Should sports gambling still keep Pete Rose out of the Hall of Fame?

You're reading the Prompt 2025 newsletter. Sign up to get it in your inbox.
Pete Rose didn't live to see himself removed from baseball's banned list. Neither did 'Shoeless' Joe Jackson. But Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred lifted the ban on both players last week, along with a slew of others, under pressure from President Donald Trump. Their reinstatement also means that a committee will now decide if they belong in the Hall of Fame. The rest of us have opinions, too — and that's why there are columnists! Joining me now are two of the very best on this topic, The Post's Sally Jenkins and Will Leitch.
💬 💬 💬
Matt Bai It probably seems odd to a lot of casual fans that we're still talking about betting like it's a mortal sin, even though you can't watch a ballgame now without being constantly assaulted by three-way parlays. Let me ask you both: What do we think is really going on here? Is the commissioner admitting that times have changed? Or does he just want to get Trump and the Rose family off his back and make it the sportswriters' problem?
Will Leitch I think it's far more the latter. Rose's history with gambling had, in the wake of baseball's embrace of gambling revenue, become an inconvenience that MLB had tried to mostly whistle past. (MLB's statement when Rose died was unmistakably muted.) But Trump is a problem that had to be dealt with. I suspect MLB's decision was, essentially, 'give him this one thing and he'll leave us, and our antitrust exemption, alone.' It's basically NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell's strategy with Trump too: Appease him, and then get what you want when he's distracted.
Matt Because we know that appeasing Trump always works.
Sally Jenkins The fact that times have changed regarding fan betting has nothing at all to do with prohibiting players from gambling, which crooks the whole deal. So it seems to me he just wanted the president off his back, and to shift responsibility to the Hall of Fame committee members. If the change of attitude toward fan betting was part of his logic, it was totally illogical and incredibly dumb conflation.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Matt Yeah, that's my sense as well. Betting on ballgames is still a bright-red line. But I imagine he's tired of having to explain why casinos can sponsor teams but Pete Rose can't get onto the Hall of Fame ballot.
Will The thing that I find so strange about the statement itself is the notion that now 'permanent' bans end when you die.
Sally Well, as John Dowd said to me, 'Reputation survives death.' The ability to inflict harm posthumously is real. This is an open invitation for players, managers and even umpires to ignore Rule 21. What Manfred has done is invite current players to bet on the games and still have hope to be inducted.
Matt Let me ask the billion-dollar question: Should Pete Rose, or Shoeless Joe for that matter, be in the Hall? How would you vote?
Sally I would vote a total NO on both counts. Shoeless Joe took $5,000 in 1919 — equivalent to almost $100,000 today — to throw games.
Will MLB does have the advantage that we are two years away from anything being decided. I honestly think a lot of it will ride on what the political environment is in 2027, when the committee next meets. I mean, I just hope we're all still alive in 2027. At a certain level, I think the move to induct Rose and Jackson, as sort of soulless and craven as it is, makes a certain strategic sense.
Matt Bleak, Will, very bleak.
Will Give Trump what he's asking for. (It's worth noting that ESPN reported that Manfred indeed called Trump after he made his decision.) And then hope he gets distracted and moves on to something else. Then you get to do what you want.
Sally By the way, Trump is a guy who lies through his teeth about his baseball prowess.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Matt Sally, does it make any difference that Rose didn't actually bet against his own team? Or at least there's never been any allegation of that. He was still trying to win, as far as we know, which seems different to me than throwing a game, like Shoeless Joe might have done.
Sally I think it makes no difference at all that Rose bet on his own team. Betting on your own team, especially as a player-manager, is, in a way, worse. You can influence lineups, pitchers, stats. You can influence all kinds of factors — for one thing, you're exercising inside knowledge and info. It's a dirtbag thing to do. It defrauds others.
Will Also, if you were a gambler watching which Reds games Rose bet on, you definitely took note of the ones he did not.
Sally TOTALLY.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Matt All right, you guys are unforgiving on this, but let me try one other angle at magnanimity. Do we really want to judge Hall of Fame credentials by morality? I mean, if we're going to go into the Hall and start removing everybody who wasn't a great character, we'll need a much smaller building.
Sally Right, the Ty Cobb argument. This isn't necessarily a moral issue — it's a gambling issue. You destroy the credibility of the game itself. Ty Cobb was a bad guy, but the problem with players and managers betting on the games is they compromise everything and everybody.
Will I totally agree. I don't think Rose shouldn't be in the Hall because he was a jerk. (Though, I highly recommend Keith O'Brien's new biography of him for a full accounting of who Rose was.) He shouldn't be in the Hall because gambling is literally one rule that you cannot break. It's posted on the wall of every clubhouse in baseball — still. It is the fundamental rule of the sport — of any sport.
Sally As my friend David Von Drehle says, it's a nihilistic suicide-homicide thing to do to the game. It really is. Gambling removes the idea that the outcome is unknown.
Will Which is really the fundamental reason to watch sports in the first place.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Matt Last question: How crazy are the odds I'd have to give you to bet that Rose does make the Hall? Three to one?
Will I think it's more likely than that. I might put it at 50-50.
Sally I also think it's 50-50.
Will But again: Let's see where we all are in 2027. (Hopefully still here!)
Sally Maybe by then, Will, another gambler's notebook could show up, with evidence he bet against his own team. This is a real hazard for the Hall, because you can't count on a word Rose ever said. He denied gambling. He denied gambling on the Reds. He denied corking bats.
Matt Those are better odds than I'd give Republicans of still controlling the House by then.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

