Google Wallet's PayPal integration is ending this June

You can no longer use Google Wallet to pay with your PayPal account in the US. As Android Authority has reported, Google has updated the Wallet Help page to state that the integration will be ending on June 13. Your linked PayPal account can no longer be used to pay for anything, and it will automatically be deleted from the digital wallet application. To be able to continue paying online with the app, including recurring payments for subscriptions, you'd have to add at least one card if you haven't yet.
While it's no longer possible to link a PayPal account to Wallet, it'll still work as intended if you attach a PayPal-branded debit card to the app, which will also let you spend your Paypal balance. It's just the account integration itself that will no longer work. That said, the change seems to only affect users in the US. In Germany, where the option to link PayPal accounts to Wallet is also available, PayPal will continue supporting the integration.
Google Wallet lets you store cards for payment online and for tap-to-pay services, as well as documents that include digital passports, state IDs, driver's licenses, virtual car keys and flight information. Last year, Google shut down its standalone Pay app in favor of Wallet in order to simplify its payment options.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

34 minutes ago

• Yahoo

5 AI stocks to consider buying and holding for the long term

Many AI applications are still in development, offering ground-floor buying opportunities in their stocks. Below are some established companies that five of contract writers like as investments to consider buying to capitalise on this transformational technology. What it does: Alphabet is a global technology company best known for Google, YouTube, Android, and cloud services. By Mark Hartley. When considering an AI investment for the long term, Google's parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) stands out. It has emerged as a key player in the AI space, leveraging its vast data resources and computational power to dig deep roots into the industry. Through DeepMind and its Gemini AI models, Alphabet is at the forefront of generative AI development. Google Cloud offers scalable AI tools and infrastructure for businesses, while AI enhancements in products like Search, Gmail, and YouTube are well-positioned to benefit from advertising revenue. Alphabet's expansive ecosystem gives it a strategic advantage in training and deploying AI models at scale. A significant risk, however, lies in the potential disruption of its core search business. As AI chatbots and generative search become more prevalent, traditional search advertising could face margin pressure. Additionally, if faces increased regulatory scrutiny on data usage, antitrust concerns and competition from rivals like Microsoft and Amazon. Mark Hartley doesn't own shares in any of the stocks mentioned. What it does: Cellebrite is the global leader in decrypting mobile phones and other devices supporting digital forensic investigations. By Zaven Boyrazian. Many AI stocks today are unproven. That's why I prefer established players leveraging AI to improve their existing mission-critical products like Cellebrite (NASDAQ:CLBT). Cellebrite specialises in extracting encrypted data from mobile phones and other devices aiding law enforcement and enterprises in criminal and cybersecurity investigations. Over 90% of crime commited today has a digital element. And when it comes to decrypting mobile phones, Cellebrite is the global gold standard. The company is now leveraging AI to analyse encrypted data – drastically accelerating a task that's historically been increadibly labour intensive identifying patterns, discovering connections, and establishing leads. Most of Cellebrite's revenue comes from law enforcement, exposing Cellebrite to the risk of budget cuts. In fact, fears of lower US federal spending is why the stock dropped sharply in early 2025. And with a premium valuation, investors can expect more volatility moving forward. But in the long run, Cellebrite has what it takes to be an AI winner in my mind. That's why I've already bought shares. Zaven Boyrazian owns shares in Cellebrite. What it does: Dell Technologies provides a broad range of IT products and services and is an influential player in AI. By Royston Wild. Dell Technologies (NYSE:DELL) isn't one of the more fashionable names in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). The good news is that this means it trades at a whopping discount to many of its peers. For this financial year (to January 2026), City analysts think earnings will soar 41% year on year, leaving it on a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 12.6 times. Such readings are as rare as hen's teeth in the high-growth tech industry. In addition, Dell shares also trade on a price-to-earnings growth (PEG) ratio of 0.3 for this year. Any reading below 1 implies a share is undervalued. These modest readings fail to reflect the exceptional progress the company's making in AI, in my opinion. Indeed, Dell last month raised guidance for the current quarter as it announced 'unprecedented demand for our AI-optimised servers' during January-March. It booked $12.1bn in AI orders in the last quarter alone, beating the entire total for the last financial year. Dell is a major supplier of server infrastructure that let Nvidia's high-power chips do their thing. Dell's shares could sink if unfavourable developments in the ongoing tariff wars transpire. But the company's low valuation could help limit the scale of any falls. Royston Wild does not own shares in Dell or Nvidia. What it does: Salesforce is a customer relationship management (CRM) software company that is developing AI agents. By Edward Sheldon, CFA. We've all seen the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in recent years. Using apps like ChatGPT and Gemini, we can do a lot of amazing things today. These apps are just the start of the AI story, however. I expect the next chapter to be about AI agents – software programmes that can complete tasks autonomously and increase business productivity exponentially. One company that is active in this space is Salesforce (NYSE: CRM). It's a CRM software company that has recently developed an agentic AI offering for businesses called 'Agentforce'. It's still early days here. But already the company is having a lot of success with this offering, having signed up 8,000 customers since the product's launch last October. Now, Salesforce is not the only company developing AI agents. So, competition from rivals is a risk. I like the fact that the company's software is already embedded in over 150,000 organisations worldwide though. This could potentially give it a major competitive advantage in the agentic AI race. Edward Sheldon has positions in Salesforce. What it does: Salesforce is a cloud-based software company specialising in customer relationship management, helping businesses manage sales, marketing, support, and data. By Ben McPoland. I think Salefsforce (NYSE: CRM) looks well set up to benefit in the age of AI. Specifically, its Agentforce platform, which lets businesses deploy AI agents to handle various tasks, could be the company's next big growth engine. By the end of April, it had already closed over 8,000 deals, just six months after launching Agentforce. Half of those were paid deals, taking its combined data cloud and AI annual recurring revenue above $1bn. Granted, that looks like small potatoes set against the $41.2bn in sales it's expected to generate this fiscal year. But it's still very early days, and management reckons the digital labour market opportunity could run into the trillions of dollars. Of course, it's always best to treat such mind-boggling projections with a healthy dose of scepticism. And the company does face stiff competition in the AI agent space, especially from Microsoft and ServiceNow. Nevertheless, I'm bullish here. Salesforce is already deeply embedded in sales, service, and marketing. Its AI agents slot into existing workflows, which I think will prove to be a big advantage over unproven AI upstarts. Ben McPoland owns shares of Salesforce. The post 5 AI stocks to consider buying and holding for the long term appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Alphabet, Amazon, Cellebrite, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Salesforce. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Forbes

