US firms explore reboot of Germany's nuclear plants
US companies have been assessing the feasibility and costs of restarting Germany's decommissioned nuclear power plants, Bild reported on Friday. The EU's largest economy has been struggling with soaring energy costs and a prolonged economic slowdown.
Germany shut down its last three reactors in April 2023, following a post-Fukushima parliamentary decision to phase out atomic energy. However, with the country's industrial output under pressure, calls to reverse the policy have been gaining momentum.
This week, politicians and nuclear energy advocates met in Berlin to discuss the feasibility of reactivating the country's mothballed plants. Among them was US nuclear engineer Mark Nelson, founder of Radiant Energy Group, who has been analyzing how quickly and affordably a nuclear restart could happen.
'There's no cheaper way to generate electricity anywhere in the world than with your fully paid-off nuclear plants,' Nelson told Bild. Backed by a consortium of investors, he believes that nine German reactors could be brought back online. Arguments that nuclear power is too expensive, he said, are based on flawed assumptions or are politically motivated.
Nelson also argued that renewable energy alone remains insufficient. In Q1 2025, renewables accounted for just 47% of Germany's electricity consumption.
Germany relied heavily on affordable Russian gas to power its industry before the Ukraine conflict, and ramped up electricity imports in 2023 after shutting down its last nuclear plants. With the EU aiming to end its reliance on Russian energy, Berlin now plans to spend €20 billion ($23 billion) on new gas-fired power stations to support moving away from coal and maintain supply stability.
Moscow has repeatedly said it remains a reliable supplier and is open to restarting gas exports to Europe. However, Chancellor Friedrich Merz reportedly opposes any resumption of Russian gas purchases.
Germany's energy crunch has taken a toll on its economy, now in its third straight year of recession. Nearly 200,000 companies shut down in 2024 – the highest figure since 2011, according to Creditreform. In April 2025, company insolvencies exceeded levels recorded during the 2008 financial crisis.
Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency (IEA), told Bild he expects 'a major nuclear comeback.'
From an economic perspective, he said, Germany will need 'both storable renewables and nuclear energy.'
Merz, a longtime critic of Germany's nuclear phaseout, has reportedly shown support for investing in small modular reactors and nuclear fusion technologies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
10 hours ago
- Russia Today
The EU's favorite war: the one Israel starts
Israel flew over to Iran with fighter jets and has since gone totally ballistic — literally and figuratively. So what does the European Union's insane clown posse have to say about it? Get yourself some popcorn. The Eurojokers are doing their best stand-up comedy again without even realizing it. First up: French President Emmanuel Macron, who took to social media to declare that 'peace and security for all in the region must remain our guiding principle.' Aww, how sweet. Calling for peace while holding your buddy's coat as he storms into the bar to punch someone on the face. So after Israel unilaterally launched its hundred-target missile tantrum across Tehran – complete with residential hits and assassinations – maybe some strong words against that kind of thing are in order? 'France has repeatedly condemned Iran's ongoing nuclear program and has taken all appropriate diplomatic measures in response. In this context, France reaffirms Israel's right to defend itself and ensure its security,' Macron posted as the conflict kicked off. Classic French parenting: ignore the kid setting the house on fire and scold the one who looked at him funny. Next up, Germany. Surely the new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, can inject some sober logic into the conversation about who just broke the fragile regional peace everyone's pretending to care about. 'Iran has subsequently threatened to accelerate uranium enrichment again. This nuclear programme violates the provisions of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and poses a serious threat to the entire region, especially to the State of Israel. We reaffirm that Israel has the right to defend its existence and the security of its citizens. We call on both sides to refrain from steps that could lead to further escalation and destabilise the entire region,' wrote Merz. Oh, so now that Israel has attacked Iran, it's time for restraint? Not before. Not during. After. Like a guy who throws the first punch in a bar fight and then shouts, 'Hey! Let's all calm down!' Both Macron and Merz say that Iran brought this on itself by enriching uranium. That's like this: you've got a neighbor who lifts weights in his home gym. You see him through the window with a squat rack, bench press, treadmill – getting jacked. And you're like, 'Wow, he's getting so ripped I'm afraid he might beat me up someday. So I better go over there now and beat him up while I still can.' That's basically what Israel did with its 'preemptive' strike. And Macron and Merz are cheering it on like, 'Totally! That guy was getting too buff. Definitely deserved a missile to the face.' Then Merz added from the G7 summit in Canada: 'This is the dirty work that Israel is doing for all of us. We are also victims of this regime.' Oh, sorry – didn't realize the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had hired Israel as a global bouncer. And remind us, Friedrich: where exactly did Iran touch Germany on the map? Because Europe is far more likely to be 'victimized' by waves of immigration facilitated by its own lax policies, and sparked by its own support for regime change wars – like this one is shaping up to be – than by any distant centrifuge. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the EU's de facto queen, is now cosplaying as global playground monitor, sending all the boys to their corners. 'Europe urges all parties to exercise maximum restraint, de-escalate immediately and refrain from retaliation. A diplomatic resolution is now more urgent than ever, for the sake of the region's stability and global security,' she wrote. Maximum restraint? That's rich – especially coming from someone who's usually all about blowing €800 billion on weapons in bulk like a redneck doomsday cult stocking up for when Russian tanks finally roll up to the McDonald's drive thru in Warsaw – five years from now, around 2030, she and the rest of the Eurojokers keep saying. 'Of course I think a negotiated solution is, in the long term, the best solution,' she later said. Sure – as long as peace doesn't get in the way of endless proxy war in Ukraine, right? So, is anyone in Europe offering a perspective that doesn't sound like a hostage video scripted by Netanyahu's PR team? Not really. The Wall Street Journal summed it up bluntly: 'Europe backs Israel against Iran despite anger over Gaza.' For actual dissent, you have to look just outside the EU. 'Israel's attacks on our neighbor Iran are a clear provocation that disregards international law. These attacks, which come at a time when negotiations on Iran's nuclear program are intensifying and international pressure is increasing against inhumane actions targeting Gaza, demonstrate Israel's rule-breaking mentality. The Netanyahu administration is trying to drag our region and the entire world into disaster with its reckless, aggressive and lawless actions,' wrote Turkish President Recep Erdoğan from right next door to the EU clown tent. Türkiye has been waiting to join the EU since 1999 – like an Amazon package left on the doorstep, permanently. Gee, wonder why. You'd think that when things get this hot, Europe might welcome some diverse opinions – if only to avoid sounding like a chorus line of brain-dead sock puppets mouthing press releases from the Israeli defense ministry.
