With a million Russians dead & wounded – Putin won't hesitate pouring ANOTHER million into meatgrinder war, insiders say

Watch our interviews with Russia experts who discuss the latest in the war
DRENCHED IN BLOOD With a million Russians dead & wounded – Putin won't hesitate pouring ANOTHER million into meatgrinder war, insiders say
EVIL Vladimir Putin would not think twice before flooding another million soldiers to die on the battlefield, defence experts have warned.
It comes as Putin's battlefield casualties have soared past the bloody one million milestone after 40 months of meatgrinder war.
Advertisement
10
Firefighters try to extinguish after a Russian drone attack in Kharkiv
Credit: Reuters
10
Ukrainian soldiers of 43rd artillery brigade fire self-propelled howitzer towards Russian positions
Credit: AP
10
An explosion of a drone lights up the sky over the city during a Russian drone strike
Credit: Reuters
10
Ukraine's fierce resistance forced Russia to pay a mighty toll for every inch of land it has taken, and its advances remain painfully slow.
The staggering milestone includes troops who have been killed or wounded so severely that they cannot fight on.
According to the Ukrainian General Staff, one million Russian military troops have been put out of action since February 24, 2022, with 628,000 of those casualties occurring in the last six months.
Burning through a million troops has won Putin just 20 per cent of Ukraine's total territory - mainly in southern and eastern areas - which is a humiliating conversion rate.
Advertisement
Despite the devastating losses which have already ripped a scar in Russian society, experts fear that Putin is likely unaffected by the numbers.
And that's because mass sacrifice is ingrained in his Soviet-style battle plan.
Russian people are also too scared to stand up to the monster they've created and would rather die killing Ukrainians
Ukrainian government source
Leading defence expert Philip Ingram told The Sun: "Putin does not care about the numbers. He has a huge number of people ready to go to war.
"Though he has been having difficulties in recruiting soldiers full-time, he is recruiting soldiers from rural Russia on contracts and paying them heavily.
Advertisement
"Russia is sending waves and waves of soldiers, often without the support of artillery and other fire weapons. They are being slaughtered."
Mr Ingram said the Russian population may not be aware of the actual casualty rate of the war, which is being kept away the Kremlin's propaganda machine.
Putin's Ukraine war toll tops 1 MILLION Russians dead & wounded 40 months into 'days-long operation'…with no end in sight, with Stephen Hall
He explained how soliders are being recruited from isolated parts of Russia where the population is often poor with low literacy levels.
And how Putin is "buying their silence" by offering them "life-changing compensations".
Advertisement
The expert said: "Soldiers are coming in from vast parts of Russia where there is no connectivity. Their literacy levels are extremely low.
"What's keeping them coming is the amount of compensation they are getting, which is often life-changing.
"It means they or their families would never have to work again for the rest of their lives.
"That's how Vladimir Putin is buying their silence; he seems to have the population behind him.
Advertisement
Russia expert Bill Borwder told The Sun that Putin would lose "another five million soldiers" if it helps him to stay in power.
Putin will sacrifice one, two or even five million Russians just to make sure that he stays in power
Bill Browder
He said: "Part of the reason that Putin is at war is not because he wants a piece of Ukraine ot he's upset with NATO.
"He's at war because he's desperately afraid of his own people, and the best way of having his people have their anger deflected is have them angry at some foreign adversary.
"Putin is so scared for losing his own life, he's ready to sacrifice one, two or even five million Russians just to make sure that he stays in power."
Advertisement
A Ukrainian government source told The Sun: "Putin doesn't care and never cared for the people of Russian Federation, be it ethnic Russians or representatives of other minorities.
