for evac," he said in an X post, urging U.S. citizens and green card holders to complete an online form. As of Friday, more than 6,400 U.S. citizens filled out that form for Israel, a separate internal department email seen by Reuters said. The form allows the agency to predict an approximate figure for potential evacuations. "Approximately 300-500 U.S. citizens per day would potentially require departure assistance," said the internal email, also dated June 20 and marked "sensitive". The State Department does not have official figures but thousands of U.S. citizens are thought to be residing in Iran and hundreds of thousands in Israel. Israel's strikes over the last week have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency. Israel says Iranian attacks have killed 24 civilians in Israel. "The U.S. Department of State received no reports of U.S. citizen casualties in Israel or Iran," the second email said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Business Times

22 minutes ago

• Business Times

Asean walks trade war tightrope

WITH its pauses and U-turns, Donald Trump's tariff agenda continues to defy firm forecasts. Still, it remains worthwhile to explore how the US president's trade wars have impacted South-east Asian economies and could continue to do so going forward. South-east Asian economies are strategically important to both China and the United States as trading partners, geographical interests and military bases, particularly for the US. Yet, for the past decade, the region has repeatedly found itself caught in the middle as these two global powers compete for economic supremacy. With a population of over 690 million – or around 8 per cent of the world's population – Asean accounts for over 3.5 per cent of global gross domestic product and 7.4 per cent of global exports, demonstrating the bloc's increasing importance to the world's economic activity. Asean is China's largest trading partner, while ranking as the US' fourth-largest trading partner, after Mexico, Canada and China. First Trump term: Unintended beneficiaries During Trump's first presidency, tariffs of 10-50 per cent were imposed on various categories of Chinese products, primarily aimed at addressing concerns over intellectual property theft, forced technology transfers, and the substantial trade deficit with China. While tariffs were subsequently halved on the premise that China would import an additional US$200 billion from the US, only around US$30 billion in additional US goods were actually imported to China between 2020 and 2024. The tariff on Chinese imports created an unexpected opportunity for Asean and Mexico through supply chain realignment. Vietnam and Mexico emerged as particular beneficiaries. Vietnam's exports to the US surged from just US$49 billion in 2018 to US$137 billion in 2024, while Mexico's exports rose from US$344 billion to US$506 billion over the same period. The rapid increase can be attributed to the relocation of Chinese manufacturing facilities and rerouting of goods, reflected in the parallel rise in goods imports from China to both Asean countries and Mexico, predominantly in partially finished or finished goods. China's supply chain realignment strategy proved remarkably successful. Mexico is now the largest exporter to the US, replacing China in 2023, while the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) now ranks as the fourth-largest exporter to the US after Mexico, China and Canada. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Strategic positioning and political complexity This shift was hardly surprising, as Asean has long been strategically important to China from multiple angles: as manufacturing bases, investment destinations and for political influence. The region's significant overseas Chinese population and close proximity to China have helped Asean countries grow closer to the country over the years. Since 2018, the bloc has become a critical hub for Chinese companies seeking to mitigate tariff exposure from the US-China trade war. Chinese firms have rerouted exports through Asean or established factories in countries like Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand and Malaysia to bypass tariffs, making the definition of 'origin of goods' and 'value-adding' increasingly opaque. Deja vu: The second Trump term Fast-forward to 2025, and investors face a deja vu moment as Trump's second presidential term took off with the strongest push yet for broad-based tariffs, maintaining significant focus on China. This reflects growing concerns about America's enormous total trade deficits with the world, which have grown to just shy of US$1 trillion. The US now understands the implications of imposing tariffs on China alone – the supply chain realignment has rendered previous tariffs ineffective in reducing the trade deficit. Asean economies once again find themselves caught in the crossfire between the world's two largest powers. This time, however, the implications are far more significant. The realignment of China's manufacturing supply chains has created jobs and entire industries over the past five years. Another shift could unwind parts of this manufacturing ecosystem and threaten people's livelihoods. The geopolitical balancing act There is also a broader geopolitical challenge. With escalating US-China tensions, Asean faces increasing pressure to align with one side or the other. Thailand and the Philippines, as examples, are notably taking a more muted stance towards geopolitical alignments. This balancing act is particularly delicate – both countries host existing US airbases while also relying heavily on China for investments, tourism and manufacturing. Given China's strong dominance as a trade partner and investor in the region, plus with the US serving as both a major export destination and source of political influence for many Asean economies, this equilibrium requires careful navigation. Asean must continue to strengthen intra-regional ties and leverage trade deals such as the RCEP and CPTPP to insulate itself from global volatility. The path forward for Asean economies must be both strategic and deliberate to safeguard the region's long-term interests. The group should focus on maintaining a delicate balance between the two global superpowers by adopting a neutral stance, while simultaneously strengthening internal resilience through enhanced intra-regional trade and improved competitiveness in manufacturing, trade and foreign direct investments. To prepare for potential geopolitical decoupling, Asean should diversify its network of economic partners and deepen institutional integration, drawing lessons from the European Union to strengthen its collective influence on the global stage. For businesses and investors, this evolving landscape presents dual-edged prospects: risks of supply chain disruptions, but also significant opportunities to position Asean as a key hub in future global trade and supply chain. Implications for bond investors While the temporary pause in new trade tariffs has brought some relief to bond investors, we view Trump 2.0 as bringing unprecedented growth risks for Asean. We expect a further economic decoupling between China and the US, which will negatively impact global growth as trade declines. In the near term, this uncertainty warrants further rate cuts from Asean central banks as inflation stabilises, growth slows and unemployment inches higher. Local currency bonds should therefore remain well-supported. We also expect to see some net international investment position flows from US assets returning to Asia, lending further support to local currency asset prices and Asian currencies. However, we remain mindful of the longer-term effects on potential economic growth from supply chain realignment and global slowdown, which can have lasting impacts on Asean economies. The writer is portfolio manager, Asia Fixed Income, at M&G Investments

