Scrapping GCSE maths doesn't add up
One-third of students reach 16 without a good pass in maths. As Simon Jenkins points out, most will endure a cycle of unsuccessful post-16 resits (GCSEs harm our young people. Ministers should have the guts to abolish them – and start again, 20 March). But it is wrong to call maths obsolete – financial literacy is impossible without a solid foundation in maths, to say nothing of the skills needed in a tech-driven economy.
Rather than abandoning GCSE maths, we need to do more to support the so-called 'forgotten third'. Improving early secondary education in the subject and introducing a short course GCSE focusing on the fundamentals would be a good start. Jenkins' suggestion of abolishing GCSEs is neither desirable nor practical. Enacting such a change would eat up capacity in a system with little to spare.
However, reform is needed. As the OCR exam board noted last year, there is an overreliance on exams at 16, and much of the curriculum is overloaded and outdated. OCR has called for fewer exams – alongside a streamlining of the curriculum in places and more subjects such as digital literacy and climate education. We were pleased to see the curriculum and assessment review's interim report reflect these calls. The most effective way to make things better for students is by improving and building on the solid system we already have.Jill DuffyChief executive, OCR exam board
I took my GCSEs in 2018. I was a capable student, getting the highest grades in my comprehensive school. I went on to a first-class Oxford degree and now a PhD. GCSEs should have been made for me – someone who loved learning and had high academic ambitions, who could think on the spot and learn lots by rote. However, I spent my GCSE year with constant nausea and emetophobia. From a neurodevelopmental perspective, GCSEs come at the worst time for students, a time when there are so many competing pressures, and students are at higher risk of mental illness. The exams don't even have any purpose any more given that education is compulsory up to 18.
Nothing in my academic career – Oxford interviews, finals at Oxford, the gruelling process of applying for PhDs – has ever been as hard as GCSEs were. If they didn't work for me, who do they work for?Name and address supplied
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ex-army chief Lord Dannatt lobbied ministers for millions to support commercial deal
A member of the House of Lords lobbied the government to get financial support worth millions of pounds for a commercial deal he was steering, documents reveal. It is the second time that Richard Dannatt, a former head of the British army, has potentially broken parliamentary rules that forbid lobbying. He is under investigation by the House of Lords authorities over a separate set of allegations, following undercover filming by the Guardian. The new documents reveal Lord Dannatt personally pressed ministers and a senior official to give political and financial backing to a venture he was chairing that was seeking to buy a Cheshire factory from a US owner in 2022. After the owner announced they intended to shut it down, Dannatt increased the pressure, urging the government to help. The crossbench peer made three key approaches. First, he contacted a minister he knew, asking for an introduction to the minister who was best placed to make the decision. Second, he sent an email pressing a civil servant to set up a meeting. 'My intervention is to elevate the discussion to ministerial level,' he wrote. Less than two weeks later, Dannatt and an executive behind the bid met Lee Rowley, the relevant business minister, to push for government backing. At issue is whether Dannatt broke the House of Lords rules that bar peers from lobbying ministers and officials in return for payment or financial incentive. Dannatt said he was not paid for engaging with the government. He said he helped a friend, a leading businessperson in the consortium, attempt to buy the factory as he believed it would save jobs and help the country. 'Put simply, I was helping a friend achieve an outcome very much in the national interest,' he said. Dannatt later received four payments during the period he was chairing the venture. He described these as 'honorarium' payments, but would not say how much he received. He was also the public face and 'chairman' of the 'embryonic' venture. Dannatt said his name and position added credibility to the discussions with the US company. 'I am not sure how else a retired four-star general who sits in the House of Lords could be described to the Americans,' he said, but he had agreed to take the title despite there being 'no board to chair, no meetings to attend or other business to conduct'. His involvement with the consortium, which was ultimately unsuccessful in its bid, ended in February 2023. Dannatt has been under investigation by the House of Lords authorities since March after the Guardian revealed he had offered to secure meetings with ministers for undercover reporters pretending to be commercial clients wanting to lobby the government. He had been secretly filmed telling the undercover reporters he could make introductions within the government and that he would 'make a point of getting to know' the best-placed minister. He is being investigated by the House of Lords commissioner for standards, the watchdog who scrutinises claims of wrongdoing in the upper chamber. Dannatt, 74, has previously denied the allegations, saying: 'I am well aware of … the Lords code of conduct … I have always acted on my personal honour.' He is one of five peers to face conduct inquiries after a months-long investigation by the Guardian. The Lords debate project examined the commercial interests of members of the House of Lords amid concerns their activities were not being properly regulated. It revealed that 91 peers had been paid by commercial companies to give political or policy advice. The new documents regarding Dannatt's communications with the government in June 2022 were disclosed under freedom of information legislation. At the time Dannatt was fronting a group of investors who wanted to buy a fertiliser factory in Cheshire. CF Industries, the US owners, planned to permanently close the factory after energy prices made it unprofitable. The consortium of investors argued that their proposal would save 500 jobs and keep important products used in the agriculture and hospitality industries within the UK. On 10 June 2022, Dannatt emailed a junior business minister he knew, asking if he could tell him who was the minister with responsibility for this area. 