Qualcomm strengthens AI portfolio with $2.4 billion Alphawave deal
HighlightsQualcomm Incorporated has agreed to acquire Alphawave Semi for approximately $2.4 billion, aiming to expand into the rapidly growing artificial intelligence data center market. Alphawave Semi's shareholders will receive 183 pence per share, a nearly 96% premium compared to the closing price prior to Qualcomm's interest, causing Alphawave's shares to surge over 22%. Qualcomm's acquisition of Alphawave Semi is expected to close in the first calendar quarter of 2026 and is not anticipated to face significant regulatory challenges, as Alphawave has exited its Chinese joint venture.
U.S. chipmaker Qualcomm agreed to acquire Alphawave for about $2.4 billion on Monday, as it expands into the booming
AI data center market
, sending shares of the
British semiconductor company
surging more than 22%.
Alphawave, which designs semiconductor tech for data centers, is the latest British company to be snapped up in a market plagued by low valuations and stunted growth, with U.S. buyers swooping on firms at comparatively low prices and better-performing bourses proving more attractive for share listings.
It can help Qualcomm diversify into the data center market, as the biggest provider of smartphone chips looks to reduce its dependence on the industry.
Qualcomm, which counts Apple and major android players such as Xiaomi among its customers, has doubled-down on catering to industries such as data centers and personal computers as the iPhone maker increasingly turns to in-house processors.
"The acquisition of Alphawave Semi aims to further accelerate and provide key assets for Qualcomm's expansion into data centers," the company said.
Alphawave shareholders will receive 183 pence per share - a near 96% premium to the March 31 closing price immediately before Qualcomm disclosed its interest. News of the deal sent the stock up more than 22%. Shares of Qualcomm rose about 4%.
Qualcomm also made two alternative all-share offers for Alphawave on Monday after multiple deadline extensions from the UK takeover panel. However, Alphawave plans to unanimously recommend the
cash offer
to its shareholders, deeming it fair and reasonable.
Jefferies analysts said they do not expect the deal to meet any material regulatory obstacles, after Alphawave exited its Chinese joint venture, WiseWave.
"Alphawave has developed leading high-speed wired connectivity and compute technologies that are complementary to our power-efficient central processing unit and neural processing unit cores," Cristiano Amon, president and CEO of Qualcomm, said.
The acquisition is expected to close during the first calendar quarter of 2026.
SoftBank-owned Arm had also sought to acquire Alphawave but decided not to pursue the takeover, Reuters had reported in April citing sources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
42 minutes ago
- Hans India
OpenAI Scrubs Jony Ive Deal from Web Amid Trademark Battle with Rival AI Firm
In a sudden turn of events, OpenAI has removed all public references to its much-discussed $6.5 billion acquisition of Jony Ive's AI hardware startup, IO Products. The move follows a legal challenge over trademark infringement by a competing firm with a similar name, stirring speculation and concern across the tech community. Over the weekend, social media users noticed the disappearance of promotional content and the official website linked to the IO Products deal. Both OpenAI and representatives for Jony Ive have since confirmed that the takedown was prompted by an ongoing trademark dispute with IYO Inc., a company also operating in the AI device space. According to Bloomberg, the case is now under judicial review. Responding to the controversy, a spokesperson for Ive called the legal complaint 'an utterly baseless complaint and we'll fight it vigorously.' The IO Products deal, officially unveiled in May, marked a pivotal shift for OpenAI—best known for its generative AI software. The partnership with Ive, the legendary former Apple designer behind iconic devices like the iPhone and iMac, aimed to bring OpenAI's first AI hardware device to market within a year. At the time of the announcement, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman had predicted that the company could sell up to 100 million units of the new hardware. He even suggested the acquisition could potentially boost OpenAI's valuation by $1 trillion, stating, 'This is the biggest thing we've ever done as a company.' In a now-deleted blog post, Altman and Ive had jointly written, 'It became clear that our ambitions to develop, engineer and manufacture a new family of products demanded an entirely new company.' OpenAI's financial commitment to the deal included $5 billion in equity, in addition to its existing 23% stake in IO from an earlier collaboration. IO Products was incorporated in Delaware in September 2023 and later registered in California in April 2025, according to public filings. Heading the new