an hour ago

• Forbes

Google Confirms Most Gmail Users Must Upgrade All Their Accounts

Most accoiunts need an upgrade, says Google. Republished on June 21 with new advice after 'record breaking' security alert. Google has confirmed another atack on Gmail users this week. Yet again, its own infrastructure has been exploited to compromise user accounts. And yet again, it comes with another warning for users to upgrade their accounts — this is now a must. Earlier this month, I covered Google's warning that most of its users still only use basic password security and are wide open to data breaches and attacks. 'We want to move beyond passwords altogether," Google said, pushing users to replace them. Passkeys, it says, "are phishing-resistant and can log you in simply with the method you use to unlock your device (like your fingerprint or face ID) — no password required.' Put simply, this links account security to hardware security, and means there are no passwords to steal or two-factor authentication (2FA) codes to bypass or intercept. While that is critical for Gmail users, it's actually much wider. Google reached out to me after that article, to emphasize that the benefits are more significant for users: Adding a passkey to a Google account protects all the services and accounts that can be accessed by that sign in. Conversely, not doing so leaves all those other accounts at risk. Even if most user accounts were secured by passwords and 2FA codes, there would still be a push to passkeys. And while Google, Microsoft and others make 2FA mandatory, the reality is that there's still a risk that codes can be shared even if they can't be stolen. That was the crux of the latest Gmail attack, tricking users into sharing codes. Scams and Protections (June 2025) The raft of headlines around a new 16 billion record data breach should focus minds, even if 'this is not a new data breach, or a breach at all,' says Bleeping Computer. 'The websites involved were not recently compromised to steal these credentials.' Mashable agrees. 'Some commentators were quick to call it the largest password leak in history, and in terms of raw records exposed, that's mostly, technically true. However, these records did not come from a single breach — or even a new breach. Instead, they came from many smaller ones," with 'the end result more a 'greatest hits' rather than a new, noteworthy hack.' Albeit that doesn't change the fact the data is out there. Kaspersky says 'the journalists haven't provided any evidence of existence of this database. Therefore, neither Kaspersky's experts nor anyone else has managed to analyze it. Therefore, we cannot say whether yours – or anyone else's – data is in there.' But, regardless, Google's latest survey still paints a bleak picture. Although '60% of U.S. consumers say they 'use strong, unique passwords,' less than 50% 'enable 2FA.' The truth is that the only form of simple 2FA is SMS codes, which are sent quickly without having to exit the app or click or tap. They even autofill and often auto-delete. But SMS is woefully insecure, it's the worst possible 2FA option. And anything else — authenticator apps, physical keys, even trusted device or app sign-ins — is more painful. Passkeys are the opposite. They're even easier than passwords and SMS 2FA. The code (which you never see) combines your login ID, password and 2FA into a simple sign-in process authenticated by your device security — ideally biometrics. And because there is no code you can see or copy, you can't share the passkey even if you want to. Even if any of the underlying code is stolen, it only works on your actual device. Google is right — this is about much more than Gmail, even if those email account attacks generate headline after headline. While there are some misgivings about the dominance and data overreach in big tech using its span of control to sign you into multiple services, even those they don't own or control, it is more secure. As Kaspersky suggests, 'let's set skepticism aside. Yes, we don't reliably know what exactly this leak is, or whose data is in it. But that doesn't mean you should do nothing. The first and best recommendation is to change your passwords,' which is an obvious immediate step. But it doesn't solve the problem. 'Use passkeys wherever possible,' Kaspersky also tells users. 'This is the modern passwordless method of logging into accounts, which is already supported by Google, iCloud, Microsoft, Meta and others.' As Google says, 'when you pair the ease and safety of passkeys with your Google Account, you can then use Sign in with Google to log in to your favorite websites and apps — limiting the number of accounts you have to maintain.'

