Ukraine says 'massive' Russian drone attack on Kyiv
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Ukraine said Monday "another massive attack" on Kyiv by Russian drones was underway, a day after the country's top military commander vowed to increase the "scale and depth" of strikes on Russia.
Diplomatic efforts to end the three-year war have stalled, with the last direct meeting between the two sides almost three weeks ago and no follow-up talks scheduled.
"Another massive attack on the capital. Possibly, several waves of enemy drones," said a statement from Tymur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv's military administration.
Two people were hospitalised in the Solomianski district, said Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko, and two others were injured near a metro station in the Sviatochinski district, Tkachenko later said.
AFP journalists in Kyiv heard the buzzing of a drone flying over the city centre and explosions, as well as gunfire.
They saw around 10 people sheltering in the basement of a residential building in central Kyiv waiting for the attack to end, most of them scrolling their phones for news.
The latest strikes came after Ukrainian commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky vowed to intensify strikes on Russia.
"We will not just sit in defence. Because this brings nothing and eventually leads to the fact that we still retreat, lose people and territories," he told reporters, including AFP.
Syrsky said Ukraine would continue its strikes on Russian military targets, which he said had proved "effective".
"Of course, we will continue. We will increase the scale and depth," he said.
- Fair response -
Ukraine has launched retaliatory strikes on Russia throughout the war, targeting energy and military infrastructure sometimes hundreds of kilometres from the front line.
Kyiv says the strikes are a fair response to deadly Russian attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure and civilians.
At least four people were killed in an overnight Russian strike on an apartment building in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk, while a strike on a Ukrainian army training ground later in the day killed three others, officials said.
In wide-ranging remarks, Syrsky conceded that Russia had some advantages in drone warfare, particularly in making fibre-optic drones that are tethered and difficult to jam.
"Here, unfortunately, they have an advantage in both the number and range of their use," he said.
He also claimed that Ukraine still held 90 square kilometres (35 square miles) of territory in Russia's Kursk region, where Kyiv launched an audacious cross-border incursion last August.
"These are our pre-emptive actions in response to a possible enemy offensive," he said.
Russia said in April that it had gained full control of the Kursk region and denies that Kyiv has a presence there.
Russia occupies around a fifth of Ukraine and claims to have annexed four Ukrainian regions as its own since launching its invasion in 2022 -- in addition to Crimea, which it captured in 2014.
Kyiv has accused Moscow of deliberately sabotaging a peace deal to prolong its full-scale offensive on the country and to seize more territory.
The Russian army said Sunday that it had captured the village of Petrivske in Ukraine's northeast Kharkiv region.
Russian forces also sent at least 47 drones and fired three missiles towards Ukraine between late Saturday and early Sunday, the Ukrainian air force said.
ant-cad/jxb/tc/fox
Originally published as Ukraine says 'massive' Russian drone attack on Kyiv
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Herald Sun
an hour ago
- Herald Sun
Iran vows retaliation for US strikes as Israel keeps up attacks
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Tehran threatened on Monday to inflict "serious" damage in retaliation for US strikes on the Islamic republic's nuclear facilities, as the Iran-Israel war entered its 11th day despite calls for de-escalation. Aerial assaults meanwhile raged on, with air raid sirens sounding across Israel and AFP journalists reporting several blasts were heard over Jerusalem. The Israeli military said it had struck missile sites in western Iran as well as "six Iranian regime airports" across the country, destroying fighter jets and helicopters. President Donald Trump said US warplanes used "bunker buster" bombs to target sites in Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz, boasting the strikes had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear capabilities. Other officials said it was too soon to assess the true impact on Iran's nuclear programme, which Israel and some Western states consider an existential threat. Iranian armed forces spokesman Ebrahim Zolfaghari said on state television that the US "hostile act", following more than a week of Israeli bombardments, would "pave the way for the extension of war in the region". "The fighters of Islam will inflict serious, unpredictable consequences on you with powerful and targeted (military) operations," he warned. Global markets reacted nervously, with oil prices jumping more than four percent early Monday. China urged both Iran and Israel to prevent the conflict from spilling over, warning of potential economic fallout. Oman, a key mediator in the stalled Iran-US nuclear talks, condemned the US strikes and called for calm. Iran's foreign ministry accused Washington of betraying diplomacy. "Future