How rival college hoops coaches see the 2026 NBA Draft's first-round prospects

Throughout the year, NBA scouts ask questions of the college coaches who face the prospects they're evaluating to get a handle on the upcoming draft class. You can get a good assessment of a player from his own coaches, but the most honest assessments come from those who face him.
Over the last few weeks, I've done the same, calling multiple coaches from each conference to get their scouting reports on the top players in this draft class. I granted the coaches anonymity in exchange for their candor, took the best of what each coach had to say and combined the report into one voice.
Advertisement
Below are scouting reports on every first-round college prospect in Sam Vecenie's latest mock draft. Players are listed in order of Vecenie's rankings and numbered by where they went off the board in the mock draft. Part two, on second-round prospects and sleepers, will publish Friday.
What struck me was how much better offensively he was this year than his reputation. Everyone's going to talk about the motor. I thought he was more a hard-playing defensive guy, and what he's able to do as a playmaker, passer, and obviously the way he shot the ball was way better than anybody thought he was going to. His ability to fit in with anybody is gonna be his greatest asset. He's going to be a star because he's just elite in his role. His defensive tenacity and ability to cover ground on that end is something that separates him.
He's got the star qualities about him, probably an all-NBA ceiling. Does he have competitive juices of a Jimmy Butler type of dude? Is that somebody that he could be comparable to down the line, in terms of impact in the game? He's going to have to tighten up his handle. He's going to have to become a much better catch-and-shoot guy to be the number one on an NBA team, but the ceiling is extremely high.
He's got a great body, great body control, great finisher at the basket. Obviously has to work on his jump shot, but he can make it. Scores at all three levels. I don't know how well he'll do with the ball out of his hands. I can see him playing a role like a Shai Gilgeous-Alexander type. I know that's the MVP. I'm not saying he's going to be Shai, but I can see his ceiling being that, because he's really, really good with the ball in his hands, really good getting downhill. He can make plays for others, and he can make plays for himself. Good size for a point guard in the NBA.
Advertisement
Dylan is a worker, man. I felt like he kept getting better and better and evolved as a player, which speaks to why he's such a coveted pick. Those guys are picked apart, and on that team, he had to do so much and was the focus of our scouting report and probably everybody else's. Tip of the cap to him and the guys at Rutgers for getting him better. Got pedigree. Dad was in the NBA. Mom was the one who really worked him out a lot. He's going to have a head start ahead of every one because of his dad and his mom.
Huge upside. Has the potential to be a 3-and-D guy at a high level. Big time athlete. Straight-line driver. Can make corner 3s. Love the joy that he plays with. His best basketball is in front of him, but I think he's talented and athletic enough he'll be able to find some spot minutes early.
His comp is Victor Oladipo. Ceiling, if he figures it out, he's Dwyane Wade. My bet is he's a good pro that probably plays eight to 10 years. I don't think he is ever going to be a centerpiece like Wade. When he gets downhill, the length will bug him. We were s— defensively, and he didn't really hurt us. I don't know if he has enough offensive firepower to be a centerpiece. But he could have a good career where he's an Oladipo type, a good player for a couple years and then one of the better players on a team for a couple years.
He wasn't as tall as they say he was. He has some special flashes and seems to enjoy playing. He had a great motor and a good spirit about him. He has the capability to play defense and probably didn't defend as well as he could at Rutgers. Some might wonder why they didn't win more with two lottery picks, but those guys were freshmen playing against older teams. When you invest a lot of money, like Rutgers did, in two guys, your supporting cast is not great. That's not their fault.
The upside for Ace is his shooting. He's a big-time shotmaker. He makes NBA type shots. He makes tough shots. If he can find a niche and take care of his body, he should have a good career.
Advertisement
One of the most naturally gifted scorers as a freshman that we've seen in our time in the league. I don't know if he's big enough to be a wing, but I think he can be combo. He can come off a ball screen. He can get separation on his shot. His shotmaking ability and his bad shotmaking ability is elite. They kind of just gave him the ball and let him go, and you don't see many people in college, much less freshmen, being able to make those types of shots. His comp is probably Jamal Crawford. But how much better does he make his team?
I do think winning has to come into play at some point. Not to say he's not a winner, but it wasn't enough to be able to take them over the hump. When Markelle Fultz went number one, Washington won nine games that year. Not sure why you would think that would be your franchise guy. And I know that (Rutgers') Dylan Harper is gonna go second. I understand it's not everything.
His whole thing is going to be how is he going to continue to develop defensively and impact winning on that end of the floor. How much can he improve in being able to physically guard one through four, one through five in the NBA, that's going to be the biggest question mark. But he's a dynamic scorer and somebody who I think should have a really long career in the NBA. If nothing else, he's gonna be somebody who's gonna give you a great punch off the bench for a long time.
