'Spend a day in our life, PM' says mum whose disabled daughter may lose PIP
Holly Wright is a mum of four - three of whom have various levels of disability who could lose hundreds of pounds of support a month under the new rules
Holly Wright, 39, is a mum of four - three of whom have various levels of disability who could lose hundreds of pounds of support a month under the new rules.
Her eldest son Kye, 18, has a learning disability and is eligible for PIP, which is unlikely to be affected.
But Holly's middle daughter, Freya, is nearly 15 and due to transition from family support onto PIP in a year.
Holly fears Freya, who needs speech and language therapy and occupational therapy, won't qualify for PIP once it's reformed.
Freya has autism, sensory processing disorder, and hypermobility.
She said despite a legal assessment confirming Freya's needs, she's struggled to get her local council, Southampton, to pay out for therapies they're required to support.
"You can't get them to fund anything without hammering them in a tribunal," Holly told the Mirror.
"Freya doesn't need as much support [as her brother], but she does need constant reminding about things."
Freya attends a special needs secondary school, and as well as occupational and speech therapy, currently does horse riding as a therapy - something quite common among children with disabilities.
"It helps with her co-ordination, and she has quite serious hypermobility, so it helps her build core muscle strength," Holly said.
But she fears she wouldn't be able to afford the therapy if Freya's money were to change significantly.
Holly estimates that the cash difference if Freya is refused PIP once she outgrows Disability Living Allowance could be as much as £400 a month.
And Holly would almost certainly lose her status as Holly's carer, and the Carer's Allowance top-up of £83.30 a week that comes with it.
"They'd expect me to go back to work," she said. "These children aren't capable of being left at home on their own."
Asked what message she'd like to send to the Prime Minister, Holly said: "Come and spend a day in our life, so you can see how broken everything is."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP clarifies PIP rules after query over 20-metre walking test
A Labour minister has clarified the rules over PIP qualifications as concerns grow that claimants may lose out on payments due to a particular rule. PIP (Personal Independence Payment) is aimed at providing support for the extra costs faced by people living with a long-term health condition or disability. The system offers both daily living and mobility components, each available at standard or enhanced rates based on the impact of someone's health condition. Conservative MP Charlie Dewhirst raised questions in Parliament about how people could be affected by losing access to part of the mobility component due to a 20-metre walking test used for eligibility. He highlighted concerns regarding the "mental health and financial impact of losing entitlement". Beneficiaries receive weekly mobility payments of either £29.20 or £77.05 under this component. The 20-metre rule refers to the 'moving around' activity criteria, which along with another task contributes to points that calculate how much you get for the mobility element. To qualify for the standard rate, a person needs a minimum total of 8 total points across the two activities, with at least 12 needed for the enhanced rate. In order to score any points related to 'moving around', claimants must be able to stand and move more than 50 metres but less than 200 metres, with or without support, which would earn them 4 points. The 20-metre rule comes in with the next category, for those with further reduced mobility, who can stand and then move unaided for more than 20 metres but not exceeding 50 metres. These people are awarded 8 points, qualifying them for the lower rate. Those who can stand and move within the same range, but only with the assistance of an aid or appliance, are entitled to 10 points. Individuals with even greater restrictions, who can stand and move more than one metre but not more than 20 metres, either with or without aid, receive the maximum 12 points, entitling them to the upper rate. Additionally, those who cannot stand at all or cannot move more than one metre without aid or assistance also receive 12 points. DWP minister Sir Stephen Timms replied to the question to clarify the walking distance rule. He said: "For those with physical restrictions, the enhanced rate of the PIP mobility component is for those 'unable' or 'virtually unable' to walk. The 20 metre distance distinguishes between those whose mobility is significantly more limited than others and who face the greater barriers on a day-to-day basis, (those who have the highest need)." The minister also said that distance is not the only factor in assessing a candidate's eligibility for the 'moving around' activity, as another consideration is what he termed 'reliability'. Mr Timms explained: "This means individuals who can walk more than 20 metres can still receive the enhanced rate of the mobility component if they cannot do so safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly or in a reasonable time. "Whilst claimants can only reach an enhanced mobility award in activity 12 if they cannot reliably walk more than 20 metres, they may still qualify for a standard award should they satisfy another descriptor scoring a minimum of 8 points. Claimants can also reach a standard or enhanced mobility award by scoring 8, or 12 points respectively across activities 11 and 12 combined." Should you drop from the enhanced mobility rate of £77.05 weekly, totalling £4,006.60 annually, to the standard rate of £29.20 per week, or £1,518.40 per year, your yearly loss of income would be £2,488.20. Addressing the specific question posed, Mr Timms acknowledged that the DWP hadn't evaluated the mental health consequences of PIP recipients losing their benefit due to the 20-metre rule. Attempting to justify this oversight, he said: "It would be extremely difficult to objectively separate the specific impact of this on mental health from other contributory factors." However, the Labour Government is carrying out a review of PIP assessments, spearheaded by Mr Timms. He said: "The first phase of this work has now begun, which includes speaking to stakeholders to gather views on how best to approach the review, and the terms of reference will be published in due course."