generations will not forget that the Iranians were in the middle of a diplomatic process with a country that is now at war with us," said ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei. Britain, France and Germany called on Iran "not to take any further action that could destabilise the region". As the world awaited Iran's response, supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called the bombing campaign Israel launched on June 13 "a big mistake". - 'Regime change' - US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called on China to help deter Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for one-fifth of the world's oil supply. With Iran threatening US bases in the region, the State Department issued a worldwide alert cautioning Americans abroad. In central Tehran on Sunday, protesters waved flags and chanted slogans against US and Israeli attacks. In the province of Semnan east of the capital, 46-year-old housewife Samireh said she was "truly shocked" by the strikes. "Semnan province is very far from the nuclear facilities targeted, but I'm very concerned for the people who live near," she told AFP. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said the US strikes revealed Washington was "behind" Israel's campaign against the Islamic republic and vowed a response. After the Pentagon stressed the goal of American intervention was not to topple the Iranian government, Trump openly toyed with the idea. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. "But if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Hours later he doubled down on emphasising the success of his strikes. "Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term!" Trump wrote, without sharing the images he was referencing. At a Pentagon press briefing earlier in the day, top US general Dan Caine said "initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, meanwhile, said his country's bombardments would "finish" once the stated objectives of destroying Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities have been achieved. "We are very, very close to completing them," he said. - 'Blow up' - Israeli strikes on Iran have killed more than 400 people, Iran's health ministry said. Iran's attacks on Israel have killed 24 people, according to official figures. Rafael Grossi, director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council that craters were visible at the Fordo facility, but it had not been possible to assess the underground damage. "Armed attacks on nuclear facilities should never take place," he added. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who was due to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, had accused the United States of deciding to "blow up" nuclear diplomacy with its intervention in the war. While Russia condemned the Israeli and US strikes, it has not offered military help and has downplayed its obligations under a sweeping strategic partnership agreement signed with Tehran just months ago. On Sunday, Russia, China and Pakistan circulated a draft resolution with other Security Council members that calls for an "immediate ceasefire" in Iran. burs-ami/dv Originally published as Iran vows retaliation for US strikes as Israel keeps up attacks
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Diplomacy can't deliver the quick wins Trump craves. But neither can war
The tumultuous '20s get ever more tumultuous. After the pandemic in 2020, the storming of the US Capitol in 2021, Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Hamas's attacks on Israel in 2023 and the re-election of Donald Trump in 2024, now, at the midpoint of 2025, comes the US entry into the war against Iran. Wearing a crimson 'Make America Great Again' cap in the Situation Room of the White House, the US commander-in-chief oversaw his country's most significant military intervention in more than 20 years. Not since George W. Bush gave the go-ahead in 2003 for US forces to invade Iraq has a president made such a potentially consequential decision. The chaos of what happened after the fall of Saddam Hussein – which the brutal theocracy in Tehran revelled in fomenting – now hangs over America's latest Middle East adventure. But there is also the possibility that Trump could achieve a feat that eluded his predecessors: elimination of Iran's nuclear threat without heavy American loss of life. With so many unknown unknowns, it is too early to say. Already, the crisis has put on display so many hallmarks of Trump's leadership. The utter unpredictability of a president who signalled last week that a window had opened up for diplomacy. His readiness to gamble. His impatience with the slow pace of negotiated solutions – it took the Obama administration and its European Union, Chinese and Russian partners two years to conclude the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal which Trump withdrew from in his first term. There was the ritualistic trashing of European allies, who conducted talks with the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva on Friday. