Nova Scotia to survey public on expanding retail sale of alcohol
See more sharing options
Send this page to someone via email
Share this item on Twitter
Share this item via WhatsApp
Share this item on Facebook
Nova Scotia has announced a month-long public survey as it considers expanding alcohol sales to various retail outlets like corner stores.
Finance Minister John Lohr says examining how alcohol is sold and consumed makes sense as the province moves to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The province will survey 1,500 Nova Scotians over the age of 19 starting this week.
It will also gather feedback on the types of stores where alcohol can be sold, locations where people can drink alcohol and health considerations related to any changes.
Alcohol is currently served at over 300 retail locations in the province.
They include Nova Scotia Liquor Corporation stores, private wine and specialty stores, on site stores at breweries and wineries and farmers markets.
Story continues below advertisement
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 29, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
3 hours ago
- Global News
Ontario proposes to weaken impending new recycling rules over costs to producers
Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government is proposing to weaken an impending slate of new recycling rules because producers of the materials said the system is getting too expensive. The province began transitioning in 2023 toward making producers pay for the recycling of their packaging, paper and single-use items. The companies' obligations were set to increase next year, but the government is now looking to delay some measures and outright cancel others, such as requirements to extend collection beyond the residential system. Environmental advocates say the proposed changes let producers off the hook and will mean more materials will end up in landfills or be incinerated. Producers say despite the rising costs, recycling rates don't actually appear to be improving, so it's time for a broader rethink. Environment Minister Todd McCarthy said the proposed changes are about ensuring the sustainability of the blue box system and protecting against unintended consequences such as job losses. Story continues below advertisement 'We want to take what we've done and improve upon what already exists, but the costs were a big deal, and so we're proposing some measures that would bring about cost savings and transparency and improvement to accomplish the goal of recycling that we all want,' he said earlier this month. The Canadian Retail Council estimates that producer costs have already increased by about 350 per cent in three years and would nearly double again just from this year to next if no changes were made to the impending new rules for 2026. The government says blue box collection costs could more than double between 2020 and 2030. 'Cost increases of this magnitude were not anticipated when the regulation was passed in 2021 and have jeopardized the stability of the blue box system today,' it says in its proposal to change the rules. Currently, producers just have to make 'best efforts' to hit certain recycling rate percentages, such as 80 per cent of paper and 50 per cent of rigid plastic, and starting next year they are set to be enforceable. Then in 2030 those percentages are set to rise. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy But now the government is proposing to delay those 2026 targets to 2031. As well, Ontario is proposing to allow non-recyclable material that gets incinerated to count for up to 15 per cent of producers' recycling targets. Story continues below advertisement Starting next year, producers are also supposed to be responsible for collecting material from more multi-residential buildings, and certain long-term care homes, retirement homes and schools. The government is now proposing to remove that requirement entirely. The same goes for a rule that would have made beverage producers responsible for containers not just dropped in a residential blue box but also those used outside the home, and a provision for producers to expand collection in public spaces. The intent behind the initial regulations was to incentivize producers to use less packaging and to use materials that can more easily be recycled, said Karen Wirsig, senior program manager for plastics with Environmental Defence. These changes would halt any progress on that score, she said. 'Municipalities have been saying for years, 'Our blue box is getting more and more filled with packaging types we can't even identify let alone properly sort … because often they're made with mixed materials that are not easily recycled,'' Wirsig said. 'So because there was that disconnect between the producers who design all this packaging and the municipalities who are collecting it, there was no way to rationalize the system and improve packaging from an environmental and sustainability point of view. These regulations were intended to start doing that, and unfortunately, now all of the incentives are going the opposite direction.' Story continues below advertisement The recycling of flexible plastics, which includes food wraps, pouches and bags, is a particular bone of contention and the government is proposing to both delay and reduce the target for that category. In a recycling facility, flexible plastics end up in all sorts of places because they're so light, getting stuck among paper or falling through the cracks of conveyor belts, said Michael Zabaneh, the Retail Council of Canada's vice-president of sustainability. Instead of a recycling target of 25 per cent taking effect next year, a target of five per cent would take effect in 2031 under the government's proposal for flexible plastics. That five per cent reflects the estimated current level of flexible plastic diversion, according to the government's regulatory proposal. It is silent on the current levels for all other materials. Those current levels are unknown, with the Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority saying it will report on rates once the three-year transition is over. That is a big problem, said Zabaneh. 'We're all in the blind,' he said. 'I think you can't have a recycling system with accountability, (and not have) transparency and real data.' The main problem with the government's current system is that it allows for multiple administrators, said Zabaneh. Producers sign up with producer responsibility organizations, which help them meet their blue box obligations. Story continues below advertisement There are four such organizations operating in Ontario, which just ends up complicating the system and making it more expensive, Zabaneh said. 'There's an administrative body to drive collection, but then processing is kind of a competitive thing, and this creates a very fragmented and inefficient system,' he said. 'It limits planning, it prevents collective investment, capital investment, so that's disincentivized, and you have a lot of added costs from logistics and audits, and that's why we have escalating costs.' Retail council members helped found and sit on the board of one producer responsibility organization so they have some idea of recycling rates from that, and based on that limited view the numbers look stagnant, the council says. Producers welcome the delayed targets, Zabaneh said, but it doesn't solve the core problem. Having a single producer responsibility organization would reduce costs and allow for greater transparency of recycling rates and financial performance, the retail council says. Canadian Beverage Association president Krista Scaldwell said their members want the system to be successful because recycling and recovery benefits companies as well as the environment. 'We want the aluminum and plastic back because we can make it into new containers,' she said. 'The members are very committed to sustainability initiatives, and so we need to understand what's creating the cost so that we can help support some change, so we can see improved recovery without escalating costs.' Story continues below advertisement Comments on the regulatory registry proposal can be submitted until July 21.
