Bombay HC strikes down GST demand on TDR used by real estate developer
NAGPUR
: In an important ruling for
Maharashtra's real estate sector
, the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court set aside a GST demand issued to a city-based developer, holding that no taxable transfer of development rights occurred under the agreement in question. The decision offers clarity on the tax implications of development agreements in the real estate sector.
The division bench of justices Avinash Gharote and Abhay Mantri delivered the ruling while allowing a petition filed by Shrinivasa Realcon, which challenged a show-cause notice issued on August 14, 2024, and a consequent GST order dated December 10, 2024. The demand pertained to a development agreement executed on April 7, 2022, for constructing a residential complex on an 8,000 sq ft plot at mouza Lendra. The developer was appointed by the landowner for a consideration of Rs7 crore and two flats.
Senior counsel Akshay Naik, assisted by Abhishek Bhoot, argued that the project did not involve any transfer or purchase of development rights or floor space index (FSI) from external sources. Instead, the construction was based solely on the existing FSI or any statutory increase.
Entry 5B of the GST notification dated June 28, 2017, amended on March 29, 2019, allows taxation of services involving the transfer of TDR or FSI for construction purposes. However, the court noted the GST law does not define a 'transfer of development right'. It referred to Clause 11.2 of the Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations, which outlines TDR as compensation in FSI granted by a planning authority, not applicable in the present case.
The bench concluded that the development agreement lacked any reference to the transfer of such rights and rejected the department's reliance on Clause 18 of the contract, which merely required compliance under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970.
Declaring the transaction outside the purview of Entry 5B, the court quashed both the show-cause notice and the final order. "The transaction contemplated does not fall within Entry 5B of the notification of June 28, 2017, as amended by another notification of March 29, 2019. Neither the show-cause notice nor the consequent order can be sustained," the judges stated in their order, thereby setting them aside.
Key takeaways from HC verdict:
- There was no actual trading of transfer of development rights (TDR) in the agreement
- Entry 5B of GST notification could not be invoked in case
- GST Act does not define 'transfer of development rights'
- Developer used existing FSI or statutory increase, not external TDR
- Clause 18 of agreement was not proof of transfer
- Set aside both show-cause notice and final tax order
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ensure trader can access his shop and conduct business: Gujarat HC
Ahmedabad: The Gujarat high court directed the state authorities to "redress" the problem faced by a Muslim trader in conducting business from his legally owned shop in a Hindu-majority locality in Vadodara city. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The complainant has allegedly faced relentless obstruction from locals, who refuse to let him open the premises. The HC reminded the state govt that maintaining law and order is its duty. Onali Dholkawala had legally purchased the shop from two Hindu brothers near Champaner Darwaza in 2016. However, he could get the sale deed registered only in 2020 after he approached the HC as the area is covered under the Gujarat Prohibition of Transfer of Immovable Property and Provisions of Tenants from Eviction from Premises in Disturbed Areas Act, 1991 (Disturbed Areas Act), which restricts property transactions and mandates the district collector's permission for transactions. He continued to face opposition from the neighbourhood, as a couple of the residents challenged the sale to a Muslim and demanded its cancellation, claiming that allowing a Muslim to buy property in the area could lead to polarisation and disturb demographic equilibrium. In Feb 2023, the HC rejected their petition and imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on each of the two litigants by terming such an objection as a "disturbing factor" because the owner "is being hounded and thwarting his attempt to enjoy the fruits of the property which he successfully purchased". An appeal against this order was dismissed as well. However, the locals still did not allow Dholkawala to use the shop. They allegedly dumped debris at the shop's gate so that it could not be opened. He approached the HC once again seeking police protection so that he could get the shop's building repaired and conduct business from the premises. He complained that he had approached Panigate police multiple times requesting protection but allegedly received no support After hearing his case, Justice H D Suthar stated, "In view of the facts of the case and looking to the grievance of the petitioner at Annexure-A, the respondent authority concerned is hereby directed to redress the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law as it is the duty of the state to maintain the law and order. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now If any adverse outcome is there, the petitioners are at liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. " Ahmedabad: The Gujarat high court directed the state authorities to "redress" the problem faced by a Muslim trader in conducting business from his legally owned shop in a Hindu-majority locality in Vadodara city. The complainant has allegedly faced relentless obstruction from locals, who refuse to let him open the premises. The HC reminded the state govt that maintaining law and order is its duty. Onali Dholkawala had legally purchased the shop from two Hindu brothers near Champaner Darwaza in 2016. However, he could get the sale deed registered only in 2020 after he approached the HC as the area is covered under the Gujarat Prohibition of Transfer of Immovable Property and Provisions of Tenants from Eviction from Premises in Disturbed Areas Act, 1991 (Disturbed Areas Act), which restricts property transactions and mandates the district collector's permission for transactions. He continued to face opposition from the neighbourhood, as a couple of the residents challenged the sale to a Muslim and demanded its cancellation, claiming that allowing a Muslim to buy property in the area could lead to polarisation and disturb demographic equilibrium. In Feb 2023, the HC rejected their petition and imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on each of the two litigants by terming such an objection as a "disturbing factor" because the owner "is being hounded and thwarting his attempt to enjoy the fruits of the property which he successfully purchased". An appeal against this order was dismissed as well. However, the locals still did not allow Dholkawala to use the shop. They allegedly dumped debris at the shop's gate so that it could not be opened. He approached the HC once again seeking police protection so that he could get the shop's building repaired and conduct business from the premises. He complained that he had approached Panigate police multiple times requesting protection but allegedly received no support After hearing his case, Justice H D Suthar stated, "In view of the facts of the case and looking to the grievance of the petitioner at Annexure-A, the respondent authority concerned is hereby directed to redress the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law as it is the duty of the state to maintain the law and order. If any adverse outcome is there, the petitioners are at liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. "
India Today
11 hours ago
- India Today
Two new GST levies may replace compensation cess, but at what cost?