North Wales Chronicle
3 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Minister insists no major welfare rebellion on the horizon after whip quits
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said Vicky Foxcroft was the only frontbencher who had spoken to her about resigning. MPs must 'look to their conscience' when deciding how to vote, Ms Nandy said, but added the Government believes the Commons will back the reforms. Lewisham North MP Ms Foxcroft said she understood 'the need to address the ever-increasing welfare bill' but did not believe the proposed cuts 'should be part of the solution', in her resignation letter to the Prime Minister. Sir Keir Starmer has faced a backlash from some Labour MPs over proposals to reform the welfare system, which are expected to save up to £5 billion a year. Ms Nandy said a 'handful' of backbench MPs had expressed concerns to her about the 'detail' of the Bill, but added she was confident the Government had listened and the package of reforms was 'absolutely right'. 'It would be wrong to say that when you bring forward big reforms, there aren't concerns and there aren't dissenting voices, of course there are. But Vicky is the only frontbencher that I've had a conversation with about resigning,' she told BBC Breakfast. She told Times Radio that Ms Foxcroft 'did the honourable thing' by standing down. 'If you can't stick with collective responsibility in Government, you have to resign. 'She's done the honourable thing. It will enable her to have a voice, and she – as the former shadow disabilities minister – is very keen to use it. 'But I think most Labour MPs, including her, agree with the principle of the reforms that we're making.' She added: 'It's now up to every MP, as it always is at moments of major reform, to look to their conscience and vote the way that they believe is right. 'And we believe this package of reforms are right and will carry the confidence of the House.' Ms Foxcroft is the second Labour frontbencher to go in protest over policy issues after Anneliese Dodds quit as development minister over cuts to the aid budget. Rebel Labour MPs welcomed Ms Foxcroft's decision, with Hartlepool's Jonathan Brash saying he had the 'utmost respect' for her 'principled stand' and Crewe and Nantwich's Connor Naismith saying it 'must have been an incredibly difficult decision but she should be commended for standing by her principles'. She said she had wrestled with whether to resign or remain in the Government and 'fight from within'. 'Sadly it… now seems that we are not going to get the changes I desperately wanted to see. 'I therefore tender my resignation as I know I will not be able to do the job that is required of me and whip – or indeed vote – for reforms which include cuts to disabled people's finances.' Legislation introduced into Parliament on Wednesday includes a tightening of the criteria for the main disability payment in England, the personal independence payment (Pip). Ministers also want to cut the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC), and delay access to it so only those aged 22 and over can claim it. The package of reforms is aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work, but dozens of Labour rebels said last month that the proposals were 'impossible to support'. Pip is aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. Data published on Tuesday showed 3.7 million people in England and Wales claimed Pip, up from 2.05 million in 2019, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion of claimants. Around 800,000 people are set to lose out on the benefit under the Government's proposals, according to an impact assessment published alongside Wednesday's legislation. The assessment also confirmed a previous estimate that 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/30, although the Government repeated this does not take into account the potentially positive impact of £1 billion annual funding by then for measures to support people into work. Ms Foxcroft received hugs and other gestures of support from her Labour backbench colleagues as she appeared in the Commons on Friday as MPs took part in votes on the assisted dying Bill. Several colleagues approached her, offering warm words, hugs, an arm on the shoulder or a pat on the back. Responding to her resignation, a Government spokesperson said: 'This Labour Government was elected to deliver change. The broken welfare system we inherited is failing the sick and most vulnerable and holding too many young people back. It is fair and responsible to fix it. 'Our principled reforms will ensure those who can work should, that those who want to work are properly supported, and that those with most severe disabilities and health conditions are protected.'