hardware division is OpenAI executive Peter Welinder, known for pioneering work in robotics and innovative product development. The team includes experts across design, hardware, software, and manufacturing, collaborating closely with OpenAI's San Francisco-based engineering and research teams. Altman and Ive's collaboration dates back to early 2023, though the public got its first hint of an 'AI-first device' in February 2025. While specific details remain under wraps, industry watchers speculate the product could rival the Humane AI Pin or Rabbit R1, or even explore futuristic formats like smart glasses, in-car systems, or AI-integrated robots. Reflecting on the collaboration, Ive shared, 'I have a growing sense that everything I have learned over the last 30 years has led me to this moment. I am so grateful for the opportunity to be part of such an important collaboration.' Altman added his admiration for Ive's approach, saying, 'AI is an incredible technology, but great tools require work at the intersection of technology, design, and understanding people and the world. No one can do this like Jony and his team; the amount of care they put into every aspect of the process is extraordinary.' As legal proceedings continue, OpenAI's ambitious foray into hardware hangs in the balance, with stakeholders closely watching how the trademark challenge might affect the future of this high-stakes collaboration.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trouble between AI's power couple: What's brewing between Microsoft and OpenAI?
The biggest partnership in the artificial intelligence (AI) world, between Microsoft and OpenAI , is showing signs of cracks. Microsoft invested $1 billion in the ChatGPT maker in 2019, ahead of the generative AI boom . The companies then rode the wave to the top, with the software maker injecting billions more in the company in the following years. But then disagreements arose over controlling AI technology and computing resources, intellectual property rights, as well as OpenAI's organisational transition plans and competitive tensions. These issues have made the once-close partnership shaky, and may fundamentally change it. What's happened? Live Events OpenAI needs Microsoft's approval to complete its transition into a public-benefit corporation. But sources told Reuters the companies have not been able to agree on details even after months of negotiations. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories Tensions have risen between the two sides after reports emerged that OpenAI is considering a "nuclear option", accusing Microsoft of anticompetitive behaviour. The companies are discussing revising the terms of Microsoft's investment, including the future equity stake it will hold in OpenAI, the report said, adding that the ChatGPT owner wants to modify existing clauses that give Microsoft exclusive rights to host OpenAI models in its cloud. Reuters reported that Microsoft was even ready to walk away from its high-stakes negotiations with OpenAI over the future of its alliance. Windsurf issue The key issue in the dispute is now Microsoft's access to OpenAI's intellectual property. OpenAI even wanted to exclude Microsoft's access to AI coding startup Windsurf, which it had acquired, due to competing products. OpenAI acquired Windsurf, an AI-assisted coding tool formerly known as Codeium, for about $3 billion, marking the company's largest acquisition to date. Microsoft-owned Github offers a competing AI tool for programmers. Investors have also poured money into a new crop of startups offering similar tools, including Anysphere, the startup behind Cursor. Analysts have said that the partnership between the legacy giant and the AI startup was always unstable, with Microsoft testing alternatives and preparing for a way forward without OpenAI.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
The six miles of water keeping global markets on edge
Oil traders see it as a worst-case scenario. Pentagon officials have long warned against it. Vice President JD Vance believes it would be suicidal. Yet Iranian lawmakers on Sunday reportedly threatened a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a strip of water connecting the energy rich Persian Gulf to global markets, after the U.S. joined Israeli strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities. That rattled oil markets and sent U.S. stock futures lower on Sunday evening. Roughly 20% of the world's petroleum passes through the 20-mile-wide strait, where dozens of skyscraper-size tankers each day funnel into a pair of 2-mile-wide traffic lanes separated by a 2-mile-wide buffer. The transit includes a similarly huge share of the world's liquefied natural gas. Crucial for cars, chemical makers and power plants around the world, the supplies help fuel the oil-hungry Chinese economy and dictate prices paid by U.S. drivers and air travelers. Iran has often harassed foreign-flagged tankers in the area and occasionally threatened to