Non-filers: Govt decides to hike cash withdrawal limit to Rs75,000
ISLAMABAD: The government has decided to increase limit from Rs50,000 to Rs75,000 for charging enhanced rate of withholding tax of 0.8 percent on cash withdrawals from banks by non-filers.
The assurance has been given by Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Chairman Rashid Mahmood Langrial during review of Finance Bill (2025-26) at a meeting of the National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance held here on Friday at the Parliament House.
During the meeting, the FBR chairman informed the committee that the rate has been proposed to be raised from 0.6 percent to 0.8percent.
Cash withdrawals from banks: FBR proposes raise in WHT for non-filers
Chairman of the committee Naveed Qamar stated that the limit is very low which needs to be increased to Rs100,000.
However, both the committee and FBR mutually agreed to raise the limit upto Rs75,000 under the Finance Bill (2025-26).
On the conclusion of the committee meeting, the FBR chairman informed media that the Finance Bill (2025-26) has increased the withholding tax rate on cash withdrawal from banks from 0.6 percent to 0.8 percent.
Due to an inadvertent mistake in budget speech, the rate of one percent has been announced. 'The proposed rate is 0.8 percent and not one percent as announced in the budget speech (2025-26)', the FBR chairman added.
About reduction in incidence of tax on salaried class, Minister of State for Finance Bilal Azhar Kayani said that there is a reduction proposed in all slabs of salaried individuals.
Tax rates for salaried individuals for income slab upto Rs3,200,000 has been reduced to provide relief to lower and middle tiers income bracket.
Minister of State for Finance Bilal Azhar Kayani said that the Finance Bill 2025-26 has proposed one percent tax on income slab between Rs600,000 and Rs1.2 million under revised salary slabs.
Later, the budget meeting of the federal cabinet has approved 2.5 per cent tax on income slab between Rs600,000 and Rs1.2 million.
When committee members asked about the reason behind this federal cabinet's decision, Kayani said that the government has increased salary of federal government employees by 10 percent.
Therefore, due to limitation of fiscal space, the tax rate was proposed to be increased from one percent to 2.5 percent for the said salary slab.
The FBR chairman said that the FBR has proposed only those changes in banking taxation laws which were agreed by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP). The provisions regarding assessment of banking companies has been made more disclosure oriented to determine true and fair income of the banking companiesand tax payable thereon under Finance Bill 2025-26. 'The extraordinary treatment given to banks in terms of taxation has been reviewed,' Langrial stated.
The FBR chairman said that very slight reduction has been made in the rates of the super tax in budget 2025-26 to give a signal to the corporate sector that the government is committed to reduce burden of taxes on compliant sectors. Super tax rates under Section 4C of the Income Tax Ordinance proposed to be reduced by half a percentage point for income slabs between Rs200 million to Rs500 million against each slab respectively.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
ICAP says AOB in finance bill may not be appropriate forum
KARACHI: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) has reviewed the discussions held during the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue's session on June 17, 2025, regarding the Finance Bill 2025, relating to proposed insertion of Section 58C into the Sales Tax Act, 1990. ICAP understands the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) efforts to combat financial misstatements, which may be resulting in evasion of sales tax. However, ICAP explains that the Audit Oversight Board (AOB), proposed in the finance bill to conduct inspections of audit firms, may not be the appropriate forum, given its statutory mandate is limited to overseeing audit quality of Public Interest Companies (PICs) only under the SECP Act 1997. ICAP proposes that being national regulators of audit profession and equipped with a robust investigation mechanism under the Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961, be designated to fulfil this oversight role. The Institute further explains that its existing Investigation Committee, constituted under the ICAP Bye-Laws 1983, comprised a reasonable number of independent members and a senior legal professional. ICAP reiterates its openness to including a nominee from FBR, AOB, or SECP on the Investigation Committee to enhance transparency. It is also disclosed that over the past five years, many cases relating to complaints received from various regulatory bodies, including SECP, SBP, AOB, and FBR, have been processed under its investigation framework. ICAP emphasizes the effectiveness of this system and informed that it annually publishes a comprehensive investigation report, the most recent of which was shared with members and public on March 13, 2025. The Institute expresses its continued support for legislative and regulatory reform in the national interest and remains committed to strengthening professional accountability across the financial ecosystem but has a concern on the introduction of alternate inspection mechanisms which may not be productive and in line with international best practices. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
FPCCI's BMP says budget lacks strategy to revive economy
