Piston Raises $6.1 Million to Modernize Fleet Fuel Payments and Expand Network
Currently, Piston serves over 120 fleets across 800 stations, processing more than $20 million in annualized volume and growing by 50 per cent month over month
You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
Piston, a startup aiming to overhaul how commercial fleets and gas stations handle fuel payments, has raised $6.1 million in seed funding led by Spark Capital, with participation from Pear VC and BOND. This round brings the total raised by the Cupertino and Lehi-based company to $7.5 million, following a $1.4 million pre-seed round through the PearX accelerator. According to a press release issued by the company, the capital will be used to scale operations and grow its network of fleet and gas station partners.
Founded by former fleet operators Vikram Sekhon and Shivam Shah, Piston has developed a cardless payments platform designed to eliminate long-standing issues in the fuel ecosystem, including rampant card fraud and inflated retail pricing. Drivers make payments via a secure QR code generated by the Piston app, which ties each transaction to a specific vehicle, time, location, and fuel type. On the other end, gas stations plug directly into Piston's infrastructure, gaining access to real-time data and commercial customers without installing new hardware or relying on intermediaries.
"Fuel was our second-largest expense after payroll, and the most chaotic to manage," said Vikram Sekhon, co-founder and CEO. "We tried every solution on the market when we ran our own fleets, and none of them worked. So we decided to build one ourselves from scratch without the baggage of legacy card networks."
Currently, Piston serves over 120 fleets across 800 stations, processing more than $20 million in annualized volume and growing by 50 per cent month over month. For the 90 per cent of U.S. gas stations that are franchise-owned, Piston offers a direct path to commercial business.
The company also has a growing presence in India. Its Kolkata office, launched in April 2023 with five people, now supports over 25 team members, including the entire engineering team. "Being from Kolkata and having lived and worked here for many years gave me the insight and conviction that we can build a world-class payments product from here," said co-founder Shivam Shah.
"Piston isn't just replacing the fleet card, it's redefining the economics of commercial fuel payments," said Arpan Shah of Spark Capital. Shravan Reddy of Pear VC added, "They identified a huge problem impacting an underserved market, and we believe there is enormous opportunity."
For fleet operators like Saga Kapital Group, the impact has been immediate. "We've lowered our fuel spend by double digits and cut reconciliation from two days to two clicks," said company president Ash Kapoor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California insurance crisis could have dire consequences for affordable housing
Insurance bills have always been on the high side for Episcopal Community Services, a San Francisco nonprofit that operates more than 2,000 units of permanent supportive housing and serves a population insurers deem risky. But over the past few years, ECS has seen insurance costs skyrocket. Its premiums rose 84% last year, on top of 10% and 15% increases the previous two years. At the same time, ECS' deductibles quadrupled last year and reached $100,000 for some properties, forcing ECS to cover most of its own claims. Those rising costs were a factor in ECS' decision to lay off six employees this year, and staff members fear that continued increases could jeopardize essential but expensive ECS services, like the homeless shelter it operates or the seven hotels it leases for supportive housing. 'If we're gonna continue to operate the housing, we have to pay the insurance,' said Chris Callandrillo, ECS' chief program officer. 'We've got to get that from somewhere, and that burden is huge.' Across California, affordable housing developers say they're being squeezed by ever-rising premiums, increasingly convoluted coverage arrangements and deductibles so high that they're self-insuring for all but the most catastrophic losses. Advocates are pushing the federal government for relief in the form of subsidies for risk mitigation or the creation of a federally backed insurance product, but few solutions appear likely in the short term. According to an analysis of over 130 California properties financed by a key federal low-income tax credit and included in the national nonprofit Enterprise Community Partners' portfolio, median annual per-unit insurance expenses increased 142% from 2019 to 2024, from $409 to $989. From 2022 to 2024, some California affordable developers reported insurance expense increases as high as 500%. Without intervention, affordable housing providers say, these ballooning costs could force cuts to staffing or on-site services and imperil future projects at a time when demand for affordable units is as high as ever. The problem goes far beyond the affordable housing sector; statewide, insurers have sought perennial rate hikes, nonrenewed customers or ceased writing new policies as they grapple with wildfire-fueled losses and high construction costs. But over the past few years, insurance costs for affordable housing developments have been about 25% higher than for market rate developments in the same areas, said Jordann Coleman, senior vice president at Walnut Creek-based Heffernan Insurance Brokers, whose client base is 40% affordable housing. And affordable housing developers say they're especially vulnerable because they're already operating on razor-thin margins — and because unlike for their market-rate counterparts, the law limits their ability to pass on costs to tenants. 