He'll be able to play right away because of the shooting and IQ. He can post up a mismatch. We tried to play him off the line, because he is an elite shooter. Great release. Great footwork. If he drives left, he wants it to his pull-up. Drives right, he's more getting to the basket. I didn't have him as a natural passer, but he knows how to make the right play. We tried to stay attached to him. He was able to get in the paint and he's so fundamental playing off two feet. He bullied our wings a couple times at the basket. Very even-keeled personality.
What everyone's gonna say is, what's he gonna do defensively in space? Duke kind of masked and hid that a little bit. He had Khaman Maluach behind him, and they were switching a lot. I don't think we quite got to see that. It wouldn't surprise me if that's the fourth-best player on a championship team.
He's an upside guy. He's dynamic off of a ball screen. He's got great speed, really good change of direction. He's got good moxie. He is the size of a modern NBA point guard. I think that's pretty evident just in terms of what he was able to do against SEC defenses this year. Reminds me of Jordan Clarkson.
What would help him is if he went to an established franchise where he can kind of blend in versus going to a losing team. I don't know if he's gonna turn your franchise around. He's gonna need a lot of other pieces to go along with him. He's a talented kid, but is he a consistent winner in the NBA? I don't know that answer. He only shot 28 percent from 3. With how much he turned the ball over and some of his on-the-court antics, I'd have some hesitancy taking him as a first-rounder. Think he'll be in the G-League a lot next year.
Advertisement
I love his size. He's the opposite of Ace Bailey. He was bigger in person than I thought he was on tape and played bigger. I love his length. I love his pace. I'd seen him play as a younger kid in some of the other events, and I loved how he adjusted to the college game and speed.
He was really good early on, especially shooting the ball, and tapered off some as the season went along. It'll be interesting to see how the speed of the game at the NBA level affects him from the point guard position. That's a tough position to play in the NBA. There's not many foreign point guards in the NBA. But he has a big-time skill set.
The thing that stood out when he played us, they were kicking our ass — up 20 — the defensive possession at the end of the game where the game is basically done, he was just communicating at one of the highest levels that I've seen and that's impressive for a freshman. Empowering some of the guys who weren't playing as much to get over screens because he was there to help. His mouth was continuously moving. I think that type of maturity is going to really help him early in his NBA career. He wasn't able to show he could shoot at Duke, but that's something he's done well in workouts. He's got the size and is a great lob threat and shot blocker.
He's probably not switchable at that level. And so now in drop coverage, is he able to protect the rim and impact the game defensively at a high enough level to stay on the court? I don't think he's as good as Dereck Lively was coming out. Dereck moved so well laterally and could really change ends quickly. I don't get that same feel from Maluach. But I was high on him after seeing him play against us, just because of the intangibles.
Physically, one of the more impressive players that we've had in our league. Able to get to his spots. Exceptional low-post scorer. Finishes at a pretty good clip around the rim. I don't think he took a step back last year, but his team did take a step back, which I think hurt him a little bit as far as just his productivity and his numbers.
But he was still pretty efficient on the offensive end. He made nine 3s this past season, so has shown the ability to shoot it. Obviously needs to improve on that consistency to have a chance to play some four in the NBA because he's too small to play the five. Turns the ball over a little too much. That'd be the one other area that he really needs to improve, but as far as going and getting rebounds, even though he's 6-8, he's got really long arms and you would think that you'd have a rebound and he would just go and get it.
If we were talking about drafting somebody in the late 80s to 90s, I would think he looks like a top-10 guy. I don't know how well his game is going to translate in today's NBA. Obviously he's going to get drafted and he's a talent. But what's his position going to be? Who is he going to defend and can he defend on the perimeter consistently enough to justify keeping him out there? It would have to be the right team. If he's able to handle the ball better and knock down open shots, he's got the other pieces to make it work.
Advertisement
Love him. I think he plays as long as he wants if his 3 ball goes in consistently, which I think it will. And then defensively he can guard perimeter-oriented guys, which is his next step. Feels like there's a ton of guys like him at 6-8 to 6-9 that can make 3s and just be out there, you know? I don't think he's a franchise guy, but I think he plays for a while. He fits a prototype. Size, length, shooting. And he's a good athlete. Each team in the NBA has a guy like him.
I was a big fan of his. Love the skill. Big. A mismatch nightmare. Could do a lot on the basketball floor. He's a Nikola Jokić type with his skill set and the way he uses his body. Great hands, great feet and a better defender than he was given credit for. I don't worry about the speed of the game with him anymore. They had a really good team, but he was the anchor of that thing. So I think he'll be just fine. His skill set is phenomenal and his IQ is better than what a lot of people give him credit for. He's working on his body. If he can figure out how to get his body in elite shape and play every single night, I think he's an All-Star.
