Donald Trump's former staffer fears he 'could declare martial law' to prevent next election
Donald Trump's former communications director Anthony Scaramucci has issued a stark warning as he fears the president could declare martial law. Speaking to Saxo on behalf of the Daily Star, Scaramucci suggested that
Trump
might declare martial law to cling to power if he runs for a second term.
Despite his short stint in the administration, which ended after he criticized cabinet members, Scaramucci has since become an outspoken critic of Trump.
He acknowledged it wasn't likely but couldn't dismiss the "worst case" scenario based on Trump's past actions: Trump attempting to maintain control by disrupting the democratic process. This speculation has been fueled by the emergence of Trump 2028 caps online.
Anthony Scaramucci
(Image: CBS via Getty Images)
Now a broadcaster and host of The Rest is Politics US, as well as a former Goldman Sachs executive, Scaramucci elaborated on his concerns: "The worst case scenario [is] he declares martial law, he creates enough havoc in the country, economic destabilisation, and he declares martial law and he cancels an election. That would be the worst case."
While he views this outcome as improbable, he believes no one can confidently exclude it from their strategic considerations. "I don't see that happening honestly, because I think what you're seeing right now is that there's a system that seems to be holding," reports
the Daily Star
.
Donald Trump
(Image: Getty Images)
Scaramucci cited recent events that demonstrate the resilience of American institutions, such as the Supreme Court's ruling against Trump's attempt to deport Venezuelan immigrants and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's resistance to presidential pressure.
Scaramucci expressed his concerns about the state of the nation's infrastructure, noting that while some parts may be "holding" together, there are other worrisome aspects.
He pointed out: "Congress, I think, is the weakest part of this," and went on to criticize their effectiveness by saying, "Frankly, I don't know what they're doing or how they're doing it.
"And I think the best thing that Trump has going for him is the Democrats. They're in absolute complete disarray. They're internally fighting with each other."
Martial Law would be the 'worst case scenario'
(Image: Getty Images)
Despite these issues, Scaramucci warned of the potential for a more severe downturn, stating, "You can't say as a strategist, a macro person, that there's a 0% chance that Trump would try to do that [implement Martial Law] because he's doing exactly what needs to be done to destroy democracy."
The conversation took an eerie turn when Scaramucci referenced the blockbuster film "Civil War," released last year, which delves into the hypothetical scenario of a president attempting to bypass the US Constitution to secure a third term in office.
In a sobering conclusion, Scaramucci remarked: "If you read the book 'How Democracies Die,' he's doing everything in the book that you would do to prepare yourself to take over from a governmental position. And that's just the facts."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Libyan Express
18 hours ago
- Libyan Express
Trump sets conditions before possible Iran strike
BY Libyan Express Jun 20, 2025 - 06:30 Trump weighs Iran strike amid talks of diplomacy. Photo via AFP Axios reported on Thursday that US President Donald Trump is carefully weighing whether to authorise military strikes against Iran, with three main conditions guiding his decision: the necessity of the action, avoiding prolonged US involvement in the Middle East, and ensuring the operation would effectively neutralise Iran's nuclear programme. White House spokesperson Caroline Leavitt stated that Trump's position on Iran 'should not come as a surprise' and highlighted the possibility of negotiations with Tehran in the near future. She added that the president intends to make a final decision on military intervention within two weeks, depending on how diplomatic talks progress. US officials also revealed that Trump held a third meeting in three days with his national security team to discuss possible responses to the situation involving Iran. The president is reportedly considering supporting Israel's actions against Iran but emphasises the need to meet the outlined conditions before proceeding. Israeli sources indicated they expect a decision from Washington regarding US participation in military operations against Iran within the next 24 to 48 hours. However, the White House has signalled that the final decision could take up to two weeks. The situation remains fluid as diplomatic efforts continue alongside military preparations. The views expressed in Op-Ed pieces are those of the author and do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of Libyan Express. How to submit an Op-Ed: Libyan Express accepts opinion articles on a wide range of topics. Submissions may be sent to oped@ Please include 'Op-Ed' in the subject line.