'Somebody's got to come up with a way to pay for that, and for us, it can't be rent,' said Linda Mandolini, CEO of Eden Housing, a Hayward developer with dozens of Bay Area affordable housing complexes. The amount Eden Housing has paid for insurance has risen every year since 2018, including a 20% jump this year on top of a 28% jump the previous year. Insurers have long considered affordable housing riskier to underwrite than market-rate housing — especially permanent supportive housing, where formerly homeless residents less used to living inside can spark fires or cause damage. But developers say insurance costs are out of step with claims, and they don't seem to take into account efforts to mitigate risks — such as hiring more security or replacing gas stoves with electric ones — or how affordable complexes can make neighborhoods safer and spur economic development over time. One insurer that writes policies for affordable housing developers declined to comment on its rationale for increasing premiums and deductibles, and another insurer did not respond to a request for comment. Before around 2020, it was possible to find a single insurer willing to underwrite an affordable housing provider's whole portfolio of properties, Coleman said. Now, she's sometimes working with up to 12 different insurers to piece together more scant coverage with higher deductibles — and each insurer has its own set of questions and restrictions. Coleman said she is increasingly reliant on more complicated risk-sharing arrangements, such as 'insurance towers' — Jenga-like stacks of policies where different insurers underwrite fractions of a single property (one of ECS' properties is underwritten by six insurers, Callandrillo said). In cases where clients have preexisting contracts that require lower deductibles than insurers are willing to grant, Coleman has also turned to deductible buy-down policies — additional coverage from a separate insurer that pays the difference in the case of a claim. 'The work is exponential, not just for us, but for our clients as well,' Coleman said. These days, it's rare that she has more than one option to offer a client. Most affordable developers are already working on shoestring budgets stretched thin by rising construction costs and still recovering from lower revenue from tenants who got out of the habit of paying rent during COVID-19. Because most expenses are nonnegotiables, such as payroll and maintenance, keeping up with insurance payments can mean dipping into funds earmarked for longer term projects. 'This is really depleting our property level reserve, our rainy day fund,' said Janelle Chan, CEO of East Bay Asian Local Development Corp., which has developed about 2,500 affordable units in Oakland. The nonprofit has diverted $12 million from its reserves over the last few years to pay for property expenses including insurance, increased utility costs and rent collection deficits, she said. As part of belt-tightening measures, the East Bay Asian Local Development Corp. is considering cutting community programming or stripping nice-to-have features from planned projects, Chan said. But if premiums stay high, affordable developers say, future projects could be in jeopardy if insurance — a prerequisite for securing loans — is just too expensive, or if developers' reserves have been too depleted to buy properties in the first place. 'We might have to put stuff on hold,' Mandolini said. Among Eden Housing's pipeline of 4,500 planned affordable homes is a complex for seniors at risk of homelessness in San Jose, converting the former Richmond Health Center into dozens of units of permanent supportive housing, and a 119-unit Liberation Park intended to revitalize a historically Black neighborhood in East Oakland. There's another even more serious risk: If mounting expenses cause developers to default, foreclosure can wipe out a property's low-income housing use designation — a more permanent setback for constructing affordable units. 'That's just a critical loss that can't be allowed to happen,' said Thom Amdur, senior vice president for policy and impact at Lincoln Avenue Capital, which invests in affordable housing across the country. Delays or defaults could threaten the region's ability to meet its housing goals. The Bay Area is required to plan to build close to 450,000 new units by 2031, of which 40% should be allocated for low- or very low-income residents, according to the state's Regional Housing Needs Determination. Affordable developers want the government to step in, either by subsidizing risk mitigation efforts or by stabilizing the insurance market through creating a federally backstopped insurance product or expanding FAIR plans — state-created insurers of last resort, such as the one in California — to cover more affordable housing. California lawmakers are considering a bill, AB1339, that would require the Department of Insurance to conduct a study on barriers to affordable housing insurance statewide. For now, developers continue to feel the squeeze. 'We're being asked to build more, and yet we are struggling to protect what we have,' Chan said. 'The candle's burning at both ends.'
