Zandile Gumede trial: Former eThekwini officials unaware of tender protocol violations

Former mayor of eThekwini, Zandile Gumede.
Image: Nomonde Zondi
The Durban High Court, hearing the R320 million Durban Solid Waste (DSW) tender corruption trial this week learned that the former City manager of eThekwini Sipho Nzuza and the ex-deputy head of Supply Chain Management (SCM) Sandile Ngcobo were not aware that certain protocols were not undertaken before the awarding of the tender in 2018.
The former eThekwini bosses are accused, along with the former mayor of the city, Zandile Gumede, and 19 others, of numerous charges, including money laundering, racketeering, fraud, corruption, and contravention of the Municipal Finance Management Act and the Municipal Systems Act, relating to the tender.
The court has learned that since the contracts were set to expire on December 31, 2017, the Solid Waste Unit stated that it was imperative to hire experienced service providers to collect waste in 2018.
During cross-examination by defence counsel Advocate Jimmy Howse SC, he questioned a State witness who was part of the Executive Acquisitions Committee (EAC), established by Nzuza to advise him on recommendations made by the Bid Adjudication Committee (BAC).
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Former eThekwini city manager Sipho Nzuza.
Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers
Howse asked the witness why, in her capacity as an EAC member, she did not alert Nzuza that compliance checks had not been completed.
He also asked her why she did not tell Nzuza that the BAC had approved the quotations of contractors to collect waste and that this had to be reviewed by the EAC.
The witness, who cannot be named, said Ngcobo had told her that EAC was not a statutory committee. She said when Ngcobo came to her office on December 28, 2017, to request her to prepare letters of award as per Nzuza's instruction, she raised this with Ngcobo, who told her that Nzuza had the final say.
'How could I have advised him(Nzuza) when I was told that EAC is not a statutory committee. I was not sitting on EAC at that time because I was on tenders and contracts,' the witness said.
She also said that she told Ngcobo that compliance checks were not done.
Howse asked her why she did not mention this when she was writing her affidavit. He said she did write that compliance checks were not completed but she did not state that she alerted Ngcobo about this on December 28.
'Because what Ngcobo and I mostly disagreed on was that the report (the BAC decision) had to go to the EAC,' she replied.
The witness added that one of her concerns was that she did not have staff to draft the letters of award.
When it was put to the witness that she was duty bound to tell Nzuzo about any concerns she tresponded that she had raised her concerns with Ngcobo and it was his responsibility to inform Nzuza.
When Howse put it to the witness that she failed to do her job, the witness disagreed with him and said she did her job to the best of her abilities.
A new witness is expected to start her testimony on Friday.
nomonde.zondi@inl.co.za

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

TimesLIVE

2 days ago

• TimesLIVE

'Millions wasted': Lesseyton sports field not built to spec, says public protector

There were procurement irregularities in the awarding of a R22.7m tender to Thalami Civils JV for the construction of the Lesseyton sports field by the Enoch Mgijima local municipality. Public protector Kholeka Gcaleka released the report on the findings of the investigation into allegations of improper conduct and maladministration by functionaries of the municipality relating to the construction of Lesseyton sports field in 2018. The Lesseyton sports field gained national notoriety in October 2021 after its unveiling was posted on social media and users immediately began questioning whether its R15m price tag constituted value for money. According to the specification dated March 9 2018, the construction was supposed to include the construction of a grassed athletic track, soccer/rugby field, netball, tennis and volleyball courts and grandstands. However, these facilities have not been constructed. Investigations found that the soccer/rugby field was not constructed according to the specifications and the electricity has not been connected. In the investigation, Gcaleka observed that the ward councillor signed the completion certificates and accepted the construction of the sports field as satisfactory, despite the municipality not receiving any value for money. According to the findings, the total amount of the awarded bid exceeded the budgeted amount of R18.7m that was approved by the department of co-operative governance and traditional affairs (Cogta) in the 2017/18 financial year. The awarded tender exceeded the budgeted amount by more than R4.7m without evidence that the municipality sought additional funding or approval from the municipal council, as required under the Municipal Finance Management Act. Further, the report found that the tender advertisement had two different closing dates and was not placed on three different publicly accessible platforms as required by the municipal supply chain management policy. The advertisement period for the tender was shortened from 30 days to 14 days, and the reason provided was that the construction of the sports field was an emergency. Gcaleka found that the municipality's definition of emergency in this regard was not in line with the definition in terms of the municipal supply chain management policy. The evidence suggests that two bid evaluation processes took place with the first process resulting in the first bidder being the preferred bidder, whereas the second process used a different formula provided by the bid adjudication committee and culminated in Thalami Civils, which was the fourth-highest scoring bidder, winning the tender. She also found that the allegations of irregularities in the management of the contract and a lack of proper oversight on the construction project by the local and provincial governments, resulting in no value for money paid, were substantiated. The public protector observed that the ward councillor signed the completion certificates and accepted the construction of the sports field as satisfactory when the municipality did not get any value for money as evident in this investigation. Gcaleka recommended that the municipal manager of the municipality ensure the reconstruction of the Lesseyton Sports Field in accordance with the bid specifications dated March 9 2018.

