Trapped crocodile rescued from the site of the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project
Volunteers rescued a six-foot crocodile trapped under heavy metal plates at the site of the ongoing construction of the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail (bullet train) project on Friday.
Hemant Vadhwana, who runs a crocodile rescue group in Vadodara, said that his team received a call on Friday afternoon from workers of the L&T Construction company, which is currently working on the bullet train project in Vadodara city. The workers informed the rescue group that a crocodile had been spotted under the metal plates kept inside a pit at a site near the Vadsar bridge, close to the Vishwamitri River flowing through the area.
Vadhwana said, 'When we rushed to the spot, we saw that the crocodile was stuck in a 25-foot deep pit, which was full of sludge… It was possibly stuck in the pit for a few days after the rains witnessed in Vadodara last week, but it is also likely that it could have been there longer… It went unnoticed as the pit was flooded. As the water receded, the crocodile was spotted by the workers. Although the metal plates have been in the pit for over a year, since the crocodile was healthy and fine, we can infer that it was there for a week to a fortnight.'
Vadhwana said that the rescue was challenging as the crocodile was covered in mud and difficult to remove from under the plates.
He further said, 'It took us three hours to bring it out from under the metal plates. The muck in the pit made it extremely challenging to rescue the crocodile from under the metal plates… we had to take the help of a crane to lift it and remove it from the pit as it was covered in muck and could not be manually removed.'
The crocodile was handed over to officials of the Vadodara social forestry department for rehabilitation and release.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Ayodhya's Ram temple to be ready by October 31; landscaping by January 1; campus to feature 20 key elements, points of interest
The Ram temple in Ayodhya is on track for completion by October, with the surrounding 70-acre compound expected to be ready with landscaping by January 1st AYODHYA: The construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya will be completed by October while the temple's 70-acre wide compound will be ready in its green avatar latest by January 1next year. Ram temple trust general secretary Champat Rai said that construction of the temple will be done by October 31. The landscaping work of the temple, to be taken up by GMR, is expected to begin in the first week of November. Vinod Mehta, project director, Larsen and Toubro construction team, said that all the milestones pertaining to the completion of the temple are going to be achieved by October 31. Temple campus to have 20 elements & points of interest 'Post that, L&T will start the process of pulling out from the project. Whatever has been defined in our scope of work would be achieved by then. That is what we are targeting at present,' said Mehta on Friday. According to officials involved with the construction work and with the Ram temple project, the landscaping work would take six to eight weeks for completion. 'With the help of the latest technology, the land filling and landscaping work should not take a lot of time. And people visiting the temple would be able to enjoy their time in the gardens and green space. The temple trust would chart out which areas are going to be opened for the devotees later,' said an officer. Meanwhile, Champat Rai said that construction of the boundary wall is going to take at least 10 to 12 months for completion. 'The parkota wall will be ready in four months. We all are focusing on the completion of the parkota. Once parkota work is over, scaffolding and heavy machines are going to be taken out in a phased manner from the premises,' said Rai. For now, the temple trust is in talks with the administration to finalise its strategy to allow the movement of the devotees on the first floor where Ram Darbar has been established. Due to availability of limited space for the movement of the visitors through the staircase, the temple trust is yet to open the first floor for the devotees. More than 20 different elements and points of interest are going to be developed in the Ram temple compound in a phased manner, said a senior office-bearer of the trust.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Train ops on WR hit due to technical fault nr Palghar
Mumbai: Suburban and long-distance train operations on the Western Railway (WR) came to a halt Friday evening after a technical fault near Palghar disrupted services during peak hours. The incident occurred around 6.55pm when the pantograph of the Mumbai-Ajmer Express got entangled with the overhead equipment (OHE) while switching tracks to the Down line towards Surat. As a result, the train came to a standstill, blocking both Up and Down lines. "The disruption hit services on the Dahanu–Virar corridor. Several suburban trains were cancelled, and long-distance trains were also affected," said a WR official. tnn
Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
HC upholds in-situ rehab of slum dwellers on 65% of encroached open spaces