The path he took to get here is pretty remarkable — starting at a Division III school and basically being an unknown player. I think he's a mid-first-round pick and probably still inching his way up. Instantly gonna fit the 3-and-D prototype that the NBA values so much. I don't think he's close to being where he can get to either, which is kind of what they're looking for too. As he develops, he'll have a chance to be a pretty good scorer, but he has immediate stock in terms of his ability to make shots and defend with his positional size.
He's a winning player. In addition to his shooting, he can post, gets to the basket and plays through contact. His character is probably the greatest thing he's got. Just a great guy. I think he is going to be somebody in the NBA that really brings a lot of value to the locker room.
He's obviously got a high level of skill. Plays with a really great motor for a young guy, great length, great hands. The worst-case scenario for him would be Thomas Bryant. Best is way, way, better than that. He just plays the game the right way. Has the physical tools, skill with the ball in his hands. He'll be better with better shooting around him because he has the ability to post but also has the ability to catch lobs. Could be used as a hub in some ways in the offense because he is a pretty good passer.
Their team was significantly different without him. Against us, he was more of a post player. I thought if he were to come back another year, he would be an absolute load to deal with once he added strength, added everything. He was one of those guys that — this is kind of a tell of a good player — you feel like you do a good job against him, but then you pick up the stat sheet and there's still a lot of production. He still has to work on decision making, but he's just so young for his class that I would bet on him. He could be an All-Star.
Man, that one's hard. He's a guy that's really intriguing just because of his positional size and being able to play the point and play in pick-and-roll. The spacing in the NBA may be better suited to his game. But I don't trust his jumper. I know he's worked at it. Does that develop? And how's he gonna score 2s? So if you can't score 2s, then you don't put two on the ball, and if you don't put two on the ball, you can't pass. That's my question. I don't know how he's going to do that. I don't think he can create his own.
But damn, he can really, really pass. Like, elite, elite. Both hands, both corners.
Love Wolf. He was better than I thought he would be. He played at his pace and never got sped up. I think he needs to work on his shooting to be a floor spacer. But he's tremendously skilled. He could have a tough time guarding, but he's probably the most ready to find a way into a role on an NBA team among Big Ten prospects just because of his age. I'm not sure what exactly that looks like. It's probably depending on the franchise.
Advertisement
Versatile. Tough. He was a lot bigger in person than I realized. His rebounding seemed like he had a level of confidence as a freshman that was impressive. Obviously got hurt during the year, but he's a guy that impacted them a ton because of his ability to get to the foul line. Will that translate as well or will he be just more of a guy that's making catch-and-shoot corner 3s? Because at UConn he was a decision maker, and I don't know if that's going to translate as well as it did in college.
I wouldn't call him an elite shooter, but a very good shooter. Defensively, he's not better. Better than I thought he'd be. I think he has a high ceiling. Physically has to get stronger, but I think with his feel, his knack for getting fouled and his competency defensively, he's an NBA starter at some point.
It's a bit funky with him because he's 6 feet and he's not a point guard. His measurements were not great. Small. He would have to be a Lou Williams type guy. I think he'll struggle a little because he is not a very speedy guy. He's not tricky with the ball. Obviously had a great freshman year. But he would be one that I would worry about because of his size.
Very, very, very talented. I love his size, his pace. Shotmaker. Scoring mentality. Before our game against Illinois, he was getting in a full sweat workout in warmups, like pro style. That was his routine. I was super impressed.
The physicality of the NBA game is what I worry about with him, but he wasn't rattled by the moment. In the guts of the game, he was really, really good. He's so young. If he gets in the right situation where he gets a vet to take him under his wing, he's a phenomenal talent, he has a chance to be really good.
Great skill set. Makes big plays, passes well, rebounds, tips, deflects, gets to the ball. And those are huge transferable skills at the next level. You look at the score and you're like, he got the quietest 20-and-8 ever. He's not a high-volume guy. Super efficient. Just knew his game, played to his game, really rebounded from the guard spot, which I think is so valuable.
And the thing to me that translates the most is work ethic. He has really, really transformed his body. We've seen the fruits of his labor at a period where he's not exhausted by the process of it. Will he be a superstar? I don't know. But he's a guy that just ends up sticking in the league because of all the things that it seems like he's about in terms of his work ethic and his competitiveness and just the willingness and impact on winning. Their other guys were good, but he made those guys way better than what they were, in my opinion. I think that's what makes him special.