With the compensation cess set to expire by March 1, 2026, the Centre is likely to propose two new levies — a Health Cess on tobacco and other harmful substances and a Clean Energy Cess on coal and automobiles, as part of the discussions at the upcoming GST Council meeting in move aims to fill the revenue gap that will open up once the transitional compensation cess is phased out. While these cesses are still under consideration, experts say they may introduce fresh complexity into the GST regime, especially for businesses and the broader Centre-State revenue-sharing IMPACT'GST was a landmark tax reform which then sought to replace a complex web of fragmented state taxation systems that were in existence before 2017,' said chartered accountant Siddharth Surana. 'Prior to 2017, states and union territories implemented and administered their own system of Value Added Tax, and the revenues from these taxes fell directly within their purview with no major need for fiscal co-operation and Centre-State harmony,' he added.'To offset the loss by the introduction of GST and the harmonisation of GST rates, the state governments were provided with compensation cess, which was a tax in addition to GST, and was applicable on certain demerit goods and sin products such as aerated beverages, automobiles and tobacco. The compensation cess was introduced only for a temporary period of time as a transitional measure, which was to end in 2022. However, with several extensions, this is likely to expire on 1st March 2026," Surana explained that the new cesses being discussed are unlikely to compromise the structural integrity of the GST system. 'In our understanding, as these levies are centrally proposed and are likely to follow the structure proposed by the central government, they are likely to be standard levies and do not pose a risk to return to the fragmented pre-GST tax structure,' he said.'Also, the taxes are targeted at very few products, mostly falling within the present 28% GST slab. Thus, while they may not affect the structure of GST, the major cause of concern would be distribution. The central and state governments would have to work out the method of distribution of proceeds of these cesses and this will require cooperative federalism,' Surana also pointed out that businesses are likely to feel the impact of any new levy on three key fronts.'In our opinion, the introduction of any new levy does have an impact on businesses on three fronts – costs, compliance and supply chain. The introduction of 2 new cesses are likely to increase the compliance burden on industry. It will also entail a change in the return formats and companies will have to adapt to the changing presentation and disclosure norms,' he compliance, Surana suggested that the policy intent behind these cesses is to influence corporate behaviour.'Further, it appears that the purpose of introducing these taxes is to increase the cost of products that are harmful to the environment and, therefore, may put more pressure on corporates to become more sustainable,' he added that the Clean Energy Cess, in particular, aligns with the government's push toward green energy. 'The use of coal as a source of power has tremendous ecological costs, and the replacement of coal with renewable sources of energy has been an objective of the government. We believe that the levy of cesses on products like automobiles will create ecological consciousness and force companies to revisit their supply chain and adopt sustainable practices.'