"For him, it is a matter of personal survival and he would be willing to send anyone to death - from a Russian soldier to a Ukrainian child - for his own miserable existence.
"Unfortunately, Russian people in majority are also too scared to stand up to the monster they've created, and would rather die killing other nation's people than risk their lives standing up against it."
10
Firefighters try to extinguish after Russian drone attack in Kharkiv
Credit: Getty
Advertisement
10
Ukrainian service members firing an anti-tank guided missile weapon system
Credit: Reuters
10
Servicemen of Armed Forces prepare to fire a self-propelled howitzer towards Russian troops
Credit: Reuters
10
Artillerymen of the 15th Operative Purpose Brigade Kara-Dag firing towards Russia
Credit: Reuters
10
Advertisement
Dr Stephen Hall, politics lecturer at the University of Bath, said that as far as the warmongering dictator is concerned, things are heading in the right direction, so he will keep on condemning young Russians to their deaths.
He told The Sun: "Putin believes he's winning the war. The Russian army is moving forward like it or not.
"He believes that he can outlast the West, that the West is weak."
Russia's strategy, Dr Hall said, has been one of "meat assault".
Advertisement
This relies on the logic that if you flood the front line with overwhelming numbers, "eventually some will get through".
Dr Hall said Putin has learned this strategy from his ruthless Soviet predecessors in World War Two.
Their idea was "ten men to every rifle", which meant: "You pick up the rifle of a fallen soldier. You keep going, you get shot. You're next. Your buddy picks up your rifle.
"The Soviet army would eventually push through. So that remains the case in Russia."
Advertisement
Russians 'know how to suffer', which allows the regime to continue with its meatgrinder tactics
Dr Stephen Hall
And that approach suits Putin just fine, because he "doesn't care about his men", Dr Hall said.
He said the Russian people "know how to suffer", which allows the regime to continue with its meat-grinder tactics.
The Kremlin also meets less resistance from the Russian people than a million losses should merit, because it simply lies to them, Dr Hall said.
He said: "They're simply not going to be told, especially in the poorer areas where Russia is recruiting - like Buryatia and Bashkortostan and elsewhere."
Advertisement
NO STOPPING
Even with the death toll climbing higher by the day — over 1,140 Russian soldiers killed or wounded on Tuesday — Putin appears to be doubling down.
The bloody milestone comes as Putin calls for a major upgrade to Russia's ground forces, Ukrainian outlet Pravda reports.
The Kremlin tyrant declared them the 'dominant force' in modern warfare and demanded faster development of 'advanced weapons systems' with 'the highest tactical and technical specifications.'
In a meeting on the state armaments programme, Putin also directed resources toward strengthening Russia's navy, further signalling his long-term military ambitions.
Advertisement
It all comes as Russia is reportedly building up a 50,000-strong force alongside the border of Kharkiv amid fears of a fresh summer offensive to attack the city.
10
With the US backing out of direct negotiations to broker a peace deal and Putin stalling ceasefire talks, experts fear a major Russian offensive could mobilise in the coming weeks.
The Ukrainian military in April reported that the Kremlin was amassing troops to prepare for a fresh assault on Kharkiv - Ukraine's second largest city.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, President Volodymyr Zelensky also said that Moscow has been attempting to gain ground in the border regions of Sumy in the northeast.
Military analysts believe he is trying to press home his advantage and capture more Ukrainian land.
They warn that Putin only has a "four-month window" to get a breakthrough in Ukraine this year.
And this could be the beginning of Russia's summer offensive targeting the border city of Kharkiv - the "fortress" city of Ukraine which put up the maximum resistance at the start of the invasion.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