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
5 reasons why the Garmin Venu X1 could be my new favorite Apple Watch Ultra 2 alternative
Garmin has officially declared war on Apple with the launch of the Garmin Venu X1, a square-shaped wellness-tracking powerhouse with an enormous AMOLED screen, slender titanium case and several high-end smartwatch bells and whistles. In short, it looks a whole lot like an Apple Watch Ultra 2 with a similarly heady price tag to match: $799. Full disclosure: I've yet to get the Venu X1 on my wrist — my colleague Nick has — but based on specs and initial impressions alone, Garmin's new sporty smartwatch seems to have a lot going for it. Will it be enough to lure away prospective Apple Watch Ultra 2 customers? It could be! As someone who reviews smartwatches for a living, I field a lot of questions from folks considering ditching their Apple Watch for something new. While their biggest Apple Watch complaint is regarding battery life… or lack thereof, a deficiency of advanced fitness tracking and training tools is another criticism I hear a lot. That, and a shortage of support for nuanced workout types. While Garmin watches don't have nearly as many third-party apps and smart features found on the best Apple Watch models, they generally excel when it comes to battery longevity, holistic tracking reliability and high-end exercise features. The brand also supports well over a hundred workout types, including everything from disc golf to boxing. Prior to the X1, Garmin already had solid alternatives for the Apple Watch Series 10 with the Garmin Venu 3, and the Apple Watch SE (2022) with the Garmin Vivoactive series. Now, the Kansas-based brand has a potentially worthy model to take on Cupertino's premier flagship. With that in mind, here are the five biggest things the Garmin Venu X1 has going for it, along with three things that could potentially hold it back from competing with the Apple Watch Ultra 2. Not only is this Garmin's first high-end smartwatch with a square face, but the screen, which stretches from bezel edge to bezel edge, is the brand's largest ever. In fact, it's slightly bigger than even the Apple Watch Ultra 2's display. Garmin doesn't provide max brightness figures for devices, but 2,000 nits is a likely bet. That's not quite as bright as the Ultra 2's 3,000 nit max brightness figure, but it's still impressive and means that the X1 will be visible even in very bright light. At just 7.9mm, this is also Garmin's thinnest smartwatch case to date. Compare that to the Apple Watch Ultra 2's 14.4mm case depth, and suddenly it feels downright clunky. Fortunately, despite the thin case, my colleague Nick reports that it feels anything but flimsy on the wrist. On a similar note, the sapphire crystal offers peace of mind when it comes to screen protection. By the way, at 9.7mm in thickness, even the latest Apple Watch Series 10 isn't as thin as the Venu X1. For its price, the Garmin Venu X1 ought to sport Garmin's latest and greatest holistic sensor tech. Thankfully, it does, which means you're getting equally as reliable (if not more) heart rate data from the X1. Garmin's sleep tracking insights are also the best in the biz, and more detailed and actionable, IMHO, than Apple's. Plus, Garmin's workout training and recovery tools blow Cupertino's out of the water. And that's not an opinion. That's a fact. Like the Garmin Instinct 3, the sporty, new Venu X1 has a built-in LED flashlight, something you won't find on any Apple Watch. Tucked into the top of the case, the nifty onboard 'torch' has an adjustable output and can be set to white or red light. Perfect for late-night dog walks and finding items in a darkened bedroom without waking a sleeping partner, this is a feature I truly wish Apple (and Google and Samsung, etc.) would rip off and add to their own devices. The best Garmin watches aren't exactly known for their smart features. While most higher-end Garmins offer the basics, like onboard music storage, NFC payments and mirrored smartphone notifications, that tends to be where the list ends. The Venu X1 offers a bit more. It isn't Garmin's first smartwatch with an onboard microphone and speaker, but it's a nice addition for folks who want to take phone calls from the wrist, as you would with an Apple Watch Ultra 2. Of course, Garmin doesn't offer cellular connectivity on any of the brand's