Haryana govt cracks whip: 80 irrigation officials in soup over quality of concrete used in projects

At least seven to eight SEs (superintending engineers) are also facing disciplinary action, besides two chief engineers. While the SEs will face action under Rule-8, a displeasure note will be served on the two chief engineers.
The list of accused officials and employees includes names of JEs (junior engineers), SDOs (sub-divisional officers), and XENs (executive engineers). These officials have been charge-sheeted under Rule-7 of Haryana Civil Services (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 2016.
Gurugram: Haryana government Wednesday initiated action against 80 officials of the Irrigation & Water Resources Department (I&WRD) for alleged corruption and negligence pertaining to quality of hardened concrete used in various projects under the department's aegis.
The names of these officials, however, have not yet been made public.
This crackdown follows a detailed probe triggered by substandard construction samples that have caused significant financial losses to the state exchequer.
Documents accessed by The Print suggest that a high-level committee, constituted on 5 June under commissioner and secretary Mohammed Shayin, IAS, was tasked with framing draft charge sheets and displeasure notes against the officials in question.
The committee includes senior officers including Jaideep Rao (chief engineer, I&WRD), Rakesh Kumar (superintending engineer), Hanish Kumar (executive engineer), Ajeet Hooda (executive engineer), and Mandeep Sheokand (executive engineer). Directed by Rao, the panel identified officials ranging from JEs to chief engineers for penalties under Rule-7.
Rule-7 provides for imposing a major penalty against a government employee, like dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement after giving him or her a reasonable opportunity to defend their actions.
Rule-8, on the other hand, mandates minor penalties like censure, withholding a promotion or an increment after giving the employee a fair chance to defend themselves.
The investigation stemmed from quality control failure uncovered in tests conducted earlier this year, for which 48 concrete samples were collected from multiple irrigation projects. Of these, 18 failed to meet standards.
A follow-up letter dated 7 June from chief engineer Jaideep Rao addressed to SEs of the department's vigilance wing revealed that officials failed to analyse test results against specifications, leading to significant deviations and financial losses.
The SEs were directed to submit a comprehensive report within two days, with daily progress updates to be shared with the department's commissioner and secretary.
'Any laxity in compliance is viewed very seriously,' Rao's letter warned.
Confirming the action while speaking to ThePrint Wednesday, Haryana Irrigation Minister Shruti Choudhry termed it as part of the government's zero-tolerance policy on corruption.
She highlighted that vigilance raids, prompted by repeated complaints, exposed systemic lapses as projects neared completion. The samples that failed quality tests included hardened concrete samples and HDP (high-density polyethylene) pipes, she said.
Choudhry noted that substantial payments had already been made to contractors, and the government is exploring recovery options. 'The charge sheets, outlining specific allegations and evidence, will pave the way for legal proceedings, with guilty officials facing dismissal, salary cuts, or promotion bans, though they retain the right to defend themselves.'
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: 'Kulguru, not V-C'—all official correspondence with Haryana education minister now only in Hindi

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

US bombs Iran's nuclear sites: Was failure to reach Khamenei the key factor in collapse of proposed America-Iran talks?

Donald Trump; Ayatollah Khamenei; Recep Tayyip Erdogan US President Donald Trump held backchannel talks for dialogue with Iran, according to a report, which added that the plan, however, did not materialise as Iranian officials failed to get approval for it by their country's Supreme Leader who is in hiding due to fears of assassination. Also Read: Which nuclear sites did US strike in Iran? Why it matters As per the Axios report, Turkey had contacted the United States offering to host the talks between senior American and Iranian officials amid the war between Iran and US ally Israel. Turkey's efforts began with a June 16 phone call by its leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan to Trump while the latter was in Canada for the G7 Summit. Also Read: Trump abruptly leaves G-7 amid speculation US will bust Iranian bomb-making facility with bunker-buster "Erdogan proposed to host a meeting in Istanbul the next day between American and Iranian officials to explore a diplomatic solution to the war," people with direct knowledge of the developments told the website. "Trump agreed and told Erdogan he was willing to send vice president JD Vance and White House's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. He even agreed to travel himself to meet with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian — if that's what was necessary to get a deal," they added. A White House official also confirmed that in the hours before the Trump-Erdogan call, the US president had received "signals" from the Iranians through other backchannels that they wanted to meet. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Meanwhile, Erdogan and his foreign minister Hakan Fidan conveyed the offer to their respective Iranian counterparts -Pezeshkian and Abbas Araghchi. The latter duo tried to communicate with Khamenei but failed to contact him. Iran subsequently informed Turkey that Tehran could not communicate the proposal to Khamenei. Turkey then told the US that the meeting was off.