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us,' he said as those talks came to an inconclusive end, even though the UK foreign secretary David Lammy had flown direct from Washington to Geneva carrying a message from the Trump administration to Iran's leadership. Lengthy diplomacy seems to bore this fabled dealmaker who boasted of ending the Ukraine war in a single day. Loading The crisis has demonstrated Trump's penchant for the dramatisation of world affairs. Always, he is centre stage. Each unfolding day is vested with the suspense of an episodic cliffhanger. Even when blood is about to be shed, a factor in his decision-making seems to be the sheer entertainment value of his actions. The flourishes he used in his speech to the nation following the B2 stealth bomber mission was classic Trump. 'We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before,' he boasted of his collaboration with the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The 'great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines' had carried out 'an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades', he added, using the patois of a carnival barker rather than a statesman. Ahead of the US strikes, we were also reminded of his fixation with winning a Nobel Peace Prize, something his nemesis, Barack Obama, achieved, rather undeservedly, early on in his first term. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan,' he moaned on Truth Social, as he cited five conflicts in which his administration had purportedly played a mediating role. In full victim mode, Trump complained he would be overlooked for the prize 'no matter what' he accomplished. Hours after this self-pitying diatribe, he took America to war. Winning is so central to his thinking. Israel, after days of strikes on Tehran and the nuclear sites, clearly had the upper hand. In joining Netanyahu – who stroked Trump's ego afterwards by praising him for 'courageously leading the free world' – he felt he was joining the winning side.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Diplomacy can't deliver the quick wins Trump craves. But neither can war
The tumultuous '20s get ever more tumultuous. After the pandemic in 2020, the storming of the US Capitol in 2021, Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Hamas's attacks on Israel in 2023 and the re-election of Donald Trump in 2024, now, at the midpoint of 2025, comes the US entry into the war against Iran. Wearing a crimson 'Make America Great Again' cap in the Situation Room of the White House, the US commander-in-chief oversaw his country's most significant military intervention in more than 20 years. Not since George W. Bush gave the go-ahead in 2003 for US forces to invade Iraq has a president made such a potentially consequential decision. The chaos of what happened after the fall of Saddam Hussein – which the brutal theocracy in Tehran revelled in fomenting – now hangs over America's latest Middle East adventure. But there is also the possibility that Trump could achieve a feat that eluded his predecessors: elimination of Iran's nuclear threat without heavy American loss of life. With so many unknown unknowns, it is too early to say. Already, the crisis has put on display so many hallmarks of Trump's leadership. The utter unpredictability of a president who signalled last week that a window had opened up for diplomacy. His readiness to gamble. His impatience with the slow pace of negotiated solutions – it took the Obama administration and its European Union, Chinese and Russian partners two years to conclude the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal which Trump withdrew from in his first term. There was the ritualistic trashing of European allies, who conducted talks with the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva on Friday. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us,' he said as those talks came to an inconclusive end, even though the UK foreign secretary David Lammy had flown direct from Washington to Geneva carrying a message from the Trump administration to Iran's leadership. Lengthy diplomacy seems to bore this fabled dealmaker who boasted of ending the Ukraine war in a single day. Loading The crisis has demonstrated Trump's penchant for the dramatisation of world affairs. Always, he is centre stage. Each unfolding day is vested with the suspense of an episodic cliffhanger. Even when blood is about to be shed, a factor in his decision-making seems to be the sheer entertainment value of his actions. The flourishes he used in his speech to the nation following the B2 stealth bomber mission was classic Trump. 'We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before,' he boasted of his collaboration with the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The 'great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines' had carried out 'an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades', he added, using the patois of a carnival barker rather than a statesman. Ahead of the US strikes, we were also reminded of his fixation with winning a Nobel Peace Prize, something his nemesis, Barack Obama, achieved, rather undeservedly, early on in his first term. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan,' he moaned on Truth Social, as he cited five conflicts in which his administration had purportedly played a mediating role. In full victim mode, Trump complained he would be overlooked for the prize 'no matter what' he accomplished. Hours after this self-pitying diatribe, he took America to war. Winning is so central to his thinking. Israel, after days of strikes on Tehran and the nuclear sites, clearly had the upper hand. In joining Netanyahu – who stroked Trump's ego afterwards by praising him for 'courageously leading the free world' – he felt he was joining the winning side.
