UK's PHP urges Assura to back its bid over KKR-Stonepeak offer
June 13 (Reuters) - British healthcare real estate investor Primary Health Properties (PHP) (PHP.L), opens new tab on Friday urged rival Assura (AGRP.L), opens new tab to back its bid over a takeover offer from KKR and Stonepeak (KKR.N), opens new tab.
Assura earlier this week backed U.S. private equity firms KKR and Stonepeak's nearly 1.7 billion pound ($2.3 billion) "best and final" sweetened cash bid, valuing its shares at 52.1 pence apiece, including dividends.
Assura had said PHP's offer posed "material risks and downsides" for its shareholders. PHP said it disagrees with that assessment.
PHP said it believed the primary care property sector was at an "inflexion point" due to strong rental growth and lower interest rates.
PHP also noted that the UK's spending plans over the next three years would benefit both firms, which invest in properties leased out to healthcare entities such as Britain's National Health Service.
PHP said its cash-and-share offer, based on its closing price of 103 pence a share on Thursday, now implied a total value of 53 pence per Assura share, including dividends.
At the time of PHP's first announcement of the offer in May, its bid consisting of 0.3769 new PHP shares and 12.5 pence in cash, had valued Assura at 51.7 pence, including dividends.
The value of an offer with a stock component will vary with the bidder's share price.
PHP said on Friday that it would not reduce the value of the PHP offer if Assura's board declared a special dividend of up to 0.84 pence apiece.
"The Board believes that with further due diligence and consideration, and factoring in the special dividend, the Board of Assura should recommend the combination to shareholders," PHP said.
Assura's shares were little changed on Friday at 49.9 pence. PHP shares were flat at 103 pence as of 0711 GMT.
($1 = 0.7389 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Amazon data centres to consume ‘as much electricity to power Burnley'
A complex of huge data centres being built by Amazon in Britain will consume as much electricity needed to power a town the size of Burnley, campaigners have claimed. The proposed data centres, near Houghton Regis in Bedfordshire, are projected to consume around 114.8 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity a year. This equivalent to the power consumed by more than 42,500 UK households, according to researchers at Global Action Plan, which is campaigning against the development. It exceeds the number of homes in Burnley, which stood at 41,955 after the most recent Census in 2021. Planning documents show the two data centres in the development will include 42 back-up diesel generators, each around 25 metres tall, that need to be fired up fortnightly to check they are working. It is estimated this will produce the same emissions as 1,079 homes heated by gas. The plans were lodged with Central Bedfordshire Council by Colliers Properties, a known partner of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the retail giant's cloud computing division. The documents name Amazon Data Services UK as the site's eventual operator. Known as Linmere Island, the project would sit on an empty 22-acre greenfield site. While the plans also include 140 solar panels, it is not clear how much power they will supply to the data centres.
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Prada CEO Gianfranco D'Attis to quit Italian luxury brand, WWD reports
June 22 (Reuters) - Prada (1913.F), opens new tab CEO Gianfranco D'Attis will leave the Italian luxury brand at the end of the month, fashion trade publication WWD reported on Sunday. It said the publication had learned D'Attis was leaving the group "by mutual agreement". Reuters could not immediately confirm the report.
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
Trump tariffs leave UK firms scrambling to renegotiate contracts
British companies are looking to renegotiate supplier contracts as they scramble to find savings that can protect them from the impact of escalating US tariffs, according to new data. A survey of firms with more than 5,000 employees found that 90 per cent fear that President Trump's import duties would hurt their revenues and profits, with businesses looking at a series of ways to manage rising costs. More than half (55 per cent) said their main tool to deal with tariff threats was to review existing contracts to find savings or renegotiate better terms with break clauses that could account for the imposition of new levies, according to Acertis, which provides contract management software. Bernadette Bulacan at Icertis said companies' first resort 'to protect margins is to take a critical look at customer and supplier relationships. For many companies, the path to surviving tariff disruption starts not with policy lobbying but with a forensic look at what's already been committed to on paper.' She said firms were taking measures to include rules of termination and force majeure clauses in contracts to deal with costs caused by tariffs, while also seeking out new suppliers in countries that were not affected by sweeping US levies. The Trump administration applied a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs he had announced on most of the world economy on April 8, which is due to expire in early July. The president has signed a partial tariff deal with the UK, but most British goods will still be subject to a 10 per cent tariff when selling to US markets, raising the average US tariff rate from about 1 per cent last year to more than 6 per cent. The European Union is also in talks with the White House about avoiding a potential 55 per cent tariff on all its goods exports. • Britain's exporters at a loss over US tariff turmoil The debate over contractual terms between suppliers and customers is part of a swathe of legal complexities about who should shoulder the cost of import taxes. In April, Howmet Aerospace, an American supplier of components to the sector, declared a force majeure event that would allow it to stop shipments if it remained subject to US tariffs. Although the full gamut of threatened tariffs has not yet been applied on most countries, recent data has shown a spike in invoice rejections as businesses attempt to delay supplier payments until they have more certainty about US trade policy. Icertis's survey, which included 1,000 companies across Britain, the United States and India, found that just under half of them were 're-evaluating' where to find suppliers to avoid tariffs, restructuring their supply chains and manufacturing plants, and also considering 'sunsetting relationships that no longer serve under new cost and compliance pressures'. About 40 per cent of UK firms said they would absorb higher costs into their margins and just over a third said they were planning to raise prices charged to consumers to deal with tariffs. Bulacan said companies should also consider price adjustment clauses that account for tariff changes. 'In the same way that force majeure clauses changed fundamentally during the pandemic, these clauses could be invoked against new tariffs to prevent potential losses,' she said.