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Thursday upheld the validity of a clause in Mumbai's development plan that permits 65% of encroached land reserved for public open spaces to be utilised for in-situ rehabilitation of slum dwellers occupying the land. A bench of justices Amit Borkar and Somasekhar Sundaresan also directed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to strictly ensure that the remaining 35% of the reserved land remains available as public open space. The bench was ruling on a petition filed in 2002 by NAGAR, a Mumbai-based nonprofit that had challenged Regulation 17(3)(D)(2) of the Development Control and Promotion Regulations (DCPR) 2034. The regulation allowed the use of 65% of encroached public open spaces that are not otherwise buildable and measure over 500 square metres in area for the in-situ rehabilitation of the encroachers via a slum rehabilitation scheme. The remaining 35% area is to be retained as public open space, according to the regulation. Refusing to interfere with the regulation, the bench said, 'It is a balanced policy that aims to recover a part of the land while also ensuring humane rehabilitation. This approach is neither unreasonable nor unconstitutional.' The bench added that the regulation reflects a practical solution to a difficult and long-standing issue between encroachments and the need for preserving public open spaces to protect the fundamental right of citizens to a healthy environment. Although the regulation reduces the reserved open space existing on paper, it ensures that at least 35% of the encroached land is freed and developed as a public amenity, the judges said. At the same time, it provides better housing and infrastructure to slum dwellers, they added. 'This approach does not destroy environmental values. It tries to recover some environmental benefit from already encroached lands, while also recognising the housing rights of the urban poor,' the bench said. What petitioners said NAGAR's petition, filed through its trustees Neera Punj and Nayana Kathpalia, challenged a notification issued by the state urban development department in 1992 and Regulation 17(3)(D)(2) of DCPR 2034. The petitioners contended that the notification and the regulation, in effect, legalised the diversion of 65% of the land for construction. This significantly diluted the purpose of the land's reservation and stripped the city of its much-needed green and open spaces, they said. According to the petitioners, the regulation went directly against the principles of sustainable development and the public trust doctrine, which asserts that public assets such as parks and open spaces should be preserved for collective enjoyment of the community and should not be sacrificed to accommodate encroachments or private development, even under the banner of welfare schemes. The petitioners also highlighted that the definition of a 'protected occupier' under the Slum Act has undergone considerable changes over the years. A larger pool of slum dwellers on encroached land can now get in-situ rehabilitation, they said, as the original cut-off date for determining eligibility has been extended from January 1, 1976, to January 1, 2011. This has, in turn, increased the burden on scarce urban land, including reserved open spaces, the petitioners argued. The petition further pointed out that even the basic safeguard in the 1992 notification—that at least 25% of the reserved open space must be encroached upon to trigger a slum rehabilitation scheme on it—was entirely removed in the new regulation. This opened up even slightly encroached parks, gardens, and playgrounds for slum rehabilitation, thereby completely defeating the purpose of reservation under the development plan, it said. The petition argued that open spaces are critical for the livability and ecological balance of the city. It added that there is no reason why the relocation policy adopted for infrastructure projects such as railways, roads, or metro corridors, which require the land to be cleared, should not be applied to slum dwellers on public open spaces, which are as essential for the well-being of citizens. What court ruled The high court found no 'clear legal or constitutional defect' in the policy and 'no procedural irregularity or legal flaw' in the procedure. However, it added that a proper balance between the two facets of the right to life—right to healthy environment and right to shelter and a dignified life—would be achieved only if the remaining 35% of these lands are strictly maintained as public open spaces. To achieve this balance, the court directed that the remaining 35% open space must be clearly demarcated in the final approved layout plan of the slum scheme. The plan should also reflect the precise location and dimensions of the open space, which cannot be subsequently modified or shifted, it said. The bench restrained the SRA from granting approval to any slum rehabilitation proposal unless this requirement is 'visibly and verifiably' complied with. The court added that slum rehabilitation schemes on public open spaces should be approved only if the encroachment existed prior to the date of reservation, and the collector issues a certificate that alternate land to rehabilitate the slum dwellers is not available. The BMC was directed to prepare a ward-wise action plan listing all reserved open spaces, complete GIS-based mapping and geo-tagging of all these plots in four months, and upload the data on its website, along with the plots' current usage status. The court also directed the state government to review the policy to evaluate whether the 35:65 ratio serves the goals of sustainable development and come up with a new policy framework, if necessary.
