Financial distress: Couple accuses Absa of reckless lending after accepting R3. 2 million second home loan
A Gauteng couple took action against Absa bank after alleging reckless lending practices that have led them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million.
Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers
A Gauteng couple took action against Absa bank after alleging reckless lending practices that have led them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million.
Christian Daniel De Klerk and his partner, long-standing customers of the bank, claim that their financial wellness was compromised when they accepted a second home loan from Absa without being given a suitable affordability assessment.
Initially, the De Klerks secured a R1.9 million home loan from Absa in 2011 and, for nearly a decade, they successfully met their repayment obligations. However, following the collapse of the husband's legal practice in March 2020 due to the pandemic, the couple were granted a temporary three-month payment holiday.
Ironically, during the same month, they said Absa approached them with an offer for a second loan, amounting to R3.2 million. Despite their precarious situation, the couple accepted the offer.
Meanwhile, the husband remained unemployed until June 2024 and the couple faced mounting debt because of missed repayments from 2022.
They maintained that their current income was inadequate to service both the new instalments and the arrears. Nevertheless, they submitted that they could meet the loan obligations under terms similar to those agreed upon in March 2020.
In seeking respite, the couple brought their case before the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT), voicing their primary grievance against Absa's alleged failure to conduct a proper affordability assessment before approving the second loan.
They argued that Absa did not request essential financial documentation such as proof of income, detailed expense records, or even a credit history report—critical assessments that would typically inform responsible lending practices. The couple contended that granting them a loan while the husband was unemployed amounted to reckless lending.
In addition, the couple alleged that Absa also failed to provide clear information regarding the loan's terms, conditions, interest rates, and penalties for missed repayments, all of which they argue have contributed to their current financial hardship.
As a result of these alleged contraventions, the couple said that they are suffering severe financial hardship, face the risk of foreclosure, and are enduring significant emotional distress, which has adversely affected their quality of life.
In the answering affidavit, Absa argued the couple's application was time-barred as more than three years have elapsed since the alleged cause of action arose. Moreover, the bank submitted that the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria enforced the loan agreement in September 2024 and ordered the couple to pay over R5.1 million including interests and declared the couples' property executable.
The bank added that the couple's case was frivolous, vexatious, and constitutes an abuse of the Tribunal's process.
In their reply, the couple disputed the assertion that the matter was time-barred. They argue that the cause of action only arose in 2022 when they began defaulting on their home loan repayments. On this basis, they contend that the three-year period should be calculated from 2022, not from 2020 when the second home loan was granted.
They also disputed the contention that the high court judgment precludes them from pursuing the complaint before the tribunal. They argue that the issue of reckless lending, which forms the crux of their complaint before the tribunal, and it was not adjudicated by the high court.
Looking at matter, the tribunal said by law, the limitation period must be calculated from 2020 March when the alleged reckless credit was extended. Having filed their application for leave to refer in February 2025—almost five years post the alleged reckless lending—the tribunal indicated that they would be barred from considering the complaint, potentially closing the door on their search for justice.
As a result, the application was dismissed.
[email protected]
IOL News
Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Premier Winde announces intensified efforts against extortion in Western Cape
Premier Alan Winde outlines the Western Cape's intensified efforts to tackle extortion through cross-sector collaboration. Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers. The Western Cape government is intensifying its battle against extortion by implementing a comprehensive, collaborative strategy that brings together law enforcement, the private sector, and local communities. Premier Alan Winde has described this issue as a 'cancer' that threatens both economic growth and public safety in the province. Speaking at his weekly digital press conference (digicon) on safety, Premier Winde was joined by Business Against Crime South Africa (BACSA) Western Cape Chairperson, Hubert Paulse, to showcase the province's increased multi-sectoral efforts to confront the growing scourge of extortion. 'This was about the whole of government and society coming together to coordinate ourselves better to confront this 'cancer' called extortion and to discuss how we are going to rid ourselves of this horrendous crime that impacts so many of our residents and businesses,' said Winde. 'It strangles economic growth and job creation. Daily, it threatens residents' safety and their livelihoods, robbing them of opportunities and their dignity.' Winde stressed that the only way to dismantle these extortion networks, often referred to as 'extortion mafias', is through collaboration across all levels of society. 'The only way we will eradicate 'extortion mafias' is if we all work together,' he said. Extortion emerged as a key focus at this week's Western Cape Government Multi-Sectoral Anti-Extortion Summit, which convened provincial ministers, SAPS representatives, the City of Cape Town, and academics to coordinate strategies aimed at combating the extortion crisis affecting local communities and businesses. BACSA, a non-profit public-private partnership established in 1996, has played a leading role in building safety partnerships across the country. Paulse highlighted how the organisation's initiatives are being used to fight extortion and other crimes, stating:` 'Our message is simple but powerful. We foster collaboration with all stakeholders to fight crime. When we work together, we do not just reduce crime, we restore hope. And with hope comes confidence. Businesses become more willing to invest, and that investment leads to the creation of more jobs.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading One of BACSA's key crime-fighting tools is its Eyes and Ears Initiative (E2), a technology-driven platform that links private security companies and other vetted partners with SAPS command centres. According to Paulse, this network uses surveillance tech such as drones and licence plate recognition to bolster real-time law enforcement responses. 'The private security industry outnumbers the police service 4:1. We are using that geographical footprint to increase the operational response and awareness of the SAPS,' said Paulse. He added that the Western Cape is 'the first province that has E2 controllers in all 6 policing districts.' Premier Winde reinforced the need to outpace criminals by embracing innovation. 'Criminals are using technology. We have to be one better than them.' Beyond tech solutions, Winde reiterated the importance of community involvement through neighbourhood watches and community policing forums. 'There is no doubt that residents who form or join NHWs know more about what is going on in their areas than anyone else, and they form essential partnerships with SAPS and municipal law enforcement,' he said. Paulse echoed this view, saying, 'We call it 'community-oriented policing'. That is what we are promoting.' Ahead of the digicon, Winde also chaired a meeting of the Western Cape Provincial Safety Council, where he welcomed a recent proposal by Police Minister Senzo Mchunu to give metro law enforcement agencies more authority. 'This is a positive step forward, we must all be obsessed and driven by the same thing: to build a safer, prosperous province and country,' the Premier said. The council also received updates on the Safer City Collaboration Cooperation Agreement signed in August 2024, which is focused on strengthening intelligence-sharing and operational coordination between SAPS, provincial departments, and the City of Cape Town. Condemning recent taxi-related violence, Winde praised the swift and coordinated response. 'It is intolerable that disputes are 'negotiated' through the barrel of a gun. I want to commend all the role players, from provincial traffic and city law enforcement to SAPS and our officials, for the speed and coordination with which they responded to the violence and threats. You truly showed how powerful we can be when we work together.' IOL News
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Africa's billionaires: Who are the richest in 2025?