22 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Pakistan condemns Trump for bombing Iran a day after recommending him for a Nobel Peace Prize

ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan condemned U.S. President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the U.S., resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit. It was this 'decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' that Pakistan praised in an effusive message Saturday night on the X platform when it announced its formal recommendation for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Less than 24 hours later, however, it condemned the U.S. for attacking Iran, saying the strikes 'constituted a serious violation of international law' and the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a phone call Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed his concern that the bombings had targeted facilities that were under the safeguards of the IAEA. Pakistan has close ties with Iran and supports its attacks on Israel, saying it has the right to self-defense. There was no immediate comment on Monday from Islamabad about the Trump Nobel recommendation, which also followed a high-profile White House lunch meeting between the president and Pakistan's powerful army chief, Asim Munir. Thursday's meeting, which lasted more than two hours, was also attended by the Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, the U.S. Special Representative for Middle Eastern Affairs. According to a Pakistani military statement, a detailed exchange of views took place on the 'prevailing tensions between Iran and Israel, with both leaders emphasizing the importance of the resolution of the conflict.' While Pakistan was quick to thank Trump for his intervention in its crisis with India, New Delhi played it down and said there was no need for external mediation on the Kashmir issue. The Himalayan region of Kashmir is divided between Pakistan and India but claimed by both in its entirety. India accuses Pakistan of backing militant groups in the region, which Pakistan denies.

Yahoo

30 minutes ago

• Yahoo

MLB Week 12 Hot or Not: Records were set!