Global News
3 hours ago
- Global News
‘Sales have stopped': Ontario developers predict layoffs if cost to build doesn't fall
A developer lobby group is renewing calls to introduce tax cuts for new projects as housing starts continue to slow, warning that if something doesn't change, tens of thousands of jobs could be at risk. On Monday, the Building Industry and Land Development Association released a brief calculation considering how far new home construction could fall and how many jobs could be lost if the sale of new homes remains low. So far this year, new single-detached family homes sales are down 50 per cent in and around Toronto, while condo sales have dropped 65 per cent compared to last year. 'We are seeing sales have stopped,' President and CEO of BILD Dave Wilkes told Global News. 'Without sales, you don't have that ability to undertake new projects, to make those investments, to provide those well-paying jobs the sector is known for.' Story continues below advertisement A research brief prepared for the advocacy group by Altus Group found that if housing starts remain low, they could bottom out at 4,000 new single-family homes per year and 10,000 new apartments. 'Importantly, this is not a forecast or projection; there may be many reasons why sales will recover,' a note of caution in the paper explains. If home sales do not recover, however, the research suggested tens of thousands of construction jobs could be on the line. It found 40,000 direct homebuilding jobs could go, as well as 30,000 construction supply chain jobs. The prediction comes in contrast to concerns only a year ago, when a labour shortage was cited as one reason for growing housing costs in Canada. 'That's how quickly the market has turned, unfortunately,' Wilkes said. 'We've seen a number of factors that created the challenges, and we see a number of solutions that can get us out of this. The market really did turn as interest rates went up, as we saw some instability in the geopolitical environment and the challenges that that created.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy He said that while costs like borrowing, materials and labour have now dropped as interest rates begin to fall again, a nervous market is being stalled by taxes and fees. 'What we have now is a cost-to-build crisis as the market has reset, where the price points are too high for individuals to be able to afford, despite the other adjustments,' he said. Story continues below advertisement BILD is using the potential labour shortage and slow market to ask for more financial relief for the development sector. It is calling for the federal and provincial governments to waive the harmonized sales tax on all new developments, rather than a few specific categories. It's a move BILD said would cost around $2 billion for the federal government and $900 million for Ontario. 'There's projects being completed now, but once those projects get completed in '26 and '27, there is gonna be a real lack of jobs, lack of investment, lack of a new activity, and lack of delivery of new homes in '28 and '29,' Wilkes added. Reducing the burden cost of taxes on builders has been a central request from the development community for years and has grown louder as new housing starts have slowed. Recent provincial legislation made major changes to the fees homebuilders pay to towns and cities, also reducing some of the approvals they have to go through. It remains to be seen how effective those changes are, with government-controlled fees making up less than a third of the cost of building a home. Figures prepared to brief Ontario Housing Minister Rob Flack, obtained by Global News, show soft costs like taxes don't make up much more of the new cost of a home than developer profit does. Story continues below advertisement The graphic shows that 10 to 20 per cent of the cost of building a new home is developer profit, while 10 to 30 per cent is soft costs. A further 10 to 20 per cent is land and 50 to 70 per cent is hard costs like materials and labour. View image in full screen Data presented to Ontario's housing minister. Global News 'Projected profit margins generally must be >10% for a housing development to be viable,' the briefing explained. Wilkes said developers need a certain profit margin to ensure they can secure loans and financing, pointing out the slowing market had already forced some to accept lower profits. 'The market is forcing those adjustments in profit — we always argue it is a 10 to 12 per cent range,' he said. 'Do we need to? The market is forcing that decision. Now, government — through development charges (provincial sales tax), (goods and services tax) — is making more on a house, many more fold, than the developer.' Story continues below advertisement A spokesperson for the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing indicated the Ontario government could be open to the move. 'We have been clear – we need partnership from the federal government to continue reducing HST and GST on homes,' they wrote in a statement.
