Fintech Startup Founder Charlie Javice Found Guilty Of Defrauding JPMorgan
Entrepreneur Charlie Javice was found guilty Friday of defrauding JPMorgan Chase after it bought her financial aid startup Frank for $175 million in 2021 based on fraudulent customer numbers.
Javice was found guilty Friday afternoon. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)
Javice, 32, was convicted of defrauding JPMorgan after prosecutors accused her of artificially inflating her startup's customer list by 10 times, according to multiple outlets.
The Forbes Under 30 alum still faces a civil trial from JPMorgan as well. The startup founder, who pleaded not guilty to her charges and denied the fraud allegations against her, faces a maximum of 30 years in prison, NBC News reported.
JPMorgan's lawsuit against Javice, one separate from the federal trial concluded Friday, remains on standby, according to The New York Times, which noted the bank is seeking to get Javice's share of the $175 million it paid to acquire Frank, her startup designed to make filing for student financial aid easier and more efficient.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices surge after US strikes on Iran with Strait of Hormuz status in focus
Oil futures surged as much as 5% on Sunday night after US strikes on Iran's three main nuclear sites intensified fears of a potential supply shock, amid growing concerns that Tehran could retaliate by closing a key maritime chokepoint. Brent crude (BZ=F), the international benchmark, gained as much as 5.7%, hovering above $80 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate (CL=F) futures also jumped more than 4% to hover around $77 per barrel. Oil prices had already posted weekly gains on Friday following the outbreak of conflict between Israel and Iran just over a week ago. On Sunday, traders weighed possible retaliation moves from Iran, a major oil producer and exporter, following the US's direct involvement. According to state media, Iran's parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz. The final decision on whether to shut the vital waterway — which handles roughly 20% of global oil flows — rests with Iran's Supreme National Security Council and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. What Wall Street once viewed as a low-probability event is now being treated as a significantly heightened risk. "Should oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz be affected, we could easily see $100 oil," said Andy Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates. Following the outbreak of the Israel-Iran war, JPMorgan analysts forecast that under a "severe outcome," a closure of the Strait of Hormuz could push oil prices to $120–$130 per barrel. If crude climbs into that range, analysts predict gasoline and diesel prices could rise by as much as $1.25 per gallon. 'Consumers would be looking at a national average gasoline price of around $4.50 per gallon—closer to $6.00 if you're in California,' Lipow said. Other possible retaliatory moves from Iran could include supporting Yemen's Houthi rebels in renewed attacks on commercial shipping. If the conflict escalates and the US or Israel targets Iran's oil export infrastructure, analysts warn that Tehran may retaliate by striking export facilities in neighboring countries. 'In other words, 'If we can't export our oil, you can't have yours,'' Lipow said. The key issue isn't just the potential for disruption, but how long it lasts, Rebecca Babin, senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth, told Yahoo Finance on Sunday. 'If infrastructure is hit but can be quickly restored, crude may struggle to hold gains,' she said. 'But if Iran's response causes lasting damage or introduces long-term supply risk, we're likely to see a stronger and more sustained move higher.' Last week, JPMorgan analysts noted that since 1967 — aside from the Yom Kippur War in 1973 — none of the 11 major military conflicts involving Israel have had a lasting impact on oil prices. In contrast, events directly involving major regional oil producers — such as the first Gulf War in 1990, the Iraq War in 2003, and the imposition of sanctions on Iran in 2018 — have all led to meaningful and sustained moves in oil markets. 'During these episodes, we estimate that oil traded at a $7–$14 per barrel premium to its fair value for an extended period,' wrote JPMorgan's Natasha Kaneva and her team. They added that the most significant and lasting price impacts historically come from 'regime changes' in oil-producing countries — whether that be through leadership transitions, coups, revolutions, or major political shifts. 'While demand conditions and OPEC's spare capacity shape the broader market response, these events typically drive substantial oil price spikes, averaging a 76% increase from onset to peak,' Kaneva wrote. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies (OPEC+) had raised output in the months leading up to Israel's strike on Iran on June 13. Ines Ferre is a Senior Business Reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @ines_ferre. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
CNBC
44 minutes ago
- CNBC
Bitcoin sinks below $99,000 as U.S. strikes on Iran trigger crypto market sell-off