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
EU ministers name Russians they want banned from bloc
Top officials from several Baltic and Nordic countries have called for banning all Russians with past or current ties to the military from entering the Schengen Zone, claiming they could pose a 'criminal threat' to the EU, even after the Ukraine conflict ends. The ban was proposed in a joint statement by the interior ministers of Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Sweden, and Finland after a meeting in Tallinn on Thursday. All of the represented countries, except Sweden, have already effectively shut down their borders to Russian citizens. In their statement, which was shared by the Estonian Interior Ministry, the officials claimed that 'even after the end of the military operation against Ukraine, threats emanating from Russia to the internal security of the European Union will remain.' They claimed that hundreds of thousands of Russian nationals who have taken part in military operations against Ukraine now have combat experience and could supposedly join organized crime groups in Europe. The statement urges EU member states to take all necessary steps to prevent individuals with military backgrounds from Russia from moving freely within the Schengen area and undermining the bloc's security. It calls for a complete ban on residence permits and visas for these individuals. The officials also highlighted the need for drone detection and disruption capabilities along the eastern borders to counter threats from organized crime networks and hostile states. Last month, Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braze urged all EU member states to stop issuing Schengen visas to Russian citizens, citing risks to the bloc's internal security. Latvian Interior Minister Rihards Kozlovskis also insisted the EU must acknowledge it is 'in a hybrid war' with Russia and claimed that Russian tourists are a danger to the bloc. In recent months, a number of Eastern European governments have argued that Russia could pose a military threat to the EU even after the Ukraine conflict concludes and have enacted draconian policies specifically targeting Russian nationals and Russian speakers. Moscow has vehemently accused Western officials, particularly those in the Baltics, of fearmongering to justify a military buildup and 'blatant discrimination against Russians.' The country's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova previously also stated that the EU's Russophobia has turned out to be an 'expensive obsession' for the bloc, noting that it has dealt a significant blow to its economy and citizens.
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
EU to gamble with Russia's frozen assets
The European Union is looking to channel billions of euros in profits from frozen Russian assets into 'riskier investments' to boost funding for Ukraine, Politico has reported, citing sources. Officials reportedly view the move as a way to generate higher returns without directly tapping into the sovereign funds themselves, which would be in breach of international law. The proposal is part of a broader EU initiative to use profits from immobilized Russian assets – primarily Western government bonds held by the Brussels-based clearing house Euroclear – to support Ukraine's war effort. Moscow has labeled the seizure of its assets as 'theft.' Western nations froze an estimated $300 billion in Russian sovereign funds following the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine in February 2022. Of that amount, more than $200 billion is held by Euroclear. The funds have generated billions in interest, with €1.55 billion ($1.78 billion) transferred to Kiev last July to back a $50 billion G7 the new plan, the assets would be placed into an EU-managed investment fund that could pursue higher-yield strategies, officials told Politico on Thursday. The goal is to increase returns without resorting to outright confiscation – a step opposed by countries such as Germany and Italy due to the potential legal and financial consequences. The EU's $21 billion contribution to the G7 loan is expected to be fully disbursed by the end of this year. With future US aid uncertain and the bloc's own budget under pressure, officials are exploring alternative ways to keep Ukraine's economy afloat beyond 2025, Politico reported. EU policymakers hope the plan will allow them to extract more revenue from the assets without violating international legal norms. The International Monetary Fund has warned that outright seizure could damage global trust in Western financial institutions. Talks among member states over confiscation have dragged on for more than three years without resolution. Brussels also reportedly sees the new investment structure as a safeguard in case Hungary vetoes the renewal of sanctions – a move that could result in the assets being returned to Russia. EU sanctions must be unanimously extended every six months, and Budapest has repeatedly threatened to block them, citing national interests. Critics caution that riskier investments could result in losses ultimately borne by EU taxpayers, the outlet has condemned the asset freeze and has threatened countermeasures, including legal action.