an hour ago

• Telegraph

Even a visit to Putin won't save Iran's regime

Now Iran really is alone. For decades, the Islamic Republic's ruthless leaders dedicated themselves to preparing for the moment when America would attack their nuclear plants. Today, the crisis long foretold has finally arrived – and Iran has seldom had fewer options for striking back. No one in Tehran would have relied on any other country to come to their aid against the US. Iran has a 'strategic partnership' with Russia, and Abbas Araghchi, the Islamic Republic's foreign minister, is expected in Moscow on Monday. True enough, Vladimir Putin was always happy to buy Iran's drones and fire them at Ukrainian cities, but there is zero chance that he will risk war with the US for the sake of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's regime. Whatever else he is in Moscow for, Mr Araghchi will not be expecting any material help from Russia. The same applies to China, no matter how publicly critical Xi Jinping, the country's president, might be of Donald Trump's attack on Iran. Beijing called the strikes a 'violation of international law'. China was always willing to import Iran's sanctioned oil at a knock-down price, but Mr Xi is not going to fight America to save the Ayatollahs in Tehran. Khamenei has always known that Iran has no real friends among the nations – hence his great project was to build his own axis of non-state allies by arming and funding terrorist groups across the Middle East.

New Statesman​

an hour ago

• New Statesman​

Britain wants no part in Israel's war

Photo byPacifism is a dirty word in Britain. The pre-war premier Neville Chamberlain's undoubtedly well-meaning but naive appeasement in the face of Hitler's Germany is rejected by all and sundry in the history books today. Ask Britons whether they'd sooner be a Chamberlain or a Churchill and the overwhelming number would reach for the latter. But how persistent the Chamberlain mindset is! 'How horrible, fantastic, incredible it is that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas masks here because of a quarrel in a far away country between people of whom we know nothing.' This was Chamberlain in 1938. And in 1938 he was a popular premier. And it could almost be forgiven for being the view of the median Britain in 2025. The nation's attitude to war overseas is more often than not best characterised as an aversion to engagement; an unwillingness to expend excess material and wealth for foreigners in far-off places. In the face of Russian aggression in Ukraine, that isolationist approach has been inverted. But the Middle East? Iran? Israel? In the shadow of Iraq? Britons baulk. Here is the state of public opinion about possible action involving Iran. You can see YouGov's wording of the question mentions Israel. It provides much-needed context, but mention of Israel may toxify attitudes somewhat – voters are increasingly unfavourable towards the state because of its actions in Gaza. But it doesn't detract from the main narrative: voters, for the most part, want to give this part of the world as wide a berth as possible. So how did we come to this? Is it all just Iraq? Not quite. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe In the 1990s, voters were against military action in Bosnia. In the shadow of the Vietnam War – 30 years hence, mind you – Britons did not want to risk British lives for a country in which many could not even name its capital. 'Don't risk UK troops' came the Independent's headline, accompanying an NOP poll that found popular support for aid but total aversion to anything that 'would end up like Vietnam'. On the rare occasion that Britons are willing to risk war, it appears to come only with very specific circumstances. It would be wrong to say voters were opposed to intervention in Iraq from the beginning. They weren't. And at one point most Britons did favour intervention to topple Saddam Hussein. Nevertheless, YouGov found there was consistent but tepid support until the middle of 2004, including in the shadow of the well-attended anti-war protests. It's a tale of two nations. On the streets, a country adamantly against any form of intervention. But when it came, voters in their living rooms rallied to the troops. But it was not to last. Not one survey since shows voter appreciation for US-UK intervention in Iraq. But Iraq has not nullified British overseas ambition. In 2015 most voters backed airstrikes to combat Islamic State in Syria. In 2018 those numbers dwindled. In 2022 Britons were quick to rally in favour of Ukraine. And as late as March this year a plurality support sending peacekeepers to the country. With the right conditions, people in the UK can be rallied to support friends in the face of adversity. But emphasis on 'friends', there. On Israel vs Iran, few regard Israel with much favourability. Right now Israel is the least liked it's ever been in Britain and much of western Europe. It's unlikely this country's public could be rallied to Israel's aid any time soon. Without a serious deterioration in regional or global security, Britons would sooner turn their backs on this 'quarrel in a far away country between people of whom we know nothing'. [See more: Let the non-doms leave] Related

BBC News

an hour ago

• BBC News

Four killed in Kyiv in new Russian aerial attack

At least four people have been killed in an overnight Russian missile and drone attack on Ukraine's capital Kyiv, the interior minister a post on social media, Ihor Klymenko says residential areas, hospitals and sports infrastructure were hit."An entire section of a residential high-rise building was destroyed" in the worst-hit Shevchenkivskyi district, he says, adding that some people are trapped under the the Kyiv region, a woman was killed and another two people injured in the Russian aerial attack, regional head Mykola Kalashnyk Russian military has not commented on the issue. Ukraine's emergencies service DSNS says 13 people - including two children and a pregnant woman - were injured in has posted footage showing shocked residents being led away from a destroyed high-rise building which was still burning.A number of blazes are reported across the entrance to one of the city's underground metro stations was damaged in the Russian attack, local officials residents of Kyiv spent the night sheltering in such recent weeks, Russia has been carrying out massive aerial attacks on Kyiv and other Ukrainian President Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.