Judge orders Kilmar Abrego Garcia's release from jail before trial, but ICE plans to detain him
A Tennessee judge on Sunday ordered the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from jail while he awaits a federal trial on human smuggling charges, but he is not expected to be allowed to go free.
The mistaken deportation of Abrego Garcia, a citizen of El Salvador who was living in Maryland, has become a flashpoint in President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown.
Prosecutors said at his June 13 detention hearing that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement would take him into custody if he were released on the criminal charges and he could be deported before he has a chance to stand trial.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes, who ordered Abrego Garcia's release, has scheduled a hearing for Wednesday to discuss the conditions of his release. The U.S. government has already filed a motion to appeal the judge's release order.
Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty to the smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify the deportation mistake after the fact.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
9 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: 'Bullseye!!!' - Trump claims Iran strikes caused 'monumental damage'; says he's open to 'regime change'
Donald Trump has asked why there would not be a "regime change" in Iran following US strikes, calling to "make Iran great again". Meanwhile, Iran's UN envoy says the current situation provides a "historic test" for the body. Watch and follow the latest below.
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
ICE detains Marine Corps veteran's wife who was still breastfeeding their child
Marine Corps veteran Adrian Clouatre doesn't know how to tell his children where their mother went after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers detained her last month. When his nearly 2-year-old son Noah asks for his mother before bed, Clouatre just tells him, ' Mama will be back soon.' When his 3-month-old, breastfeeding daughter Lyn is hungry, he gives her a bottle of baby formula instead. He's worried how his newborn will bond with her mother absent skin-to-skin contact. His wife, Paola, is one of tens of thousands of people in custody and facing deportation as the Trump administration pushes for immigration officers to arrest 3,000 people a day. Even as Marine Corps recruiters promote enlistment as protection for families lacking legal status, directives for strict immigrant enforcement have cast away practices of deference previously afforded to military families, immigration law experts say. The federal agency tasked with helping military family members gain legal status now refers them for deportation, government memos show. To visit his wife, Adrian Clouatre has to make an eight-hour round trip from their home in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to a rural ICE detention center in Monroe. Clouatre, who qualifies as a service-disabled veteran, goes every chance he can get. Paola Clouatre, a 25-year-old Mexican national whose mother brought her into the country illegally more than a decade ago, met Adrian Clouatre, 26, at a southern California nightclub during the final months of his five years of military service in 2022. Within a year, they had tattooed each other's names on their arms. After they married in 2024, Paola Clouatre sought a green card to legally live and work in the U.S. Adrian Clouatre said he is 'not a very political person' but believes his wife deserved to live legally in the U.S. 'I'm all for 'get the criminals out of the country,' right?" he said. "But the people that are here working hard, especially the ones married to Americans — I mean, that's always been a way to secure a green card.' Detained at a green card meeting The process to apply for Paola Clouatre's green card went smoothly at first, but eventually she learned ICE had issued an order for her deportation in 2018 after her mother failed to appear at an immigration hearing. Clouatre and her mother had been estranged for years — Clouatre cycled out of homeless shelters as a teenager — and up until a couple of months ago, Clouatre had 'no idea' about her mother's missed hearing or the deportation order, her husband said. Adrian Clouatre recalled that a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services staffer asked about the deportation order during a May 27 appointment as part of her green card application. After Paola Clouatre explained that she was trying to reopen her case, the staffer asked her and her husband to wait in the lobby for paperwork regarding a follow-up appointment, which her husband said he believed was a 'ploy.' Soon, officers arrived and handcuffed Paola Clouatre, who handed her wedding ring to her husband for safekeeping. Adrian Clouatre, eyes welling with tears, said he and his wife had tried to 'do the right thing' and that he felt ICE officers should have more discretion over arrests, though he understood they were trying to do their jobs. 'It's just a hell of a way to treat a veteran,' said Carey Holliday, a former immigration judge who is now representing the couple. 'You take their wives and send them back to Mexico?' The Clouatres filed a motion for a California-based immigration judge to reopen the case on Paola's deportation order and are waiting to hear back, Holliday said. Less discretion for military families Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in an emailed statement that Paola Clouatre 'is in the country illegally" and that the administration is 'not going to ignore the rule of law.' 