Amul denies activists' charge that its ‘liquid instant formula' violates IMS Act
Representative image
Activists argue Amul's promotion of the product highlighting its convenience for working mothers positions it as a breastfeeding substitute, which is prohibited. Amul has said that it's 'in complete compliance of the IMS Act'
Amul's widely publicised launch of "India's first liquid infant formula" has outraged activists who have complained to the government that it is a violation of the Infant Milk Substitutes (IMS) Act.
The Act prohibits the promotion of any breastmilk substitute meant for children below two years of age.
The launch of Amul's liquid ready-to-feed infant milk substitute and its coverage in the media highlighted its convenience, particularly describing it as "ideal to carry" and "good for working mothers". "Such framing directly positions the product as a substitute for breastfeeding and this action as promotion," argued public health activists who have complained to the secretaries of the women and child development ministry, the health ministry, the CEO of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), and chairperson of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights.
In response to the objections, Amul tweeted: "Amulspray is one of India's oldest and most trusted infant milk food brands and is in complete compliance of the IMS Act...".
Public health advocates argued that Amul's actions constitute a clear case of promotion of an infant milk substitute - an act explicitly prohibited under Section 3(c) of the IMS Act, which states: "No person shall... take part in the promotion of infant milk substitutes, feeding bottles or infant foods".
The law also prohibits having any pictures or other graphic material or phrases designed to increase the saleability of infant milk substitute or infant food.
Amul's use of a teddy bear graphic on the product's label could be considered a breach of this provision, they stated.
The complaint has demanded an enquiry into the launch and promotion of Amul's product, immediate removal of the graphic of a teddy bear from the product label, media guidelines for IMS-compliant reporting and strong enforcement of the IMS Act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
Avantel gains after bagging orders worth Rs 25 cr
Avantel rallied 6.29% to Rs 164.75 after the company secured two orders worth Rs 24.73 crore from Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders and Defence Electronics Applications Laboratory, DRDO. The first order, worth Rs 11.06 crore, was awarded by Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders. It includes domestic manufacturing, with a delivery schedule from April 2026 to August 2029. A performance bank guarantee of 5% is required. The second contract, worth Rs 13.67 crore, was received from DRDO's DEAL division and is due for completion by August 2027. This order includes a 3% performance bank guarantee. Avantel specializes in providing strategic solutions to the Indian Defence Services and related establishments. It has developed and manufactured various radio components and unique products such as satellite communications, HF communications, electronic warfare, and radar systems. Currently, Avantel is working on expanding its portfolio by developing SCA-compliant software-defined radios, high-power HF systems, air defence radars, and small satellites. The companys consolidated net profit fell 49.96% to Rs 6.08 crore on a 17.96% rise in revenue from operations to Rs 49.26 crore in Q4 FY25 over Q4 FY24.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Kamal Nath's nephew and industrialist Ratul Puri discharged in Rs 354-crore bank fraud case
A Delhi Court discharged industrialist Ratul Puri, who is senior Congress leader Kamal Nath's nephew, on May 24 in a Rs 354-crore bank fraud case in which Puri and others had been accused by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) of defaulting on loans and resulting in financial losses to multiple banks. 'From above discussion, there is sufficient material on the record to come to a prima facie view that the allegations levelled against the accused persons have predominant contours of a dispute of civil nature and does not have the markings of a criminal offence. The dispute predominantly of a civil nature is being given colour or shades of criminal nature,' said Special Judge Sanjeev Aggarwal of Rouse Avenue Court in his order. What tilted the case in the favour of the accused people was the fact that the banks had denied the CBI sanction to investigate and prosecute 40 of their officials. 'As the competent authorities qua bankers have even shut out initiation of investigations against all of their bankers, totalling 40 in numbers u/S. 17A of PC (Prevention of Corruption Act) Act, it shows that present case was not having any criminal complexion or no criminal ingredients of cheating, deception or inducement,' noted Judge Aggarwal. '…senior bankers/Government officials, who are experts in the field of banking and know nitties and gritties of all the loan transactions, were fully conscious of this aspect when they denied approval u/S. 17 A of PC Act and they can also be said to be aware that the matter was of civil nature for which banks may have civil remedies available to them, as per law,' he added. The CBI had accused Ratul Puri, his wife Nita Puri, and private company Moser Baer India Limited (which made CDs and DVDs) of defrauding a consortium of banks. It had alleged that the goal of the accused was to defraud the banks by siphoning off money by misusing loans granted to them. The CBI had also alleged that the siphoning of funds could not have been possible without the 'active connivance of bank officials' since it was the job of the bank officials to monitor the loans. '…there was no diversion or siphoning or misuse of the loan(s) at any point of time and the loans were utilised for the purposes for which it was disbursed as per the RBI guidelines and the banking norms and in view of the fact that the senior functionaries of the different banks/consortium of banks running into 40 in numbers were even denied approval to investigate u/S. 17A of the PC Act by the different sets of competent authorities,' said Judge Aggarwal.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