LAHORE: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry's Businessmen Panel (BMP) has raised strong concerns over the Federal Budget, calling it a document full of theoretical optimism but lacking the concrete execution strategy required to address Pakistan's deep-rooted economic and industrial challenges. The BMP leadership said the government missed a critical opportunity to push forward structural reforms and provide the private sector with practical relief to overcome prevailing financial hardships, rising production costs, and export stagnation. BMP Chairman and former FPCCI President Mian Anjum Nisar said the budget failed to outline any viable roadmap for industrial expansion, job creation, or meaningful growth in the manufacturing sector. He regretted that instead of facilitating businesses, the budget has prioritised tax revenue goals without fixing fundamental issues affecting productivity and competitiveness. He stressed that Pakistan's economic revival is not possible without the active engagement and support of the business community, which continues to feel sidelined despite repeated promises of stakeholder-driven policy. Nisar criticised the government's excessive reliance on indirect taxation and short-term fiscal tools, warning that such an approach will only widen inequality and hinder long-term economic planning. He pointed out that the government has introduced aggressive tax measures without corresponding reforms in documentation and enforcement, creating fears of harassment among already compliant businesses. He strongly opposed granting tax authorities unchecked powers, such as freezing business accounts without prior notice, terming them anti-business and contrary to the spirit of voluntary compliance and trust-building. He said that the Rs1,000 billion earmarked for development spending is inadequate to meet the pressing infrastructure needs of Pakistan's economy, especially in industrial zones, ports, logistics corridors, and power transmission lines, adding unless these funds are used transparently with strict project prioritisation, they will have minimal impact. He urged the government to revive long-stalled industrial and transport infrastructure projects, which are essential to improving supply chains and reducing the cost of doing business. He also expressed serious disappointment over the continued neglect of value-added sectors, particularly textile, apparel, and light engineering, which are the backbone of Pakistan's export economy. Nisar reiterated the BMP panel's longstanding demand for the revival of the zero-rated regime and the removal of procedural hurdles in sales tax refunds. He noted that working capital remains stuck in refund cycles, which creates a liquidity crisis for exporters already struggling with thin margins and delayed shipments. He called for a complete rethinking of the country's tax strategy. Instead of placing more burdens on the formal sector, the government should broaden the base by targeting untaxed segments and expanding documentation through rational incentives. The business community has long urged for a simplified and predictable tax regime with reduced compliance costs, which remains unmet in the current budget. The panel emphasized that a true economic turnaround can only be achieved through structural reforms, reduced dependency on IMF programs, and the formulation of a long-term industrial policy. It pointed out that over reliance on remittances, foreign loans, and import-based revenues is unsustainable and exposes the country to repeated cycles of crisis. BMP urged the government to shift from short-term fire fighting to institutional capacity-building, export diversification, and innovation-led growth. BMP reaffirmed its commitment to standing with Pakistan's business community and offering constructive solutions, but stressed that the government must match its words with action and work hand in hand with stakeholders to lift the economy from stagnation toward sustainable, inclusive growth. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Finance bill contains drafting errors: experts
ISLAMABAD: Finance Bill (2025-26) contains drafting errors and contradictions amongst taxing statues including Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Federal Excise Act, 2005. Tax experts told Business Recorder that policymaker has been harmonizing the parallel provisions contained in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Federal Excise Act, 2005 as all these are administered by the same officer of the field formations. But contrary to the established policy and past practice through Finance Bill 2025 certain contradictory amendments are proposed. The tax experts have pointed out that earlier all the three taxing statutes contained a provision that after issuance of show cause notice the assessment order was to be passed within a specified period and this provision was interpreted as mandatory in various judgments of the Supreme Court. Budget FY25-26: Finance bill still being discussed, says FBR However, through Finance Bill the provisions contained in Section 122(9) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 is proposed to be omitted meaning thereby that there would be no time limit for passing the assessment order after issuance of show cause notice and practically the same can be passed within five years of the end of the Financial Year in which the relevant return of total income was filed. Contrary to this, the identical provision contained in Section 11G of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and sections of the Federal Excise Act would be continued. This differential treatment in the taxing statute administered by the same assessing officer does not sound to reason and is contrary to the norms of justice and fair play. When contacted, Shahid Jami, a Lahore based tax lawyer, explained that though Anomalies Committees have been constituted by the Federal Government but such fine points are not likely to be addressed by them as this may not be considered anomaly by them. He pointed out a drafting error according to which sub-section (1) of Section 46 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 pertaining to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal is intended to be substituted and the proposed amendment provide appeal only against the appeal order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and contrary to the earlier provision existing for decades no appeal has been provided against the order passed by the Zonal Commissioner and FBR under the Act or Rules. Jami stated that the wording appears to be erroneous in drafting and not intentional change in policy as the words 'under this Act and Rule made there under' exist in the proposed amendment but the authorities of Zonal Commissioner and FBR are missing. It is imperative that such drafting errors and contradictions are removed from the Finance Bill for uniformity of taxing statues and to protect the rights of the taxpayers. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