As the temperatures rise, so does the level of competition. MLB's 12th week was record-breaking and filled with excitement, as the All-Star voting amps up and midseason approaches. From June 15-21, feuds and drama reached boiling points on both coasts, while the Midwest teams kept their heads down and continued to grind. AL West Hot: Cal Raleigh surpass Johnny Bench's home run record in the first half of the season Raleigh has been the best catcher in baseball all season, and that's because of his slug. Big Dumper has a .639 slugging percentage with 29 home runs, and his 29th home run was record-breaking. His 419-foot bomb on June 20 passed Johnny Bench's record for the most dingers by a primary catcher, and his 30th one on June 21 broke the record for most home runs by a switch-hitter before the All-Star break. Oh yeah, and on Sunday he hit yet another long ball. Simply put, Raleigh has been a monster this year. Advertisement Not: Brandon Walter fumbles against the Angels Walter's fourth season start against Los Angeles didn't go as planned. After nearly pitching a shutout against Minnesota earlier in the week, Walter surrendered nine hits, seven runs, and two home runs to the Halos. Although he pitched six full frames and nearly 100 pitches, Houston's No. 5 starter couldn't tame the division rivals, who are becoming more competitive with every game they play. AL Central Hot: Carlos Estévez claims baseball's saves lead The Royals closer dethroned Robert Suárez for the most saves in the league. Estévez took advantage of Suárez's three-game suspension for intentionally hitting Shohei Ohtani on June 20 when Kansas City traveled to San Diego. With a 6-4 lead, Estévez narrowly secured his 22nd save of the year after giving up a solo home run to Manny Machado in the ninth. Not: White Sox skid inches them closer to last in the league The South Side is regressing again. They finally snapped their eight-game losing streak, but their weak offense still dragged Chicago's record to 24-53. The White Sox recorded a -14 run differential with the lowest point of the week being Shane Smith's six runs allowed in 4 ⅓ innings against the Cardinals, eventually forcing a position player pitching to finish their 12-2 loss. The White Sox are now only seven games ahead of the Rockies for last place in MLB. AL East Hot: It's the summer of Gunnar (Henderson) Henderson's bat has heated up this month. He batted .381 with five runs, three RBIs, and four walks last week. While he didn't send any balls over the fence, Henderson's patience and consistency at the plate kept him from striking out more than once in his 18 at-bats. While his April was quite slow, Henderson has sufficiently made up for lost time this month. Advertisement Not: Rafael Devers' trade rattles Boston's lineup Trading Rafael Devers shook up Red Sox fans and players, too. Boston's lineup delivered a paltry .171 batting average and .310 slugging percentage. Although the Red Sox pulled off four wins despite only scoring 16 runs in six games, it's clear that the front office politics have sufficiently shaken up Boston. A win is a win, but Boston's executives have a lot of work and explaining to do to their fans and themselves on how they shipped their third superstar to the West Coast. NL West Hot: Eugenio Suárez can't stop hitting home runs Suárez is gaining ground on the home run leaderboard. Last week, he mashed five dingers, scoring a home run in four consecutive games. Two of them were hit against the Rockies in Arizona's 14-8 triumphant slugfest. Suárez's home run total now sits at 25, tied with Shohei Ohtani for third-most in the league. Not: Dylan Cease's poor outing against Los Angeles raises questions about his reliability Cease has had a bumpy season, with mostly serviceable but not stellar outings, but last week he pitched his second-worst game of the season. While he managed to last five innings, Cease gave up six runs off of five hits and a walk to the Dodgers. His nine strikeouts shouldn't go unrecognized, but his five-run fourth inning killed all momentum the Padres gained with their 1-0 lead. Cease's pitching has been unpredictable, as seen by his polar opposite starts within one week against the Dodgers and Royals, and he should continue to be considered an unreliable starter. NL Central Hot: Jacob Misiorowski sets a league record in his second MLB game Brewers top pitching prospect Misiorowski couldn't have asked for a better start to his baseball career. After allowing no hits in his debut, he held the Twins to one hit, two runs, and six strikeouts in Milwaukee's outstanding 17-6 triumph. Misiorowski set a league record by not allowing a single hit in the first 11 innings of his career, and at this pace it likely won't be the only record he sets. Advertisement Not: Pittsburgh's offense sits in idle The Pirates didn't have enough gas in the tank to outscore the Tigers or Rangers. Hitters slashed .203/.262/.262, failing to score more than three runs in any game outside of a 8-4 victory in the Motor City. Although the offense was weak across the board, Oneil Cruz particularly struggled, going 3-for-21 all week. Beginning the season, the Pirates offense didn't wow anyone on paper, and they have yet to impress on the field for more than a handful of games at a time. NL East Hot: Chris Sale continues to stun batters He's now on the injured list with a broken rib, but the veteran southpaw pitched a gem against the Mets. He nearly pitched the entire game, shutting out New York in 8 ⅔ innings with only five hits and a walk forfeited, along with seven strikeouts. The 2024 NL Cy Young winner lowered his season ERA to 2.52 and raised his strikeout total to 114 with his eighth quality start this year. Not: Francisco Lindor chills out Lindor's struggles are representative of the Mets' seven-game losing streak. Lindor went nearly hitless last week, finally reaching base on something more than a walk on June 21. His cold streak seemingly appeared overnight, as the veteran shortstop's slash line dropped from .282/.351/.485 to .267/.340/.463 within a week. Thankfully, Lindor came back with a boom at the end of the week. More from

Bloomberg

37 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

What Does the US Strike on Iran Mean for Israel?

Live on Bloomberg TV CC-Transcript 00:00Walk us through how the Israeli public has responded to the US military intervention over the weekend. Good morning, Joumanna. Yes, well, this was a dramatic weekend, one of historic proportions in Israel as elsewhere in the region and in the world, especially countries that have a stake in this part of the world. And Israelis, I would say this is to judge by everything from television panelists to the people I've shared bomb shelters with during the Iranian retaliatory missile attacks appear to be relieved, jubilant, astonished at the fact that the world's great power, the United States, did intervene finally, and using its firepower for what appears to have been a knockout blow, at least as described by President Trump and by his staff to the Iranian nuclear program. Of course, the question is whether it was a knockout blow. And I think what you're going to see today is the discourse shifting to one of BDA. That's the refrain you'll be hearing a lot of battle damage assessments, whether indeed it was a knockout blow, whether indeed the damage was enough to end any credible work at those sites and effectively allow Israel to pack up and say that the war is over. The main threat, what it's described as the main threat to its existence going back decades has now been dealt with conclusively. I thought it was interesting. The Israeli prime minister gave a televised address yesterday where he said Israel is very close to reaching goals in Iran but will also avoid a war of attrition. How should we be reading those comments, Dan? Well, it's worth keeping in mind that the two countries are separated by something like a thousand miles of territory. I think three international borders, Iran is something like 70 times the size of Israel. There really is an asymmetry here in terms of disposition, geography, military standing. So for all the virtuosity of Israeli forces here, I don't think they could afford to sustain fighting in the long run, something akin to what we've seen in the last 20 months in Gaza, in Lebanon, in Syria, which are neighboring countries or neighboring territories. So the Israelis are looking logistically at this. I think they're also signaling to the American public, those Americans who are wondering whether this is a repeat of 2003 in Iraq, that this was a one time deal for Israel and for the United States, that perhaps the US role has begun and ended with this airstrike and that Israel, the country most involved in this, the U.S. ally, is really also trying to wrap things up as soon as it believes that its goals have been achieved and those goals may be achieved very soon.