logo
Finnish fighter jet crashes in Arctic town, pilot ejected

Finnish fighter jet crashes in Arctic town, pilot ejected

A Finnish F/A-18 Hornet fighter jet crashed on Wednesday near the Rovaniemi airport in Finland's Arctic north, but the pilot was rescued after ejecting, the armed forces said.
Advertisement
The crash occurred 'in the Rovaniemi airport area' around 11am, the military said in a statement.
'The aircraft crashed during a rehearsal for an air show,' Timo Herranen, commander of the Finnish Air Force, told AFP.
Herranen said 'the pilot luckily was able to eject from the aircraft' and had only sustained 'mild injuries'.
Herranen did not wish to comment on a possible reason for the accident 'at this stage' and said an investigation was under way.
Rescue personnel and vehicles work at the site where the jet crashed. Photo: via AP
According to the military, there were 'no injuries on the ground'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pilot who died in North Carolina plane crash was trying to avoid hitting turtle on runway
Pilot who died in North Carolina plane crash was trying to avoid hitting turtle on runway

South China Morning Post

time15 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Pilot who died in North Carolina plane crash was trying to avoid hitting turtle on runway

The pilot of a small plane that crashed near a North Carolina airport this month had raised a wheel after landing to avoid hitting a turtle on the runway, according to a National Transportation Safety Board preliminary report. The pilot of the Universal Stinson 108 and a passenger were killed in the June 3 crash near Sugar Valley Airport in Mocksville, officials said. A second passenger was seriously injured in the crash. A communications operator looking out the airport office window advised the pilot that there was a turtle on the runway, according to the report released this week. The operator reported that the pilot landed about 427 metres (1,400 feet) down the 739-metre (2,424-foot) runway, then lifted the right main wheel to avoid the turtle. The operator heard the pilot advance the throttle after raising the wheel, but the plane left her view after that. A man cutting the grass at the end of the runway reported seeing the pilot raise the right wheel to avoid the turtle, then the wings rocked back and forth and the plane took off again, according to the report.

Air India crash in Ahmedabad makes 2025 deadliest aviation year in a decade
Air India crash in Ahmedabad makes 2025 deadliest aviation year in a decade

South China Morning Post

time13-06-2025

  • South China Morning Post

Air India crash in Ahmedabad makes 2025 deadliest aviation year in a decade

The crash of Air India Flight 171 has turned 2025 into one of the deadliest years in the past decade for civil aviation. There were 242 people aboard the Boeing 787, according to the airline, when the plane went down in a fireball on Thursday soon after taking off from Ahmedabad, India. The accident is likely to produce more fatalities, given that it crashed into a residential area. There is only one known survivor. Globally, the number of civil aviation fatalities has reached more than 460 in 2025, according to Jan-Arwed Richter, founder of Jacdec, a German consulting firm that tracks aviation safety. The average over the past decade is 284 based on the firm's methodology. Commercial aviation safety reached a high-water mark in 2023, when industry groups said there were no fatal crashes. Since then, a number of high-profile incidents have grabbed headlines. The deadliest years for civil aviation in the past decade were 2018 and 2015, with more than 500 fatalities each, based on Jacdec's figures. Richter urged the media not to jump to conclusions while investigators search for the cause of the Air India crash. 'And I want to emphasise the bigger picture here,' Richter said. 'Air travel is and remains the safest way of going from one place to another.' Thursday's Air India crash is on track to become the worst commercial airline disaster since MH17 in 2014. The Malaysian Airlines flight, shot down over Ukraine, left 298 people dead, according to the Aviation Safety Network, which tracks fatal crashes. Aeroplane crash in Canada highlights importance of seat belt safety The lone survivor As Air India Flight AI171 descended towards its doom on Thursday, Ramesh Vishwaskumar sat in the first row of economy class – headed for some of the most harrowing and luckiest moments of his life. After the Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a densely populated district of the western Indian city of Ahmedabad, Vishwaskumar managed to get out of the plane. He was injured, but alive. All 241 others on board had perished. A video that has since gone viral on social media shows a slightly bloodied man walking near the crash site, surrounded by an incredulous crowd. 'Thirty seconds after take-off, there was a loud noise,' Vishwaskumar told local reporters, according to the Hindustan Times newspaper. 'There were dead bodies around me. I got scared. I got up and ran. There were pieces of the plane everywhere.' Media outlets identified him as a UK citizen aged 40, from the city of Leicester. It is a tale of survival that stands out in an aircraft accident that ranks as the worst disaster in civil aviation in more than a decade. The cause of the crash, which killed scores more on the ground as the fully fuelled aircraft tore into buildings and exploded into flames, remains unknown. Members of the local community stand outside the family home of Ramesh Viswashkumar in Leicester, Britain. Viswashkumar is the lone survivor of the London-bound Air India aircraft crash in Ahmedabad, India. Photo: Reuters What went wrong? The Boeing Co. 787 Dreamliner appeared to not achieve sufficient thrust as it lumbered down nearly the full length of a 3,352-metre (11,000-foot) runway, a distance that should have been more than enough to take off, said Bob Mann, head of aviation consultant RW Mann & Co. That could stem from a misconfiguration of the plane before take-off or incorrect weight data entered into the plane's computer system that determines how much power is needed to get off the ground, he said. Mann cautioned that his views were unofficial and not corroborated by data or cockpit voice recorders, which have yet to be recovered from the site. The 787's landing gear was never retracted, which normally occurs just after take-off, said Jeff Guzzetti, a former accident investigation chief for the US Federal Aviation Administration. Investigators from the US National Transportation Safety Board and FAA will travel to India to assist with that government's investigation of the crash. Additional clues should emerge when authorities recover the plane's flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder, the so-called black boxes containing key information about what was happening to aeroplane systems and pilots in the flight's final moments.

What caused Air India crash? Experts focus on plane's flaps, landing gear
What caused Air India crash? Experts focus on plane's flaps, landing gear

South China Morning Post

time13-06-2025

  • South China Morning Post

What caused Air India crash? Experts focus on plane's flaps, landing gear

Video of the Air India jet that crashed into a neighbourhood points to potential anomalies that aviation safety authorities will examine to understand what caused the accident that killed at least 241 people. The Boeing Co. 787 Dreamliner appeared to not achieve sufficient thrust as it lumbered down nearly the full length of a 3,352-metre (11,000-foot) runway, a distance that should have been more than enough to take off, said Bob Mann, head of aviation consultant RW Mann & Co. That could stem from a misconfiguration of the plane before take-off or erroneous weight data entered into the plane's computer system that determines how much power is needed to get off the ground, he said. Mann cautioned that his views were unofficial and not corroborated by data or cockpit voice recorders, which have yet to be recovered from the site. 'If the weight is high compared to the actual number, you end up with a very aggressive take-off,' Mann said. 'If the weight is low compared to the actual, you end up with not enough commanded power.' The 787's landing gear was never retracted, which normally occurs just after take-off, said Jeff Guzzetti, a former accident investigation chief for the US Federal Aviation Administration. He also said that he wanted to know more about whether the plane's flaps – movable panels along the wing that generate additional lift during take-off – were in the correct position, noting that it was possible those were raised mistakenly instead of the landing gear. 02:40 Air India plane bound for London crashes moments after take off in Ahmedabad Air India plane bound for London crashes moments after take off in Ahmedabad 'You don't see any smoke or fire or engines burping or anything like that. You don't see any structural failure occurring,' Guzzetti said. 'It just appears the aeroplane was unable to climb once it got off the runway.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store