Africa's 22 billionaires saw their combined fortunes surge to a record $105 billion (R1.9 trillion) this year, up from $82.4bn held by 20 individuals last year, the Forbes 2025 Africa billionaires report showed. Here's the top five on the list Aliko Dangote - Nigerian industrialist Aliko Dangote is the founder and president/chief executive of the Dangote Group, the largest conglomerate in West Africa, which includes Dangote Cement, a subsidiary of the Dangote Group, is the largest cement producer in Africa. He remains Africa's wealthiest person for the 14th consecutive year. His net worth surged to an estimated $23.9 billion, driven significantly by Forbes now valuing his massive Dangote Refinery near Lagos. The refinery, operational after lengthy delays, is key to Nigeria's shift from fuel importer to exporter. Dangote, ranked among the world's top 100 richest, calls the project pivotal for Africa's self-sufficiency. Johann Rupert and family - South African luxury goods magnate Johann Rupert holds firm as Africa's second-richest billionaire. His fortune climbed 39% to $14 billion, largely reflecting the rebound in shares of Richemont, the luxury group he chairs and controls through family holdings. Richemont, owner of brands like Cartier, benefited from strong global demand for high-end jewellery and watches, cementing the Rupert family's dominant position in the sector.
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Court criticises Absa's bookkeeping after bank fails to recover R6. 7 million
In 2021, Absa and Gola Trading and Projects signed a business loan, secured by a mortgage bond of R5.6 million and supported by personal guarantees from Arandana and Tswane Refineries. Image: Absa/Facebook Absa has lost a bid to attach property after it claimed that this was the best way to recover some R6.7 million it said was owed to it by two companies and Authar Arandana after they allegedly defaulted on a loan. In dismissing the dispute over the multimillion-rand business loan, the South Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg was scathing in its judgement about the reliability of Absa's books. 'In any event, it seems clear to me that… it is evident the bookkeeping of the plaintiff was in disarray.' The Judge, N.S. Kruger, said this conclusion was based on a review of communication between Absa as plaintiffs and defendants Gola Trading and Projects, Arandana, and Tswane Refineries. Kruger also considered 'various conflicting loan statements'. Kruger said in the recent judgement that 'it seems that as far as [Absa] is concerned, the one hand is unaware of what the other is doing. In my view the defendants have succeeded in raising triable issues [matters that can be defended] in these respects'. In 2021, Absa and Gola Trading and Projects signed a business loan, secured by a mortgage bond of R5.6 million and supported by personal guarantees from Arandana and Tswane Refineries. The contract's date is in dispute, having been signed in either February or October 2021, but the court noted its structure and obligations are not. The loan included a capital facility of R5.535m, fees and VAT, and an additional amount for interest and potential legal costs. According to the Absa, by mid-2023, Gola Trading and Projects had defaulted on payments, falling five instalments behind, which was more than R430 000. This, Absa claims, triggered a contractual clause allowing the loan to be cancelled and the full balance, of more than R5.27 million, to be called in immediately. But the defendants contest this, saying no such arrears existed. They point to a series of loan statements showing lower arrears and argue that subsequent payments – including two of R90,000 and a larger one of over R194,000 – brought the account into a credit position. By 10 October 2023, they received a statement showing that no arrears were owed. Despite this, Absa continued to chase the money, later adjusting the alleged arrears to R312,000 and seeking summary judgment. The amount claimed was later revised again to R4.27 million, which the judge said raised further questions. The defendants argued that this pattern of inconsistencies undermines Absa's certificate of balance and suggested a material dispute that should be tested at trial. Among the errors cited was an apparent reference to a '2019 agreement' in the bank's court papers – something Absa later admitted was a drafting mistake, the judgment noted. There were also discrepancies in the bank's internal calculations, leading to conflicting figures across statements and correspondence, the judge said. The defendants argued that, even if the loan was technically in arrears at one point, Absa's subsequent conduct, accepting payments and requesting further instalments, effectively reinstated the contract. They assert that no formal notice of breach was served before the alleged cancellation, and that the bank's changing demands demonstrate the agreement was still in place. Adding to the complexity, the third defendant has since gone into voluntary liquidation. Absa has postponed its claim against this party, focusing instead on recovering funds from Arandana and Gola Trading and Projects, and seeking a court order to declare the mortgaged property executable. However, this matter will now have to be settled through mediation. IOL