Bitcoin fell to its lowest level since May over the weekend, as rising tensions in the Middle East and renewed inflation fears triggered a sharp selloff across digital assets. Bitcoin dropped below the $99,000 mark on Sunday — its lowest point in more than a month — as the crypto market became the first to react to escalating geopolitical risk. Bitcoin is trading around $99,380, down more than 2% over the past 24 hours, while ether has dropped 5% to below $2,200. Solana, XRP, and dogecoin also posted sharp losses, dragging the entire crypto complex deep into the red. The selloff appears to be a combination of geopolitical shock and macroeconomic concern. Iran has reportedly threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz — a vital shipping lane that handles about 20% of global oil supply. JPMorgan warns that a full closure could drive oil prices as high as $130 per barrel. One prominent macro research firm notes that such a spike could send U.S. inflation back toward 5% — a level not seen since March 2023, when the Fed was still actively raising rates. That outlook has traders reassessing the path of interest rates — and rotating out of speculative assets like crypto. While bitcoin is often pitched as an inflation hedge, it's currently behaving more like a high-beta tech stock. According to crypto data provider Kaiko, bitcoin's correlation with the tech-heavy Nasdaq has climbed sharply in recent weeks, after hitting a multi-month low earlier this year — a period that coincided with surging inflows into spot bitcoin ETFs. Institutional positioning also appears to have shifted. More than $1.04 billion flowed into spot bitcoin ETFs from Monday through Wednesday last week, according to data from CoinGlass. But those inflows collapsed heading into the weekend, with zero net movement Thursday and just $6.4 million on Friday — coinciding with President Donald Trump's early G7 departure and the announcement of a two-week review of U.S. options on Iran. The technical breakdown added fuel to the selloff. CoinGlass research shows bitcoin's drop below $99,000 triggered forced selling across offshore derivatives platforms like Binance and Bybit. At its peak on Sunday, more than $1 billion in crypto positions were liquidated during a 24-hour span — with over 95% coming from long bets, underscoring just how overexposed the market was heading into the weekend.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices surge 5% after US strikes on Iran with Strait of Hormuz status in focus
Oil surged more than 5% on Sunday after US strikes on Iran's three main nuclear sites intensified fears of a potential supply shock, amid growing concerns that Tehran could retaliate by closing a key maritime chokepoint. Brent crude (BZ=F), the international benchmark, surged as much as 5.7% to hover above $81 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate (CL=F) futures were also expected to rise above $77 per barrel. Crude futures had already posted weekly gains following the outbreak of conflict between Israel and Iran just over a week ago. On Sunday, traders weighed possible retaliation moves from Iran, a major oil producer and exporter, following the US's direct involvement. According to state media, Iran's parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz. The final decision on whether to shut the vital waterway — which handles roughly 20% of global oil flows — rests with Iran's Supreme National Security Council and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. What Wall Street once viewed as a low-probability event is now being treated as a significantly heightened risk. "Should oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz be affected, we could easily see $100 oil," said Andy Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates. Following the outbreak of the Israel-Iran war, JPMorgan analysts forecast that under a "severe outcome," a closure of the Strait of Hormuz could push oil prices to $120–$130 per barrel. If crude climbs into that range, analysts predict gasoline and diesel prices could rise by as much as $1.25 per gallon. 'Consumers would be looking at a national average gasoline price of around $4.50 per gallon—closer to $6.00 if you're in California,' Lipow said. Other possible retaliatory moves from Iran could include supporting Yemen's Houthi rebels in renewed attacks on commercial shipping. If the conflict escalates and the US or Israel targets Iran's oil export infrastructure, analysts warn that Tehran may retaliate by striking export facilities in neighboring countries. 'In other words, 'If we can't export our oil, you can't have yours,'' Lipow said. The key issue isn't just the potential for disruption, but how long it lasts, Rebecca Babin, senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth, told Yahoo Finance on Sunday. 'If infrastructure is hit but can be quickly restored, crude may struggle to hold gains,' she said. 'But if Iran's response causes lasting damage or introduces long-term supply risk, we're likely to see a stronger and more sustained move higher.' Last week, JPMorgan analysts noted that since 1967 — aside from the Yom Kippur War in 1973 — none of the 11 major military conflicts involving Israel have had a lasting impact on oil prices. In contrast, events directly involving major regional oil producers — such as the first Gulf War in 1990, the Iraq War in 2003, and the imposition of sanctions on Iran in 2018 — have all led to meaningful and sustained moves in oil markets. 'During these episodes, we estimate that oil traded at a $7–$14 per barrel premium to its fair value for an extended period,' wrote JPMorgan's Natasha Kaneva and her team. They added that the most significant and lasting price impacts historically come from 'regime changes' in oil-producing countries — whether that be through leadership transitions, coups, revolutions, or major political shifts. 'While demand conditions and OPEC's spare capacity shape the broader market response, these events typically drive substantial oil price spikes, averaging a 76% increase from onset to peak,' Kaneva wrote. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies (OPEC+) had raised output in the months leading up to Israel's strike on Iran on June 13. Ines Ferre is a Senior Business Reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @ines_ferre. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