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Focus on FDI receipts by India from 2014 – 2024 & India's role in the Global Supply Chain in the future
Dr. Prashant Prabhakar Deshpande has post-graduated in Economics with a Gold Medal in 1976 and was awarded a Ph.D in Social Sciences from Nagpur University in 2007. Introduction FDI has long been hailed as a vital driver of economic growth in both developed and developing countries presenting opportunities for increased productivity, transfer of technology, job creation, and enhanced global competitiveness. India's FDI inflows in 2024-25 have reportedly reached $81.04 billion, a 14% increase from the previous year led by the services sector followed by the computer software and the Hardware. FDI inflows have seen a steady rise from $36.05 billion in FY 2013-14 to $81.04 billion (provisional) in FY 2024-25 amounting to 124.80 % increase with13.69 % increase in FY 2024-25 amounting to $81.04 billion from $71.28 billion reported in FY 2023-24. While the services sector emerged as the top recipient of FDI equity in FY 2024–25 attracting 19 % of total inflows it was followed by: Computer software and hardware (16 %), and; Trading (8 %). FDI into the Services sector rose by 40.81 % to $9.35 billion from $6.64 billion in the previous year, with a strong surge in the FDI in the Manufacturing sector growing by 18.11 % in FY 2024–25 reaching $19.04 billion compared to $16.12 billion in FY 2023–24. Transformation in India's foreign investment scenario post-2014 India's Foreign Investment scenario has experienced transformation since 2014 with FDI equity inflows having been noticed surging, especially between 2019 and 2024. Government reforms like Make in India and Digital India are credited with this increased investor confidence along with the digital economy and the manufacturing sectors having experienced significant growth, it has been observed. It has been pointed out, India has changed post-2014 from a hesitant reformer to a strategic magnet for investment resulting in the country attracting a significant amount of foreign capital over the past decade. While from 2004 to 2014 India received FDI equity inflows to the tune of $208 billion, between 2014 to 2024 it received over $500 billion FDI equity inflows, with $300 billion having been received between 2019 and 2024. It is noteworthy that despite global slowdowns, India received during the April–December 2024 period alone $40.67 billion FDI, demonstrating a monumental shift in global confidence in the ability of India. According to observers, this is not a mere coincidence. They point out that government's relentless focus on Minimum Government, Maximum Governance, and its flagship reforms, Make in India, Startup India, Digital India, GST rollout and the National Logistics Policy have not only improved ease of doing business but have enhanced India's appeal to the foreign investors, enabling India to climb in the World Bank Rank from over 140 to 63 in 2019. Embarking on Transformative Reforms In the Regulatory domain, the Indian government undertook transformative reforms across multiple sectors to liberalise FDI norms. Thus: Between 2014 and 2019: Increased FDI caps in Defence, Insurance & Pension sectors and; Liberalized policies for Construction, Civil Aviation & Single Brand Retail Trading. From 2019 to 2024: Allowed 100 per cent FDI under the automatic route in Coal mining, Contract manufacturing & Insurance intermediaries. In 2025, the Union Budget proposed: Increasing the FDI limit from 74% to 100% for companies investing their entire premium within India. The Sectoral performance in attracting FDI Computer software and hardware attracted $95 billion in FDI since 2014. Services ranging from finance and IT to R&D and consultancy attracted $77 billion. According to observers this demonstrates that India is no more just a back office, but rather, is a global innovation partner. In 2014, 75–80% of India imported smartphones. Their exports being negligible a decade ago have now surged to $21 billion the Production Linked Incentive scheme having prompted global giants like Apple to assemble iPhones in India through Foxconn, the Taiwanese Multinational Electronics Contract Manufacturer and Wistron, an Electronics Manufacturer based in Taiwan. In addition, FDI into manufacturing, auto, construction equipment, and pharmaceuticals demonstrates India's strategic shift from service-led to a balanced, broad-based growth. Contribution by FDI It is pointed out: Every dollar of FDI received, does not only represent capital, but also leads to: Job creation; Supply chain expansion, and; Transfer of technology. FDI fuels the MSME ecosystem scaling 'zero defect, zero effect' practices in manufacturing lead to assure customers, reduce wastages, increase productivity, expand markets, apart from saving on energy, etc. lifting Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities into the investment spotlight. In an appeal, PM Narendra Modi has also urged the industry, especially the MSMEs to manufacture goods with 'zero defects' and to ensure that the goods have 'zero effect' on the environment. Foreign investors have also aligned with India's green ambitions. From renewable energy to electric mobility, foreign capital is now enabling not just growth, but sustainable & future-facing growth. Epilogue As companies diversify away from China under 'China+1', India has emerged as a stable, democratic, scalable alternative. The India-UAE CEPA (Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between UAE & India, India-Australia ECTA (Australia-India Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement, and FTAs with the UK, EU, and EFTA (European Free Trade Association) nations are opening new high-value channels like Green Hydrogen, EVs, Fintech, and beyond. Although Vietnam and Indonesia are said to be the real competitors, India, according to observers, represents a unique mix of scale, stability, skills, and a massive domestic market. With reforms in land acquisition, judicial efficiency, and deepening infrastructure investment, India's ability to anchor global value chains according to them, will therefore only grow stronger over the period. Since 2014, according to observers, India's FDI trajectory reflects more than just capital inflow but signals global endorsement of India's structural shift. The combination of scale, reform, digital depth, and manufacturing intent of India is hard to match according to them. As such, as global supply chains realign, India stands out, not as an alternative, but as a priority according to them. The coming decade therefore would not be about catching up, but about leading by India according to them. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
