Sky Ireland in fresh ‘consequences' dodgy box warning to thousands of Irish households amid illegal streaming clampdown
SKY Ireland is warning thousands of households that dodgy box users and distributors will face "consequences" if caught illegally streaming content.
It's believed that at least 400,000 people in Ireland use a dodgy box to access content.
Dodgy boxes allow people to illegally stream
It is
If caught, it could lead to fines of up to €127,000 or
Sky Ireland and other industry bodies will shortly appear before the
READ MORE IN IRISH NEWS
The appearance comes after an injunction and search order was issued against a potential operator of an illegal streaming service in
Two others linked to the dodgy box operation were issued cease-and-desist orders.
Issued by Federation Against Copyright Theft, it warned them they would face criminal prosecution if they failed to stop 'illicit streaming activities'.
Sky Ireland CEO JD Buckley told the
MOST READ IN THE IRISH SUN
"We continuously evolve our investigative strategies to crack down on illegal streaming and protect consumers from risks including malware,
"Further action will follow with consequences for those identified as operating illegal services and for those who watch them."
The Data Protection Commission confirmed that it has been engaging with
USE OF PERSONAL DATA
This relates to Sky's use of personal data in an effort to clamp down on the issue.
DPC Chairperson Dr Des Hogan told RTE: "There are legitimate reasons why companies might decide that they want to take action against fraud.
"However, the use of personal data would be the question for us, and whether that's been done in an appropriate, ethical manner."
He revealed that both parties have been in talks for some time, and will have a meeting in two weeks.
Hogan added: "Any sharing of personal data, or processing of that personal data outside a company has to be done in a lawful manner under the GDPR.
"So that will be the focus of our discussions, and has been the focus of our discussions with Sky and we're hopeful we'll see a successful landing point from those discussions."
It's understood that Sky has confirmed it has been in talks with the DPC regarding this issue for some time.
A spokesperson said: "We look forward to continuing our discussions with them on this important matter."
1
It's believed around 400,000 people use dodgy boxes in Ireland
Credit: Getty Images - Getty
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
19 hours ago
- Irish Times
Dodgy boxes: Could I get in trouble for owning one after recent court cases?
Dodgy boxes are back in the news are they? They are, for a couple of reasons. A man appeared before Trim District Court on Wednesday charged with selling the boxes and other technical equipment that had the potential to deprive Sky Television of almost €750,000 in revenue, the court was told. He was jailed for 3½ years. Separately, and almost simultaneously, the same broadcaster alleged during a High Court hearing that another man may have earned up to €450,000 a year from operating a different dodgy service. So these dodgy boxes are definitely illegal are they? They are and they aren't. The dodgy boxes – or Android boxes, which is what they are properly called – are not at all illegal. What do you mean? Android is an entirely legitimate operating system that runs on multiple technologies including phones, tablets and Fire Sticks. READ MORE But if Android boxes are legit, why are all these people coming before the courts? The boxes are fine, but they can allow people to do illegal things. Apps can be easily installed that allow people to stream copyrighted content from the internet on to their televisions, tablets or phones. The people who are ending up in court are the ones selling the boxes preloaded with the dodgy apps and selling codes that give access to the platforms where copyrighted content can be found. Could a humble dodgy box owner get into trouble? I am asking for a friend. Well, Sky Ireland chief executive JD Buckley said this week that the company 'continuously evolves our investigative strategies to crack down on illegal streaming and protect consumers from risks including malware, fraud and identity theft. Further action will follow with consequences for those identified as operating illegal services and for those who watch them.' Consequence? Those who watch them? Sounds worrying. It does seem to suggest Sky would target end users of the boxes, but that may be a stretch. Knowingly circumventing restrictions and accessing copyrighted content could leave people exposed to prosecution for sure, but there are hundreds of thousands of dodgy box owners out there. Ireland's courts service, already groaning under the strain of its caseload, would probably not be delighted by moves against all of those watching copyrighted content for free. Garda sources have even expressed doubt the force would have jurisdiction when it comes to the use of such boxes, suggesting it would be a civil, rather than criminal, matter. [ Dodgy boxes and suspect streaming: can Irish viewers be persuaded away from illegal services? Opens in new window ] And this is all a Sky thing is it? No, not at all. Sky is a key player in Irish broadcast and is the pre-eminent broadcaster of many hugely popular sports, including the English Premier League. Many, many people unwilling to pay the monthly subscription costs or pay-per-view charges use the dodgy boxes to access the content for free, which is why Sky is often found front and centre in the war on illegal streamers. But there is a broader umbrella group also fighting against the tide of streamers. And who are they? They are called the Federation Against Copyright Theft ( Fact ) and they have taken multiple actions against dodgy box operators in recent years. It says many consumers are unaware that piracy networks are often linked to organised crime, with their profits potentially funding other illegal activities. The London -based group, has said they have been successful in shutting down thousands of prohibited streams, and have brought about the demise of services for those using the illegal operations. Social media profiles selling dodgy boxes have also disappeared while subscriptions have been terminated and paid settlements agreed. So that is the end of streamers is it? Hmm, it seems unlikely that the thousands of Irish homes that access movies, TV programmes and sport are just going to stop. The war on pirated content appears to be a long way from over.