The Print

2 hours ago

• The Print

UP: Woman, lover sentenced to life imprisonment for killing husband

District and Session Judge Agra Sanjay Kumar Malik on June 19 held Poonam and Soni guilty of the murder of Rakesh (28) and sentenced them to life imprisonment, District Government Advocate Basant Gupta on Saturday said. The court also imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 on each of the convicts. Agra (UP), Jun 21 (PTI) A court here has sentenced a woman and her lover to life imprisonment in connection with the murder of her husband in 2021. The two were in a relationship even before Poonam's marriage to Rakesh. Soni used to visit her house often, he said. On January 24, 2021, Soni came to meet Poonam, which Rakesh opposed. Due to this, the two strangled Rakesh with a cloth and fled. The police managed to arrest the duo after several days. PTI COR NAV NB NB This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Hindustan Times

3 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

Delay in RERA chief appointment shows govt's ‘mala fide' intent: Himachal HC

The delay in appointment of Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) chief and members was with a 'mala fide purpose', observed the Himachal Pradesh high court while hearing a public interest litigation on the delay in these appointments. RERA was rendered headless after the post of chairperson had fallen vacant in December last year, following retirement of Shrikant Baldi. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Pulling up the state government over the delay, on Friday, the high court directed it to issue notification for the post of chairman and other members by June 25. The court has also imposed a fine of ₹ 5 lakh on the government. '....after the recommendation was sent, the office of RERA has been relocated to Dharamshala on June 13, 2025, without even identifying the alternative office place. We are also of the prima facie opinion that the whole purpose of dragging of the appointments and shifting the HQ of RERA is with a mala fide purpose and at this stage, we do not wish to say anything more,' read the order of division bench of chief justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia and justice Ranjan Sharma on Friday, the copy of which was made available on Saturday. RERA was rendered headless after the post of chairperson had fallen vacant in December last year, following retirement of Shrikant Baldi. '....sequence of events would go on to show that the state government is dragging its feet for not notifying the appointment of chairperson and the members,' observed the HC, while directing the state to issue notification regarding the appointments by June 25, failing which the chief secretary shall come present on the said date. In the detailed order high court pointed out that the issue had first cropped up on May 9, when a PIL filed by Atul Sharma, challenging the extension of six months granted to Prabodh Saxena as Himachal's chief secretary, who was also one of top-runners for the post of HP RERA chairperson. The order mentioned that 'Office of chief justice has also received a large number of representations that the appointment of chairperson and members, as such are not being notified and therefore, judicial notice also be taken of the same.' The recommendations of selection committee headed by the HP high court chief justice with the secretary (urban development), and secretary (law) as its members regarding appointment of RERA chairperson and members was sent by the registrar general of high court on March 13, and as per the Rule 18(5) of Himachal Pradesh Real Estate [Regulation and Development] Rules, 2017, the selection process has to be time bound. During the earlier hearing of the PIL, the state government was asked to file affidavit giving 'Specific reason that the state has withheld the recommendations of the selection committee.' The state government had cited 'relocation of RERA office to Dharamshala, district Kangra, which was on the basis of a policy decision', as reason for delay in appointment while admitting that 'State government is under the obligation as per the rules to appoint the chairperson and members.' The state government through a status report on Friday had informed the high court that by notification dated June 19, 'that only one Member has been appointed namely Vidur Mehta', and the process of appointment of other members and the chairperson is currently under consideration and is in process.