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

Should PayPal be on my list of shares to buy?

On the face of it, PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) ought to be on my list of shares to buy. The company has a market value of $69bn and has generated just under $6bn in free cash in the last year. With minimal debt, that implies a free cash flow yield of almost 9%. That's pretty high considering the business isn't in decline – but there's a catch when it comes to the valuation. With no dividend, PayPal returns cash to shareholders via share buybacks. These work by reducing the outstanding share count, increasing the value of each of the remaining shares. Since 2020, PayPal's returned over $20bn via share repurchases. That's around 30% of its current market value and the returns have been going up. Year Share Buybacks 2024 $6bn 2023 $5bn 2022 $4.2bn 2021 $3.4bn 2020 $1.6bn Despite this, the company's share count has only fallen by about 13% over the last five years. That's much less impressive and it raises an important question for investors. PayPal's share count isn't really going down much despite the firm using almost all the free cash it generates to buy back shares. So where's the money going? A big part of the answer is stock-based compensation. This is where PayPal issues shares to pay its staff part of their salaries in the firm's stock, rather than cash. A lot of companies do this and I don't think there's anything intrinsically wrong with it. But it's something that investors need to factor into their calculations. Since 2020, PayPal's issued around $6.5bn in stock to cover these expenses. And this has gone some way towards offsetting the cash the firm's been using for share buybacks. In 2024, the company spent almost $6bn on repurchasing shares, but just over 20% of this was offset by stock-based compensation. So the outstanding share count only fell by around 6%. Stock-based compensation doesn't involve cash leaving the business directly. As a result, some investors tend to think it isn't a real expense. I however, think this is a mistake. Issuing equity automatically reduces the value of share buybacks and this is a key mechanism companies can return cash to shareholders. This is especially true when it comes to PayPal. Its 9% free cash flow yield's attractive at first sight, but the firm can't just use this to bring down its share count by that amount every year. Before it can start bringing down its number of shares outstanding, it has to buy back the ones it issued. And it has to do that with cash, making it a very real expense for investors. I don't think PayPal's stock-based compensation is a reason to dismiss the stock out of hand immediately. And the company's undergoing an interesting shift in terms of its priorities. Focusing on margins over revenue growth could boost profits and integrating further into the online transaction process could boost its competitive position. These are potential positives. For the time being though, I think there are better opportunities available. While the stock looks like a bargain at first sight, I don't think it's as attractive for me as it seems. The post Should PayPal be on my list of shares to buy? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Stephen Wright has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended PayPal. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data