Business Times

an hour ago

• Business Times

Oil prices settle lower as US sanctions ease fears of escalation in Iran

[HOUSTON] Oil prices settled down on Friday (Jun 20) as the US imposed new Iran-related sanctions, marking a diplomatic approach that fed hopes of a negotiated agreement, a day after US President Donald Trump said he might take two weeks to decide US involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. Brent crude futures settled down US$1.84, or 2.33 per cent, to US$77.01 a barrel. US West Texas Intermediate crude for July, which did not settle on Thursday as it was a US holiday and expires on Friday, was down 21 US cents, or 0.28 per cent, at US$74.93. The more liquid August contract settled at US$73.84. Brent rose 3.6 per cent on the week, while front-month US crude futures increased 2.7 per cent. The Trump administration issued fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on two entities based in Hong Kong, and counter-terrorism-related sanctions, according to a notice posted to the US Treasury Department website. The sanctions target at least 20 entities, five individuals and three vessels, according to the Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Those sanctions are cutting both ways. They may be part of a broader negotiation approach towards Iran. The fact that they are undertaking this is a signal that they are trying to resolve this outside of conflict,' said John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital in New York. Oil prices jumped almost 3 per cent on Thursday after Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran, while Iran, Opec's third-largest producer, fired missiles and drones at Israel. Neither side showed any sign of backing down in the week-old war. Brent prices retreated after the White House said Trump would decide whether the United States would get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks. 'Although a major escalation is yet to occur, risks to supply from the region remain high, still hinging upon the potential for US involvement,' said Russell Shor, senior market analyst at Israel's UN ambassador said Israel seeks genuine efforts on Iran's nuclear capabilities from Friday's meeting between European and Iranian ministers, not just another round of talks. 'However, while Israel and Iran carry on pounding away at each other, there can always be an unintended action that escalates the conflict and touches upon oil infrastructure,' PVM analyst John Evans said. Iran in the past has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for Middle East oil exports. Oil exports so far have not been disrupted and there is no shortage of supply, said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS. 'The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions,' he said. An escalation of the conflict in such a way that Israel attacks export infrastructure or Iran disrupts shipping through the strait could lead to oil at US$100 a barrel being a reality, said Panmure Liberum analyst Ashley Kelty. Elsewhere, the EU has abandoned its proposal to lower the price cap on Russian oil to US$45, Bloomberg reported. US energy firms this week cut the number of oil and natural gas rigs operating for an eighth week in a row for the first time since September 2023, energy services firm Baker Hughes said in its closely followed report. The oil and gas rig count, an early indicator of future output, fell by one to 554 in the week to Jun 20, the lowest since November 2021. REUTERS