Leader Live
3 hours ago
- Leader Live
Minister insists no major welfare rebellion on the horizon after whip quits
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said Vicky Foxcroft was the only frontbencher who had spoken to her about resigning. MPs must 'look to their conscience' when deciding how to vote, Ms Nandy said, but added the Government believes the Commons will back the reforms. Lewisham North MP Ms Foxcroft said she understood 'the need to address the ever-increasing welfare bill' but did not believe the proposed cuts 'should be part of the solution', in her resignation letter to the Prime Minister. Sir Keir Starmer has faced a backlash from some Labour MPs over proposals to reform the welfare system, which are expected to save up to £5 billion a year. Ms Nandy said a 'handful' of backbench MPs had expressed concerns to her about the 'detail' of the Bill, but added she was confident the Government had listened and the package of reforms was 'absolutely right'. 'It would be wrong to say that when you bring forward big reforms, there aren't concerns and there aren't dissenting voices, of course there are. But Vicky is the only frontbencher that I've had a conversation with about resigning,' she told BBC Breakfast. She told Times Radio that Ms Foxcroft 'did the honourable thing' by standing down. 'If you can't stick with collective responsibility in Government, you have to resign. 'She's done the honourable thing. It will enable her to have a voice, and she – as the former shadow disabilities minister – is very keen to use it. 'But I think most Labour MPs, including her, agree with the principle of the reforms that we're making.' She added: 'It's now up to every MP, as it always is at moments of major reform, to look to their conscience and vote the way that they believe is right. 'And we believe this package of reforms are right and will carry the confidence of the House.' Ms Foxcroft is the second Labour frontbencher to go in protest over policy issues after Anneliese Dodds quit as development minister over cuts to the aid budget. Rebel Labour MPs welcomed Ms Foxcroft's decision, with Hartlepool's Jonathan Brash saying he had the 'utmost respect' for her 'principled stand' and Crewe and Nantwich's Connor Naismith saying it 'must have been an incredibly difficult decision but she should be commended for standing by her principles'. She said she had wrestled with whether to resign or remain in the Government and 'fight from within'. 'Sadly it… now seems that we are not going to get the changes I desperately wanted to see. 'I therefore tender my resignation as I know I will not be able to do the job that is required of me and whip – or indeed vote – for reforms which include cuts to disabled people's finances.' Legislation introduced into Parliament on Wednesday includes a tightening of the criteria for the main disability payment in England, the personal independence payment (Pip). Ministers also want to cut the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC), and delay access to it so only those aged 22 and over can claim it. The package of reforms is aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work, but dozens of Labour rebels said last month that the proposals were 'impossible to support'. Pip is aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. Data published on Tuesday showed 3.7 million people in England and Wales claimed Pip, up from 2.05 million in 2019, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion of claimants. Around 800,000 people are set to lose out on the benefit under the Government's proposals, according to an impact assessment published alongside Wednesday's legislation. The assessment also confirmed a previous estimate that 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/30, although the Government repeated this does not take into account the potentially positive impact of £1 billion annual funding by then for measures to support people into work. Ms Foxcroft received hugs and other gestures of support from her Labour backbench colleagues as she appeared in the Commons on Friday as MPs took part in votes on the assisted dying Bill. Several colleagues approached her, offering warm words, hugs, an arm on the shoulder or a pat on the back. Responding to her resignation, a Government spokesperson said: 'This Labour Government was elected to deliver change. The broken welfare system we inherited is failing the sick and most vulnerable and holding too many young people back. It is fair and responsible to fix it. 'Our principled reforms will ensure those who can work should, that those who want to work are properly supported, and that those with most severe disabilities and health conditions are protected.'