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Sky claims man may have made €450,000 a year from 'dodgy box' service
Broadcaster and telecommunications giant Sky has claimed in the High Court that a Co Wexford man may have earned up to €450,000 a year from operating a so-called 'dodgy box' service. Sky TV Limited alleges David Dunbar has operated an illegal service providing thousands with access to its copyrighted broadcast material since 2018. Last month, Sky was granted various orders aimed at gathering evidence of Mr Dunbar's alleged infringement, including permission to seize devices belonging to him. In a sworn statement to the court, a Sky anti-piracy investigator says Mr Dunbar is considered by Sky to be a 'top-level' copyright infringer, and that his activity 'is likely to have been to the very serious detriment' of Sky and broadcasters and legitimate streaming services in Ireland. Last November, investigators at Sky became aware of a social media account involved in selling an Internet Protocol television service (IPTV). IPTV is the technology behind 'dodgy box' services. This account was later linked to Mr Dunbar, the investigator says. Separately, Sky investigators were informed of an anonymous tip-off received by An Garda Síochána's Crime Stoppers initiative, alleging Mr Dunbar's operation of the service. The investigator estimates Mr Dunbar to have up to 5,000 customers paying for his service, generating about €450,000 per year from the operation. Sky's investigation found Mr Dunbar allegedly charged two annual subscription rates for the service, priced at €80 and €100 respectively. The investigator says he believes Mr Dunbar has at least 1,682 customers, but the true number is likely much higher. Court orders On Thursday, barristers for Sky said Mr Dunbar, with an address at Manor Crescent, Roxborough Manor, Co Wexford, had breached a number of the court's orders, and was in contempt of court. Theo Donnelly BL, appearing for Sky and instructed by Philip Lee solicitors, said statements made by Mr Dunbar in the proceedings contained inaccuracies and inconsistencies, and failed to explain certain breaches of orders. Mr Donnelly said bank statements exhibited to an unsworn statement, received by his side this week and due to be filed with the court, appeared to show a dissipation of funds, in breach of freezing orders granted by the court. Mr Donnelly suggested that Mr Dunbar be given a final opportunity to clarify Sky's concerns, brought on by his statements. Adam Dodd, a solicitor representing Mr Dunbar, said his client had provided a 'fulsome' affidavit, 'warts and all'. He said his client had admitted to his contempt of court, and has indicated that he is seeking to comply with the orders of the court. Mr Justice Mark Sanfey said he was of the view that Mr Dunbar should 'put his best foot forward' and answer queries raised by Sky regarding his statements to the court. Mr Justice Sanfey warned Mr Dodd that there was a limit to his patience. The judge adjourned the case to next month.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Sky alleges Co Wexford man may have made €450,000 a year from ‘dodgy box' service
Broadcaster and telecommunications giant Sky has claimed in the High Court that a Co Wexford man may have earned up to €450,000 a year from operating a so-called 'dodgy box' service. Sky TV Limited alleges David Dunbar has operated an illegal service providing thousands with access to its copyrighted broadcast material since 2018. Last month, Sky was granted various orders aimed at gathering evidence of Mr Dunbar's alleged infringement, including permission to seize devices belonging to him. In a sworn statement to the court, a Sky anti-piracy investigator says Mr Dunbar is considered by Sky to be a 'top-level' copyright infringer, and that his activity 'is likely to have been to the very serious detriment' of Sky and broadcasters as well as legitimate streaming services in Ireland. Last November, investigators at Sky became aware of a social media account involved in selling an Internet Protocol television service (IPTV). IPTV is the technology behind 'dodgy box' services. READ MORE This account was later linked to Mr Dunbar, the investigator says. Separately, Sky investigators were informed of an anonymous tip-off received by An Garda Síochána's Crime Stoppers initiative, alleging Mr Dunbar's operation of the service. The investigator estimates Mr Dunbar to have up to 5,000 customers paying for his service, generating about €450,000 per year from the operation. Sky's investigation found Mr Dunbar allegedly charged two annual subscription rates for the service, priced at €80 and €100 respectively. The investigator says he believes Mr Dunbar has at least 1,682 customers, but the true number is likely much higher. On Thursday, barristers for Sky said Mr Dunbar, with an address at Manor Crescent, Roxborough Manor, Co Wexford, had breached a number of the court's orders, and was in contempt of court. Theo Donnelly BL, appearing for Sky and instructed by Philip Lee solicitors, said statements made by Mr Dunbar in the proceedings contained inaccuracies and inconsistencies, and failed to explain certain breaches of orders. Mr Donnelly said bank statements exhibited to an unsworn statement, received by his side this week and due to be filed with the court, appeared to show a dissipation of funds, in breach of freezing orders granted by the court. Mr Donnelly suggested that Mr Dunbar be given a final opportunity to clarify Sky's concerns, brought on by his statements. Adam Dodd, a solicitor representing Mr Dunbar, said his client had provided a 'fulsome' affidavit, 'warts and all'. He said his client had admitted to his contempt of court, and has indicated that he is seeking to comply with the orders of the court. Mr Justice Mark Sanfey said he was of the view that Mr Dunbar should 'put his best foot forward' and answer queries raised by Sky regarding his statements to the court. Mr Justice Sanfey warned Mr Dodd that there was a limit to his patience. The judge adjourned the case to next month.