Advertisement
Grateful he's gone. He's for sure a long-term NBA guy, especially with the NBA game trending back to bigger guys. You watch the playoffs, and these teams are playing 11 to 13 guys. They're just mixing combination lineups. I just don't see how he can't be in those games. He has an incredible feel and IQ for the game. His size is real. His ability to execute the drop coverage that a lot of NBA teams utilize with their big is elite. He's got a great feel for it. He has a motor. Sometimes you hear motor and it's guys who are just fast running around. But that dude does not get tired. He came out like four minutes a game maybe? And he's sprinting up and down the floor.
And then offensively, man, I think he's just gotten better and better. He finishes well with both hands around the paint. He's about as consistent as they can be. He actually can shoot and he improved and showed his 3-point shooting a bit where you had to guard him. He's got to speed up the mechanics some, but his ability to protect the rim and then his IQ at being able to play pick-and-roll defense and catch lobs, he'll be a guy that will be on a roster for a really long time and could anchor a second team as a five man with the upside to be a starter down the line.
Elite shotmaker. His ability to go from playing off the ball to being their point guard and showing the ability to not only take over games offensively shooting it but also facilitating it while cutting down on his turnovers speaks to his ability to find a place to play at the next level offensively.
Defensively, he's got a lot of work to do. He gets lost out there on the floor. He's a bit of a liability, but there's not many people that I've ever seen play that can immediately make up for their defensive mistakes by knocking down three straight 3s in a row. He's so elite offensively that you're almost willing to put up with his inability to defend because he's that good on that end of the floor. But for him to be able to play consistent minutes, he's got to get better defensively.
Obviously has the size and the frame. Was a very efficient player, really didn't take bad shots, which I think is a positive. He works his tail off. And quite honestly, even playing in the SEC, he was a lot tougher than I thought he was going to be when he first got into the league. He's just a good-natured, soft-spoken, nice person. Better skill level than what you think. Still not consistent enough as a shooter, but when it comes to upside, athleticism, being able to slide his feet, guard multiple positions, make a standstill 3, I like his upside. He should be in the lottery consideration. You can plug and play him and put him in a rotation as your second-unit guy and keep developing him with other really good players around him.
Big and can really shoot. Really good rebounder. His shooting numbers were excellent. He took some really bad off the dribble 3s. If you take his off-the-dribble 3 out of his overall percentage, then the numbers just skyrocket. (Raynaud was 2 of 18 on off-the-dribble 3s and 65 of 110 on catch-and-shoot 3s.) He would take a lot of tough shots at the college level. But as a secondary guy and a big that can shoot, I think there's a lot of offensive value. Good athlete, but not like elite. The physicality of the NBA game, curious to see how he makes that transition. He averaged over three offensive rebounds a game, so there isn't a motor issue.
Defensively, can he drop or can he switch? Is he good at either of those? Not a great rim protector. His defense will determine his upside, but at a minimum, he's pretty skilled, a good passer and can really shoot. He averaged 20 and almost 12 and made some big, big shots in big moments. That's pretty darn good. He'll find a way to make it.
Advertisement
I think he's going to be a better NBA player than he was a college player. His game just translates better to the NBA as a 3-and-D guy. I've had 20-plus people in the NBA reach out. He's got all the tangibles. He's 6-9 with a 7-foot plus wingspan. St. Joe's could have utilized him a little bit more, but it's just hard to do that when you've got arguably the best point guard and the best shooting guard in our league with Xzayvier Brown and Erik Reynolds. They didn't run a fancy system. They just kind of just balled out.
He probably didn't rebound it as well as you would think given his size and athleticism inside of the A-10, but he's one of those guys that fits in with the modern day NBA. He's not great putting the ball down. But as a 3-and-D, versatile swing, he can guard up or down with his size and lateral quickness and ability to make spot 3s. He's got to improve his ability to shoot off movement, but he can make catch-and-shoot kickout 3s as a really good complementary piece.
I don't love him. I think people get to the point where they kind of throw out that 3-and-D label pretty loosely just because he's got the size and athleticism that that prototype has. But I think he's got a ways to go to kind of realize that. I didn't see the super high-level defense. He shot a good percentage from 3 (37.9 percent), but he was the guy for UNC who you helped off. We were daring him to shoot and he made some shots. But nothing really stood out about his offensive game. I didn't see a legit handle, and I didn't see a guy that was overly aggressive either.
He would have been better served coming back playing a bigger role offensively to show that he can do a little bit more. Is he worth a shot because he has the attributes they're looking for? Yes. He'll probably carve out a role in the NBA. I just don't know if he's an impactful player.
(Top illustration photos: Joe Buglewicz, Jared C. Tilton / Getty Images)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