disrupt that trade more broadly in times of stress, a move that could upend financial markets and send global energy costs soaring. On Sunday, after U.S. forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites, Iranian state media reported that Iran's parliament had approved a closure of the strait. But they added that ultimate power to do so lay with the regime's top security officials. Many oil traders and energy executives still view the scenario as a scorched-earth tactic and distant possibility. Tanker-tracking firms said Sunday that traffic through the strait was proceeding as usual. Smoke and fire rise from an oil refinery in Tehran after an Israeli strike this month. Even so, oil markets remain on edge. The cost of Brent crude futures, the international pricing benchmark, jumped 3.2% on Sunday, trading around $79.50 a barrel. Prices have now climbed about 15% since Israel unleashed its punishing air campaign earlier this month. U.S. stock futures edged lower, with contracts tied to the S&P 500 down about 0.5%. 'It's a bargaining chip," said Anthony Gurnee, a retired longtime tanker-company executive, referring to the strait. 'Once they use it, it's gone." Gurnee, who served in the 1980s as a U.S. Navy intelligence analyst focusing on threats to commercial shipping, said a full closure of the strait by Iran would prompt a swift military response by American warships that have recently moved into the region. But 'I don't think it's a three- or four-day operation," he said. 'It could take much longer." Any disruption to ship traffic could also slow Iranian energy exports, a lifeline to Iran's economy. Although Israeli strikes have hit Iran's domestic energy infrastructure in recent days, shipments from the country have continued flowing to oil-hungry buyers in China and elsewhere. Rystad Energy estimates that Iranian exports since the outset of Israeli strikes are actually as much as 30% to 40% higher than typical volumes this time of year. 'Their entire economy runs through the Strait of Hormuz," Vance said Sunday on NBC, calling a closure 'suicidal." 'I don't think it makes any sense." Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs said the likelihood of a disruption will ultimately depend on whether the conflict continues to expand—and if the regime itself is threatened in an existential way. 'Strategically, Iran could view short-term economic sacrifice as leverage," he said. 'But it would also sacrifice its sole global energy revenue stream, bear domestic blowback and risk long-term damage to its [reputation]." Naval analysts and tanker operators say the Iranian navy has increasingly projected power using what is called an asymmetric tool kit, including groups of small, speedy boats that swarm larger targets. Mines laid in the waterway could cripple ships, while sunken tankers could potentially block the passage for a longer period of time. 'They can also storm ships on helicopters and hold them for long periods," said Erik Hanell, the chief executive of Swedish-based tanker operator Stena Bulk, which has tankers in the area. Commandos from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps stormed one of the company's tankers, the Stena Impero, in 2019 and held it for three months in response to the U.K. stopping an Iranian tanker in Gibraltar. Ship crews said IRGC speed boats have come within yards of tankers. 'They are all over the place," said Mihai Barbu, an executive officer for a European tanker that is about to enter the strait from its north side. 'They can use high explosives on the hull, hit us with rocket-propelled grenades or use heavy artillery from their bases on the coast. It's scary." The saber-rattling has conjured memories of the attacks on oil tankers traded by Iran and Iraq during their broader conflict in the 1980s. U.S. warships patrolled the region and eventually began escorting some commercial ships, in operations that turned deadly. Iraqi forces accidentally fired on a U.S. vessel in 1987, killing 37 members of the crew. In 1988, a U.S. ship hit an Iranian mine but managed to stay afloat. Retired U.S. Navy Capt. Jim McTigue commanded a 453-foot frigate that was one of several U.S. vessels that destroyed two Iranian oil platforms in response to the mining incident. Soon after, he said, an approaching Iranian warship let loose a Harpoon missile that buzzed about 100 feet past another vessel in McTigue's group. McTigue's ship returned fire with four of its own missiles, helping destroy the largest warship the U.S. Navy has sunk since World War II. 'They called it a one-day war," McTigue said of Operation Praying Mantis, which also included additional U.S. ships that fought elsewhere. As for Iran's current threat, McTigue said, 'I don't think anybody in a one-on-one tactical situation can even come close to us. You really got to look at the strategic implications. That's where it's far more difficult to predict what the outcome would be." Write to David Uberti at and Costas Paris at