'If you could point me in the right direction, ideally with an introduction, and I can take it from there.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion He promoted his UK-based consortium as a better 'economic and political alternative' to the closure of the factory. 'The alternative scenario is that a hedge fund buys the factory, sells off its assets and exits with a profit, allowing 500 workers to become redundant, the UK dependent on imported CO2 and no increase in fertiliser production thus the price remaining high.' An introduction to the right minister was made. Six days later, the peer emailed a senior official in the business department, saying: 'I am aware that [Dannatt's friend] has been talking with officials but my intervention is to elevate the discussion to ministerial level. There are some quite key issues at stake here relating to jobs in the north-west and the price of some key commodities.' On 27 June, Dannatt and Mark Law, his friend who was also leading the consortium, met Rowley, then a minister in the business department. The Financial Times has previously reported that the consortium sought a government loan of up to £10m to help restart the factory. The government refused, arguing that it was purely a commercial matter. The consortium later collapsed. Dannatt said he had not had any formal arrangements or contract with the consortium, nor had he discussed with Law what his future role might have been if they had managed to buy the factory. 'My motivation and purpose was to get a deal over the line, in the national interest,' he said. He said any assumption that he 'would have developed a substantive and remunerated role as chairman and taken an active role in the work of the company' was wrong. He added that if the bid had been successful, 'it would have been a very different matter'. As well as the continuing investigation by the House of Lords authorities, another watchdog has examined Dannatt's conduct. Last month, it cleared Dannatt of being paid by the consortium to lobby the government. Harry Rich, the registrar of consultant lobbyists, is responsible for investigating whether individuals have broken the law by failing to declare that they have received money from a third party to lobby ministers or Whitehall's most senior officials. However the House of Lords watchdog is considering the matter under a different set of rules which take a wider view of lobbying than the registrar of consultant lobbyists. The question now is whether, as the consortium's chair, he advocated for the venture on the understanding that he could at some point benefit personally. This could be a breach of the Lords rules. Dannatt has passed his correspondence with the Guardian about his involvement with the consortium to the House of Lords commissioner who is investigating his conduct when speaking to undercover reporters.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Hong Kong teachers allegedly told to avoid US Independence Day events
Teachers in Hong Kong have been warned to keep themselves and students away from any US Independence Day celebrations as they may breach national security laws, educators have alleged. A text message purportedly sent by the principal of a Hong Kong school to staff said the education bureau's regional education office had reminded them 'to be careful about Independence Day activities organised by the US consulate in Hong Kong, and not to participate to avoid violating the national security law and Hong Kong laws'. The text was published on Edu Lancet, a Facebook page run by a former manager at the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority, Hans Yeung. It urged staff to be diligent in 'protecting' any students who were considering participating, and to discourage them. Another email shared on Edu Lancet and seen independently by the Guardian, told faculty staff that any teacher who received an invitation from an embassy or a foreign organisation funded by an embassy must seek permission to attend from the principal for the purpose of 'maintaining national security'. The Hong Kong education bureau did not confirm or deny the claims in response to questions from the Guardian, but in a statement said it had enacted policies to help schools 'effectively prevent and suppress acts and activities that endanger or are detrimental to national security'. 'Schools have the responsibility to play a good gatekeeper role and to enhance the sensitivity of teachers and students to national security,' it said. The bureau had enacted 'clear guidelines' for schools which required them to 'establish school-based mechanisms and formulate appropriate measures according to their own circumstances and needs to implement various tasks related to safeguarding national security and national security education', it added. The bureau did not answer questions about what laws would be broken by attending any Fourth of July event, or whether such warnings only applied to the US holiday. The US Consulate in Hong Kong has been contacted for comment. Edu Lancet and Yeung, who runs the page to voice concerns from those working with the education system and 'expose the current problems', have been criticised by the Hong Kong government in the past for their posts. The security secretary, Chris Tang, has accused Yeung of 'making incitements' from his now home in the UK. The purported directives fit in with tightening restrictions on Hong Kong's education system, and a push to have the curriculum focus more on national security amid increased control of the city by the Chinese government. After pro-democracy protests wracked the city in 2019, the ruling Chinese Communist party imposed a national security law on Hong Kong which broadly outlawed acts of dissent and opposition as violations against the state. In 2020 