smartwatches, so you'll need to have a paired phone nearby to make the most of the mic and speaker. While the Garmin Venu X1 has a lot going for it against the Apple Watch Ultra 2, battery life is one area it doesn't impress. Sure, in smartwatch mode, you can get up to eight days of usage, but that drops to just two days when using the always-on screen mode. And when using GPS to track an activity, battery life is just 14 hours. By comparison, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is good for roughly 36 hours in smartwatch mode (or 72 hours in low-power mode) with the always-on display and 12 hours when using GPS to track an activity. Another downside to the Venu X1 compared to the Ultra 2 is that the former doesn't have multiband GPS; the latter does. The advantage of multiband is better tracking reliability, particularly in areas where the sky may be obstructed. Finally, the Garmin Veny X1 has just 50 meters of water resistance. That's enough for brief periods of surface-level swimming but nothing more. The Ultra 2, meanwhile, offers 100 meters of water resistance and is suitable for scuba diving.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Home values in this hypercompetitive part of the Bay Area are starting to dip
For the past two years, Silicon Valley home values have soared to record highs, with one of the country's most expensive housing markets becoming even more so. But recently, that trend has begun to curve downward. The typical home value in Santa Clara County dipped from about $1.72 million in November to $1.69 million in May, according to data from real estate company Zillow. That 2% decline is nowhere near enough to erase the nearly 40% increase in the county's home values since 2020, and other California counties have seen home values fall even further in the past six months. But the shift underscores how the cooling U.S. housing market is affecting even hypercompetitive regions such as the Bay Area. A booming tech industry, and particularly optimism around artificial intelligence, led to a significant increase in Silicon Valley home values over the past five years, with many tech workers making offers far above sellers' asking prices. But President Donald Trump's economic policies rattled the stock market and consumer confidence earlier this year, causing some homebuyers across the U.S. to withdraw, especially as interest rates remain high. That doesn't mean home values are in free fall or that homes are suddenly affordable for many Bay Area residents. But it does mean some sellers are having to whittle down their prices to strike a deal. What's happening in the South Bay is also occurring across California: More homes are for sale, but demand hasn't kept up, making bidding wars less fierce. About 7,000 homes in Santa Clara County were put on the market from January to May this year, about 4% more than the same period last year, according to data from real estate brokerage Redfin. But the number of pending sales has dipped slightly. The Silicon Valley housing market is still one of the hottest in the Bay Area. Redfin data shows homes in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties still sell in a median of two weeks, and most homes sell above asking price. Zillow's estimates from earlier this year even seemed to indicate that home values in the region's most expensive neighborhoods would remain immune from the economic volatility that rippled through other markets. 'If you're in a really good ZIP code or if the home is marketed in the right way, a buyer will still (want to) get it,' said Nikki Edwards, a Realtor with Silicon Valley-based EQ1 Real Estate. But some sellers who hoped to earn top dollar are now finding they may need to scale back expectations. Buyers are now competing with two or three other offers instead of 15 or 20, Edwards said. Because of that, sellers 'can't be overly aggressive on price.' The Bay Area saw a 'very big increase' in price cuts during spring, as has much of the U.S., said Patrick Carlisle, chief market analyst at Compass. The number of Bay Area listings with price reductions reached its highest May level in at least five years last month, he added. It's not just the Bay Area's tech hubs that are seeing home values start to level out. Contra Costa and Marin counties have also seen their values dip, while growth has flattened in much of the rest of the state.