From cloud-first to cloud-smart: Why Indian enterprises need a sovereign strategy
Over the past decade, Indian enterprises have quickly adopted the cloud and are now embracing a cloud-first approach to accelerate their digital transformation. But today, the conversation is shifting. With rising compliance demands and geopolitical concerns, this strategy to gain agility and scale is being re-evaluated. This transition from "cloud-first" to "cloud-smart" is especially relevant in a country like India, where there is growing emphasis on digital sovereignty. In the early phases of digital transformation, the cloud-first model was effective. It prompted companies to update their IT systems, migrate workloads more rapidly, and respond to business demands more quickly. However, soon, a lot of businesses began to face difficulties. They discovered that not all workloads are suitable for the public cloud, including performance bottlenecks for applications sensitive to latency, and soaring costs. Businesses began to encounter increasingly complex challenges related to data control, security, and regulatory compliance as digital systems evolved. Cloud-smart: Optimizing for control, and compliance A cloud-smart strategy involves the judicious usage of cloud resources. It emphasizes choosing the right deployment model, which is either public, private, hybrid, or sovereign cloud , based on regulatory obligations and the organization's workload requirements. Gartner predicted that by 2023, 60% of all organizations that had adopted a cloud-first policy would seek out a more balanced, cloud-smart approach to it. This is a vital approach for India. The Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act mandates strict guidelines for localization and data handling. Sectoral regulators such as the RBI and IRDAI have introduced data residency requirements for financial and insurance data. In this context, data storage with processing overseas might not always be a viable or compliant option when depending on foreign hyperscalers. Why sovereign cloud is becoming non-negotiable Digital sovereignty is having national jurisdiction over data and digital infrastructure. While global cloud platforms offer scalability and innovation, they bring challenges. With escalating cyber threats, enterprises and governments are prioritizing control over security. India recorded over 1.6 billion cyberattacks in 2023 alone. Enterprises now face risks due to foreign surveillance laws, such as the U.S. CLOUD Act. Hyperscalers worldwide, even with technological prowess, cannot often provide a guarantee of jurisdiction. In contrast, a sovereign cloud ensures data is stored, processed, and managed under Indian laws within Indian borders. It allows enterprises to control their digital assets and aligns itself with the vision of the government for a self-reliant digital India. The problems with relying on global hyperscalers Many CIOs and CTOs are now rethinking how their infrastructure is set up, especially when it comes to critical workloads. It's becoming harder to ensure that data stays within India and keeps up with changing local regulations. There's also a growing security concern, with limited visibility into where exactly data is stored or who might have access. Moreover, using proprietary tools often leads to vendor lock-in, making it tough to switch providers when needed. Shifting global politics poses the constant risk of foreign policy changes. This can disrupt access to essential data or services. These concerns are pushing tech leaders to look for smarter, more resilient strategies that offer better control and resilience. The roadmap for enterprise leaders 1. Give hybrid and multi-cloud architectures top priority: Use a combination of sovereign, private, and public cloud services. While less sensitive workloads can use global infrastructure, sensitive data can remain in India, providing flexibility and ensuring compliance. 2. Integrate Compliance by Design: Ensure your cloud strategy incorporates Indian data protection laws from the outset. Decide on deployment models based on the sensitivity of the data. Collaborate with suppliers who provide clear data residency controls. 3. Reduce Vendor Lock-In: Use infrastructure-agnostic tools, containerized apps, and open standards. To maintain resilience and bargaining power, design systems with portability in mind. 4. Make Security and Observability Better: Implement strong encryption methods, keep track of your own encryption keys, and make sure that data flows between platforms are always being watched and audited. 5. Partner with cloud providers based in India: Local cloud partners can give you sovereign infrastructure, faster support, and a better understanding of the rules and regulations. Look for providers that MeitY has approved for government and BFSI workloads. Looking ahead The cloud will be the cornerstone of India's projected $1 trillion digital economy by 2027. However, this foundation needs to be based on compliance, sovereignty, and smart architectural decisions. The cloud-smart approach is a strategic necessity rather than merely a tactical change. In addition to future-proofing their operations, businesses that adopt a sovereign-first mentality will also support India's larger goal of technological autonomy. The time has come for IT leaders to review their cloud strategy and establish sovereignty as a key component of their digital approach.