12 minutes ago

• Yahoo

"Those three guys are not gonna win anything" - Shannon Sharpe urges the Lakers to trade Austin Reaves and improve their team

"Those three guys are not gonna win anything" - Shannon Sharpe urges the Lakers to trade Austin Reaves and improve their team originally appeared on Basketball Network. Time is ticking for the Los Angeles Lakers if they want to maximize their championship prowess with the tandem of Luka Doncic and LeBron James. With "The King" turning 41 next season, the window to chase a championship with him is narrow at best. Advertisement That is why Shannon Sharpe feels the Purple and Gold need to act strategically, and that includes considering a tough decision — trading their most valuable trade chip, Austin Reaves, to pursue a traditional center that can help elevate the game of both James and Doncic. Reaves is the only asset that the Lakers have After averaging 15.9 points and 5.5 assists during the 2023-24 campaign, AR proved himself to be one of the most reliable no. 3 options in the league. As a result, the franchise rewarded him with a four-year, $53 million contract before the start of this season. And "Hillbilly Kobe" didn't disappoint, averaging 20.2 points in the 2024-25 season, asserting himself as one of the most valuable pieces in their core. During the 2025 trade deadline, the Lakers seemed determined not to entertain any trade offers for Reaves. However, as the legendary NFL tight end said, now is the time to consider. With the 6'5" shooting guard now reaching his borderline All-Star level, more and more teams will be interested in offering him a lucrative contract worthy of his growth and talent. Advertisement On his podcast, Sharpe argued that from a team perspective, the Lakers need to offer their most valuable piece to acquire a battle-tested rim protector and pick-and-lob threat who can dominate the paint alongside the marquee duo. "The Lakers can only pay him so much. You're gonna go somewhere and get a big payday anyway. You ain't trying to stay with the Lakers when you get $200 million, and they can't give you that," Sharpe said. "Yeah, he has improved every single year; he's a hell of a player." "But those three guys are not gonna win anything. Now, I'm not saying you gotta package him, but they need a (traditional) big. He's the only valuable piece that they have," he added. Related: "He's Mr. Discipline, Mr. Straight, Mr. Conservative" - Dennis Rodman admits Gregg Popovich was "the big problem" in San Antonio The Lakers should never trade AR As tempting as it is to see Reaves' name used as trade bait, the truth is that the Lakers should not let go of him so easily. The 26-year-old is not an ordinary rising star but a homegrown fan favorite. Suppose the organization has put its faith in him. In that case, he has rewarded that trust by improving each season, regardless of the coaching changes or shifting roles. Advertisement Whether Bron or Luka was out of the lineup, AR stepped up and delivered, proving that he's more than capable of handling pressure on the big stage. And that is exactly the type of selfless, gritty player who can help build long-term success. He might not have individual accolades to his name. Still, with how Reaves has performed in the 2024-25 season, he was better as a third option than the second option of some teams and, in a handful of cases, more impactful than the production of the team's best player. Thus, the Lakers should definitely have plans for the future now that the Doncic era has begun. Still, trading proven youngsters like Reaves would only be a lose-lose move, as they would be giving up on a selfless, team-oriented player only to add another experiment to their roster. Related: "With Jordan, they don't talk about the the playoff losses" - Michael Beasley says LeBron is '100%' the GOAT over MJ This story was originally reported by Basketball Network on May 28, 2025, where it first appeared.