the then chief executive, Carrie Lam, blamed the education system for fuelling the protests, setting the tone for an overhaul which is still ongoing. The Hong Kong government has since altered the school curriculum to include teachings on national security in subjects including English language, music, maths and sport, and to focus more on patriotic education. It has also banned texts it sees as endangering national security, including a picture book about sheep created by the city's physiotherapists union, and prosecuted authors. Teachers in Hong Kong have previously told the Guardian they felt pressure to self-censor, in fear of being reported for remarks seen as unpatriotic. Since the start of the 2023-24 school year, all new teachers in public sector schools, direct subsidy scheme schools and kindergartens must sit an exam on Hong Kong's mini constitution, the Basic Law, and the national security law. Hong Kong's education minister, Christine Choi, has repeatedly warned of 'soft resistance' in schools, and this month said educators had to be vigilant against the infiltration of 'hostile forces' through events such as book fairs and extracurricular activities which 'could include undesirable reading materials'. Additional reporting by Jason Tzu Kuan Lu
Times
2 days ago
- Times
Drop in state school pupils going to Oxbridge blamed on pandemic
There were fewer state school pupils admitted to Oxford and Cambridge this academic year, new figures show. Both universities saw a decline in the proportion of their intake from state schools and an increase in those who were privately educated. Oxford's UK state school admissions were at the lowest since 2019, falling from 67.6 per cent in 2023 to 66.2 per cent in 2024 while private school intake increased from 32.4 per cent to 33.8 per cent. Of UK students at Cambridge, 71 per cent came from state schools in autumn 2024, down from 72.6 per cent in 2023, while the proportion from independent schools increased from 27.4 per cent to 29 per cent. A breakdown of Cambridge figures showed 18.8 per cent of those who applied from state schools were successful — 15.9 per cent of applicants from comprehensive schools were admitted compared with 24.4 per cent from grammar schools. For independent schools, the success rate was 21.6 per cent. Both universities said the pandemic had affected their state school intake in recent years. Cambridge said its long-term trend remained positive and Oxford said it had taken more pupils on free school meals. • How Cambridge is making the most of Trump's war on Harvard Dr Martin Thompson, director of undergraduate admissions at Cambridge, said the figures came after a period of rapid growth in state school admissions and remained above pre-Covid levels, when the state school intake was 68.7 per cent. He said: 'We remain fully committed to widening participation. We saw several subjects become much more competitive. Students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, and state school students, are more likely to apply to these courses. The secondary school sector [is] still grappling with disrupted education and attainment gaps.' An Oxford University spokeswoman said that access for those from disadvantaged backgrounds was a priority and that the number of students who had been entitled to free school meals had increased to 8.1 per cent. She added: 'Factors such as socio-economic disadvantage and school performance can make it difficult for some students to access their full potential before applying to university, and therefore we use a range of contextual information to help us to better understand students' achievements.' More women were admitted to Cambridge, with the proportion up from 50 to 52 per cent. At Oxford, the proportion of women admitted fell from last year but was still at 51.9 per cent. China was by far the biggest provider of students from outside the UK, with Cambridge taking 252 students from China and Oxford 566. At both institutions, this was followed by Singapore and Hong Kong. However, applications from both EU students and the rest of the world had fallen from last year at Oxford. Cambridge said that applications from EU students fell slightly but increased from the rest of the world. Far more ethnic minority students were admitted than previous years, accounting for 30.8 per cent of those taken at Oxford and 35.1 per cent at Cambridge. Oxford has seen a sharp increase in applications from students of Bangladeshi and Pakistani heritage, from 2 per cent of all UK students in 2020 to 3.2 per cent in 2024. The proportion of black African or Caribbean students is only marginally higher than last year, at 3.8 per cent. The most competitive course at Oxford was economics and management, with 19 applications per place, followed by computer science and maths and computer science. Psychology, law and computer science were among the courses with the highest intake of deprived students while classics, geography and biomedical sciences were the lowest. • I got a text about my student loan. A bit like an STI clinic calling The most competitive courses at Cambridge were its graduate medicine course, computer science and psychological and behavioural sciences. Those with the highest entry rates for applicants included classics, modern and medieval languages and music, but they also had very low numbers from deprived backgrounds. Of those admitted to Oxford, 85.6 per cent were awarded A*AA or better at A-level and 45.5 per cent achieved at least three A* grades. At Cambridge, 17.7 per cent of arts students and 39.3 per cent of science students achieved three A*s. A further 5,600 unsuccessful students went on to achieve at least A*AA in their three best A-levels. The average amount owed by new graduates has broken through the £50,000 barrier for the first time, new government figures show. Graduates now owe an average of £53,000 as soon as they start repaying their loans, up from £48,270 a year ago. The total amount owed to the government is £266 billion, by students who took out higher education loans in England. Graduates now repay 9 per cent of their salary once they earn above £21,000 and the loan is not written off until 40 years after they start paying.