'Ignoring an Immigration Judge's order to leave the U.S. is a bad idea,' U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a June 9 post on X which appeared to refer to Clouatre's case. The agency added that the government 'has a long memory and no tolerance for defiance when it comes to making America safe again.' Prior to the Trump administration's push to drive up deportations, USCIS provided much more discretion for veterans seeking legal status for a family member, said Holliday and Margaret Stock, a military immigration law expert. In a Feb. 28 memo, the agency said it 'will no longer exempt' from deportation people in groups that had received more grace in the past. This includes the families of military personnel or veterans, Stock said. As of June 12, the agency said it has referred upward of 26,000 cases to ICE for deportation. USCIS still offers a program allowing family members of military personnel who illegally entered the U.S. to remain in the country as they apply for a green card. But there no longer appears to be room for leeway, such as giving a veteran's spouse like Paola Clouatre the opportunity to halt her active deportation order without facing arrest, Stock said. But numerous Marine Corps recruiters have continued to post ads on social media, geared toward Latinos, promoting enlistment as a way to gain 'protection from deportation' for family members. 'I think it's bad for them to be advertising that people are going to get immigration benefits when it appears that the administration is no longer offering these immigration benefits,' Stock said. 'It sends the wrong message to the recruits.' Marine Corps spokesperson Master Sgt. Tyler Hlavac told The Associated Press that recruiters have now been informed they are 'not the proper authority' to 'imply that the Marine Corps can secure immigration relief for applicants or their families.' ___ Brook is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
The National
25 minutes ago
- The National
SNP must woo voters to turn our indy hopes into reality
As we approach next year's election, polls suggest the notion has never been more popular – and yet the formation of a Unionist administration at Holyrood is more on the cards than at any time since 2007. We need serious action to prevent this outcome. And we don't have long. On Saturday, we made a start. The SNP's National Council meeting in Perth rightly was not open to the press or public. It provided a safe space for party activists to have a candid debate with its leadership, away from our opponents and detractors. READ MORE: US enters war with Iran after Donald Trump orders bombing of key nuclear sites I for one feel heartened at the tenor and content of the discussion. We haven't yet got the answers, but at least we are now asking the right questions. Over the months ahead, party members need to devise and unite behind a strategy to win a majority at next May's Scottish Parliament election. First things first. Political independence for our country will be central to the party's message. How could it be anything other than that? There is no point to the SNP if the party does not represent the ambition of self-government, now shared by a majority of our citizens. Frustration and fatigue have eaten away at our capacity in this movement. It has made us question the motivation and integrity of comrades. Repeated comments on social media – and indeed in the columns of this paper – suggest that the SNP has deprioritised independence. The party's leader is accused of shying away from the arguments. But no-one present in Perth on Saturday could have left with that impression. I saw a party leader there who not only demonstrated commitment to the political objective of an independent Scotland but who also offered a serious strategic assessment of how to achieve it. The internal chaos that consumed the party a year ago has dissipated; the haemorrhaging of support stemmed; the party in government stabilised. These were not ends in themselves but necessary steps to regroup and redeploy in the fight for our country's future. Now we need to get back to business: being the political leadership of the movement for national autonomy. It's time for phase two. The SNP need to convince people who want Scotland to be independent to vote for a party that will fight for their right to make that choice. That means confronting the yawning gap between support for independence and for the party. Awareness is growing that this needs a sophisticated approach – different people don't vote SNP for different reasons. So, we need to talk to them differently. Being performative isn't good enough. Just repeating the word doesn't make it happen. Two major groups of people matter in this. Firstly, those who tell pollsters that they think Scotland should be independent, but intend to vote for parties that are against it. It is not that their support for independence is weak, more that they don't see how independence is relevant right now. They are worried about paying this month's bills, about getting a health appointment, about their kids going to war. So, we need to talk about the why of independence. We need to make it relevant. We need to show how making our own decisions means we can make better ones. Our manifesto must spell out how control of our own resources affects key aspects of people's lives. It is about getting power for a purpose. The second group are those who want Scotland to be independent but do not vote. Some have never voted; some have given up because they no longer see how voting will achieve what they want. They have been ground down by the intransigence and denial of the UK state. For this group we need to talk about the how of independence. We need to make next year's vote an assertion of the Claim of Right. People have been denied the opportunity to consider this country's constitutional future not by the SNP government but by serial UK administrations, whose actions have been underwritten by the UK Supreme Court. This is unacceptable. It must change. And next May we need to invite people to demand that change. If they do, then we need explain our plans for executing their mandate. No more pretending that it will just happen because we vote for it. It will require a massive campaign to mobilise the political will of the people behind their government. This will be the time for civic conventions, for mass public information, for cross-party alliances, for legal and diplomatic effort at home and abroad. To do any of this we need to win the election. That is why the SNP must ask all those who want Scotland to be independent to give, indeed ,or lend, the party their vote. We need to do that with humility and without illusion. And those independence supporters who are thinking of not voting need to think again. Not because one vote changes the world, but because it creates the conditions where their hopes are more likely to become reality.