Global News
a day ago
- Global News
Carney travels to Europe for security, defence talks with EU, NATO
Prime Minister Mark Carney will depart for Europe on Sunday for back-to-back summits where he is expected to make major commitments for Canada on security and defence. Carney will be joined by Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand, Defence Minister David McGuinty and secretary of state for defence procurement Stephen Fuhr at the EU and NATO summits, where military procurement and diversifying supply chains will top the agendas. The international meetings come as Canada looks to reduce its defence procurement reliance on the United States due to strained relations over tariffs and President Donald Trump's repeated talk about Canada becoming a U.S. state. Carney will fly first to Brussels, Belgium, starting the trip with a visit to the Antwerp Schoonselhof Military Cemetery where 348 Canadian soldiers are buried. He will also meet with Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Story continues below advertisement At the EU-Canada summit, Anand and McGuinty are expected to sign a security and defence agreement with the EU in what one European official described Friday as one of the most ambitious deals Europe has ever signed with a third country. The agreement will open the door to Canada's participation in the ReArm Europe initiative, allowing Canada to access a 150-billion-euro loan program for defence procurement, called Security Action for Europe. An EU official briefing reporters on Friday said once the procurement deal is in place, Canada will have to negotiate a bilateral agreement with the European Commission to begin discussions with member states about procurement opportunities. A Canadian official briefing reporters on the summit Saturday said the initial agreement will allow for Canada's participation in some joint procurement projects. However, a second agreement will be needed to allow Canadian companies to bid. 1:48 Carney to increase U.S. steel, aluminum tariffs if trade talks with Trump stall At the EU-Canada summit, leaders are also expected to issue a joint statement to underscore a willingness for continued pressure on Russia, including through further sanctions, and call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. Story continues below advertisement After Brussels, Carney heads to The Hague in the Netherlands for the NATO leaders' summit on Tuesday and Wednesday. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy There, Carney will meet with the King of the Netherlands and later with leaders of Nordic nations to discuss Arctic and transatlantic security. At the NATO summit, Carney will take part in bilateral meetings with other leaders. The summit agenda includes a social dinner hosted by the king and queen of the Netherlands and a two-and-a-half hour meeting of the North Atlantic Council. NATO allies are expected to debate a plan to hike alliance members' defence spending target to five per cent of national GDP. NATO data shows that in 2024, none of its 32 members spent that much. The Canadian government official who briefed reporters on background says the spending target and its timeline are still up for discussion, though some allies have indicated they would prefer a seven-year timeline while others favour a decade. Canada hasn't hit a five- per- cent defence spending threshhold since the 1950s and hasn't reached the two per cent mark since the late 1980s. NATO says that, based on its estimate of which expenditures count toward the target, Canada spent $41 billion in 2024 on defence, or 1.37 per cent of GDP. That's more than twice what it spent in 2014, when the two per cent target was first set; that year, Canada spent $20.1 billion, or 1.01 per cent of GDP, on defence. Story continues below advertisement In 2014, only three NATO members achieved the two per cent target — the U.S., the U.K., and Greece. In 2025, all members are expected to hit it. Any agreement to adopt a new spending benchmark must be ratified by all 32 NATO member states. Former Canadian ambassador to NATO Kerry Buck told The Canadian Press the condensed agenda is likely meant to 'avoid public rifts among allies,' describing Trump as an 'uncertainty engine.' 'The national security environment has really, really shifted,' Buck said, adding allies next door to Russia face the greatest threats. 'There is a high risk that the U.S. would undercut NATO at a time where all allies are increasingly vulnerable.' Trump has suggested the U.S. might abandon its mutual defence commitment to the alliance if member countries don't ramp up defence spending. Story continues below advertisement 'Whatever we can do to get through this NATO summit with few public rifts between the U.S. and other allies on anything, and satisfy a very long-standing U.S. demand to rebalance defence spending, that will be good for Canada because NATO's good for Canada,' Buck said. Carney has already made two trips to Europe this year — the first to London and Paris to meet with European allies and the second to Rome to attend the inaugural mass of Pope Leo XIV.
