CCP warns of Rs75m fine on illegal agreements
The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has issued a cautionary notice to undertakings that enter into prohibited agreements without seeking prior exemption, warning of financial penalties of up to Rs75 million, or 10% of annual turnover.
The CCP has observed that certain agreements between undertakings and their wholesalers, dealers, agents and retailers may constitute a refusal to deal with non-dealers and often include restrictive provisions that could violate Section 4(2) of the Competition Act 2010, according to a press release issued by the CCP on Saturday.
These potentially anti-competitive clauses may include resale price maintenance, market division, non-competition obligations or other conditions that restrict competition. Such vertical agreements — those between parties operating at different levels of supply chain – are void ab initio as they prevent, restrict or distort competition, unless specifically exempted by the CCP under Section 5 read with Section 9 of the Act, it said.
Exemption applications submitted to the CCP are evaluated using the criteria in Section 9 of the Act. Agreements that promote production or distribution, encourage technical or economic progress or result in efficiency gains that outweigh any adverse impact on competition may be granted exemption, the CCP announced.
The commission has strongly advised all undertakings to apply for exemption under Section 5 before entering into any such agreements to avoid potential sanctions.
Under the Competition Act 2010, the CCP is empowered to ensure free competition across all sectors of the economy, aiming to enhance economic efficiency and protect consumers from anti-competitive practices such as abuse of dominance, cartelisation, deceptive marketing and mergers that may reduce market competition.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Taxman gets arrest powers
Listen to article A National Assembly panel on Saturday approved special powers for tax authorities to arrest individuals involved in tax fraud, while it deferred the approval of another fiscal law that would have suddenly deprived government entities of their cash surpluses. Meanwhile, teachers and researchers will now be subject to full income tax, as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) did not agree to the government's proposal to extend the 25% income tax rebate for another fiscal year. Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Chairman Rashid Langrial informed the National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance that the IMF had refused to extend the rebate. The committee, chaired by Syed Naveed Qamar, approved legal powers for the FBR to arrest taxpayers involved in tax fraud without prior court approval. However, additional safeguards were added to limit the discretionary use of these powers. At one point, Qamar remarked that the tax fraud "law has been borrowed from the National Accountability Bureau". The Senate Standing Committee on Finance had already cleared the controversial proposal. Now, following minor amendments by the National Assembly panel, the bill is expected to become law from July 1. Tax fraud has been defined as: "knowingly, intentionally or dishonestly doing any act or abets any action to cause loss of tax under this Act, including: using or preparing false, forged and fictitious documents including return, statements, annexures and invoices; false claim of input tax credit based on fictitious transactions; issuance of any tax invoice without supply of goods; tampering with or destroying of any material evidence or documents required to be maintained; generating fake input through manipulation of return filing system of the Board and making fake entries in the sales tax returns or in the annexures; and making fictitious compliance of section 73, including routing of payments back to the registered person, or for the benefit of the registered person, through a bank account held by a supplier or a purported supplier." Upon committing any of the above offences, the FBR will have the authority to arrest the individual without first seeking a warrant from any court of law. FBR Chairman Rashid Langrial said the criminality of tax fraud has been divided into two parts. In some cases, court permission will be required before an arrest is made. He explained that crimes such as suppression of taxable supplies under the Sales Tax Act, suppression or nonpayment of withholding tax for more than three months, dealing in goods liable to confiscation and making taxable supplies without registration will require court approval for arrest. According to the proposal, an Inland Revenue officer not below the rank of assistant commissioner – or any officer authorised by the board – may initiate an inquiry upon approval from the commissioner, if there is material evidence pointing to the commission of tax fraud or an offence warranting prosecution under the act. The inquiry officer shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, including summoning and enforcing attendance of any person, examining on oath, requiring discovery and production of documents and receiving evidence on affidavits. The inquiry officer must complete the inquiry within six months. During proceedings, the officer must provide the accused with a chance to be heard and confront them with details of the alleged fraud. A final report will then be submitted to the commissioner, who may either approve a full investigation, request further details, or close the matter. Upon approval, the investigation must be completed within three months. The board may authorise a commissioner — through a three-member committee notified by the chairman — to issue an arrest warrant if the tax loss exceeds Rs50 million. Arrests will only be made if the accused fails to respond to three notices, attempts to flee, or is likely to tamper with evidence. When asked, Langrial said the accused can also be arrested at the airport if there is suspicion of an escape attempt. Cash surplus The standing committee held an extended discussion on a government proposal to assert full rights over the cash surpluses held by state-owned enterprises. The proposed amendment to the Public Finance Management Act aimed to grant the federal government control over these surpluses. "The federal government's budget deficit would never end, and it now wants to bankrupt the public sector companies," Syed Naveed Qamar said. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb argued that the companies were acting like "states within a state" and were not cooperating. He added that even government-nominated board members were not being heeded, blaming bureaucrats for the lack of progress. Minister of State for Finance Bilal Kayani withdrew the bill from the agenda, saying the government would reintroduce it after incorporating the committee's recommendations to strike a balance between fiscal discipline and autonomy. One major state-owned company was reported to be sitting on a cash surplus of Rs253 billion.
Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
CAT upholds CCP decision against PSM
ISLAMABAD: The Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has upheld the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) decision against Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM), affirming its ruling that the state-owned enterprise had abused its dominant position in the sale of low carbon steel billets. The CCP had imposed a penalty of Rs25 million for PSM's anti-competitive and discriminatory conduct. While acknowledging the violation, the Tribunal partially allowed PSM's appeal and reduced the penalty to Rs5 million, citing the limited duration of non-compliance. The CCP took suo motu notice in 2009 following media reports and a complaint by M/s Frontier Foundry (Pvt.) Ltd., which alleged preferential treatment by PSM towards a particular buyer, Abbas Group, at the expense of other market participants. CCP's investigation revealed that PSM withheld supply of key steel products between November 2008 and January 2009 without any objective justification, thereby violating Section 3 of the Competition Ordinance, 2007. The Tribunal observed that PSM failed to inform all buyers of product availability, enabling exclusive access for a single group and causing harm to other market players. Such conduct, the Tribunal noted, constituted abuse of dominance under Section 3(2)(g) and (h) of the Ordinance. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Tribunal reduces penalty on steel mill
To resolve the issue, the company even offered to transfer 15% (126 million) shares of the steel mill to the government without any payment in exchange for gas supply. photo: file Listen to article The Competition Appellate Tribunal has upheld the Competition Commission of Pakistan's (CCP) decision against Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM), affirming its ruling that the state-owned enterprise abused its dominant position in the sale of low-carbon steel billets. The CCP had imposed a penalty of Rs25 million for PSM's anti-competitive and discriminatory conduct. While acknowledging the violation, the tribunal partially allowed PSM's appeal and reduced the penalty to Rs5 million, citing the limited duration of non-compliance. The CCP took suo motu notice in 2009 following media reports and a complaint from Frontier Foundry that alleged preferential treatment by PSM towards a particular buyer, Abbas Group, at the expense of other market participants. The CCP investigation revealed that PSM withheld supply of key steel products between November 2008 and January 2009 without any objective justification, violating Section 3 of the Competition Ordinance.