The Citizen

2 days ago

• The Citizen

Public Protector flags irregularities in R22m Lesseyton Stadium, questions 'emergency'

The construction of the Lesseyton Sports Field exceeded the approved R18.7 million budget. Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka has found evidence of mismanagement in the construction of the controversial Lesseyton Sports Field in Komani, Eastern Cape. In a report released on Wednesday following an investigation into allegations of maladministration and improper conduct, Gcaleka highlighted serious procurement issues involving the Enoch Mgijima Local Municipality. The sports facility, unveiled in October 2021, drew widespread public criticism due to its poor quality and the high cost associated with its construction. A forensic investigation conducted by a law firm had revealed that the contract for building the stadium — awarded to construction company Thalami Civils — was irregular. Public Protector investigation over Lesseyton Sports Field tender On Wednesday, Gcaleka found that procurement irregularities in the awarding of the R22.7 million tender had been substantiated. She pointed out that one key issue was that the project exceeded the R18.7 million budget approved by the Eastern Cape Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta) in the 2017-18 financial year. 'The awarded tender exceeded the budgeted amount by over R4.7 million, and there is no evidence that the municipality approached the municipal council for additional funding as required by Section 19(1) of the Municipal Finance Management Act,' Gcaleka said. ALOS READ: Sanral taking its time to investigate R1.57bn tender award Additional procedural issues were also found during the tender process. Gcaleka highlighted inconsistencies in the contract's advertisement, revealing that it had two different closing dates and was not published on three publicly accessible platforms, as required by the municipal supply chain management policy. 'The tender advertisement period was shortened from 30 days to 14 days, and the reasons provided was that the construction of Lesseyton Sports Field was an emergency. 'The municipality's definition of emergency in this regard is found not to be in line with the definition in terms of regulation 22(2) of the municipal supply chain management policy,' she remarked. Bid evaluation process questioned The Public Protector's investigation uncovered irregularities in the bid evaluation process, including evidence that two separate evaluations took place. 'The first process resulted in bidder 1 being the preferred bidder, whereas the second process utilised a different formula provided by the BAC [bid adjudicating committee] and culminated in Thalami Civil, which was the fourth.' Gcaleka questioned the rationale provided by the Enoch Mgijima Local Municipality for bypassing the top-scoring bidder. READ MORE: DA demands full AGSA report on R400m driving licence tender The municipality had justified not awarding the tender to the highest scoring bidder by claiming the bidder had recently been awarded a similar contract. 'The reasons provided by the BAC did not amount to, I quote, 'objective criterion', and [were] not supported by any legal or rational authority. 'Moreover, this reason was not part of the evaluation criteria in terms of the specification or determined by the BEC [bid evaluation committee].' Lack of oversight on Lesseyton Sports Field project The Public Protector concluded that the appointment of Thalami Civils contravened section 2(1)(e) and (f) of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA), which mandates awarding contracts to the highest-scoring bidder unless objective criteria justify otherwise. 'The allegations that there were irregularities in the management of the contract and a lack of proper oversight on the Lesseyton Sports Field construction project by the local and provincial governments, resulting in no value for money, are substantiated,' Gcaleka added. NOW READ: Macpherson not deterred by 'political pressure or death threats' over R800m oxygen tender

The Herald

3 days ago

• The Herald

Gunman who disrupted ActionSA branch launch appears in court

Party members scurried for cover as one of the gunmen, who arrived in a Toyota Quantum, fired shots inside the venue. Some party members managed to disarm the gunman. Mncwango confirmed the incident and said the men stormed the meeting venue and started shooting. 'We managed to disarm the suspects and took them to Sydenham police station,' he said. Mncwango said the branch launch had to be cancelled because members were terrified. He said they want the suspects to reveal who sent them. Mncwango has many enemies in the province due to his stance against corruption in the provincial government and eThekwini municipality. Hadebe, who chose to represent himself during proceedings, failed in his bid to have presiding magistrate Ntokozo Myeni refuse an application for the media to photograph him. Senior prosecutor Seema Reddy had not objected to the application as there was no identity parade because Hadebe was arrested on the scene. Court proceedings got off to a bad start as Hadebe infuriated Myeni because of his inaudible responses to the court. Hadebe later requested the court to grant him bail, saying he transported children to school and had strong emotional ties with his children. Reddy said the state was opposed to bail and called for the matter to be postponed to Tuesday. She said information had also surfaced that Hadebe had previous convictions dating back to 2015. TimesLIVE