Libyan Express
18 hours ago
- Libyan Express
Trump faces internal Republican rift over possible Iran intervention
Steve Bannon says let Israel 'finish what they started' The prospect of United States military involvement in Iran has exposed growing divisions within the Republican coalition, particularly among members of former President Donald Trump's political base, some of whom are urging caution against further entanglement in the Middle East. Several prominent figures associated with the so-called 'America First' movement — a key component of Trump's electoral support in 2016 and 2024 — have voiced concern over reports that the US could join Israeli efforts to target Iran's nuclear infrastructure in the absence of a diplomatic solution. Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief strategist and a longstanding advocate of non-interventionist policies, said the US should not repeat past military engagements without broad national support. 'We can't do this again,' Bannon said at a press briefing in Washington on Wednesday. 'We can't have another Iraq.' Bannon reiterated his position on his War Room podcast, where he was joined by Jack Posobiec, another prominent conservative commentator. Posobiec argued that involving the US in regime change efforts could lead to unintended consequences. Bannon responded that such political change, if it occurs, 'has to come from the people, not from a foreign power.' The comments reflect wider concerns among certain Republican factions that military action could mark a departure from Trump's traditionally cautious approach to foreign conflicts. Critics have pointed to the potential deployment of advanced US munitions, including bunker-busting bombs, as a sign of possible escalation. Iran has issued warnings about any direct American involvement, suggesting it would have significant consequences, though it has not specified what form those might take. Trump downplays internal dissent Asked about opposition within his support base, Trump appeared dismissive of the idea that the issue could cause lasting political damage. 'My supporters are more in love with me today than they were even at election time,' he said at the White House on Wednesday. 'I only want one thing: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' While acknowledging that 'some are a little bit unhappy now,' Trump insisted that others agree with his assessment that preventing Iran from developing a nuclear arsenal is a priority. 'I'm not looking to fight,' he said. 'But if it's a choice between them fighting or having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do.' Trump has not formally announced any military plans, stating only that he has 'some ideas' on the path forward. Intraparty tensions The debate has highlighted a divide within the Republican Party over how the US should respond to Iran's nuclear ambitions. Marc Short, a former senior adviser to Trump and an ally of ex-Vice President Mike Pence, described the disagreement as 'a pretty large rift.' However, he suggested that Trump's political base was likely to remain loyal. 'Most of the president's followers are loyal to him more so than to any worldview,' Short said. Others argue that supporting Israel could strengthen Trump's standing among more traditional conservative voters. A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in March found that 48% of Republicans supported using US military force to defend Israel, compared with 28% who disagreed. Among Democrats, only 25% agreed, while 52% expressed opposition. Iran has consistently denied seeking nuclear weapons, but US and Israeli officials believe Tehran's programme could lead to regional instability. Analysts have warned that an Iranian nuclear capability could trigger a wider arms race in the Middle East. MAGA figures call for restraint Bannon urged the administration to provide greater clarity on its intentions. 'This is one of the oldest civilisations in the world, with over 90 million people,' he said. 'This is not something you play around with. You have to think this through, and the American people have to be on board.' Other high-profile Republicans have echoed those concerns. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene wrote on social media: 'Anyone calling for the US to become fully involved in the Israel–Iran war is not America First. We are tired of foreign wars.' Former Fox News presenter Tucker Carlson has also criticised interventionist rhetoric, including in a recent exchange with Senator Ted Cruz, in which Carlson challenged Cruz's stance on regime change in Iran. Senator Lindsey Graham, a long-time Republican figure on foreign affairs, took a different view, telling Fox News he hoped Trump would support Israel's campaign. 'Iran is an existential threat to our friends in Israel,' Graham said. Vice President JD Vance attempted to address the debate by expressing confidence in the president's judgment. 'People are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue,' he wrote online. As of Wednesday evening, no decision had been announced. Trump said discussions were ongoing and that a final determination had yet to be made.
Libyan Express
6 days ago
- Libyan Express
US envoy Massad Boulos to visit Libya next week
BY Libyan Express Jun 15, 2025 - 04:03 Massad Boulos, US special envoy to Africa, pictured with President Donald Trump during a White House meeting Massad Boulos, the United States' special envoy to Africa under President Donald Trump, is scheduled to visit Libya next week amid escalating tensions in the region. This will be his first official trip to the country. According to Middle East Eye, Boulos intends to begin his visit in Tripoli, the seat of the Government of National Unity, before travelling to Benghazi, where forces loyal to Khalifa Haftar are based. Earlier this year, Boulos was expected to visit Libya but instead went to Cairo, reportedly at the request of Egyptian authorities. Sources cited by Middle East Eye reveal that during this period, Boulos held talks with a senior advisor to former Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah regarding the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Libya's sovereign wealth funds, which remain frozen under sanctions. The discussions included the potential investment of some of these funds through American companies operating in Libya. In a related development, NBC reported that the Trump administration allegedly pressured the Libyan government to accept up to one million Palestinians from Gaza—where Israeli military operations have been ongoing since 7 October 2023—in exchange for the release of these funds. Meanwhile, Saddam Haftar, son of Khalifa Haftar, is reportedly gaining influence within the Trump administration's national security circles. According to US and Arab sources speaking to Middle East Eye, Saddam's profile has risen, positioning him as a potential future leader. In April, Saddam Haftar visited Washington, meeting with Boulos at the State Department. Notably, he also held confidential discussions with senior US intelligence officials, details of which had not previously been disclosed. Middle East Eye also notes that in 2019, former President Trump gave tacit approval to Khalifa Haftar's offensive to capture Tripoli, although the campaign ultimately failed following Turkish intervention. The views expressed in Op-Ed pieces are those of the author and do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of Libyan Express. How to submit an Op-Ed: Libyan Express accepts opinion articles on a wide range of topics. Submissions may be sent to oped@ Please include 'Op-Ed' in the subject line.