Yahoo

12 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Stephen A. Smith Updates Tyrese Haliburton's 'Superstar' Status After Game 6 of the NBA Finals

Stephen A. Smith Updates Tyrese Haliburton's 'Superstar' Status After Game 6 of the NBA Finals originally appeared on Athlon Sports. As the NBA season looks forward to the final game of the 2024-25 season, there will be a lot of anticipation leading up to Game 7 of the NBA Finals. Advertisement The Indiana Pacers were able to keep their championship hopes alive after a complete blowout in their final home game of the season, beating the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game 6 with a final score of 108-91. Jun 19, 2025; Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana Pacers guard Andrew Nembhard (2) dribbles defended by Oklahoma City Thunder forward Jalen Williams (8) in the first quarter during game six of the 2025 NBA Finals at Gainbridge Fieldhouse© Trevor Ruszkowski-Imagn Images Defense was the key factor to the Pacers' dominant victory, as Indiana made Oklahoma City turn the ball over 21 times compared to their 11. This helped the Pacers take 92 shots, while the Thunder attempted just 74. One key headline leading up to the game was the health status of the Pacers' point guard, Tyrese Haliburton. Haliburton has been dealing with a calf strain, and it left him labeled as questionable heading into the series-determining game. Advertisement He was able to play in the game, and his calf was able to hold up as he finished with 14 points, five assists, and two steals in a limited 23 minutes. Indiana Pacers guard Tyrese Haliburton reacts after a play against the Oklahoma City Thunder during Game 6 of the 2025 NBA Finals at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on June 19, Terada-Imagn Images ESPN's Stephen A. Smith was left unimpressed, however, and he was able to give an update on Haliburton's "superstar" status on Friday morning. "He's a damn good player. He sort of stirs the cups for Indiana's offense. We will give him his props where it's due, what we're not going to do is call him a superstar. We're not going to do that," Stephen A. Smith said on First Take. Stephen A. was also able to give Haliburton credit in the impressive amount of clutch shots he's made for the Pacers in their playoff run this season. Advertisement Haliburton has hit four different game-tying or go-ahead shots in the final five seconds of games in the 2025 NBA Playoffs. His buzzer-beating game-winner in Game 1 has given the Pacers momentum in The Final's series against the Thunder, leading to their push to Game 7 to determine who will win the NBA championship this season. The real question will be if Tyrese Haliburton and the Indiana Pacers will be able to continue their prominent run this playoffs and travel back to Oklahoma City to knock of the Thunder and capture the franchise's first NBA championship. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 20, 2025, where it first appeared.

Yahoo

15 minutes ago

• Yahoo

WNBA Coach Responds to Reporter's Accusation Following 2024 Post About Caitlin Clark

WNBA Coach Responds to Reporter's Accusation Following 2024 Post About Caitlin Clark originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Minnesota Lynx head coach Cheryl Reeve found herself in hot water again after her previous behavior toward Indiana Fever star Caitlin Clark resurfaced. Advertisement Reeve's 2024 social media posts recently resurfaced after award-winning reporter Christine Brennan brought them up in a recent interview. Brennan accused Reeve of showing "stunningly bad behavior" for supposedly "blaming [Clark] for not having Minnesota Lynx games on TV." Reeve caught wind of the allegations, and the veteran coach decided to fire back with her own tirade against Brennan. "What she wrote is fiction," Reeve said in a recent appearance on FanDuel Sports Network. "And if she were paying attention, one of the things that I have done for years is held the league accountable for their missteps, mishaps, their lack of representation of all teams. "And so that particular situation had nothing to do with Caitlin Clark. It had everything to do with a WNBA social media post that promoted one preseason game and not all preseason games. And so I simply said that. Advertisement "And by the way, the Minnesota Lynx are playing the Chicago Sky, which also had some popular player in Angel Reese that people were interested in. And it simply wasn't posted on their account." Reeve was far from done. She then turned her attention to Brennan, whom she is now accusing of painting her as the villain in her story. "If Christine Brennan were being thorough and a legitimate reporter in this situation, she would have gotten full context. But it didn't fit the narrative," Reeve said. "Christine Brennan likes to have a villain in her storytelling. I am Christine Brennan's villain. That's what she's going to, that's the sword she's going to die on. And it's a fiction, the stuff that she has written about me and my interest in Caitlin Clark being on or off the (national) team." Minnesota Lynx coach Cheryl Reeve during a game.© Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports Reeve also touched on Brennan's accusation about the former's role in not including Clark in the national team for the Paris Olympics last year, which was a whole controversy on its own. Reeve is strongly denying that allegation as well, as she has now left no doubt about her opinion on this matter and on Brennan. Advertisement Related: Caitlin Clark Assigns Blame After Fever's Loss to Valkyries Related: Indiana Fever's Sophie Cunningham Turns Heads After Exciting Personal News Related: WNBA Makes Caitlin Clark Announcement After Fever-Sun Game This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 21, 2025, where it first appeared.